Test Publication:
Vi Bilagare
225/60 R18
8 tyres
4 categories
Test Size:
225/60 R18
Tyres Tested:
8 tyres
Vi Bilagare is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
The excellent Swedish publication ViBilagare has just released their 2020 summer SUV tyre test. Testing seven of the most popular on-road 225/60 R18 tyres, ViBilagare also included the the mild all-terrain Continental CrossContact LX2 tyre as a very useful benchmark as to how much on-road performance you lose out on by fitting one of the very best mild off-road tyres on the market.
As usual, we'll summarise the important data from the test below, and recommend you head over to the brilliant ViBilagare website for a more in depth look.
Dry
Dry braking was led by the new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, stopping the test BMW X3 0.3 meters ahead of the second placed Bridgestone Turanza T005 and 0.7 meters ahead of the third placed Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The premium mild all-terrain tyre was considerably worse than even the worst pure on-road SUV tyre, stopping the vehicle a huge seven meters later than the test winning Michelin.
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Pirelli Scorpion Verde
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Nankang AS1
- Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Dry handling was again led by Bridgestone, Goodyear and Michelin, but this time the Goodyear and Bridgestone SUV tyres had the advantage, tying on a 66.4 second lap time, with Michelin 0.4 seconds behind. Again, the mild all-terrain tyre struggled, early 2 seconds off the pace.
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
- Pirelli Scorpion Verde
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV
- Nankang AS1
- Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Wet
Wet braking was again won by Michelin, with a more significant advantage over the rest of the tyres than in the dry.
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Pirelli Scorpion Verde
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Nankang AS1
- Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Michelins wet advantage continued to the wet handling and straight aquaplane testing, with Goodyear, Bridgestone and Nokian also performing well in all wet tests. Sadly, the mild off-road tyre didn't perform any better in the wet than it did in the dry, losing all three of the wet tests.
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Pirelli Scorpion Verde
- Nankang AS1
- Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Pirelli Scorpion Verde
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Nankang AS1
- Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Environment
ViBilagare did an excellent job of rating each tyres subjective comfort rating, which is how the tyre feels and sounds in the cabin, rather than a simple drive by noise test.
All eight tyres were close, but as we've seen in other tests the Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV and Vredestein Ultrac Satin both provide excellent levels of comfort while driving on all surfaces. The mild all-terrain tyre finally excelled in a test, matching the very best of the on-road tyres in comfort levels.
- Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV
- Nankang AS1
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
- Pirelli Scorpion Verde
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
The subjective noise test results were close. ViBilagare also tested objective drive-by external noise at two different speeds on two different surfaces, so head over to their website to see the full results.
- Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
- Vredestein Ultrac Satin
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV
- Nankang AS1
- Pirelli Scorpion Verde
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
The rolling resistance testing was also close, but as seen in other tests, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has an advantage over its premium rivals.
Results
Near faultless performance in the dry and wet, good balance, safe driving characteristics.
Steering not as linear as the Bridgestone and Goodyear, a little noise, high price.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
33.9 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
66.8 s |
66.4 s |
+0.4 s |
99.4% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
21.5 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
71.59 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
90.4 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
3 Points |
4 Points |
-1 Points |
75% |
| Subj. Noise |
6th |
2 Points |
4 Points |
-2 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
5.18 kg / t |
4.97 kg / t |
+0.21 kg / t |
95.95% |
Good dry handling, excellent aquaplaning resistance, good wet performance.
Steering not as sharp as the Bridgestone, high price.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
34.6 M |
33.9 M |
+0.7 M |
97.98% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
66.4 s |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
23.6 M |
21.5 M |
+2.1 M |
91.1% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
71.82 s |
71.59 s |
+0.23 s |
99.68% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
88.1 Km/H |
90.4 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
97.46% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
3 Points |
4 Points |
-1 Points |
75% |
| Subj. Noise |
1st |
4 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
5.08 kg / t |
4.97 kg / t |
+0.11 kg / t |
97.83% |
Very comfortable, low noise, well balanced and easy to drive.
Average dry braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
36.9 M |
33.9 M |
+3 M |
91.87% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
67 s |
66.4 s |
+0.6 s |
99.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
22.9 M |
21.5 M |
+1.4 M |
93.89% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
72.97 s |
71.59 s |
+1.38 s |
98.11% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
88.4 Km/H |
90.4 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
97.79% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
4 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Noise |
1st |
4 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
5.1 kg / t |
4.97 kg / t |
+0.13 kg / t |
97.45% |
Fun to drive with quick steering response, short dry braking, excellent dry handling, good wet handling, lowest fuel use.
Average aquaplaning resistance, high noise.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
34.2 M |
33.9 M |
+0.3 M |
99.12% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
66.4 s |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
22.7 M |
21.5 M |
+1.2 M |
94.71% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
72.84 s |
71.59 s |
+1.25 s |
98.28% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
80 Km/H |
90.4 Km/H |
-10.4 Km/H |
88.5% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
7th |
2 Points |
4 Points |
-2 Points |
50% |
| Subj. Noise |
6th |
2 Points |
4 Points |
-2 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
4.97 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, high comfort levels, well priced.
Below average braking performance in the dry and wet.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
37.1 M |
33.9 M |
+3.2 M |
91.37% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
67 s |
66.4 s |
+0.6 s |
99.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
24.8 M |
21.5 M |
+3.3 M |
86.69% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
74.51 s |
71.59 s |
+2.92 s |
96.08% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
87.2 Km/H |
90.4 Km/H |
-3.2 Km/H |
96.46% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
4 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Noise |
1st |
4 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
5.17 kg / t |
4.97 kg / t |
+0.2 kg / t |
96.13% |
Low fuel consumption, well balanced in the dry.
Poor wet handling with sudden loss of grip, low aquaplaning resistance, poor comfort.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
36.9 M |
33.9 M |
+3 M |
91.87% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
67 s |
66.4 s |
+0.6 s |
99.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
24.5 M |
21.5 M |
+3 M |
87.76% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
76.2 s |
71.59 s |
+4.61 s |
93.95% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
80.2 Km/H |
90.4 Km/H |
-10.2 Km/H |
88.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
7th |
2 Points |
4 Points |
-2 Points |
50% |
| Subj. Noise |
6th |
2 Points |
4 Points |
-2 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
5.07 kg / t |
4.97 kg / t |
+0.1 kg / t |
98.03% |
Cheap to buy, progressive loss of grip with early warning.
Low grip level in all conditions, with oversteer balance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
38 M |
33.9 M |
+4.1 M |
89.21% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
67.5 s |
66.4 s |
+1.1 s |
98.37% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
25.6 M |
21.5 M |
+4.1 M |
83.98% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
77.79 s |
71.59 s |
+6.2 s |
92.03% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
79.1 Km/H |
90.4 Km/H |
-11.3 Km/H |
87.5% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
3 Points |
4 Points |
-1 Points |
75% |
| Subj. Noise |
5th |
3 Points |
4 Points |
-1 Points |
75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
5.19 kg / t |
4.97 kg / t |
+0.22 kg / t |
95.76% |
High levels of comfort, the grip releases progressively with early warning
[Tested against on-road tyres]Generally a lower level of grip compared to on-road specific tyres, poor steering feedback.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
40.1 M |
33.9 M |
+6.2 M |
84.54% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
68.1 s |
66.4 s |
+1.7 s |
97.5% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
26.3 M |
21.5 M |
+4.8 M |
81.75% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
78.01 s |
71.59 s |
+6.42 s |
91.77% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
76 Km/H |
90.4 Km/H |
-14.4 Km/H |
84.07% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
4 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Noise |
1st |
4 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
5.29 kg / t |
4.97 kg / t |
+0.32 kg / t |
93.95% |
Those new Michelin and Goodyear are really nice, those brands (including Dunlop with Goodyear) are always my top two choice for tyres.
This Nokian is a really nice surprise, especially for the confort, something important to me.