Menu
Laufenn G Fit 4S View Gallery (1)
155-265/35-80 R13-20 125 sizes 2021 Winter rated

Laufenn G Fit 4S

Laufenn Tyres Touring All Season

The Laufenn G Fit 4S is an economy touring all-season tyre that stands out for reassuring wet-road grip and a generally easy, predictable feel. Driver feedback is very positive for the money, often highlighting secure handling, comfort and surprisingly capable winter use. Independent testing agrees it can be genuinely strong in wet handling, but also flags a consistent safety caveat: dry braking performance lags rivals.

7.8
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
90%
Wet Grip
91%
Road Feedback
83%
Handling
84%
Wear
88%
Comfort
88%
Buy again
94%
Snow Grip
90%
Ice Grip
78%
8 Reviews
87% Average
59,400 miles driven
5 Tests (avg: 15th)
Laufenn G Fit 4S

Laufenn G Fit 4S

All Season Economy
BETA
7.8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Wet
84.4
1.93x / 9 tests
Value
73.8
0.42x / 4 tests
Snow
73.2
1.38x / 4 tests
Dry
62.8
1.5x / 6 tests
Comfort
40
0.32x / 1 test
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
83
3 tests
Braking
72.9
11 tests
Traction
70.8
1 test
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 5
Publications: 1
Period: 2021 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 8
Avg Rating: 87.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.47
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 10/17 16 metrics
2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 10/30 2 metrics
2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2024 225/50 R17 17/37 2 metrics
2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 195/55 R16 16/37 2 metrics
2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2021 225/50 R17 21/34 2 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
5
Tests
15th
Average
10th
Best
21st
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test
225/40 R18 • 2025
10th/30
2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test
225/40 R18 • 2025
10th/17
The Kleber Quadraxer 3, as Michelin's budget sub-brand, proves to be a snow talent and the best second-tier brand from a premium manufacturer in the test. This tyre inherits some of Michelin's winter expertise, delivering strong cold-weather performance at a more accessible price point. However, it's somewhat weaker in dry conditions and suffers from increased rolling resistance, leading to higher fuel consumption.
2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview
225/50 R17 • 2024
17th/37
View Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
155/80R13 79 T D C 71
155/80R13 79 T D C 71
14 inch
185/60R14 82 H D B 71
175/65R14 86 H XL C B 71
165/70R14 81 T D C 71
175/65R14 82 T D B 71
175/65R14 82 T D B 71
185/60R14 82 H D B 71
175/65R14 86 H XL C B 71
165/70R14 81 T D C 71
15 inch
195/55R15 85 V D B 72
195/65R15 95 H XL C B 72
185/65R15 88 H C B 71
195/65R15 91 V D B 72
195/65R15 91 H C B 72
195/65R15 91 H C B 72
185/65R15 88 H C B 71
195/55R15 85 V D B 72
195/65R15 91 V D B 72
185/65R15 92 T XL C B 71
195/65R15 95 H XL C B 72
16 inch
205/55R16 91 H D B 72
215/60R16 99 V XL C B 72
205/60R16 96 V XL C B 72
205/55R16 91 H D B 72
205/55R16 94 V XL C B 72
205/55R16 94 V XL C B 72
205/60R16 96 V XL C B 72
17 inch
215/55R17 98 W XL C B 72
235/65R17 108 V XL C B 72
215/45R17 91 Y XL C B 72
225/60R17 99 H C B 72
225/50R17 98 V XL C B 72
205/50R17 93 W XL C B 72
225/45R17 94 W XL C B 72
205/50R17 93 W XL C B 72
225/50R17 98 V XL C B 72
225/45R17 94 W XL C B 72
225/50R17 98 W XL C B 72
215/45R17 91 Y XL C B 72
225/60R17 99 H C B 72
18 inch
235/60R18 107 W XL C B 72
225/40R18 92 Y XL C B 72
225/40R18 92 Y XL C B 72
245/40R18 97 Y XL C B 72
245/45R18 100 Y XL C B 72
19 inch
235/35R19 91 Y XL C B 72
20 inch
255/45R20 105 W XL C B 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Laufenn G Fit 4S >>

Questions and Answers for the Laufenn G Fit 4S

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Laufenn G Fit 4S. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Review Summary

Based on 6 user reviews

Across six reviews, the Laufenn G Fit 4S is described as a strong-value all-season tyre with confident grip and safe, predictable handling, especially in wet conditions. The highest-weighted feedback also praises winter capability (snow/ice) and notes good comfort and generally low road noise. A small minority mention some noise at higher speeds, but overall satisfaction is high and several reviewers would buy again.

Strengths
  • Strong grip and handling (including cornering stability and responsiveness)
  • Very good wet-weather traction
  • Good value/budget-friendly performance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride
  • Promising/strong all-season capability (including snow/ice reported by some)
  • Good early wear/tread life impressions

Top 3 Laufenn G Fit 4S Reviews

Given 99% while driving a Opel Corsa C (185/55 R15) on mostly town for 1,000 miles
Exelent tires on my corsa C
Helpful 890
November 22, 2023
Given 86% while driving a Volkswagen Golf 1.9 Tdi (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Very nice budget tyre
Helpful 898
November 7, 2023
Given 89% while driving a Citroën C5 Tourer (195/65 R15) on mostly motorways for 1,300 miles
I drove these tires around 2000 km and they are great. The car is not so powerfull but this tires fits it very well. I am driving maxinum possible fast where ever I can and they didnt slip any where. Very good on wet. Little bit noisy above 100kmh. For that price around 50e they are great. Waiting winter to see snow grip
Helpful 1066
September 1, 2022

How would you rate the Laufenn G Fit 4S?

Click a star to start your review

166 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Laufenn G Fit 4S Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 84% while driving a Skoda Fabia 1.2 (205/55 R16) on for 1,500 miles
After an accident in my previous car, I picked up a Skoda Fabia as a hack and it needed new tyres on all four corners. The Laufenn was an unknown brand to me but found out they're Hankook related, so took a punt on them in Nov 25. Over winter, they were simply brilliant and I had to deal with six inches of snow, compacted snow and ice on 1:10 inclines in rural Staffordshire. I was literally driving around AWD suvs that were stuck on summer tyres. After 1500 miles on them, they look brand new still and having done motorway, town, country I can safely say they're a good buy. They're comfortable, provide generally good feedback and aren't too loud on the motorway or A roads at speed. Not the sort of tyre to be using to find the limits of any car but for everyday driving and good, predictably safe grip in all conditions, they're absolutely ideal, especially at the price point you'll find them at. Would I buy them again? Yep. Was I happy with the purchase just before winter, you betcha!
Helpful 10
April 11, 2026
Given 92% while driving a Honda Accord (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 500 average miles
Recently bought these as they are made in the Hankook factory in Hungary, with the same rubber mix in them as Hankook tyres. Previously had Hankook Optima 4s and was very happy, so opted for another Hankook brand this time. Have not had a chance to drive in snow, but handle very well in wet and very quiet tyres.
Helpful 1042
October 25, 2021
Given 72% while driving a Citroën C4 (205/55 R16) on mostly motorways for 100 average miles
Fitted the tires a few hundred km's ago. Very quiet ride and handles really well. Cornering grip is amazing and the car feels very responsive.
Helpful 1029
May 19, 2021
Rate the Laufenn G Fit 4S