Below are all the data points for the 2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.

How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

Hankook iON FlexClimate

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 3.30 M (8.5%) | Avg: 40.53 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON FlexClimate with a result of 39 M. The difference between best and worst was 7.8%.

Hankook iON FlexClimate

39 M
Michelin CrossClimate 2

40.3 M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

42.3 M

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 3.10 Km/H (2.8%) | Avg: 108.20 Km/H

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Hankook iON FlexClimate

110.1 Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

107.5 Km/H
Michelin CrossClimate 2

107 Km/H

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 3.20 M (8.2%) | Avg: 40.57 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON FlexClimate with a result of 39.1 M. The difference between best and worst was 7.6%.

Hankook iON FlexClimate

39.1 M
Michelin CrossClimate 2

40.3 M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

42.3 M

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 3.50 Km/H (4.7%) | Avg: 72.37 Km/H

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON FlexClimate with a result of 74.6 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.7%.

Hankook iON FlexClimate

74.6 Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

71.4 Km/H
Michelin CrossClimate 2

71.1 Km/H

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 7.10 Km/H (8.3%) | Avg: 81.93 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON FlexClimate with a result of 86 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 8.3%.

Hankook iON FlexClimate

86 Km/H
Michelin CrossClimate 2

80.9 Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

78.9 Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Spread: 0.40 m/sec2 (13.2%) | Avg: 2.81 m/sec2

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON FlexClimate with a result of 3.04 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 13.2%.

Hankook iON FlexClimate

3.04 m/sec2
Michelin CrossClimate 2

2.76 m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

2.64 m/sec2

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Spread: 3.30 M (10.3%) | Avg: 33.47 M

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 32 M. The difference between best and worst was 9.3%.

Michelin CrossClimate 2

32 M
Hankook iON FlexClimate

33.1 M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

35.3 M

Snow Traction (s)

Spread: 0.70 s (11.3%) | Avg: 6.53 s

Snow acceleration time (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 6.2 s. The difference between best and worst was 10.1%.

Michelin CrossClimate 2

6.2 s
Hankook iON FlexClimate

6.5 s
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

6.9 s

Snow Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 2.20 Km/H (4%) | Avg: 53.53 Km/H

Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 54.5 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4%.

Michelin CrossClimate 2

54.5 Km/H
Hankook iON FlexClimate

53.8 Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

52.3 Km/H

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 0.42 kg / t (6%) | Avg: 7.19 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 7.03 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 5.6%.

Michelin CrossClimate 2

7.03 kg / t
Hankook iON FlexClimate

7.1 kg / t
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

7.45 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position	Tyre	Score
	Hankook iON FlexClimate	0%
2	Michelin CrossClimate 2	0%
3	Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV	0%

Discussion

4 comments

JM Aug 9, 2025 archived

The dominance of the Hankook is impressive. It don't think that even the new CC3 could compete in wet and dry because of the low difference to CC2. Why don't they replace the old K4S2 completely?

#10266
1. TyreReviews JM Aug 11, 2025 archived
  
  I'm sure there's an update coming. Worth keeping in mind this was tested at Hankooks proving ground, other tests might not have the iON quite as far ahead but there's no doubt it's an impressive tyre.
  
  #10268
  1. FE TyreReviews Sep 24, 2025 archived
    
    Based in the current data, can we assume that this tire is better than continental all saison contact 2 & pirelli cinturato all season sf3?
    
    #10308
    1. TyreReviews FE Sep 26, 2025 archived
      
      It depends on your priority but I would not go so far as to state that.
      
      #10316

Menu

2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test