Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Recent 2025 tests sharpen the contrast. Potenza Sport repeatedly set the standard for braking and lap time in both wet and dry, even winning large multi-tyre shootouts. Meanwhile, the Asymmetric 6 claimed multiple overall wins by blending competitive grip with class-leading rolling resistance, lower noise, and standout mileage, often delivering the best long-term value.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been fifteen tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport | six | |
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | nine |
While it might look like the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is better than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Best-in-class wet and dry braking/lap performance across many tests
- Precise, sporty steering with high grip and confidence at the limit
- Strong wet handling consistency and feedback
- Improving wear in 2025 tests versus historic results
- Lowest rolling resistance with excellent fuel/energy efficiency
- Class-leading wear and value (cost per 1,000 km)
- Low noise and better ride comfort
- Very good aquaplaning resistance and balanced handling
Dry Braking
Looking at data from thirteen tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during nine dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 0.56% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during four dry handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 0.53% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during four dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 0.19% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 7.49% more points than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Fun
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one subj. fun tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport scored 10.53% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Fun: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Subj. Fun winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from thirteen tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during nine wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 0.98% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Cool
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 0.32% less distance than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 3.35% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during four wet handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 1.86% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during five wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 0.75% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 3.67% more points than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had 3.29% higher lateral wet grip than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from twelve tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during eight straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 floated at a 0.41% higher speed than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from ten tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 slipped out at a 2.27% higher speed than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Gravel Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one gravel handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 1.47% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Gravel Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Gravel Handling winner was calculated >>
Gravel Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one gravel traction tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had 0.63% better traction on gravel than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Gravel Traction: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Gravel Traction winner was calculated >>
Sand Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one sand traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had 4.68% better traction in sand than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Sand Traction: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Sand Traction winner was calculated >>
Grass Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one grass traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had 8.19% better traction on grass than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Grass Traction: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Grass Traction winner was calculated >>
Mud Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one mud traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had 9.16% better traction in mud than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Mud Traction: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Mud Traction winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four subj. comfort tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 6.11% more points than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport scored 4.55% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Noise: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from ten tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during ten noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 3.23% quieter than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one noise tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport measured 0.28% quieter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Noise: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during five wear tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is predicted to cover 20.35% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Wear: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 30.71% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four price tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 cost 3.13% less than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Price: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from eleven tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during eleven rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had a 14.27% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 used 3.45% less fuel than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 wore 18.18% less per 1000km driven than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Abrasion: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Driver Reviews
Drivers largely describe the Bridgestone Potenza Sport as a very high-grip UHP tyre with standout wet traction, strong dry grip, and sharp, precise steering that makes cars feel more direct and confidence-inspiring. Braking performance and stability at speed are frequently praised, and many consider it strong value versus Michelin/Continental rivals. The most common downsides are high road noise, a firm/harsh ride, and faster-than-expected tread wear (especially with aggressive driving or track use). A recurring theme is temperature sensitivity: performance can drop noticeably when the tyre is cold or in near-freezing conditions until it warms up.
Based on 126 reviews with an average rating of 80%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Driver Reviews
Across reviews, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is most often described as an exceptionally confident UHP tyre with very strong dry and especially wet grip, high braking performance, and predictable/progressive handling near the limit. Many drivers also report a noticeably more comfortable ride and lower noise than the tyres they replaced, making it feel unusually "daily-friendly" for this category. The most repeated downsides are quicker-than-expected wear for some users and pronounced rumble/roar on rough asphalt, with a smaller but recurring theme of softer sidewalls or slightly duller turn-in compared with sharper rivals.
Based on 183 reviews with an average rating of 86%
I have now had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's, Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersports, Michelin PS4 and even some Avon's (for a brief period) on my current car - a Golf GTI Clubsport 40.
I mix up my driving a lot - lots of motorway driving but also lots of hard street driving and B road blasts, I find it massively important to have the best tyres possible to allow me to push my car as hard as I can in a safe manner.
I was massively impressed with the Asymmetric 5's, the sheer grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is the consummate all-rounder and value leader. It wins on comfort, noise, rolling resistance, aquaplaning resistance, and wear by meaningful margins, while keeping braking and handling close enough to challenge for overall victories-often at a lower total cost per 1,000 km. For daily performance driving, mixed weather, and long-term ownership costs, the Goodyear is the safer bet. For maximum road-going pace and feel, the Bridgestone remains the more exciting choice.
Key Differences
- Bridgestone consistently stops shorter in wet and dry; Goodyear is usually close but not best-in-test for braking
- Goodyear dominates rolling resistance; Bridgestone is frequently last or near-last for efficiency
- Goodyear delivers markedly longer mileage and lower cost-per-1,000 km
- Bridgestone provides sharper steering feel and faster laps; Goodyear favors balance and composure
- Aquaplaning resistance generally favors Goodyear (straight/curved) while Bridgestone excels in wet handling laps
- Cabin refinement trends quieter for Goodyear; Bridgestone is often louder and firmer
Overall Winner: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.
Discussion
- No comments yet — be the first.