Test Publication:
Pro Mobil
225/70 R15C
7 tyres
5 categories
Test Publication:
Pro Mobil
Test Size:
225/70 R15C
Tyres Tested:
7 tyres
Pro Mobil is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
If you need to keep your van mobile year round, all season tyres are an increasingly popular solution, which is why German publication Pro Mobile have tested seven commercial all season tyres in the popular 225/70 R15C tyre size.
On test they have all the manufactures you'd expect from a car all season tyre test, with Continental, Falken, Goodyear, Maxxis, Michelin, Pirelli and Vredestein included in the test.
As always, Pro Mobile have applied their own score weighting to get to their overall results, so make sure you dig into the data and find work out what you want from your all season tyre, as if you spend a lot more time in the dry and wet with rare snow use, a tyre like the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate or Pirelli Carrier All Season might be the right choice for you.
Dry
As with all season tyres intended for cars, Michelin held a big dry braking advantage with the Agilis CrossClimate, with Pirelli next of the best.
- Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
- Pirelli Carrier All Season
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo
- Maxxis VanSmart AS AL2
- Falken EuroAll Season Van11
- Continental VanContact 4Season
- Vredestein Comtrac 2 All Season
Interestingly Michelin couldn't carry that advantage over to dry, instead Pirelli took the top spot with the Continental VanContact 4S and Vredestein Comtrac 2 All Season a close second and third.
- Pirelli Carrier All Season
- Continental VanContact 4Season
- Vredestein Comtrac 2 All Season
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo
- Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
- Maxxis VanSmart AS AL2
- Falken EuroAll Season Van11
Wet
The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo held an impressive advantage during wet braking testing, with Michelin in second place.
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo
- Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
- Pirelli Carrier All Season
- Continental VanContact 4Season
- Maxxis VanSmart AS AL2
- Falken EuroAll Season Van11
- Vredestein Comtrac 2 All Season
Goodyear retained its wet grip advantage during wet handling testing, but this time with Continental and Pirelli tying for second place.
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo
- Continental VanContact 4Season
- Pirelli Carrier All Season
- Vredestein Comtrac 2 All Season
- Maxxis VanSmart AS AL2
- Falken EuroAll Season Van11
- Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
The Maxxis VanSmart AS AL2 had a large aquaplaning advantage.
- Maxxis VanSmart AS AL2
- Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo
- Pirelli Carrier All Season
- Vredestein Comtrac 2 All Season
- Continental VanContact 4Season
- Falken EuroAll Season Van11
Snow
Snow specialist Continental held a considerable advantage during snow braking, with Pirelli performing extremely poorly.
Snow handling testing repeated the Continental and Pirelli first and last positions.
- Continental VanContact 4Season
- Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
- Vredestein Comtrac 2 All Season
- Maxxis VanSmart AS AL2
- Falken EuroAll Season Van11
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo
- Pirelli Carrier All Season
Environment
Impressively Continental also had the lowest fuel use on test, something important to commercial vehicles.
The Continental also had the lowest external pass by noise, with the testers commenting on a humming noise from the Falken and very loud noise from the Vredestein.
- Continental VanContact 4Season
- Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo
- Pirelli Carrier All Season
- Maxxis VanSmart AS AL2
- Falken EuroAll Season Van11
- Vredestein Comtrac 2 All Season
Results
Very good traction, cornering and braking on snow, easy to control in the wet, very good in the dry, pleasantly quiet.
Long dry braking distances.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
49.5 M |
43.8 M |
+5.7 M |
88.48% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
86.1 Km/H |
86.2 Km/H |
-0.1 Km/H |
99.88% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
37.9 M |
35.2 M |
+2.7 M |
92.88% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
63.9 Km/H |
64.3 Km/H |
-0.4 Km/H |
99.38% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
74.5 Km/H |
78.4 Km/H |
-3.9 Km/H |
95.03% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
18.2 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Handling |
1st |
45 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
71.3 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
6.8 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
High levels of control, good handling, short braking distances and good aquaplaning resistance in the wet, quiet with good levels of comfort.
Imbalanced traction / lateral grip in the snow, slightly longer dry braking distances.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
48.2 M |
43.8 M |
+4.4 M |
90.87% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
85.2 Km/H |
86.2 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.84% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
35.2 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
64.3 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
76.6 Km/H |
78.4 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
97.7% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
3rd |
18.9 M |
18.2 M |
+0.7 M |
96.3% |
| Snow Handling |
6th |
43.3 Km/H |
45 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
96.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
71.6 dB |
71.3 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
7.5 kg / t |
6.8 kg / t |
+0.7 kg / t |
90.67% |
Good lateral grip in the snow, high levels of aquaplaning resistance, balanced and safe handling with very short braking distances in the dry.
Imbalanced traction / lateral grip in the snow, strong understeer in the wet.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
43.8 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
85.1 Km/H |
86.2 Km/H |
-1.1 Km/H |
98.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
36.8 M |
35.2 M |
+1.6 M |
95.65% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
62.7 Km/H |
64.3 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
97.51% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
76.8 Km/H |
78.4 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
97.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
5th |
19.3 M |
18.2 M |
+1.1 M |
94.3% |
| Snow Handling |
2nd |
44.5 Km/H |
45 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
98.89% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
71.6 dB |
71.3 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
7.3 kg / t |
6.8 kg / t |
+0.5 kg / t |
93.15% |
Good driving characteristics on snow.
Longer braking distances and reduced cornering grip in the dry and wet, average comfort, humming noise.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
49.2 M |
43.8 M |
+5.4 M |
89.02% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
83.4 Km/H |
86.2 Km/H |
-2.8 Km/H |
96.75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
39.9 M |
35.2 M |
+4.7 M |
88.22% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
62.8 Km/H |
64.3 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
97.67% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
72.2 Km/H |
78.4 Km/H |
-6.2 Km/H |
92.09% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
19 M |
18.2 M |
+0.8 M |
95.79% |
| Snow Handling |
5th |
43.9 Km/H |
45 Km/H |
-1.1 Km/H |
97.56% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
72.2 dB |
71.3 dB |
+0.9 dB |
98.75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.1 kg / t |
6.8 kg / t |
+0.3 kg / t |
95.77% |
Low noise levels, good in snow handling.
Long braking distances on all surfaces, reduced cornering grip and oversteer balanced in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
49.1 M |
43.8 M |
+5.3 M |
89.21% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
84.7 Km/H |
86.2 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98.26% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
38.6 M |
35.2 M |
+3.4 M |
91.19% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
62.8 Km/H |
64.3 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
97.67% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
78.4 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
5th |
19.3 M |
18.2 M |
+1.1 M |
94.3% |
| Snow Handling |
4th |
44.1 Km/H |
45 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
98% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
71.9 dB |
71.3 dB |
+0.6 dB |
99.17% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
7.5 kg / t |
6.8 kg / t |
+0.7 kg / t |
90.67% |
Very good in the wet, good aquaplaning resistance, good grip in the dry.
Very weak grip in all snow conditions. Not suitable for trips to the mountains.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
46.3 M |
43.8 M |
+2.5 M |
94.6% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
86.2 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
37.4 M |
35.2 M |
+2.2 M |
94.12% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
63.9 Km/H |
64.3 Km/H |
-0.4 Km/H |
99.38% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
76.4 Km/H |
78.4 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
97.45% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
7th |
23 M |
18.2 M |
+4.8 M |
79.13% |
| Snow Handling |
7th |
37.8 Km/H |
45 Km/H |
-7.2 Km/H |
84% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
71.6 dB |
71.3 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.1 kg / t |
6.8 kg / t |
+0.3 kg / t |
95.77% |
Dynamic handling and good grip during snow handling.
Very long braking distances in the wet and dry, very sluggish steering, loud noise.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
50.4 M |
43.8 M |
+6.6 M |
86.9% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
85.9 Km/H |
86.2 Km/H |
-0.3 Km/H |
99.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
41.7 M |
35.2 M |
+6.5 M |
84.41% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
63.5 Km/H |
64.3 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
98.76% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
76.2 Km/H |
78.4 Km/H |
-2.2 Km/H |
97.19% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
2nd |
18.8 M |
18.2 M |
+0.6 M |
96.81% |
| Snow Handling |
3rd |
44.3 Km/H |
45 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
98.44% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
75.1 dB |
71.3 dB |
+3.8 dB |
94.94% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
7.5 kg / t |
6.8 kg / t |
+0.7 kg / t |
90.67% |
Any plans this year on an update for this 2020 test? Or there is no new models? Many thanks for the valuable information.
There should be newer versions of this on the site, hopefully autobild will do another this year
I get the different weighting especially concerning snow with these non-uk tests, but looking at the results the end rankings seem well mixed up to me!
The falken gave pretty dismal results across the board, the maxxis put in a good showing for a lower mid-range tyre, and whilst the Vredestein was indeed let down by braking, it was much stronger elsewhere. The final ranking seems to be upside down if nothing else... ?
I'm not sure if Pro Mobile are the same or use the same scoring system as Auto Bild, but if a tyre does very poorly in one test (such as Pirelli in snow) it means it can't place well overall. It's a bit odd, which is why I prefer aiming for the data :)