Menu

2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Dry
  3. Wet
  4. Environment
  5. Results
  6. Nokian WetProof
  7. Bridgestone Turanza T005
  8. Michelin Primacy 4
  9. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
  10. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
  11. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
  12. Continental Premium Contact 5
  13. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
  14. Giti GitiPremium H1
  15. Nexen N Blue HD+
  16. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Test Publication:
Auto Motor Und Sport
215/55 R17 11 tyres 4 categories
Read the original test at Auto Motor Und Sport → Similar Tests
Test Publication:
Auto Motor Und Sport
Read the original test at Auto Motor Und Sport →
Test Size: 215/55 R17
Tyres Tested: 11 tyres
Test Categories:
4 categories (10 tests)
Similar Tests
Auto Motor Und Sport is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
The 2019 Auto Motor und Sport tyre test has tested eleven crossover SUV tyres in 215/55 R17. While this fitment isn't the most exciting fitment in the world, usually being found fitted to vehicles like the Vauxhall Mokka, Skoda Karoq, Seat Ateca, Hyundai Kona and Audi Q2, it is a high growth segment thanks to the huge sales of these types of cars.

The results of this test are fairly straight forward, with only one note. The Continental PremiumContact 5 tested has been replaced by the PremiumContact 6, which undoubtably would have fared better than the seventh place overall.

 

Dry

Dry braking was extremely close between the top four tyres, with the Michelin just having the edge of the group.

Dry Braking

Spread: 3.20 M (8.9%)|Avg: 37.55 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Michelin Primacy 4
    36.10 M
  2. Nokian WetProof
    36.20 M
  3. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    36.40 M
  4. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    36.40 M
  5. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
    37.30 M
  6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    37.50 M
  7. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    38.00 M
  8. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    38.00 M
  9. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    38.60 M
  10. Continental Premium Contact 5
    39.20 M
  11. Giti GitiPremium H1
    39.30 M

Dry handling was also close, with the top eight tyres averaging 1km/h difference over the handling lap.

Dry Handling

Spread: 2.10 Km/H (2%)|Avg: 103.74 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Nokian WetProof
    104.50 Km/H
  2. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    104.30 Km/H
  3. Giti GitiPremium H1
    104.30 Km/H
  4. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    104.00 Km/H
  5. Michelin Primacy 4
    104.00 Km/H
  6. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    103.90 Km/H
  7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    103.90 Km/H
  8. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    103.50 Km/H
  9. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
    103.20 Km/H
  10. Continental Premium Contact 5
    103.10 Km/H
  11. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    102.40 Km/H

Three tyres were awarded the top spot for the subjective dry handling scores.

Subj. Dry Handling

Spread: 3.00 Points (33.3%)|Avg: 7.82 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)
  1. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    9.00 Points
  2. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    9.00 Points
  3. Michelin Primacy 4
    9.00 Points
  4. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
    8.00 Points
  5. Giti GitiPremium H1
    8.00 Points
  6. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    8.00 Points
  7. Nokian WetProof
    8.00 Points
  8. Continental Premium Contact 5
    7.00 Points
  9. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    7.00 Points
  10. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    7.00 Points
  11. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    6.00 Points

Wet

Wet braking proved the Nokian WetProof's high safety qualities, winning the wet braking testing to be the best braking tyre overall.

Wet Braking

Spread: 4.30 M (12.1%)|Avg: 37.11 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian WetProof
    35.40 M
  2. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    35.50 M
  3. Continental Premium Contact 5
    35.90 M
  4. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
    36.10 M
  5. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    36.10 M
  6. Michelin Primacy 4
    36.60 M
  7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    37.30 M
  8. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    38.10 M
  9. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    38.30 M
  10. Giti GitiPremium H1
    39.20 M
  11. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    39.70 M

While the Bridgestone couldn't place better than mid-pack for wet braking, it was the fastest around the wet handling lap, with the Nokian again proving its wet weather prowess.

Wet Handling

Spread: 5.30 Km/H (6%)|Avg: 85.60 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    88.10 Km/H
  2. Nokian WetProof
    87.10 Km/H
  3. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
    87.00 Km/H
  4. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    86.20 Km/H
  5. Continental Premium Contact 5
    86.20 Km/H
  6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    85.70 Km/H
  7. Giti GitiPremium H1
    85.30 Km/H
  8. Michelin Primacy 4
    85.10 Km/H
  9. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    84.10 Km/H
  10. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    84.00 Km/H
  11. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    82.80 Km/H

The aging Continental PremiumContact 5 proved to be the best during straight aquaplaning.

Straight Aqua

Spread: 5.40 Km/H (6.7%)|Avg: 77.39 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
  1. Continental Premium Contact 5
    80.50 Km/H
  2. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
    79.70 Km/H
  3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    79.10 Km/H
  4. Giti GitiPremium H1
    78.20 Km/H
  5. Nokian WetProof
    78.10 Km/H
  6. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    77.00 Km/H
  7. Michelin Primacy 4
    76.90 Km/H
  8. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    76.10 Km/H
  9. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    75.40 Km/H
  10. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    75.20 Km/H
  11. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    75.10 Km/H

The Goodyear took the lead during subjective wet handling scores, with the Nokian and Bridgestone just a point behind.

Subj. Wet Handling

Spread: 5.00 Points (50%)|Avg: 7.55 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)
  1. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
    10.00 Points
  2. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    9.00 Points
  3. Nokian WetProof
    9.00 Points
  4. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    8.00 Points
  5. Continental Premium Contact 5
    8.00 Points
  6. Michelin Primacy 4
    8.00 Points
  7. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    7.00 Points
  8. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    7.00 Points
  9. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    6.00 Points
  10. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    6.00 Points
  11. Giti GitiPremium H1
    5.00 Points

Environment

The Michelin Primacy 4 used the least fuel on test.

Rolling Resistance

Spread: 1.70 kg / t (22.4%)|Avg: 8.37 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
  1. Michelin Primacy 4
    7.60 kg / t
  2. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    7.70 kg / t
  3. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
    7.80 kg / t
  4. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    8.10 kg / t
  5. Giti GitiPremium H1
    8.40 kg / t
  6. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    8.50 kg / t
  7. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    8.50 kg / t
  8. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    8.60 kg / t
  9. Continental Premium Contact 5
    8.80 kg / t
  10. Nokian WetProof
    8.80 kg / t
  11. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    9.30 kg / t
19,000 km
£1.45/L
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

The Nokian was the quietest tyre on test, with the Toyo having its only good placement of the test.

Noise

Spread: 3.00 dB (4.2%)|Avg: 73.10 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
  1. Nokian WetProof
    71.50 dB
  2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    71.60 dB
  3. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    72.40 dB
  4. Giti GitiPremium H1
    72.70 dB
  5. Michelin Primacy 4
    72.80 dB
  6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    72.80 dB
  7. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
    73.00 dB
  8. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    74.20 dB
  9. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    74.20 dB
  10. Continental Premium Contact 5
    74.40 dB
  11. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    74.50 dB

And lastly, the subjective comfort scoring was again very close, but this time Pirelli managed to combine good handling results and good levels of comfort better than any other tyre on test.

Subj. Comfort

Spread: 4.00 Points (40%)|Avg: 8.09 Points
Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)
  1. Pirelli CINTURATO P7
    10.00 Points
  2. Continental Premium Contact 5
    9.00 Points
  3. Giti GitiPremium H1
    9.00 Points
  4. Michelin Primacy 4
    9.00 Points
  5. Nexen N Blue HD Plus
    8.00 Points
  6. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
    8.00 Points
  7. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
    8.00 Points
  8. Bridgestone Turanza T005
    8.00 Points
  9. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
    7.00 Points
  10. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    7.00 Points
  11. Nokian WetProof
    6.00 Points

Results

1st

Nokian WetProof

215/55 R17
Nokian WetProof
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 2nd 36.2 M 36.1 M +0.1 M 99.72%
Dry Handling 1st 104.5 Km/H 100%
Subj. Dry Handling 4th 8 Points 9 Points -1 Points 88.89%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 1st 35.4 M 100%
Wet Handling 2nd 87.1 Km/H 88.1 Km/H -1 Km/H 98.86%
Subj. Wet Handling 2nd 9 Points 10 Points -1 Points 90%
Straight Aqua 5th 78.1 Km/H 80.5 Km/H -2.4 Km/H 97.02%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 11th 6 Points 10 Points -4 Points 60%
Noise 1st 71.5 dB 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 9th 8.8 kg / t 7.6 kg / t +1.2 kg / t 86.36%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
2nd

Bridgestone Turanza T005

215/55 R17
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 3rd 36.4 M 36.1 M +0.3 M 99.18%
Dry Handling 4th 104 Km/H 104.5 Km/H -0.5 Km/H 99.52%
Subj. Dry Handling 4th 8 Points 9 Points -1 Points 88.89%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 8th 38.1 M 35.4 M +2.7 M 92.91%
Wet Handling 1st 88.1 Km/H 100%
Subj. Wet Handling 2nd 9 Points 10 Points -1 Points 90%
Straight Aqua 8th 76.1 Km/H 80.5 Km/H -4.4 Km/H 94.53%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 5th 8 Points 10 Points -2 Points 80%
Noise 8th 74.2 dB 71.5 dB +2.7 dB 96.36%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 2nd 7.7 kg / t 7.6 kg / t +0.1 kg / t 98.7%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
2nd

Michelin Primacy 4

215/55 R17
Michelin Primacy 4
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 1st 36.1 M 100%
Dry Handling 4th 104 Km/H 104.5 Km/H -0.5 Km/H 99.52%
Subj. Dry Handling 1st 9 Points 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 6th 36.6 M 35.4 M +1.2 M 96.72%
Wet Handling 8th 85.1 Km/H 88.1 Km/H -3 Km/H 96.59%
Subj. Wet Handling 4th 8 Points 10 Points -2 Points 80%
Straight Aqua 7th 76.9 Km/H 80.5 Km/H -3.6 Km/H 95.53%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 2nd 9 Points 10 Points -1 Points 90%
Noise 5th 72.8 dB 71.5 dB +1.3 dB 98.21%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 1st 7.6 kg / t 100%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
4th

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

215/55 R17
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 5th 37.3 M 36.1 M +1.2 M 96.78%
Dry Handling 9th 103.2 Km/H 104.5 Km/H -1.3 Km/H 98.76%
Subj. Dry Handling 4th 8 Points 9 Points -1 Points 88.89%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 4th 36.1 M 35.4 M +0.7 M 98.06%
Wet Handling 3rd 87 Km/H 88.1 Km/H -1.1 Km/H 98.75%
Subj. Wet Handling 1st 10 Points 100%
Straight Aqua 2nd 79.7 Km/H 80.5 Km/H -0.8 Km/H 99.01%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 9th 7 Points 10 Points -3 Points 70%
Noise 7th 73 dB 71.5 dB +1.5 dB 97.95%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 3rd 7.8 kg / t 7.6 kg / t +0.2 kg / t 97.44%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
4th

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

215/55 R17
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 3rd 36.4 M 36.1 M +0.3 M 99.18%
Dry Handling 2nd 104.3 Km/H 104.5 Km/H -0.2 Km/H 99.81%
Subj. Dry Handling 1st 9 Points 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 4th 36.1 M 35.4 M +0.7 M 98.06%
Wet Handling 9th 84.1 Km/H 88.1 Km/H -4 Km/H 95.46%
Subj. Wet Handling 7th 7 Points 10 Points -3 Points 70%
Straight Aqua 11th 75.1 Km/H 80.5 Km/H -5.4 Km/H 93.29%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 5th 8 Points 10 Points -2 Points 80%
Noise 3rd 72.4 dB 71.5 dB +0.9 dB 98.76%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 6th 8.5 kg / t 7.6 kg / t +0.9 kg / t 89.41%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
4th

Pirelli CINTURATO P7

215/55 R17
Pirelli CINTURATO P7
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 7th 38 M 36.1 M +1.9 M 95%
Dry Handling 6th 103.9 Km/H 104.5 Km/H -0.6 Km/H 99.43%
Subj. Dry Handling 1st 9 Points 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 2nd 35.5 M 35.4 M +0.1 M 99.72%
Wet Handling 4th 86.2 Km/H 88.1 Km/H -1.9 Km/H 97.84%
Subj. Wet Handling 4th 8 Points 10 Points -2 Points 80%
Straight Aqua 9th 75.4 Km/H 80.5 Km/H -5.1 Km/H 93.66%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 1st 10 Points 100%
Noise 11th 74.5 dB 71.5 dB +3 dB 95.97%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 4th 8.1 kg / t 7.6 kg / t +0.5 kg / t 93.83%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
7th

Continental Premium Contact 5

215/55 R17
Continental Premium Contact 5
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 10th 39.2 M 36.1 M +3.1 M 92.09%
Dry Handling 10th 103.1 Km/H 104.5 Km/H -1.4 Km/H 98.66%
Subj. Dry Handling 8th 7 Points 9 Points -2 Points 77.78%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 3rd 35.9 M 35.4 M +0.5 M 98.61%
Wet Handling 4th 86.2 Km/H 88.1 Km/H -1.9 Km/H 97.84%
Subj. Wet Handling 4th 8 Points 10 Points -2 Points 80%
Straight Aqua 1st 80.5 Km/H 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 2nd 9 Points 10 Points -1 Points 90%
Noise 10th 74.4 dB 71.5 dB +2.9 dB 96.1%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 9th 8.8 kg / t 7.6 kg / t +1.2 kg / t 86.36%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
8th

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

215/55 R17
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 6th 37.5 M 36.1 M +1.4 M 96.27%
Dry Handling 6th 103.9 Km/H 104.5 Km/H -0.6 Km/H 99.43%
Subj. Dry Handling 8th 7 Points 9 Points -2 Points 77.78%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 7th 37.3 M 35.4 M +1.9 M 94.91%
Wet Handling 6th 85.7 Km/H 88.1 Km/H -2.4 Km/H 97.28%
Subj. Wet Handling 7th 7 Points 10 Points -3 Points 70%
Straight Aqua 3rd 79.1 Km/H 80.5 Km/H -1.4 Km/H 98.26%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 9th 7 Points 10 Points -3 Points 70%
Noise 5th 72.8 dB 71.5 dB +1.3 dB 98.21%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 11th 9.3 kg / t 7.6 kg / t +1.7 kg / t 81.72%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
9th

Giti GitiPremium H1

215/55 R17
Giti GitiPremium H1
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 11th 39.3 M 36.1 M +3.2 M 91.86%
Dry Handling 2nd 104.3 Km/H 104.5 Km/H -0.2 Km/H 99.81%
Subj. Dry Handling 4th 8 Points 9 Points -1 Points 88.89%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 10th 39.2 M 35.4 M +3.8 M 90.31%
Wet Handling 7th 85.3 Km/H 88.1 Km/H -2.8 Km/H 96.82%
Subj. Wet Handling 11th 5 Points 10 Points -5 Points 50%
Straight Aqua 4th 78.2 Km/H 80.5 Km/H -2.3 Km/H 97.14%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 2nd 9 Points 10 Points -1 Points 90%
Noise 4th 72.7 dB 71.5 dB +1.2 dB 98.35%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 5th 8.4 kg / t 7.6 kg / t +0.8 kg / t 90.48%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
10th

Nexen N Blue HD+

215/55 R17
Nexen N Blue HD Plus
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 7th 38 M 36.1 M +1.9 M 95%
Dry Handling 8th 103.5 Km/H 104.5 Km/H -1 Km/H 99.04%
Subj. Dry Handling 8th 7 Points 9 Points -2 Points 77.78%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 9th 38.3 M 35.4 M +2.9 M 92.43%
Wet Handling 10th 84 Km/H 88.1 Km/H -4.1 Km/H 95.35%
Subj. Wet Handling 9th 6 Points 10 Points -4 Points 60%
Straight Aqua 10th 75.2 Km/H 80.5 Km/H -5.3 Km/H 93.42%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 5th 8 Points 10 Points -2 Points 80%
Noise 8th 74.2 dB 71.5 dB +2.7 dB 96.36%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 8th 8.6 kg / t 7.6 kg / t +1 kg / t 88.37%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
11th

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

215/55 R17
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 9th 38.6 M 36.1 M +2.5 M 93.52%
Dry Handling 11th 102.4 Km/H 104.5 Km/H -2.1 Km/H 97.99%
Subj. Dry Handling 11th 6 Points 9 Points -3 Points 66.67%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 11th 39.7 M 35.4 M +4.3 M 89.17%
Wet Handling 11th 82.8 Km/H 88.1 Km/H -5.3 Km/H 93.98%
Subj. Wet Handling 9th 6 Points 10 Points -4 Points 60%
Straight Aqua 6th 77 Km/H 80.5 Km/H -3.5 Km/H 95.65%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Subj. Comfort 5th 8 Points 10 Points -2 Points 80%
Noise 2nd 71.6 dB 71.5 dB +0.1 dB 99.86%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 6th 8.5 kg / t 7.6 kg / t +0.9 kg / t 89.41%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

Similar Tyre Tests

Show All summer tyre tests
2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test
March 2026 255/45 R19 Hankook Ventus Evo 9 tyres
2025 Teknikens Varld Summer Tyre Test
April 2025 235/55 R19 Pirelli Scorpion 8 tyres
2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test
April 2025 255/55 R18 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 10 tyres
2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test
April 2025 225/55 R18 Pirelli Cinturato C3 7 tyres
2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test
March 2025 235/55 R19 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 7 tyres
2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test
March 2024 225/55 R17 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 10 tyres

Discussion

14 comments
  1. StuBeeDoo archived

    I have a BMW X3 with Pirelli P7s on and they just don't seem to be wearing out! I wouldn't mind if I liked them, but in the wet they don't inspire confidence. They have done over 35000 miles and still have over 3.5mm on. The date code is 4014, so they have likely been on the car for over 4 years. I'm thinking of changing them due to age, although I wouldn't normally change tyres until they get below 3mm. I'd like to see an SUV group test that includes the Avon ZX7.

    #5016
    1. TyreReviews StuBeeDoo archived

      AT 4 years old they're coming to the end of their usable life, so it's best to get them changed :)

      #5019
      1. StuBeeDoo TyreReviews archived

        Thanks for replying. There's lot of conflicting information on the 'net, which is why I posted here - I'd rather trust your judgement. A very useful resource, a credit to the internet.

        #5020
  3. Roman archived

    Can you please test Toyo Tranpath MPZ?

    #4729
  4. Lux archived

    How sub. comfort has been calculated?
    Nokian are the best for noise but the worst in sub. comfort...

    #4639
    1. TyreReviews Lux archived

      Every magazine has slightly different criteria so I'm not entirely sure how AMS came to their scoring.

      #4644
  5. dufonrafal . archived

    The Primacy 4 dfoesn't score that well in the wet. But that's with new tyres.

    Since Michelin is advertising that the Primacy 4 will keep his wet handling capabilities better that the competitors, a used tyre test would have been nice.

    #4527
    1. TyreReviews dufonrafal . archived

      There are other tests where it does score well in wet handling, it's all very close at the top at the moment!

      #4529
  6. Dan archived

    Could you possibly do a video/an article about various parameters of the tyre? How it can influence the end-result? (as I take the response here would be just too long - well I would hope for a long one ;))

    - how load / speed index influences the construction of the tyre, and if having way higher than needed might improve/lower comfort/handling etc
    - how tyre presure can influence the behavior on dry/wet/breaking and how balance of the car can be impacted/improved by having rear/front differ in pressure

    Also is there any way of actually know the thread width of individual tyres? I've only seen one web page having this listed - www.tirerack.com, but those are US market tyres, so will differ to what we have in europe...
    Theory here being that some say, 235 width tyres will have contact patch (thread width) wider than other manufacturer, but even than different height one (ie 235/45 might be different to 235/35) - which in the end will not reflect various bits of the tests.. (like breaking distances, aquaplaning resistance etc.)

    #4525
  7. MG archived

    Still waiting for some 225-40-R18 or similar tests for a FWD car. Need new rubber in less than 6 months. I kinda look more to Continental because they're usually strong in wet grip/traction without sacrificing dry performance. But I'm still not sure for the Premium Contact 6 (some test "complain" about wet grip) . I have bad experience with Michelin after 3 years, where wet grip/traction get a major hit (currently running 4 year old PS3, and wheel spin in wet and understeer, is ridiculous in a Ceed GT 1.6 Turbo). On my previous car originally with Michelin Energy (205-55R16)and wet grip... well, butter would provide more grip. Swapped for Continental PremiumContact 5 at the time, and the difference was night and day.
    So the contenders for the requirements, Continental PremiumContact 6, Michelin PS4, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersport if available in 18... it's a tough one.

    #4522
    1. TyreReviews MG archived

      The wet grip of the PC6 is up there with PS4 and Asym 5. They're all amazing tyres.

      #4523
      1. MG TyreReviews archived

        For example the Auto Bild 2019 Summer tire test puts the PremiumContact 6 in 5 place overall. It gets a 7 place for wet braking and 10 place for wet handling. Even the Falkens FK510 and the Hankook S1 evo3 get better results.
        The previous Continental (premiumcontact 5 or sportcontact5) tires were always at the top in the wet compared to the rivals at the time.
        The only tire that gets consistent results between tests is the Michelin PS4. So it might be a safer bet.
        Sorry for all the doubts, but replacing 4 tires is expensive, and i want to make sure it's a proper fit for the car so i can enjoy it the best.
        Thanks for the help. Can't wait for the next video.

        #4530