Menu

2024 Classic Car Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
7 min read Updated

Adjust Result Weighting

The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Dry 35%
Wet 50%
Comfort 5%
Value 10%
Dry 35% · Wet 50% · Comfort 5% · Value 10%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet
Comfort
Value

Test Results Data

BEST Good Average Below Average
# Tyre Total Score Dry Wet Comfort Value
Braking M Handling Km/H % Braking M Handling Km/H Circle s Straight Aqua Km/H Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 % Noise dB % Rolling Resistance kg / t %
1 ▲1 Dunlop Sport Classic 97.5% 38.7 3 86.8 3 97.6% 50.3 2 76.1 3 11.8 3 87.1 3 3.92 97.1% 74 96.8% 9.01 100%
2 ▼1 Pirelli Cinturato HS CN12 96.3% 37.2 87.5 2 99.9% 50.5 3 78.8 11.4 86.1 3.21 96.6% 75.4 95% 10.9 82.7%
3 Pirelli Cinturato P5 96.2% 38 2 87.6 98.9% 49.5 78.4 2 11.4 93.3 3.53 2 98.8% 78 91.8% 11.88 75.8%
4 Vredestein Sprint Classic 93.9% 39.5 86.2 96.3% 53.5 75.2 11.9 91.5 2 3.37 3 94% 72.6 98.6% 10.91 82.6%
5 Michelin XWX 90% 39.3 85.5 96.1% 58.5 72.9 12.6 73.6 2.35 84.9% 72.5 3 98.8% 9.99 3 90.2%
6 ▲1 Radar Dimax Classic 88.1% 39.1 86.8 3 97.1% 71.9 66.2 13.2 80 2.73 79.3% 71.9 2 99.6% 9.53 2 94.5%
7 ▼1 Dunlop SP Sport Aquajet 86.3% 41.4 86.3 94.2% 64.5 71.2 12.9 73.8 2.13 81.1% 71.6 100% 11.54 78.1%
Scroll for more
1
97.5%
Dry 98% Wet 97% Comfort 97% Value 100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 38.7 M 3
Dry Handling 86.8 Km/H 3
Wet
Wet Braking 50.3 M 2
Wet Handling 76.1 Km/H 3
Wet Circle 11.8 s 3
Straight Aqua 87.1 Km/H 3
Curved Aquaplaning 3.92 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 74 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 9.01 kg / t
Dry 100% Wet 97% Comfort 95% Value 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.2 M
Dry Handling 87.5 Km/H 2
Wet
Wet Braking 50.5 M 3
Wet Handling 78.8 Km/H
Wet Circle 11.4 s
Straight Aqua 86.1 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.21 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 75.4 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 10.9 kg / t
Dry 99% Wet 99% Comfort 92% Value 76%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 38 M 2
Dry Handling 87.6 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 49.5 M
Wet Handling 78.4 Km/H 2
Wet Circle 11.4 s
Straight Aqua 93.3 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.53 m/sec2 2
Comfort
Noise 78 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 11.88 kg / t
Dry 96% Wet 94% Comfort 99% Value 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 39.5 M
Dry Handling 86.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 53.5 M
Wet Handling 75.2 Km/H
Wet Circle 11.9 s
Straight Aqua 91.5 Km/H 2
Curved Aquaplaning 3.37 m/sec2 3
Comfort
Noise 72.6 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 10.91 kg / t
5
90%
Dry 96% Wet 85% Comfort 99% Value 90%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 39.3 M
Dry Handling 85.5 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 58.5 M
Wet Handling 72.9 Km/H
Wet Circle 12.6 s
Straight Aqua 73.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.35 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 72.5 dB 3
Value
Rolling Resistance 9.99 kg / t 3
6
88.1%
Dry 97% Wet 79% Comfort 100% Value 95%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 39.1 M
Dry Handling 86.8 Km/H 3
Wet
Wet Braking 71.9 M
Wet Handling 66.2 Km/H
Wet Circle 13.2 s
Straight Aqua 80 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.73 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 71.9 dB 2
Value
Rolling Resistance 9.53 kg / t 2
Dry 94% Wet 81% Comfort 100% Value 78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 41.4 M
Dry Handling 86.3 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 64.5 M
Wet Handling 71.2 Km/H
Wet Circle 12.9 s
Straight Aqua 73.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.13 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 71.6 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 11.54 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.

Discussion

11 comments
  1. 4cvg archived

    The Tire Rack has just done a "classic" tyre test. Compared to ABK thoroughness, it's a disappointingly limited effort but, given the paucity of "classic" tyre tests, it would be nice for you to give it a forum.

    #10437
    1. TyreReviews 4cvg archived

      I'll put it on the list.

      #10440
  2. 4cvg archived

    Jonathan, I don't know if you are in conversation with the good folk at ABK, but if so, perhaps you could suggest to them that a future test of interest would be in 155/80-15. I mention it because it is a size of interest as it is available in the FF compound formulation of the Xas. The regular compound Xas generally tests poorly in the wet but the FF should do better in merely slick conditions which don't make demands on the pattern's poor water clearance.
    Adding interest would be to also test some 145/80 (XZX for example) &, if it is available still, the TB15 in 170/65 against the 155/80 field.
    Vehicle? Superbeetle maybe (5" rims) or R8 Gordini or R8S (with 4.5" standard wheels)

    #9667
    1. 4cvg 4cvg archived

      Oh, and perhaps 175/70-15 as it allows the CN36 to feature.

      #9668
    2. TyreReviews 4cvg archived

      Sadly I have almost no contact with AB, other than our paths crossing sometimes when testing. Dirk is a great guy, maybe write in?

      #9674
      1. 4cvg TyreReviews archived

        Would it breach confidentiality to share his email (or whatnot) here?

        #9677
        1. TyreReviews 4cvg archived

          Unfortunately I don't have it!

          #9697
          1. 4cvg TyreReviews archived

            I've requested via the generic ABK contact email but no response yet.

            #9698
  3. 4cvg archived

    Thanks so much for this Jonathan. The ABK tests are otherwise very hard to access. (Spoken as someone whose youngest car is 45 years old & all of them take unfashionably small sizes.) I'll spread the word that it's up here.

    #9643
    1. TyreReviews 4cvg archived

      Sounds like you have quite the interesting garage!

      #9646