Test Publication:
Auto Bild
215/55 R17
22 tyres
4 categories
Test Size:
215/55 R17
Tyres Tested:
22 tyres
Auto Bild is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
The 2022 AutoBild summer tyre is here! As usual, the test started out as a
wet and dry braking test of fifty sets of tyres in the popular 215/55 R17 size using a VW Passat, with the best twenty one moving through to this full test. Not only have AutoBild managed to test the new Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and Kumho Ecsta HS52, they've also put all twenty one sets of tyres through a wear test, and included an (unnamed) all season tyre as a reference in the grip tests!
The Best in Test
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 won the test by combining good grip in the dry and wet, very low rolling resistance and the best wear on test. Even though it wasn't the cheapest tyre, when AutoBild divided the purchase price by the projected mileage it also proved to be the best value tyre on test, a very impressive showing from Goodyear.
Hankook will be pleased with a second place overall for the new Prime 4. The Prime 3 often had high wear, but the Prime 4 was excellent in the wear test, one of the best tyres in the dry and very good in the wet.
It seems impossible to keep the Michelin Primacy 4 away from the podium of a test, with the French tyre finishing third overall with low wear and a very low rolling resistance as its standout qualities, but thanks to its high purchase price, its calculated value was 20% lower than the Goodyears.
The other notiable inclusion in this test was the ultra low rolling resistance Continental EcoContact 6. Due to the way tyre tests work, this tyre was never going to do well overall thanks to lower levels of wet grip, but the Continental eco tyre did prove to have a significant advantage in rolling resistance, reasonable grip in the dry and wet (remember it beat thirty other tyres in dry and wet braking to get to this test) and surprisingly good levels of wear. If you're looking for a tyre to save petrol, this might be the one for you, but it's definitely not great for sporty handling.
As for the all season tyre, it was the worst in dry braking which was no surprise, but also the worst in both aquaplaning tests, mid pack in dry and wet handling, and mid-pack for rolling resistance. Given this is the only tyre which would offer any sort of grip in snow, it's a fairly impressive result.
Below is the exhaustive data, and be sure to check out the full test on the AutoBild website!
Dry
The new Kumho and Nokian led the way in dry braking, with Bridgestone and Hankook tied behind them.
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Nokian PowerProof
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Sava Intensa UHP 2
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- GT Radial FE2
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Goodride SA57
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Reference All Season
Hankook led the dry handling lap with the fastest average speed, and Michelin was the best of the rest.
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Sava Intensa UHP 2
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Vredestein Ultrac
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Reference All Season
- Goodride SA57
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- GT Radial FE2
- Nokian PowerProof
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Continental EcoContact 6
Wet
The Bridgestone Turanza T005 consistently leads wet braking testing, and once again it was the best tyre in the test. The new Hankook again placed well, with Falken and Vredestein close behind.
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Nokian PowerProof
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- GT Radial FE2
- Sava Intensa UHP 2
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Goodride SA57
- Reference All Season
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Continental EcoContact 6
Bridgestone again led the wet in wet handling, with Hankook and this time Nokian rounding out the top three.
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Nokian PowerProof
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Reference All Season
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Sava Intensa UHP 2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Fulda SportControl 2
- GT Radial FE2
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Goodride SA57
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Continental EcoContact 6
Wet circle roughly mirrored wet handling.
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Nokian PowerProof
- Sava Intensa UHP 2
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Reference All Season
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- GT Radial FE2
- Goodride SA57
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Continental EcoContact 6
There were varying results for the two aquaplaning tests.
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Nokian PowerProof
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Sava Intensa UHP 2
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- GT Radial FE2
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Goodride SA57
- Reference All Season
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Sava Intensa UHP 2
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- GT Radial FE2
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Goodride SA57
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Nokian PowerProof
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Reference All Season
Wear
The test winning Goodyear had a huge lead in wear, with Michelina and Continental rounding out the top three.
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Sava Intensa UHP 2
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Debica Presto UHP2
- GT Radial FE2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Goodride SA57
- Nokian PowerProof
Value is calculated by dividing the purchase price of the tyres by the projected mileage then giving a Euros per 1000km figure.
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Goodride SA57
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Sava Intensa UHP 2
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Continental EcoContact 6
- GT Radial FE2
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Nokian PowerProof
Environment
The eco bias Continental had a good lead in the rolling resistance test, with Michelin, Bridgestone and Goodyear the best of the "regular" tyres.
Autobild conducted external noise testing at 50 km/h and 80 km/h, these are the results from 50 km/h.
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- GT Radial FE2
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Goodride SA57
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Sava Intensa UHP 2
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Reference All Season
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Nokian PowerProof
- Vredestein Ultrac
Results
Premium performance with excellent handling, short braking, lowest wear on test, best value on test, low rolling resistance.
Expensive.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
17th |
36.8 M |
35.7 M |
+1.1 M |
97.01% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
95 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
13th |
46.4 M |
43 M |
+3.4 M |
92.67% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
74.3 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
99.2% |
| Wet Circle |
2nd |
6.64 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.1 m/s |
98.52% |
| Straight Aqua |
17th |
82.6 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-5.6 Km/H |
93.65% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
4th |
4.54 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.31 m/sec2 |
93.61% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
9th |
68.8 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.7 dB |
97.53% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
1st |
51340 KM |
|
|
100% |
| Value |
1st |
10.42 Price/1000 |
|
|
100% |
| Price |
19th |
535 |
300 |
+235 |
56.07% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
7.1 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+1.41 kg / t |
80.14% |
Excellent handling in the dry and wet, short braking distances, good mileage, good value for money.
Average comfort.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
35.8 M |
35.7 M |
+0.1 M |
99.72% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
96 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
43.5 M |
43 M |
+0.5 M |
98.85% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
74.5 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-0.4 Km/H |
99.47% |
| Wet Circle |
4th |
6.59 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.15 m/s |
97.77% |
| Straight Aqua |
13th |
84.3 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-3.9 Km/H |
95.58% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
17th |
3.98 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.87 m/sec2 |
82.06% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
68.6 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.5 dB |
97.81% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
4th |
40800 KM |
51340 KM |
-10540 KM |
79.47% |
| Value |
4th |
11.64 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+1.22 Price/1000 |
89.52% |
| Price |
14th |
475 |
300 |
+175 |
63.16% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
7.35 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+1.66 kg / t |
77.41% |
Very good handling, crisp steering, good aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances, very low wear, low rolling resistance.
Expensive.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
36.2 M |
35.7 M |
+0.5 M |
98.62% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
95.6 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-0.4 Km/H |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
45.8 M |
43 M |
+2.8 M |
93.89% |
| Wet Handling |
14th |
73 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
97.46% |
| Wet Circle |
14th |
6.2 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.54 m/s |
91.99% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
86.4 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
97.96% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
14th |
4.15 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.7 m/sec2 |
85.57% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
68.3 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.2 dB |
98.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
2nd |
44880 KM |
51340 KM |
-6460 KM |
87.42% |
| Value |
8th |
12.59 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+2.17 Price/1000 |
82.76% |
| Price |
20th |
565 |
300 |
+265 |
53.1% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
6.83 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+1.14 kg / t |
83.31% |
Good grip and excellent wet and dry handling, good aquaplaning properties, precise steering behaviour, short wet and dry braking distances.
Average wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
35.8 M |
35.7 M |
+0.1 M |
99.72% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
95.2 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
99.17% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
43 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
74.9 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Circle |
1st |
6.74 m/s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
12th |
84.4 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
95.69% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
7th |
4.47 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.38 m/sec2 |
92.16% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
11th |
68.9 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.8 dB |
97.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
11th |
31960 KM |
51340 KM |
-19380 KM |
62.25% |
| Value |
19th |
15.96 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+5.54 Price/1000 |
65.29% |
| Price |
17th |
510 |
300 |
+210 |
58.82% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
6.94 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+1.25 kg / t |
81.99% |
High aquaplaning resistance, stable wet handling, short braking distances, dynamic dry handling, low noise.
Very high rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
36.5 M |
35.7 M |
+0.8 M |
97.81% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
95.2 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
99.17% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
43.6 M |
43 M |
+0.6 M |
98.62% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
73.5 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.13% |
| Wet Circle |
3rd |
6.61 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.13 m/s |
98.07% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
88.2 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
5th |
4.53 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.32 m/sec2 |
93.4% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
68.4 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.3 dB |
98.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
7th |
35360 KM |
51340 KM |
-15980 KM |
68.87% |
| Value |
5th |
12.02 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+1.6 Price/1000 |
86.69% |
| Price |
10th |
425 |
300 |
+125 |
70.59% |
| Rolling Resistance |
22nd |
9.38 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+3.69 kg / t |
60.66% |
Balanced performance, short wet and dry braking, good comfort, good price to performance ratio.
Slow steering.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
35.7 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
12th |
94.7 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
44.7 M |
43 M |
+1.7 M |
96.2% |
| Wet Handling |
15th |
72.6 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
96.93% |
| Wet Circle |
16th |
6.16 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.58 m/s |
91.39% |
| Straight Aqua |
16th |
83.6 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-4.6 Km/H |
94.78% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
18th |
3.97 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.88 m/sec2 |
81.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
68.6 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.5 dB |
97.81% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
5th |
39440 KM |
51340 KM |
-11900 KM |
76.82% |
| Value |
2nd |
10.65 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+0.23 Price/1000 |
97.84% |
| Price |
9th |
420 |
300 |
+120 |
71.43% |
| Rolling Resistance |
14th |
8.51 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.82 kg / t |
66.86% |
Very good aquaplaning resistance, good braking, good comfort, well priced.
Average wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
36.3 M |
35.7 M |
+0.6 M |
98.35% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
95.1 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
99.06% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
15th |
46.5 M |
43 M |
+3.5 M |
92.47% |
| Wet Handling |
12th |
73.2 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
97.73% |
| Wet Circle |
9th |
6.29 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.45 m/s |
93.32% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
85.6 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-2.6 Km/H |
97.05% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
6th |
4.51 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.34 m/sec2 |
92.99% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
16th |
69.2 dB |
67.1 dB |
+2.1 dB |
96.97% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
13th |
31620 KM |
51340 KM |
-19720 KM |
61.59% |
| Value |
5th |
12.02 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+1.6 Price/1000 |
86.69% |
| Price |
4th |
380 |
300 |
+80 |
78.95% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.19 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.5 kg / t |
69.47% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, precise wet handling, short wet and dry braking, good comfort, well priced.
Slow steering in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
36.1 M |
35.7 M |
+0.4 M |
98.89% |
| Dry Handling |
18th |
94.1 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
98.02% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
45 M |
43 M |
+2 M |
95.56% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
74 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
98.8% |
| Wet Circle |
5th |
6.49 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.25 m/s |
96.29% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
88.1 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-0.1 Km/H |
99.89% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
9th |
4.37 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.48 m/sec2 |
90.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
18th |
69.7 dB |
67.1 dB |
+2.6 dB |
96.27% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
6th |
36380 KM |
51340 KM |
-14960 KM |
70.86% |
| Value |
14th |
13.33 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+2.91 Price/1000 |
78.17% |
| Price |
16th |
485 |
300 |
+185 |
61.86% |
| Rolling Resistance |
20th |
8.96 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+3.27 kg / t |
63.5% |
Stable handling and short braking in the dry, low noise, good comfort.
Longer braking and understeer handling in the wet.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
36.3 M |
35.7 M |
+0.6 M |
98.35% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
95 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
18th |
48.5 M |
43 M |
+5.5 M |
88.66% |
| Wet Handling |
18th |
72.1 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-2.8 Km/H |
96.26% |
| Wet Circle |
19th |
5.97 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.77 m/s |
88.58% |
| Straight Aqua |
14th |
83.8 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-4.4 Km/H |
95.01% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
19th |
3.87 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.98 m/sec2 |
79.79% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
68.1 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1 dB |
98.53% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
8th |
35020 KM |
51340 KM |
-16320 KM |
68.21% |
| Value |
18th |
14.56 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+4.14 Price/1000 |
71.57% |
| Price |
17th |
510 |
300 |
+210 |
58.82% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.19 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.5 kg / t |
69.47% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, short braking distances in the dry and wet, good price to performance ratio.
Very slow steering, average wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
36.5 M |
35.7 M |
+0.8 M |
97.81% |
| Dry Handling |
18th |
94.1 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
98.02% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
11th |
45.9 M |
43 M |
+2.9 M |
93.68% |
| Wet Handling |
16th |
72.4 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
96.66% |
| Wet Circle |
7th |
6.38 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.36 m/s |
94.66% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
85.6 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-2.6 Km/H |
97.05% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
12th |
4.27 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.58 m/sec2 |
88.04% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
18th |
69.7 dB |
67.1 dB |
+2.6 dB |
96.27% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
10th |
32980 KM |
51340 KM |
-18360 KM |
64.24% |
| Value |
10th |
13.19 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+2.77 Price/1000 |
79% |
| Price |
11th |
435 |
300 |
+135 |
68.97% |
| Rolling Resistance |
11th |
8.37 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.68 kg / t |
67.98% |
Balanced handling in the dry and wet, short dry braking, good comfort.
Low aquaplaning resistance, average wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
35.9 M |
35.7 M |
+0.2 M |
99.44% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
95.4 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
99.38% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
12th |
46.3 M |
43 M |
+3.3 M |
92.87% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
73.4 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98% |
| Wet Circle |
12th |
6.23 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.51 m/s |
92.43% |
| Straight Aqua |
19th |
81.6 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-6.6 Km/H |
92.52% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
21st |
3.68 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-1.17 m/sec2 |
75.88% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
13th |
69 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.9 dB |
97.25% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
11th |
31960 KM |
51340 KM |
-19380 KM |
62.25% |
| Value |
15th |
13.92 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+3.5 Price/1000 |
74.86% |
| Price |
12th |
445 |
300 |
+145 |
67.42% |
| Rolling Resistance |
16th |
8.56 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.87 kg / t |
66.47% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, short wet and dry braking, low price.
Slow steering, average wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
36.5 M |
35.7 M |
+0.8 M |
97.81% |
| Dry Handling |
16th |
94.2 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
98.13% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
15th |
46.5 M |
43 M |
+3.5 M |
92.47% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
73.4 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98% |
| Wet Circle |
10th |
6.27 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.47 m/s |
93.03% |
| Straight Aqua |
15th |
83.7 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-4.5 Km/H |
94.9% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
2nd |
4.83 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.02 m/sec2 |
99.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
15th |
69.1 dB |
67.1 dB |
+2 dB |
97.11% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
15th |
30600 KM |
51340 KM |
-20740 KM |
59.6% |
| Value |
11th |
13.24 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+2.82 Price/1000 |
78.7% |
| Price |
5th |
405 |
300 |
+105 |
74.07% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
7.96 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.27 kg / t |
71.48% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, short wet and dry braking, good comfort, low noise.
Average grip in the wet, slow steering, understeer in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
36.2 M |
35.7 M |
+0.5 M |
98.62% |
| Dry Handling |
16th |
94.2 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
98.13% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
17th |
46.7 M |
43 M |
+3.7 M |
92.08% |
| Wet Handling |
20th |
71.6 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
95.59% |
| Wet Circle |
20th |
5.94 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.8 m/s |
88.13% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
86 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-2.2 Km/H |
97.51% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
13th |
4.17 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.68 m/sec2 |
85.98% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
67.8 dB |
67.1 dB |
+0.7 dB |
98.97% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
9th |
34340 KM |
51340 KM |
-17000 KM |
66.89% |
| Value |
7th |
12.09 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+1.67 Price/1000 |
86.19% |
| Price |
6th |
415 |
300 |
+115 |
72.29% |
| Rolling Resistance |
13th |
8.43 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.74 kg / t |
67.5% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, dynamic driving behaviour, short wet braking.
Very high wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
36.1 M |
35.7 M |
+0.4 M |
98.89% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
95 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
44 M |
43 M |
+1 M |
97.73% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
74.3 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
99.2% |
| Wet Circle |
6th |
6.43 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.31 m/s |
95.4% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
86.4 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
97.96% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
3rd |
4.59 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.26 m/sec2 |
94.64% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
22nd |
70.1 dB |
67.1 dB |
+3 dB |
95.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
19th |
27200 KM |
51340 KM |
-24140 KM |
52.98% |
| Value |
20th |
16.73 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+6.31 Price/1000 |
62.28% |
| Price |
13th |
455 |
300 |
+155 |
65.93% |
| Rolling Resistance |
12th |
8.42 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.73 kg / t |
67.58% |
High aquaplaning resistance, good comfort, low rolling resistance.
Limited wet and dry grip.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
36.5 M |
35.7 M |
+0.8 M |
97.81% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
95 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
21st |
51 M |
43 M |
+8 M |
84.31% |
| Wet Handling |
21st |
70.9 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
94.66% |
| Wet Circle |
21st |
5.88 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.86 m/s |
87.24% |
| Straight Aqua |
11th |
84.8 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-3.4 Km/H |
96.15% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
15th |
4.14 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.71 m/sec2 |
85.36% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
11th |
68.9 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.8 dB |
97.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
14th |
31280 KM |
51340 KM |
-20060 KM |
60.93% |
| Value |
12th |
13.27 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+2.85 Price/1000 |
78.52% |
| Price |
6th |
415 |
300 |
+115 |
72.29% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
7.8 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.11 kg / t |
72.95% |
Excellent aquaplaning resistance, short wet braking, well priced.
Understeer in the dry, high wear, high rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
20th |
37.3 M |
35.7 M |
+1.6 M |
95.71% |
| Dry Handling |
20th |
94 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
97.92% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
45.2 M |
43 M |
+2.2 M |
95.13% |
| Wet Handling |
13th |
73.1 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
97.6% |
| Wet Circle |
12th |
6.23 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.51 m/s |
92.43% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
87.9 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-0.3 Km/H |
99.66% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
1st |
4.85 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
13th |
69 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.9 dB |
97.25% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
17th |
27880 KM |
51340 KM |
-23460 KM |
54.3% |
| Value |
12th |
13.27 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+2.85 Price/1000 |
78.52% |
| Price |
3rd |
370 |
300 |
+70 |
81.08% |
| Rolling Resistance |
18th |
8.84 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+3.15 kg / t |
64.37% |
Very good aquapaning resistance, safe wet handling, short wet braking, low price.
Understeer in the dry, very high wear, high rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
19th |
37.2 M |
35.7 M |
+1.5 M |
95.97% |
| Dry Handling |
21st |
93.9 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
97.81% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
44.7 M |
43 M |
+1.7 M |
96.2% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
73.6 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.26% |
| Wet Circle |
15th |
6.19 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.55 m/s |
91.84% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
87.3 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
98.98% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
10th |
4.34 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.51 m/sec2 |
89.48% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
17th |
69.4 dB |
67.1 dB |
+2.3 dB |
96.69% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
18th |
27540 KM |
51340 KM |
-23800 KM |
53.64% |
| Value |
9th |
12.89 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+2.47 Price/1000 |
80.84% |
| Price |
2nd |
355 |
300 |
+55 |
84.51% |
| Rolling Resistance |
19th |
8.93 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+3.24 kg / t |
63.72% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, low noise, low price.
Understeer in the dry, and long wet braking, very high rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
20th |
37.3 M |
35.7 M |
+1.6 M |
95.71% |
| Dry Handling |
12th |
94.7 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
19th |
48.9 M |
43 M |
+5.9 M |
87.93% |
| Wet Handling |
18th |
72.1 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-2.8 Km/H |
96.26% |
| Wet Circle |
18th |
6.01 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.73 m/s |
89.17% |
| Straight Aqua |
21st |
80.4 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-7.8 Km/H |
91.16% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
11th |
4.28 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.57 m/sec2 |
88.25% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
9th |
68.8 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.7 dB |
97.53% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
20th |
26860 KM |
51340 KM |
-24480 KM |
52.32% |
| Value |
3rd |
11.17 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+0.75 Price/1000 |
93.29% |
| Price |
1st |
300 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
21st |
8.98 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+3.29 kg / t |
63.36% |
Short dry braking, very low rolling resistance, low wear.
Limited aquaplaning resistance, long wet and dry braking, slow steering with high levels of understeer.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
12th |
36.4 M |
35.7 M |
+0.7 M |
98.08% |
| Dry Handling |
22nd |
93.8 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-2.2 Km/H |
97.71% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
22nd |
51.1 M |
43 M |
+8.1 M |
84.15% |
| Wet Handling |
22nd |
67.7 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-7.2 Km/H |
90.39% |
| Wet Circle |
22nd |
5.68 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-1.06 m/s |
84.27% |
| Straight Aqua |
20th |
81.5 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-6.7 Km/H |
92.4% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
20th |
3.75 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-1.1 m/sec2 |
77.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
67.1 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
3rd |
41480 KM |
51340 KM |
-9860 KM |
80.79% |
| Value |
16th |
13.98 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+3.56 Price/1000 |
74.54% |
| Price |
21st |
580 |
300 |
+280 |
51.72% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
5.69 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, well priced, low noise.
Slow steering, average wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
18th |
37 M |
35.7 M |
+1.3 M |
96.49% |
| Dry Handling |
14th |
94.5 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98.44% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
13th |
46.4 M |
43 M |
+3.4 M |
92.67% |
| Wet Handling |
17th |
72.3 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-2.6 Km/H |
96.53% |
| Wet Circle |
17th |
6.11 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.63 m/s |
90.65% |
| Straight Aqua |
18th |
82.2 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-6 Km/H |
93.2% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
8th |
4.45 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.4 m/sec2 |
91.75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
68.5 dB |
67.1 dB |
+1.4 dB |
97.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
16th |
29240 KM |
51340 KM |
-22100 KM |
56.95% |
| Value |
17th |
14.19 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+3.77 Price/1000 |
73.43% |
| Price |
6th |
415 |
300 |
+115 |
72.29% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
8.24 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.55 kg / t |
69.05% |
Very good dry braking, good aquaplaning resistance, dynamic wet handling.
Slow steering and low stability in the dry, very high wear, very low value.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
35.7 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
15th |
94.4 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
98.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
45.2 M |
43 M |
+2.2 M |
95.13% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
74.4 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
99.33% |
| Wet Circle |
8th |
6.34 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.4 m/s |
94.07% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
86 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-2.2 Km/H |
97.51% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
16th |
4.12 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-0.73 m/sec2 |
84.95% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
21st |
69.8 dB |
67.1 dB |
+2.7 dB |
96.13% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
21st |
25840 KM |
51340 KM |
-25500 KM |
50.33% |
| Value |
21st |
18.58 Price/1000 |
10.42 Price/1000 |
+8.16 Price/1000 |
56.08% |
| Price |
15th |
480 |
300 |
+180 |
62.5% |
| Rolling Resistance |
15th |
8.55 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+2.86 kg / t |
66.55% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
22nd |
40.9 M |
35.7 M |
+5.2 M |
87.29% |
| Dry Handling |
11th |
94.8 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
98.75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
20th |
49.9 M |
43 M |
+6.9 M |
86.17% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
73.6 Km/H |
74.9 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.26% |
| Wet Circle |
11th |
6.25 m/s |
6.74 m/s |
-0.49 m/s |
92.73% |
| Straight Aqua |
22nd |
79.8 Km/H |
88.2 Km/H |
-8.4 Km/H |
90.48% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
22nd |
3.64 m/sec2 |
4.85 m/sec2 |
-1.21 m/sec2 |
75.05% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
18th |
69.7 dB |
67.1 dB |
+2.6 dB |
96.27% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
17th |
8.8 kg / t |
5.69 kg / t |
+3.11 kg / t |
64.66% |
I was checking out the FALKEN 205/55 R16 ZIEX ZE310AEC 91V, which have a Fuel Efficiency mark A, but it says here it has almost the highest rolling resistance... So, now I'm a bit confused...
This test would have been started in 2021 so it might be that the tyre has had a midlife update.
Got it. Might be :)
Still no Primacy 4+ review...
I tested it in a comparison video on youtube against ps5 and ps4s and auto express have tested it: https://www.tyrereviews.com...
When the Conti EC5 was released, it had spider charts comparing it with the EC3 & a (woeful) "fuel efficiency optimised" experimental tyre. The message was that one can't go too far down the LRR path without serious degradation of wet grip. It seems that that experimental tyre is the parent of the execrable EC6..
Conti EC 6 is already older (Oct. 2018 productions starts, 2019 first sales but developed much earlier), see https://reifenpresse.de/202...
It has already kind of "Evo" further optimized (pattern, fuel consumption, compound, grip and handling) and more quiet successor which is called EC 6Q, at least already in the OEM versions. But I see at the bottom of the reference that currently its available ony in 17-21'...but it was not yet publicly and independently tested, first test results I expect to be published in the spring 2023.
Normally I saw there are still shops selling the older EC5, maybe also in smaller sizes, which are probably no more profitable for the producers, given the huge raise of primary materials, energies and inflation.
You can also use alternatives from the remaining top producers, like e.g. not so much known Hankook K435 Eco 2, Michelin Primacy 4/4+ or Bridgestone Turanza T005 or Eco etc. But probably all producers will increase the prices within the 1st half of this year, at least, so hurry up to buy slightly older stock, if you need it this year.
I do wish that other qualities were optimised a bit more or that the excellent PC5 &/or PC2 were maintained in more smaller sizes as an alternative to the EC6. Presumably the market isn't there. I have used the Kinergy Eco2 (to replace no longer available PC2 in my size) dirt is a decided step down in crispness of response, wet grip & limit behaviour.
.
I am not sure how the Goodyear wins this considering it is way behind the best in terms of performance on the road. Looking at the individual results suggest that is the middle of the pack at most things (apart from wear)
Auto Bild have quite a complicated downgrade system meaning if a tyre is best in every test but one key test where is was "yellow" then it can never finish in the top group. The exact details of this aren't published as far as I know so we have to trust the results.
I remember a website (Hungarian I think) that contained some of the tyre tests where you could value various criteria on your own (e.g. safety parameters in the dry / wet, performance, rolling resistance, estimated mileage). And it changed the rankings according to your criteria. Sadly I can't remember its address anymore, it's been a few years.
It is not just tyre tests, current Euro NCAP also no longer analyses real safety of a given car but checks if it has enough assisting and potentially dangerous gizmos instead.
IF safety was the primary criteria, Vredestein and Nokian would be definitely in the top three whereas Goodyear would have been in the bottom third.
If you ever find that website please share it, I remember it too and loved the solution, I'm trying to implement one on tyre reviews so it would be great to have it as a reference.
Found it, deeply burried at autonavigator.hu.
the most recent being a winter tyre test of 2021 (https://www.autonavigator.h...
Legend, thank you for finding that! :D
Graphs - or texts - for rolling resistance and noise should switch positions. Also, there's no final verdict (pros and cons) for »Bridgestone T005« now. It's nice you mentioned »Auto bild« site and magazine for details, but maybe it would be useful to mark »Volkswagen Passat Variant B8« as test-vehicle.
Well spotted, thank you.