Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Comfort | Value | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Handling Km/H | Subj. Dry Handling Points | % | Braking M | Handling Km/H | Subj. Wet Handling Points | Straight Aqua Km/H | % | Subj. Comfort Points | Noise dB | % | Rolling Resistance kg / t | % | |||
| 1 ▲3 | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance | 97.4% | 37.3 | 103.2 | 8 | 97% | 36.1 | 87 3 | 10 ★ | 79.7 2 | 98.7% | 7 | 73 | 84% | 7.8 3 | 97.4% |
| 2 | Michelin Primacy 4 | 97.1% | 36.1 ★ | 104 | 9 ★ | 99.8% | 36.6 | 85.1 | 8 | 76.9 | 94.7% | 9 2 | 72.8 | 94.1% | 7.6 ★ | 100% |
| 3 ▼1 | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 96.6% | 36.4 3 | 104 | 8 | 98.4% | 38.1 | 88.1 ★ | 9 2 | 76.1 | 95.4% | 8 | 74.2 | 88.2% | 7.7 2 | 98.7% |
| 4 | Pirelli CINTURATO P7 | 96.5% | 38 | 103.9 | 9 ★ | 97.5% | 35.5 2 | 86.2 | 8 | 75.4 | 95.9% | 10 ★ | 74.5 | 98% | 8.1 | 93.8% |
| 5 ▼4 | Nokian WetProof | 96.4% | 36.2 2 | 104.5 ★ | 8 | 98.9% | 35.4 ★ | 87.1 2 | 9 2 | 78.1 | 98% | 6 | 71.5 ★ | 80% | 8.8 | 86.4% |
| 6 ▼2 | Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 | 95% | 36.4 3 | 104.3 2 | 9 ★ | 99.5% | 36.1 | 84.1 | 7 | 75.1 | 93.3% | 8 | 72.4 3 | 89.4% | 8.5 | 89.4% |
| 7 | Continental Premium Contact 5 | 94.5% | 39.2 | 103.1 | 7 | 93.8% | 35.9 3 | 86.2 | 8 | 80.5 ★ | 96.5% | 9 2 | 74.4 | 93.1% | 8.8 | 86.4% |
| 8 | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | 92.9% | 37.5 | 103.9 | 7 | 96% | 37.3 | 85.7 | 7 | 79.1 3 | 93.6% | 7 | 72.8 | 84.1% | 9.3 | 81.7% |
| 9 | Giti GitiPremium H1 | 91.9% | 39.3 | 104.3 2 | 8 | 95.2% | 39.2 | 85.3 | 5 | 78.2 | 89.4% | 9 2 | 72.7 | 94.2% | 8.4 | 90.5% |
| 10 | Nexen N Blue HD Plus | 91.8% | 38 | 103.5 | 7 | 95.3% | 38.3 | 84 | 6 | 75.2 | 90.1% | 8 | 74.2 | 88.2% | 8.6 | 88.4% |
| 11 | Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV | 90.5% | 38.6 | 102.4 | 6 | 93.1% | 39.7 | 82.8 | 6 | 77 | 88.8% | 8 | 71.6 2 | 89.9% | 8.5 | 89.4% |
Scroll for more
Dry
97%
Wet
99%
Comfort
84%
Value
97%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.3 M
Dry Handling
103.2 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
8 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
36.1 M
Wet Handling
87 Km/H
3
Subj. Wet Handling
10 Points
★
Straight Aqua
79.7 Km/H
2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
7 Points
Noise
73 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
7.8 kg / t
3
Dry
100%
Wet
95%
Comfort
94%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.1 M
★
Dry Handling
104 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
9 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
36.6 M
Wet Handling
85.1 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
8 Points
Straight Aqua
76.9 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
9 Points
2
Noise
72.8 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
7.6 kg / t
★
Dry
98%
Wet
95%
Comfort
88%
Value
99%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.4 M
3
Dry Handling
104 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
8 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
38.1 M
Wet Handling
88.1 Km/H
★
Subj. Wet Handling
9 Points
2
Straight Aqua
76.1 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
8 Points
Noise
74.2 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
7.7 kg / t
2
Dry
98%
Wet
96%
Comfort
98%
Value
94%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38 M
Dry Handling
103.9 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
9 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
35.5 M
2
Wet Handling
86.2 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
8 Points
Straight Aqua
75.4 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
10 Points
★
Noise
74.5 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
8.1 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
98%
Comfort
80%
Value
86%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.2 M
2
Dry Handling
104.5 Km/H
★
Subj. Dry Handling
8 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
35.4 M
★
Wet Handling
87.1 Km/H
2
Subj. Wet Handling
9 Points
2
Straight Aqua
78.1 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
6 Points
Noise
71.5 dB
★
Value
Rolling Resistance
8.8 kg / t
Dry
100%
Wet
93%
Comfort
89%
Value
89%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.4 M
3
Dry Handling
104.3 Km/H
2
Subj. Dry Handling
9 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
36.1 M
Wet Handling
84.1 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
7 Points
Straight Aqua
75.1 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
8 Points
Noise
72.4 dB
3
Value
Rolling Resistance
8.5 kg / t
Dry
94%
Wet
97%
Comfort
93%
Value
86%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.2 M
Dry Handling
103.1 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
7 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
35.9 M
3
Wet Handling
86.2 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
8 Points
Straight Aqua
80.5 Km/H
★
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
9 Points
2
Noise
74.4 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
8.8 kg / t
Dry
96%
Wet
94%
Comfort
84%
Value
82%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.5 M
Dry Handling
103.9 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
7 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
37.3 M
Wet Handling
85.7 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
7 Points
Straight Aqua
79.1 Km/H
3
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
7 Points
Noise
72.8 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
9.3 kg / t
Dry
95%
Wet
89%
Comfort
94%
Value
91%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.3 M
Dry Handling
104.3 Km/H
2
Subj. Dry Handling
8 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
39.2 M
Wet Handling
85.3 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
5 Points
Straight Aqua
78.2 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
9 Points
2
Noise
72.7 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
8.4 kg / t
Dry
95%
Wet
90%
Comfort
88%
Value
88%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38 M
Dry Handling
103.5 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
7 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
38.3 M
Wet Handling
84 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
6 Points
Straight Aqua
75.2 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
8 Points
Noise
74.2 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
8.6 kg / t
Dry
93%
Wet
89%
Comfort
90%
Value
89%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.6 M
Dry Handling
102.4 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
6 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
39.7 M
Wet Handling
82.8 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
6 Points
Straight Aqua
77 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
8 Points
Noise
71.6 dB
2
Value
Rolling Resistance
8.5 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
I have a BMW X3 with Pirelli P7s on and they just don't seem to be wearing out! I wouldn't mind if I liked them, but in the wet they don't inspire confidence. They have done over 35000 miles and still have over 3.5mm on. The date code is 4014, so they have likely been on the car for over 4 years. I'm thinking of changing them due to age, although I wouldn't normally change tyres until they get below 3mm. I'd like to see an SUV group test that includes the Avon ZX7.
AT 4 years old they're coming to the end of their usable life, so it's best to get them changed :)
Thanks for replying. There's lot of conflicting information on the 'net, which is why I posted here - I'd rather trust your judgement. A very useful resource, a credit to the internet.
https://www.falkentyre.com/...
Can you please test Toyo Tranpath MPZ?
How sub. comfort has been calculated?
Nokian are the best for noise but the worst in sub. comfort...
Every magazine has slightly different criteria so I'm not entirely sure how AMS came to their scoring.
The Primacy 4 dfoesn't score that well in the wet. But that's with new tyres.
Since Michelin is advertising that the Primacy 4 will keep his wet handling capabilities better that the competitors, a used tyre test would have been nice.
There are other tests where it does score well in wet handling, it's all very close at the top at the moment!
Could you possibly do a video/an article about various parameters of the tyre? How it can influence the end-result? (as I take the response here would be just too long - well I would hope for a long one ;))
- how load / speed index influences the construction of the tyre, and if having way higher than needed might improve/lower comfort/handling etc
- how tyre presure can influence the behavior on dry/wet/breaking and how balance of the car can be impacted/improved by having rear/front differ in pressure
Also is there any way of actually know the thread width of individual tyres? I've only seen one web page having this listed - www.tirerack.com, but those are US market tyres, so will differ to what we have in europe...
Theory here being that some say, 235 width tyres will have contact patch (thread width) wider than other manufacturer, but even than different height one (ie 235/45 might be different to 235/35) - which in the end will not reflect various bits of the tests.. (like breaking distances, aquaplaning resistance etc.)
Still waiting for some 225-40-R18 or similar tests for a FWD car. Need new rubber in less than 6 months. I kinda look more to Continental because they're usually strong in wet grip/traction without sacrificing dry performance. But I'm still not sure for the Premium Contact 6 (some test "complain" about wet grip) . I have bad experience with Michelin after 3 years, where wet grip/traction get a major hit (currently running 4 year old PS3, and wheel spin in wet and understeer, is ridiculous in a Ceed GT 1.6 Turbo). On my previous car originally with Michelin Energy (205-55R16)and wet grip... well, butter would provide more grip. Swapped for Continental PremiumContact 5 at the time, and the difference was night and day.
So the contenders for the requirements, Continental PremiumContact 6, Michelin PS4, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersport if available in 18... it's a tough one.
The wet grip of the PC6 is up there with PS4 and Asym 5. They're all amazing tyres.
For example the Auto Bild 2019 Summer tire test puts the PremiumContact 6 in 5 place overall. It gets a 7 place for wet braking and 10 place for wet handling. Even the Falkens FK510 and the Hankook S1 evo3 get better results.
The previous Continental (premiumcontact 5 or sportcontact5) tires were always at the top in the wet compared to the rivals at the time.
The only tire that gets consistent results between tests is the Michelin PS4. So it might be a safer bet.
Sorry for all the doubts, but replacing 4 tires is expensive, and i want to make sure it's a proper fit for the car so i can enjoy it the best.
Thanks for the help. Can't wait for the next video.
Also:
https://www.tyrereviews.co....
https://www.tyrereviews.co....