Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Snow | Comfort | Value | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Handling Km/H | % | Braking M | Handling Km/H | Straight Aqua Km/H | % | Braking M | Handling Km/H | % | Noise dB | % | Wear KM | Value Price/1000 | Price | Rolling Resistance kg / t | % | |||
| 1 ▲4 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | 94.7% | 44.5 | 82.6 3 | 92% | 29.2 ★ | 74.3 3 | 74.2 | 98.6% | 24.6 | 76.4 | 97.5% | 70 | 98.1% | 42230 | 11.25 | 475 | 7.95 | 79.6% |
| 2 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus | 94.2% | 44.7 | 81.7 | 91.2% | 30.6 | 74.7 2 | 74.6 | 96.9% | 24.3 | 77.3 | 98.7% | 70.3 | 97.7% | 42870 | 10.71 | 470 | 8.44 | 79.2% |
| 3 ▼2 | Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 94.1% | 44.4 3 | 82.9 2 | 92.2% | 31.5 | 73.7 | 76.7 2 | 95.4% | 24.5 | 77.3 | 98.3% | 68.9 2 | 99.7% | 45920 2 | 10.89 | 500 | 8.11 | 81.3% |
| 4 ▼1 | Michelin Alpin 6 | 94% | 44.5 | 81.7 | 91.4% | 30.4 2 | 73.1 | 71.7 | 95.8% | 24.7 | 76.9 | 97.7% | 71.2 | 96.5% | 51250 ★ | 10.15 | 520 | 8.57 | 83.8% |
| 5 ▼1 | Apollo Aspire XP Winter | 93.7% | 44.7 | 82.3 | 91.6% | 31.2 | 72.8 | 73.4 | 94.8% | 25.1 | 76.6 | 96.7% | 71 | 96.8% | 45100 3 | 8.31 | 375 | 8.8 | 86.5% |
| 6 ▲1 | BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 | 93.5% | 45.2 | 81.2 | 90.5% | 32 | 72.4 | 78 ★ | 94.2% | 24.2 | 77.6 | 99.1% | 69.6 | 98.7% | 41410 | 9.66 | 400 | 8.77 | 80.7% |
| 7 ▲8 | Kleber Krisalp HP3 | 93.3% | 46 | 80.4 | 89.3% | 32.2 | 72.1 | 75.8 3 | 93.4% | 24 ★ | 78.4 ★ | 100% | 69.3 3 | 99.1% | 37310 | 9.25 | 345 | 8.56 | 81.5% |
| 8 | Semperit Speed Grip 3 | 93.3% | 46.5 | 81.6 | 89.5% | 31.6 | 72.6 | 66.8 | 93.2% | 24.3 | 78.3 3 | 99.4% | 70.2 | 97.9% | 41410 | 9.66 | 400 | 7.81 | 83.9% |
| 9 ▼3 | Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 92.9% | 44.4 3 | 82.5 | 92% | 30.8 | 74.1 | 69.3 | 95.5% | 25.2 | 76.5 | 96.5% | 71.7 | 95.8% | 41410 | 10.87 | 450 | 8.97 | 76.8% |
| 10 ▲1 | Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 | 92.5% | 46.7 | 81.9 | 89.5% | 33 | 72.5 | 68.4 | 91.6% | 24.7 | 77 | 97.7% | 68.7 ★ | 100% | 40590 | 7.88 3 | 320 3 | 9.59 | 84.9% |
| 11 ▼2 | Hankook Winter i cept RS2 | 92.5% | 45.1 | 81.8 | 90.9% | 32 | 71.7 | 70.1 | 92.6% | 24.9 | 78.4 ★ | 98.3% | 74.1 | 92.7% | 41820 | 9.33 | 390 | 9.29 | 80.4% |
| 12 ▲1 | Nokian WR Snowproof | 92.2% | 44.7 | 81.5 | 91.1% | 32.2 | 71.1 | 65.5 | 91.4% | 24.6 | 77.3 | 98.1% | 70.6 | 97.3% | 39970 | 11.69 | 465 | 7.43 ★ | 79.8% |
| 13 ▼3 | Uniroyal MS Plus 77 | 92% | 46 | 81.7 | 90% | 32.8 | 72.3 | 70.3 | 92% | 24.6 | 77 | 97.9% | 71.1 | 96.6% | 38360 | 10.25 | 395 | 8.28 | 79.5% |
| 14 ▲5 | Debica Frigo HP2 | 92% | 46.7 | 80.7 | 88.8% | 34.2 | 69.5 | 68.4 | 88.5% | 24.1 2 | 77.8 | 99.4% | 74.5 | 92.2% | 39770 | 7.67 2 | 305 2 | 7.85 | 91% |
| 15 ▲2 | Sava Eskimo HP2 | 91.9% | 47.3 | 81.3 | 88.6% | 33.6 | 69.6 | 66.6 | 89% | 24.1 2 | 77.4 | 99.1% | 76.1 | 90.3% | 39360 | 7.62 ★ | 300 ★ | 7.78 3 | 91.4% |
| 16 ▲4 | Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 91.9% | 45.5 | 80.1 | 89.5% | 31.5 | 72.5 | 72.2 | 94% | 24.8 | 76.3 | 97.1% | 69.8 | 98.4% | 35260 | 10.35 | 365 | 9.99 | 73.6% |
| 17 ▼1 | Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 91.8% | 46.3 | 81.6 | 89.7% | 32.9 | 71.3 | 73.3 | 91.7% | 24.3 | 77 | 98.5% | 73.9 | 93% | 40180 | 11.57 | 465 | 7.77 2 | 78.8% |
| 18 ▼6 | Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 91.4% | 46.4 | 81.8 | 89.7% | 33.5 | 70.2 | 71.7 | 90.2% | 24.3 | 75.3 | 97.3% | 73.3 | 93.7% | 38950 | 9.5 | 370 | 7.8 | 83.7% |
| 19 ▼1 | Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 91.2% | 44.3 2 | 81.8 | 91.7% | 31.3 | 72 | 68.1 | 93.4% | 26.4 | 75.3 | 93.7% | 71.6 | 96% | 36080 | 11.64 | 420 | 8.04 | 76.2% |
| 20 ▼6 | Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 | 90.9% | 45.7 | 81.9 | 90.4% | 32.5 | 71.7 | 62.8 | 91% | 26 | 75.6 | 94.5% | 72.4 | 94.9% | 39970 | 9.93 | 395 | 8.11 | 81.6% |
| 21 | Reference Summer | 61.3% | 38.4 ★ | 84.6 ★ | 100% | 30.4 2 | 75.7 ★ | 89.1 | 98% | 69.7 | 9.3 | 26.9% | |||||||
Scroll for more
Dry
92%
Wet
99%
Snow
98%
Comfort
98%
Value
80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.5 M
Dry Handling
82.6 Km/H
3
Wet
Wet Braking
29.2 M
★
Wet Handling
74.3 Km/H
3
Straight Aqua
74.2 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.6 M
Snow Handling
76.4 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
70 dB
Value
Wear
42230 KM
Value
11.25 Price/1000
Price
475
Rolling Resistance
7.95 kg / t
Dry
91%
Wet
97%
Snow
99%
Comfort
98%
Value
79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.7 M
Dry Handling
81.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
30.6 M
Wet Handling
74.7 Km/H
2
Straight Aqua
74.6 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.3 M
Snow Handling
77.3 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
70.3 dB
Value
Wear
42870 KM
Value
10.71 Price/1000
Price
470
Rolling Resistance
8.44 kg / t
Dry
92%
Wet
95%
Snow
98%
Comfort
100%
Value
81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.4 M
3
Dry Handling
82.9 Km/H
2
Wet
Wet Braking
31.5 M
Wet Handling
73.7 Km/H
Straight Aqua
76.7 Km/H
2
Snow
Snow Braking
24.5 M
Snow Handling
77.3 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
68.9 dB
2
Value
Wear
45920 KM
2
Value
10.89 Price/1000
Price
500
Rolling Resistance
8.11 kg / t
Dry
91%
Wet
96%
Snow
98%
Comfort
97%
Value
84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.5 M
Dry Handling
81.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
30.4 M
2
Wet Handling
73.1 Km/H
Straight Aqua
71.7 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.7 M
Snow Handling
76.9 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
71.2 dB
Value
Wear
51250 KM
★
Value
10.15 Price/1000
Price
520
Rolling Resistance
8.57 kg / t
Dry
92%
Wet
95%
Snow
97%
Comfort
97%
Value
87%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.7 M
Dry Handling
82.3 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
31.2 M
Wet Handling
72.8 Km/H
Straight Aqua
73.4 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
25.1 M
Snow Handling
76.6 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
71 dB
Value
Wear
45100 KM
3
Value
8.31 Price/1000
Price
375
Rolling Resistance
8.8 kg / t
Dry
91%
Wet
94%
Snow
99%
Comfort
99%
Value
81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
45.2 M
Dry Handling
81.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
32 M
Wet Handling
72.4 Km/H
Straight Aqua
78 Km/H
★
Snow
Snow Braking
24.2 M
Snow Handling
77.6 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
69.6 dB
Value
Wear
41410 KM
Value
9.66 Price/1000
Price
400
Rolling Resistance
8.77 kg / t
Dry
89%
Wet
93%
Snow
100%
Comfort
99%
Value
82%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
46 M
Dry Handling
80.4 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
32.2 M
Wet Handling
72.1 Km/H
Straight Aqua
75.8 Km/H
3
Snow
Snow Braking
24 M
★
Snow Handling
78.4 Km/H
★
Comfort
Noise
69.3 dB
3
Value
Wear
37310 KM
Value
9.25 Price/1000
Price
345
Rolling Resistance
8.56 kg / t
Dry
90%
Wet
93%
Snow
99%
Comfort
98%
Value
84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
46.5 M
Dry Handling
81.6 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
31.6 M
Wet Handling
72.6 Km/H
Straight Aqua
66.8 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.3 M
Snow Handling
78.3 Km/H
3
Comfort
Noise
70.2 dB
Value
Wear
41410 KM
Value
9.66 Price/1000
Price
400
Rolling Resistance
7.81 kg / t
Dry
92%
Wet
96%
Snow
97%
Comfort
96%
Value
77%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.4 M
3
Dry Handling
82.5 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
30.8 M
Wet Handling
74.1 Km/H
Straight Aqua
69.3 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
25.2 M
Snow Handling
76.5 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
71.7 dB
Value
Wear
41410 KM
Value
10.87 Price/1000
Price
450
Rolling Resistance
8.97 kg / t
Dry
90%
Wet
92%
Snow
98%
Comfort
100%
Value
85%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
46.7 M
Dry Handling
81.9 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
33 M
Wet Handling
72.5 Km/H
Straight Aqua
68.4 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.7 M
Snow Handling
77 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
68.7 dB
★
Value
Wear
40590 KM
Value
7.88 Price/1000
3
Price
320
3
Rolling Resistance
9.59 kg / t
Dry
91%
Wet
93%
Snow
98%
Comfort
93%
Value
80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
45.1 M
Dry Handling
81.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
32 M
Wet Handling
71.7 Km/H
Straight Aqua
70.1 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.9 M
Snow Handling
78.4 Km/H
★
Comfort
Noise
74.1 dB
Value
Wear
41820 KM
Value
9.33 Price/1000
Price
390
Rolling Resistance
9.29 kg / t
Dry
91%
Wet
91%
Snow
98%
Comfort
97%
Value
80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.7 M
Dry Handling
81.5 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
32.2 M
Wet Handling
71.1 Km/H
Straight Aqua
65.5 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.6 M
Snow Handling
77.3 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
70.6 dB
Value
Wear
39970 KM
Value
11.69 Price/1000
Price
465
Rolling Resistance
7.43 kg / t
★
Dry
90%
Wet
92%
Snow
98%
Comfort
97%
Value
80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
46 M
Dry Handling
81.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
32.8 M
Wet Handling
72.3 Km/H
Straight Aqua
70.3 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.6 M
Snow Handling
77 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
71.1 dB
Value
Wear
38360 KM
Value
10.25 Price/1000
Price
395
Rolling Resistance
8.28 kg / t
Dry
89%
Wet
89%
Snow
99%
Comfort
92%
Value
91%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
46.7 M
Dry Handling
80.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
34.2 M
Wet Handling
69.5 Km/H
Straight Aqua
68.4 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.1 M
2
Snow Handling
77.8 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
74.5 dB
Value
Wear
39770 KM
Value
7.67 Price/1000
2
Price
305
2
Rolling Resistance
7.85 kg / t
Dry
89%
Wet
89%
Snow
99%
Comfort
90%
Value
91%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
47.3 M
Dry Handling
81.3 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
33.6 M
Wet Handling
69.6 Km/H
Straight Aqua
66.6 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.1 M
2
Snow Handling
77.4 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
76.1 dB
Value
Wear
39360 KM
Value
7.62 Price/1000
★
Price
300
★
Rolling Resistance
7.78 kg / t
3
Dry
90%
Wet
94%
Snow
97%
Comfort
98%
Value
74%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
45.5 M
Dry Handling
80.1 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
31.5 M
Wet Handling
72.5 Km/H
Straight Aqua
72.2 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.8 M
Snow Handling
76.3 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
69.8 dB
Value
Wear
35260 KM
Value
10.35 Price/1000
Price
365
Rolling Resistance
9.99 kg / t
Dry
90%
Wet
92%
Snow
99%
Comfort
93%
Value
79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
46.3 M
Dry Handling
81.6 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
32.9 M
Wet Handling
71.3 Km/H
Straight Aqua
73.3 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.3 M
Snow Handling
77 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
73.9 dB
Value
Wear
40180 KM
Value
11.57 Price/1000
Price
465
Rolling Resistance
7.77 kg / t
2
Dry
90%
Wet
90%
Snow
97%
Comfort
94%
Value
84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
46.4 M
Dry Handling
81.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
33.5 M
Wet Handling
70.2 Km/H
Straight Aqua
71.7 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
24.3 M
Snow Handling
75.3 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
73.3 dB
Value
Wear
38950 KM
Value
9.5 Price/1000
Price
370
Rolling Resistance
7.8 kg / t
Dry
92%
Wet
93%
Snow
94%
Comfort
96%
Value
76%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.3 M
2
Dry Handling
81.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
31.3 M
Wet Handling
72 Km/H
Straight Aqua
68.1 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
26.4 M
Snow Handling
75.3 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
71.6 dB
Value
Wear
36080 KM
Value
11.64 Price/1000
Price
420
Rolling Resistance
8.04 kg / t
Dry
90%
Wet
91%
Snow
95%
Comfort
95%
Value
82%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
45.7 M
Dry Handling
81.9 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
32.5 M
Wet Handling
71.7 Km/H
Straight Aqua
62.8 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
26 M
Snow Handling
75.6 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.4 dB
Value
Wear
39970 KM
Value
9.93 Price/1000
Price
395
Rolling Resistance
8.11 kg / t
Dry
100%
Wet
98%
Snow
27%
Comfort
99%
Value
80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.4 M
★
Dry Handling
84.6 Km/H
★
Wet
Wet Braking
30.4 M
2
Wet Handling
75.7 Km/H
★
Snow
Snow Braking
89.1 M
Comfort
Noise
69.7 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
9.3 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
Hello.
I generally prefer Michelin tyres but in 2019 Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ takes good results on tests and in addition this tyre is %25 cheaper than Michelin. If we compare Michelin Alpin 6 and Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ which one will be your preference? why? do you have experinces about these 2 tyres?
Many thanks.
I use my car in Istanbul, and the tyre sizes are 215/55R17
I've not used either, but looking at the test data I would lean towards the Goodyear if it's 25% cheaper!
Hello! for 235/40R18, what would you choose between BF Goodrich g-force winter 2 and Hankook icept EVO2? I can only find info on RS2, but EVO2 not much. BF Goodrich is like 15 euro / tyre cheaper. Also, are the Hankooks actually that noisy or in reality not that unconfortable? I live in Romania, lately not much snow, only wet and dry, lets say 3-4 weeks of snow usually. Ty.
Can I nominate http://www.tyrereviews.co.u... instead?
You could, but its 130-150 Euros more / set (really close to Blizzaks and Continental ts850p). Anyway, bought the BF Goodrich 1 day ago, they seem decent enough so far.
The graphs are misleading, as (except for snow braking) they do not show zero. Minor differences look large if the graph shows only the leading edge of the data. In addition, there is no information regarding how the tests were done, how many times, and any error margins. From a scientific point of view these tests and the shown results are about as misleading as you could possibly make them. However good or bad each tyre might be, your tests show nothing believable. For example, if you reproduce the snow handling graph showing the data from zero, it would look just like the snow braking graph rather than the "image" of large differences.
Hi,
I am living in Athens Greece where the winders are mild but I am skiing and I want to have a second set of winder tires for January to March. But besides the days on the mountain where the conditions will be around 0 degrees with snow, during the everyday life this tires will cross mostly dry conditions with high temperatures for a snow tire (mostly above 10 degrees, some days even 20).
What is your recommendation where I should accommodate pure winder conditions and mild conditions as well?
Thanks!
any comment? thank you in advance!
Sorry for the delay in replying. For this, I'd probably consider the Continental Allseasoncontact or Ts860. I'd go for the all seasons if you'll be on mostly treated roads when skiing, or the winters if you will travel a little more off piste
thanks!!
I've seen many of your tests and I've read many articles regarding differences between premium and mid-range tyres. I still can't understand why in the world i would spend thousands on a premium tyres when i can buy lets say Apollo Aspire XP Winter tyre which costs half the price compared to GY, Conti etc and have only marginal differences in performances. I mean the differences are so minimal and hardly noticeable while the price gap is huge. What am i missing here? Thanks!
Half the price isn't quite right, we're tracking it at 75 vs 95 so not a massive difference, and the price charged reflects the quality of tyre, the new Aspire is an excellent midrange tyre!
Everyone can make their own choice based on the data and the local market pricing :)
--
To whom it may concern:
I just recently purchased the Continental WinterContact tires for my Volkswagen T-ROC 2.0 TDI 4MOTION. Do you recommend that I also buy chains for my all wheel drive car?
Sincerely,
Carlo Marcello Alberici
Hi,
It depends how much snow and ice you might encounter. I wouldn't worry too much about chains for most "normal" winter conditions if you have AWD and winter tyres.
funny review
7th: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
15th: Kleber Krisalp HP3
Same tyre different name (for different markets) and different positions from 7 to 15 :)
Hi, what tyre would you recommend bridgeston blizzak LM005 or goodyear performance+?
Don't use it much in snow condition.
The Goodyear is winning more tests this year
Thanks. In my size there is still only continental TS860. As GY are difficult to order, what would you recommend between TS850, LM005, nokian wr4 and michelin alpin 5?
Conti
Thank you
Hello,
this tyre test was for 225/45/17. I am driving Citroen C4 Grand Picasso (y. 2013) and the car has a tyre size 215/50/17.
Do this tests qualifie also for this tyre 215/50/17? Or should i look for other tests in this size?
Thank you...
Yes, there's normally a fairly large correlation
Hi,
I have seen winter test here lately, and there was so different results using nearly same tyres. What could be a truth of these? For example at Kleber Krisalp HP3
ADAC 2nd place
AUTOBILD 15th place
another AUTOBILD overview 8th place
Why could be so different results at same tyre?
Tyre size might be the biggest factor here, ADAC might have tested a size that's had a recent update, where as Autobild might have an older compound tyre. That said, with the results so close, many things can change the overall results.
Hi. Between the GY UG Performance+ and Vredestein Wintrac Pro ( 215/55/17 98V ) what would you choose? Where i live ( Romania ) we have max 2-3 weeks of snow in the winter season ( Nov - March ). Mostly dry and wet. Sometimes i go u to ski resorts, but i have a Passat 4motion, so traction would not be a great issue. I saw that Vredestein is doing better in dry and wet...
Suggestions? :)
Very difficult question! I'd likely pick the Goodyear, just because they're slightly newer. They both seem excellent choices.
Another interesting article thanks Jonathan.
The question of value really depends on the performance of tyres throughout their life. Michelin currently make a big play on their tyres performance down to 1.6mm and I keep coming back to this article:
http://www.tyrereviews.co.u...
But also in the original Autobild article:
https://www.autobild.de/bil...
Though my German language skills amount to relying on Mr Google my understanding is that apart from Michelin and Goodyear the other tyre makes don't perform in certain conditions below 4mm and even approaching that level their performance is failing off.
It's a shame that this all life data of tyre performance is not really available to Mr J Public.
Yor last link only mentioned All Season tyres.
This topic not so easy. Michelin published a report, made by Dekra and TÜV, on behalf of Michelin. A review with ~ 2mm and different winter tyres. Michelin is -who wonder- the winner, the looser of this review was Bridgestone LM001 Evo by far the worst performance.
But: Conti TS860, Dunlop Wintersport 5 and Goodyear Ultra Grip 9 weren´t far away.
But (2nd) only tested were traction and braking on snow. No handling, no other tests.
This report/review only shows: If you are on the way in a crowd in which all cars drive dangerously worn tires you are maybe have the best performance, but if there is also anyone with midrange winter tyres with more than 3mm you will loose ;)
That´s not enough to buy Michelin and drive it to 2mm.
In Germany the winter are also wet, raining, snow melting. It´s not funny to drive on german Autobahn in wet conditions with a 2mm tyre.
In the neighbor country Austria (where many germans make a trip to skiing) a winter tyre with less than 4mm is not recognized as a winter tyre, You have to pay a punishment from 35€ to 5000€(!).