Menu

2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
4 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Pirelli CINTURATO P7
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Falken FK510 SUV
Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Continental Sport Contact 5
Nokian WetProof
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 3.09 M (8.8%) | Avg: 36.62 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 5 with a result of 35.03 M. The difference between best and worst was 8.1%.
  1. Continental Sport Contact 5
    35.03 M
  2. Nokian WetProof
    35.17 M
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    35.56 M
  4. Falken FK510 SUV
    35.66 M
  5. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    37.67 M
  6. Yokohama BluEarth RV02
    37.78 M
  7. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    37.94 M
  8. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    38.12 M

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Spread: 2.00 Points (66.7%) | Avg: 2.13 Points

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 5 with a result of 3 Points. The difference between best and worst was 66.7%.
  1. Continental Sport Contact 5
    3 Points
  2. Falken FK510 SUV
    3 Points
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    3 Points
  4. Nokian WetProof
    2 Points
  5. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    2 Points
  6. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    2 Points
  7. Yokohama BluEarth RV02
    1 Points
  8. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    1 Points

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 2.83 M (7.3%) | Avg: 39.70 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 with a result of 38.72 M. The difference between best and worst was 6.8%.
  1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    38.72 M
  2. Falken FK510 SUV
    38.84 M
  3. Continental Sport Contact 5
    38.98 M
  4. Nokian WetProof
    39.27 M
  5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    39.64 M
  6. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    39.99 M
  7. Yokohama BluEarth RV02
    40.6 M
  8. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    41.55 M

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Spread: 2.00 Points (66.7%) | Avg: 1.88 Points

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 5 with a result of 3 Points. The difference between best and worst was 66.7%.
  1. Continental Sport Contact 5
    3 Points
  2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    3 Points
  3. Nokian WetProof
    2 Points
  4. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    2 Points
  5. Falken FK510 SUV
    2 Points
  6. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    1 Points
  7. Yokohama BluEarth RV02
    1 Points
  8. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    1 Points

Wet Circle (m/s)

Spread: 0.80 m/s (9.9%) | Avg: 7.72 m/s

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken FK510 SUV with a result of 8.09 m/s. The difference between best and worst was 9.9%.
  1. Falken FK510 SUV
    8.09 m/s
  2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    7.94 m/s
  3. Continental Sport Contact 5
    7.88 m/s
  4. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    7.77 m/s
  5. Nokian WetProof
    7.73 m/s
  6. Yokohama BluEarth RV02
    7.55 m/s
  7. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    7.47 m/s
  8. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    7.29 m/s

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 4.50 Km/H (5.7%) | Avg: 76.81 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli CINTURATO P7 with a result of 78.4 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 5.7%.
  1. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    78.4 Km/H
  2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    77.7 Km/H
  3. Continental Sport Contact 5
    77.2 Km/H
  4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    77.1 Km/H
  5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    77.1 Km/H
  6. Falken FK510 SUV
    77 Km/H
  7. Nokian WetProof
    76.1 Km/H
  8. Yokohama BluEarth RV02
    73.9 Km/H

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Spread: 1.00 Points (33.3%) | Avg: 2.38 Points

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 with a result of 3 Points. The difference between best and worst was 33.3%.
  1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    3 Points
  2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    3 Points
  3. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    3 Points
  4. Falken FK510 SUV
    2 Points
  5. Continental Sport Contact 5
    2 Points
  6. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    2 Points
  7. Yokohama BluEarth RV02
    2 Points
  8. Nokian WetProof
    2 Points

Subj. Noise ( Points)

Spread: 1.00 Points (33.3%) | Avg: 2.38 Points

Subjective in car noise levels (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 with a result of 3 Points. The difference between best and worst was 33.3%.
  1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    3 Points
  2. Falken FK510 SUV
    3 Points
  3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    3 Points
  4. Nokian WetProof
    2 Points
  5. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    2 Points
  6. Yokohama BluEarth RV02
    2 Points
  7. Continental Sport Contact 5
    2 Points
  8. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    2 Points

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 0.23 kg / t (23.7%) | Avg: 1.07 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian WetProof with a result of 0.97 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 19.2%.
  1. Nokian WetProof
    0.97 kg / t
  2. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    1 kg / t
  3. Continental Sport Contact 5
    1.01 kg / t
  4. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    1.03 kg / t
  5. Yokohama BluEarth RV02
    1.05 kg / t
  6. Falken FK510 SUV
    1.15 kg / t
  7. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    1.16 kg / t
  8. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    1.2 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 0%
2 Continental Sport Contact 5 0%
3 Falken FK510 SUV 0%
4 Nokian WetProof 0%
5 Pirelli CINTURATO P7 0%
6 Vredestein Ultrac Satin 0%
7 Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 0%
8 Yokohama BluEarth RV02 0%

Similar Tyre Tests

Show All summer tyre tests
2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test
March 2026 255/45 R19 Hankook Ventus Evo 9 tyres
2025 Teknikens Varld Summer Tyre Test
April 2025 235/55 R19 Pirelli Scorpion 8 tyres
2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test
April 2025 255/55 R18 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 10 tyres
2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test
April 2025 225/55 R18 Pirelli Cinturato C3 7 tyres
2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test
March 2025 235/55 R19 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 7 tyres
2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test
March 2024 225/55 R17 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 10 tyres

Discussion

8 comments
    1. TyreReviews Scour archived

      Good spot on the typo, thank you :)

      I'm working on the Sport Auto test for next week :)

      #5653
      1. Scour TyreReviews archived

        Well, I´m German, and know the magazine ;)

        In the test sport auto mentioned the CSC6 have a new rubber compound. Maybe that´s the reason why it beat the 4S so clear on wet.

        #5654
        1. TyreReviews Scour archived

          It's a really interesting test, but I'm a bit surprised the CSC6 was grouped with the UHP and not the UUHP! I'd be interesting in speaking to them to find out why, as Conti definitely market it as UUHP (CPC6 is the UHP)

          #5655
          1. Scour TyreReviews archived

            Thought the same. It wouldn´t make a different in the single categories, but in the final result. The CSC6 would also win in UUHP clearly because it´s mich better in the wet than the PS4S or F1 SS

            #5656
          2. Scour TyreReviews archived

            BTW, the URL and Firefox stills shows "Fart"

            I read now in sport auto that Conti Marketing says it is an UHP

            #5657
            1. TyreReviews Scour archived

              I can't change the URL without breaking other things so it's staying as Fart ;)

              I've spoken to Conti recently and they agree it is a UUHP, and they marketed as UUHP on the launch. It's all a bit confusing but still the best tyre overall.

              The write up is very long and out tomorrow!

              #5658
              1. Scour TyreReviews archived

                Yep, confusing. sport auto wrote the Marketing-Team/conversation-partner rwll them it´s only an UHP

                #5659