Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Comfort | Value | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Handling Km/H | % | Braking M | Handling Km/H | Circle m/s | Straight Aqua Km/H | Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | % | Noise dB | % | Wear KM | Value Price/1000 | Price | Rolling Resistance kg / t | % | |||
| 1 ▲1 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 96% | 35.8 3 | 96 ★ | 99.9% | 43.5 2 | 74.5 2 | 6.59 | 84.3 | 3.98 | 96.5% | 68.6 | 97.8% | 40800 | 11.64 | 475 | 7.35 | 78.7% |
| 2 ▼1 | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | 95.9% | 36.8 | 95 | 98% | 46.4 | 74.3 | 6.64 2 | 82.6 | 4.54 | 96.1% | 68.8 | 97.5% | 51340 ★ | 10.42 ★ | 535 | 7.1 | 87.3% |
| 3 ▲1 | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 95.9% | 35.8 3 | 95.2 | 99.4% | 43 ★ | 74.9 ★ | 6.74 ★ | 84.4 | 4.47 | 98.7% | 68.9 | 97.4% | 31960 | 15.96 | 510 | 6.94 3 | 68.6% |
| 4 ▲1 | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | 95.4% | 36.5 | 95.2 | 98.5% | 43.6 3 | 73.5 | 6.61 3 | 88.2 ★ | 4.53 | 97.9% | 68.4 | 98.1% | 35360 | 12.02 | 425 | 9.38 | 70.7% |
| 5 ▼2 | Michelin Primacy 4 | 94.5% | 36.2 | 95.6 2 | 99.1% | 45.8 | 73 | 6.2 | 86.4 | 4.15 | 93.9% | 68.3 | 98.2% | 44880 2 | 12.59 | 565 | 6.83 2 | 79.9% |
| 6 ▲2 | Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 | 94.4% | 36.1 | 94.1 | 98.5% | 45 | 74 | 6.49 | 88.1 2 | 4.37 | 96.5% | 69.7 | 96.3% | 36380 | 13.33 | 485 | 8.96 | 68.9% |
| 7 ▲7 | Vredestein Ultrac | 94.2% | 36.1 | 95 | 98.9% | 44 | 74.3 | 6.43 | 86.4 | 4.59 3 | 97.2% | 70.1 | 95.7% | 27200 | 16.73 | 455 | 8.42 | 61.6% |
| 8 ▼2 | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 94.1% | 35.7 ★ | 94.7 | 99.3% | 44.7 | 72.6 | 6.16 | 83.6 | 3.97 | 93.4% | 68.6 | 97.8% | 39440 | 10.65 2 | 420 | 8.51 | 77.8% |
| 9 ▼2 | Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 93.9% | 36.3 | 95.1 | 98.7% | 46.5 | 73.2 | 6.29 | 85.6 | 4.51 | 94.6% | 69.2 | 97% | 31620 | 12.02 | 380 | 8.19 | 72.4% |
| 10 ▲2 | Debica Presto UHP2 | 93.7% | 36.5 | 94.2 | 98% | 46.5 | 73.4 | 6.27 | 83.7 | 4.83 2 | 95.1% | 69.1 | 97.1% | 30600 | 13.24 | 405 | 7.96 | 69.8% |
| 11 ▲4 | Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 93.5% | 37.3 | 94 | 96.8% | 45.2 | 73.1 | 6.23 | 87.9 3 | 4.85 ★ | 96.1% | 69 | 97.3% | 27880 | 13.27 | 370 3 | 8.84 | 67% |
| 12 ▼2 | Fulda SportControl 2 | 93.3% | 36.5 | 94.1 | 97.9% | 45.9 | 72.4 | 6.38 | 85.6 | 4.27 | 94.5% | 69.7 | 96.3% | 32980 | 13.19 | 435 | 8.37 | 69.5% |
| 13 ▲2 | Nexen N Fera Primus | 93.1% | 37.2 | 93.9 | 96.9% | 44.7 | 73.6 | 6.19 | 87.3 | 4.34 | 95.2% | 69.4 | 96.7% | 27540 | 12.89 | 355 2 | 8.93 | 67.7% |
| 14 ▲7 | Nokian PowerProof | 92.9% | 35.7 ★ | 94.4 | 99.2% | 45.2 | 74.4 3 | 6.34 | 86 | 4.12 | 95.1% | 69.8 | 96.1% | 25840 | 18.58 | 480 | 8.55 | 58.5% |
| 15 ▼2 | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 92.6% | 36.2 | 94.2 | 98.4% | 46.7 | 71.6 | 5.94 | 86 | 4.17 | 91.9% | 67.8 2 | 99% | 34340 | 12.09 | 415 | 8.43 | 72.3% |
| 16 ▼5 | Toyo Proxes Comfort | 92.5% | 35.9 | 95.4 3 | 99.4% | 46.3 | 73.4 | 6.23 | 81.6 | 3.68 | 92.2% | 69 | 97.3% | 31960 | 13.92 | 445 | 8.56 | 67.2% |
| 17 ▲3 | GT-Radial FE2 | 92.2% | 37 | 94.5 | 97.5% | 46.4 | 72.3 | 6.11 | 82.2 | 4.45 | 93.1% | 68.5 | 98% | 29240 | 14.19 | 415 | 8.24 | 66.8% |
| 18 | Goodride SA57 | 91.5% | 37.3 | 94.7 | 97.2% | 48.9 | 72.1 | 6.01 | 80.4 | 4.28 | 90.8% | 68.8 | 97.5% | 26860 | 11.17 3 | 300 ★ | 8.98 | 72.3% |
| 19 ▼10 | BFGoodrich Advantage | 91.4% | 36.3 | 95 | 98.7% | 48.5 | 72.1 | 5.97 | 83.8 | 3.87 | 90.3% | 68.1 3 | 98.5% | 35020 | 14.56 | 510 | 8.19 | 68% |
| 20 ▼5 | Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus | 90.9% | 36.5 | 95 | 98.4% | 51 | 70.9 | 5.88 | 84.8 | 4.14 | 89.2% | 68.9 | 97.4% | 31280 | 13.27 | 415 | 7.8 | 70.4% |
| 21 ▼2 | Continental EcoContact 6 | 90.3% | 36.4 | 93.8 | 97.9% | 51.1 | 67.7 | 5.68 | 81.5 | 3.75 | 86% | 67.1 ★ | 100% | 41480 3 | 13.98 | 580 | 5.69 ★ | 80.9% |
| 22 | Reference All Season | 84.5% | 40.9 | 94.8 | 93% | 49.9 | 73.6 | 6.25 | 79.8 | 3.64 | 90.3% | 69.7 | 96.3% | 8.8 | ||||
Scroll for more
Dry
100%
Wet
97%
Comfort
98%
Value
79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
35.8 M
3
Dry Handling
96 Km/H
★
Wet
Wet Braking
43.5 M
2
Wet Handling
74.5 Km/H
2
Wet Circle
6.59 m/s
Straight Aqua
84.3 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.98 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
68.6 dB
Value
Wear
40800 KM
Value
11.64 Price/1000
Price
475
Rolling Resistance
7.35 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
96%
Comfort
98%
Value
87%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.8 M
Dry Handling
95 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
46.4 M
Wet Handling
74.3 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.64 m/s
2
Straight Aqua
82.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.54 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
68.8 dB
Value
Wear
51340 KM
★
Value
10.42 Price/1000
★
Price
535
Rolling Resistance
7.1 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
99%
Comfort
97%
Value
69%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
35.8 M
3
Dry Handling
95.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
43 M
★
Wet Handling
74.9 Km/H
★
Wet Circle
6.74 m/s
★
Straight Aqua
84.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.47 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
68.9 dB
Value
Wear
31960 KM
Value
15.96 Price/1000
Price
510
Rolling Resistance
6.94 kg / t
3
Dry
99%
Wet
98%
Comfort
98%
Value
71%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.5 M
Dry Handling
95.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
43.6 M
3
Wet Handling
73.5 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.61 m/s
3
Straight Aqua
88.2 Km/H
★
Curved Aquaplaning
4.53 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
68.4 dB
Value
Wear
35360 KM
Value
12.02 Price/1000
Price
425
Rolling Resistance
9.38 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
94%
Comfort
98%
Value
80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.2 M
Dry Handling
95.6 Km/H
2
Wet
Wet Braking
45.8 M
Wet Handling
73 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.2 m/s
Straight Aqua
86.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.15 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
68.3 dB
Value
Wear
44880 KM
2
Value
12.59 Price/1000
Price
565
Rolling Resistance
6.83 kg / t
2
Dry
99%
Wet
97%
Comfort
96%
Value
69%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.1 M
Dry Handling
94.1 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
45 M
Wet Handling
74 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.49 m/s
Straight Aqua
88.1 Km/H
2
Curved Aquaplaning
4.37 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
69.7 dB
Value
Wear
36380 KM
Value
13.33 Price/1000
Price
485
Rolling Resistance
8.96 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
97%
Comfort
96%
Value
62%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.1 M
Dry Handling
95 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
44 M
Wet Handling
74.3 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.43 m/s
Straight Aqua
86.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.59 m/sec2
3
Comfort
Noise
70.1 dB
Value
Wear
27200 KM
Value
16.73 Price/1000
Price
455
Rolling Resistance
8.42 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
93%
Comfort
98%
Value
78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
35.7 M
★
Dry Handling
94.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
44.7 M
Wet Handling
72.6 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.16 m/s
Straight Aqua
83.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.97 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
68.6 dB
Value
Wear
39440 KM
Value
10.65 Price/1000
2
Price
420
Rolling Resistance
8.51 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
95%
Comfort
97%
Value
72%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.3 M
Dry Handling
95.1 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
46.5 M
Wet Handling
73.2 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.29 m/s
Straight Aqua
85.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.51 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
69.2 dB
Value
Wear
31620 KM
Value
12.02 Price/1000
Price
380
Rolling Resistance
8.19 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
95%
Comfort
97%
Value
70%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.5 M
Dry Handling
94.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
46.5 M
Wet Handling
73.4 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.27 m/s
Straight Aqua
83.7 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.83 m/sec2
2
Comfort
Noise
69.1 dB
Value
Wear
30600 KM
Value
13.24 Price/1000
Price
405
Rolling Resistance
7.96 kg / t
Dry
97%
Wet
96%
Comfort
97%
Value
67%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.3 M
Dry Handling
94 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
45.2 M
Wet Handling
73.1 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.23 m/s
Straight Aqua
87.9 Km/H
3
Curved Aquaplaning
4.85 m/sec2
★
Comfort
Noise
69 dB
Value
Wear
27880 KM
Value
13.27 Price/1000
Price
370
3
Rolling Resistance
8.84 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
95%
Comfort
96%
Value
70%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.5 M
Dry Handling
94.1 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
45.9 M
Wet Handling
72.4 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.38 m/s
Straight Aqua
85.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.27 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
69.7 dB
Value
Wear
32980 KM
Value
13.19 Price/1000
Price
435
Rolling Resistance
8.37 kg / t
Dry
97%
Wet
95%
Comfort
97%
Value
68%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.2 M
Dry Handling
93.9 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
44.7 M
Wet Handling
73.6 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.19 m/s
Straight Aqua
87.3 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.34 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
69.4 dB
Value
Wear
27540 KM
Value
12.89 Price/1000
Price
355
2
Rolling Resistance
8.93 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
95%
Comfort
96%
Value
59%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
35.7 M
★
Dry Handling
94.4 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
45.2 M
Wet Handling
74.4 Km/H
3
Wet Circle
6.34 m/s
Straight Aqua
86 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.12 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
69.8 dB
Value
Wear
25840 KM
Value
18.58 Price/1000
Price
480
Rolling Resistance
8.55 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
92%
Comfort
99%
Value
72%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.2 M
Dry Handling
94.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
46.7 M
Wet Handling
71.6 Km/H
Wet Circle
5.94 m/s
Straight Aqua
86 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.17 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
67.8 dB
2
Value
Wear
34340 KM
Value
12.09 Price/1000
Price
415
Rolling Resistance
8.43 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
92%
Comfort
97%
Value
67%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
35.9 M
Dry Handling
95.4 Km/H
3
Wet
Wet Braking
46.3 M
Wet Handling
73.4 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.23 m/s
Straight Aqua
81.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.68 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
69 dB
Value
Wear
31960 KM
Value
13.92 Price/1000
Price
445
Rolling Resistance
8.56 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
93%
Comfort
98%
Value
67%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37 M
Dry Handling
94.5 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
46.4 M
Wet Handling
72.3 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.11 m/s
Straight Aqua
82.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.45 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
68.5 dB
Value
Wear
29240 KM
Value
14.19 Price/1000
Price
415
Rolling Resistance
8.24 kg / t
Dry
97%
Wet
91%
Comfort
98%
Value
72%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.3 M
Dry Handling
94.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
48.9 M
Wet Handling
72.1 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.01 m/s
Straight Aqua
80.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.28 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
68.8 dB
Value
Wear
26860 KM
Value
11.17 Price/1000
3
Price
300
★
Rolling Resistance
8.98 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
90%
Comfort
99%
Value
68%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.3 M
Dry Handling
95 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
48.5 M
Wet Handling
72.1 Km/H
Wet Circle
5.97 m/s
Straight Aqua
83.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.87 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
68.1 dB
3
Value
Wear
35020 KM
Value
14.56 Price/1000
Price
510
Rolling Resistance
8.19 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
89%
Comfort
97%
Value
70%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.5 M
Dry Handling
95 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
51 M
Wet Handling
70.9 Km/H
Wet Circle
5.88 m/s
Straight Aqua
84.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4.14 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
68.9 dB
Value
Wear
31280 KM
Value
13.27 Price/1000
Price
415
Rolling Resistance
7.8 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
86%
Comfort
100%
Value
81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.4 M
Dry Handling
93.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
51.1 M
Wet Handling
67.7 Km/H
Wet Circle
5.68 m/s
Straight Aqua
81.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.75 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
67.1 dB
★
Value
Wear
41480 KM
3
Value
13.98 Price/1000
Price
580
Rolling Resistance
5.69 kg / t
★
Dry
93%
Wet
90%
Comfort
96%
Value
65%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
40.9 M
Dry Handling
94.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
49.9 M
Wet Handling
73.6 Km/H
Wet Circle
6.25 m/s
Straight Aqua
79.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.64 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
69.7 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
8.8 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
I was checking out the FALKEN 205/55 R16 ZIEX ZE310AEC 91V, which have a Fuel Efficiency mark A, but it says here it has almost the highest rolling resistance... So, now I'm a bit confused...
This test would have been started in 2021 so it might be that the tyre has had a midlife update.
Got it. Might be :)
Still no Primacy 4+ review...
I tested it in a comparison video on youtube against ps5 and ps4s and auto express have tested it: https://www.tyrereviews.com...
When the Conti EC5 was released, it had spider charts comparing it with the EC3 & a (woeful) "fuel efficiency optimised" experimental tyre. The message was that one can't go too far down the LRR path without serious degradation of wet grip. It seems that that experimental tyre is the parent of the execrable EC6..
Conti EC 6 is already older (Oct. 2018 productions starts, 2019 first sales but developed much earlier), see https://reifenpresse.de/202...
It has already kind of "Evo" further optimized (pattern, fuel consumption, compound, grip and handling) and more quiet successor which is called EC 6Q, at least already in the OEM versions. But I see at the bottom of the reference that currently its available ony in 17-21'...but it was not yet publicly and independently tested, first test results I expect to be published in the spring 2023.
Normally I saw there are still shops selling the older EC5, maybe also in smaller sizes, which are probably no more profitable for the producers, given the huge raise of primary materials, energies and inflation.
You can also use alternatives from the remaining top producers, like e.g. not so much known Hankook K435 Eco 2, Michelin Primacy 4/4+ or Bridgestone Turanza T005 or Eco etc. But probably all producers will increase the prices within the 1st half of this year, at least, so hurry up to buy slightly older stock, if you need it this year.
I do wish that other qualities were optimised a bit more or that the excellent PC5 &/or PC2 were maintained in more smaller sizes as an alternative to the EC6. Presumably the market isn't there. I have used the Kinergy Eco2 (to replace no longer available PC2 in my size) dirt is a decided step down in crispness of response, wet grip & limit behaviour.
.
I am not sure how the Goodyear wins this considering it is way behind the best in terms of performance on the road. Looking at the individual results suggest that is the middle of the pack at most things (apart from wear)
Auto Bild have quite a complicated downgrade system meaning if a tyre is best in every test but one key test where is was "yellow" then it can never finish in the top group. The exact details of this aren't published as far as I know so we have to trust the results.
I remember a website (Hungarian I think) that contained some of the tyre tests where you could value various criteria on your own (e.g. safety parameters in the dry / wet, performance, rolling resistance, estimated mileage). And it changed the rankings according to your criteria. Sadly I can't remember its address anymore, it's been a few years.
It is not just tyre tests, current Euro NCAP also no longer analyses real safety of a given car but checks if it has enough assisting and potentially dangerous gizmos instead.
IF safety was the primary criteria, Vredestein and Nokian would be definitely in the top three whereas Goodyear would have been in the bottom third.
If you ever find that website please share it, I remember it too and loved the solution, I'm trying to implement one on tyre reviews so it would be great to have it as a reference.
Found it, deeply burried at autonavigator.hu.
the most recent being a winter tyre test of 2021 (https://www.autonavigator.h...
Legend, thank you for finding that! :D
Graphs - or texts - for rolling resistance and noise should switch positions. Also, there's no final verdict (pros and cons) for »Bridgestone T005« now. It's nice you mentioned »Auto bild« site and magazine for details, but maybe it would be useful to mark »Volkswagen Passat Variant B8« as test-vehicle.
Well spotted, thank you.