Laufenn S fit EQ
WatchThe Laufenn S fit EQ is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.
Expected Mileage
22,991
miles
High Confidence
14
Reviews
66%
Average
86,322
miles driven
4
Tests (avg: 20th)
All Tests
View Test Results4
Tests
20th
Average
9th
Best
44th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2020 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test
12th/12
235/55 R17 • 2020
Good in the dry
Very weak in the wet
Not Recommended
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout
44th/45
225/45 R17 • 2019
2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test
9th/12
205/55 R16 • 2018
Low price.
Weak in the dry and wet.
Satisfactory.
Alternative Tyres
8.4/10
8.1/10
8.0/10
7.8/10
7.7/10
7.0/10
| Size | Fuel | Wet | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 inch | |||
| 205/55R16 91 V | C | C | 71 |
| 205/55R16 91 H | C | C | 71 |
| 17 inch | |||
| 225/50R17 94 W | D | B | 71 |
| 225/45R17 91 W | D | B | 71 |
| 18 inch | |||
| 245/45R18 96 W | D | B | 71 |
| 20 inch | |||
| 255/45R20 105 W XL | D | A | 73 |
Questions and Answers for the Laufenn S fit EQ
Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Laufenn S fit EQ. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Review Summary
Based on 13 user reviews
Drivers report mixed experiences with the Laufenn S fit EQ: many praise its quiet ride, strong value, and balanced dry/wet grip for normal driving, while others criticize wet grip at the limit, steering feedback, and durability/puncture susceptibility. High-scoring reviews highlight good handling, low noise, and decent wear for budget money; several low/mid reviews cite vague feel, poor wet traction when pushed, and faster front wear/noise growth. Overall sentiment is middling with positives weighted by several high scores but notable negatives from multiple low scores.
Strengths
- Low road noise (when new/for many)
- Good dry grip for normal driving
- Acceptable wet grip for everyday use
- Good value/price-performance
- Decent wear for some users
Areas for Improvement
- Weak wet grip when pushed/low-speed understeer
- Vague steering/poor feedback
- Sidewall softness/puncture susceptibility
- Noise increases as they wear
- Front wear faster than expected for some
Top 3 Laufenn S fit EQ Reviews
Suzuki 2007 Vtt Suzuki swift
(225/85 R17)
on mostly town
for 0 miles
3 tyres in 3 months due to bubble in side wall not happy at all no one willing to take responsibility just getting blamed on pot holes don't buy stay well awsy
Given 37%
while driving a
Volkswagen CC
(235/40 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 115 spirited miles
Worst tyres I have ever had on a car. These came new fitted to the car (7.5 mm all round).
As the miles piled on the MPG got worse. Started out managing 55 MPG on the motorway, now I can barely manage 40 mpg.
Dry grip is there but there's little feedback.
Wet grip, I have absolutely no confidence in the them, tyres easily spin up and easily under steer. When accelerating you have to be gentle on the throttle will 30 MPH before accelerating, if you force them expect traction to work overtime until the tyres grip. Even with suspension in sports mode it makes little difference.
Braking distances in either conditions is long.
Durability is not that great, every week or 2 I have had to reset the pressure monitoring system. They lose quite a lot of pressure hence I have had to add pressure quite a lot. In the 2 years owned I have had about 4 punctures. One tyre is on it's 2nd puncture and can't be repaired. Front tyres were already (first service after purchase) at the 3 mm after 8k miles the rears were still good at 6mm and even now the rears are at 5.8mm.
The only redeeming quality is the comfort.
Given 91%
while driving a
Alfa Romeo GT 1.9 JTD
(225/40 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 6,000 average miles
Excellent budget tires, they grip really good in corners if pushed hard, very quiet on the road however be careful of potholes because they are soft and can be punctured very easily
Latest Laufenn S fit EQ Reviews
Given 87%
while driving a
Toyota Avensis
(225/45 R17)
on mostly motorways
for 35,000 average miles
About to change the front pair after 35000 kms on them, I have absolutely nothing against them. I've made 60% of the driving on highway, 30% on roads, and 10% left on the city. I've tried them on snowed, rained, and dry roads and they are excelent. Good handling, no noise, and excelent wear. I allways check tire pressure according to the vehicle recomendation.
But if I have to say something bad about them it's probably that I basically feel no feedback, like when I enter on a curve too fast, sometimes I feel like it's going to drift away, but definetly never happens.
I would recomend those wheels for sure
Given 51%
while driving a
Renault Clio 172
(195/45 R16)
on a combination of roads
for 500 miles
Bought these as a recommended replacement to some excellent Vetus Primes on my Renault Sport Clio 172.
I wish I hadn't!
Grip is sort of there, but the tyre walls are so flimsy that any aggressive corner results in: weave wobble boing boing "oh my god I'm gonna crash!!!!"
I genuinely thought something important on the suspension had broken, they're that bad.
They've been on around a month, and to be honest, I'm just about ready to take a financial hit and replace them with something (anything!) else with some actual handling characteristics.
In short: if you drive like Miss Daisy then they're not bad, but if you have a car with more than 60hp and you enjoy going round bends without worrying then I'd avoid these.
Given 58%
while driving a
Audi A4 Avant 2.0T Quattro
(255/35 R19)
on mostly town
for 10,000 average miles
Fitment - 2014 A4 B8.5 S-Line wagon, 2.0T
Normal city driving, all year around
Dry weather performance - no issues, grip fine, low noise, good wear
Wet weather performance - poor. Front tyres lose traction under moderate corner acceleration resulting in low speed understeer. No problem with straight line and sweeping bends grip but would not recommend pushing these tyres in the wet.
Recommendation - summer-only tyres - ok. Winter or all-round use - avoid.
Given 91%
while driving a
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
(275/40 R20)
on mostly town
for 7 easy going miles
I bought s used car with a mixture of Blacklion and Hifly tyres. I taught I needed a wheel bearing until my mechanic said it was the road noise. He offered the Laufenn and the car was transformed into a quite cruiser. I don’t do big mileage or drive hard so I don’t need a premium performance tyre. Just something quiet, stops me in the rain and doesn’t feel detached from the steering wheel, Laufenn does all that at a good price and my fuel consumption is a little lighter. No issues with 12,000 kms todate.
Given 70%
while driving a
Volvo S40 1.6d
(205/55 R16 H)
on mostly motorways
for 20,000 average miles
I own the tires on VOLVO S40 1.6 116 horse power
The tires have their advantages: Excellent grip on dry, Very well grip on wet with almost no sliding on heavy water. Low noise levels and very good feedback on the steering wheel.
Disadvantages: The tires wear is average (that is expected considering the good grip levels)
They perform not well at speeds higher than 170 kmh. The rubber is soft and higher internal temperatures makes the tire lose the ground. Not recommended for heavy vehicles or high speeds.
Given 37%
while driving a
Mercedes Benz A45
(235/35 R19 W)
on a combination of roads
for 9,000 spirited miles
Had a brand new set of 4 of this tyre come with the car when I bought it. Not a tyre I’ve enjoyed at all. Really loud road noise which progressively gets worse and worse as they wear. Grip was very sketchy at times with the car skipping out on me a few times in the dry and worse so in the wet. After 9,000 miles of moderate to hard driving (with launches) the front has around 3 to 3.5mm left and the rear is around 5 to 5.5mm left.
I’m replacing them early due to the noise and the lack of suitability for this car, they may perform a lot better on something with less performance.
I’m replacing them early due to the noise and the lack of suitability for this car, they may perform a lot better on something with less performance.
Given 61%
while driving a
Honda Accord
(205/60 R16 V)
on mostly country roads
for 1,200 spirited miles
I purchased 4 of these tyres to replace the Michelin Primacy LC's which were due for replacement. As my car is getting a lot older I decided that it may not be worth paying the extra for Michelin which I have been using on this car for 8 years. I have only done approx. 2000kms on them and it was very noticeable that the turn in response was poor and that the tyres could be heard scrubbing on the same bends that the Michelins just gripped and felt like you were driving on rails. The Laufenns are a quiet tyre when new but even after 2000km they have become a little noisier and have a feeling of vagueness in the straightahead position and the smoothness of the Michelins is absent.
Laufenns are good value for money as the Michelins are nearly twice the price and they would suit an average driver.
Laufenns are good value for money as the Michelins are nearly twice the price and they would suit an average driver.
Given 91%
while driving a
Suzuki 2010 sx4 AWD cross over
(215/45 R17 W)
on mostly country roads
for 3,000 spirited miles
Decided to give these a try based on price point instead of going with the bridgestones I normally and wow was I impressed. Looks like laufenn/hankook really stepped up the game with this tyre in terms of value for money. Really balanced wet and dry performance and I've yet to actually find the limits to these tyres.
Given 77%
while driving a
Volkswagen Golf R32 MK4
(225/40 R18 W)
on a combination of roads
for 1,500 spirited miles
Had these tyres fitted when we got our Golf R32. Tread pattern is very similar to the Hankook H452 that I run on another car in the exact same size.
Compound is also very similar at a fraction of the cost. They look almost as if they came out of the same factory (with the same font and size stamping).
In terms of driving feel, I can't fault these tyres. Excellent dry and wet performance with good low road noise. Car also had brand new rotors, pads and fluids so this helped benchmark the test.
They feel very similar to the Hankook S1Noble2, no surprise since they both made in Indonesia by Hankook and very likely to be from the same factory.
Compound is also very similar at a fraction of the cost. They look almost as if they came out of the same factory (with the same font and size stamping).
In terms of driving feel, I can't fault these tyres. Excellent dry and wet performance with good low road noise. Car also had brand new rotors, pads and fluids so this helped benchmark the test.
They feel very similar to the Hankook S1Noble2, no surprise since they both made in Indonesia by Hankook and very likely to be from the same factory.
Volkswagen (235/45 R17 W)
on mostly motorways
for 0 average miles
I had two fronts recently fitted to replace the hankook tyres that I was very pleased with but couldn't get stock anywhere. Laufenn is a "cheaper" brand made and marketed by hankook, which I thought I'd try as they sat in my price range. I didn't know what to expect, and given past experience of the cheaper tyre ranges (Nankang particularly) I was expecting great dry traction but very poor wet handling (Nankang feeling down right dangerous in that respect). However, I'm very very pleased that they are equally good in the wet as they are in the dry. Can't comment on how well they last in terms of mileage as they have only just been fitted, but if I can get 12,000 out of them like the hankooks they replace then happy days. Didn't know the laufenn brand before but do now! Would recommend!