Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
The results are also unusually clear on outcomes, not just individual metrics. In big group tests the Goodyear repeatedly finishes near the top (e.g., 2/20 in the 2026 Auto Bild test; 1/21 in Auto Bild 2025 and 2023), while the Yokohama tends to sit mid-to-lower pack (e.g., 13/20 in 2026 Auto Bild; 19/21 in Auto Bild 2025; 15/21 in Auto Bild 2023). The data suggests the V107 can feel very sporty and can be strong on a warm, dry road-yet it gives back too much in wet performance and ownership costs to win overall comparisons consistently.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been nine tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | nine |
While it might look like the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is better than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Consistently stronger wet braking and wet handling; often a multi-metre advantage in wet stops (e.g., 42.9 m vs 47.9 m in Auto Bild 2026)
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance in a straight line across tests (e.g., 94.7 vs 93.0 km/h in Auto Bild 2026; 79.4 vs 75.9 km/h in ADAC 2025)
- Outstanding longevity and low wear/abrasion; routinely 40-90% more projected mileage in Auto Bild/ADAC datasets
- Lower rolling resistance and better overall running costs/value per 1,000 km; regularly ~15-20% lower RR and better €/1,000 km
- Very strong dry braking performance across the shared tests; wins dry braking in the majority of comparisons (6 vs 3)
- Sporty, responsive dry dynamics with strong subjective “fun”/feedback reported in performance testing
- Can be fractionally quicker in certain dry handling measures (small margins)
- Often slightly cheaper purchase price than the Goodyear in the datasets where price is reported
Dry Braking
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 0.44% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Dry Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 0.28% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.5% faster around a lap than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 6.76% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Fun
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one subj. fun tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 scored 15% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Fun: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Subj. Fun winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 5.92% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Cool
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 2.79% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 5.04% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.78% faster around a wet lap than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.51% faster around a wet lap than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two subj. wet handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 9.91% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.64% faster around a wet circle than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 floated at a 2.63% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 slipped out at a 4.8% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three subj. comfort tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 10.22% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 scored 4.55% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Noise: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 2.68% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 0.69% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during five wear tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is predicted to cover 34.03% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wear: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during five value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 28.16% better value based on price/1000km than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two price tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 cost 2.4% less than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Price: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during five rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had a 16.73% lower rolling resistance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 used 1.75% less fuel than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 lost 18.9% less particle wear matter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Abrasion: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Driver Reviews
Across reviews, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is most often described as an exceptionally confident UHP tyre with very strong dry and especially wet grip, high braking performance, and predictable/progressive handling near the limit. Many drivers also report a noticeably more comfortable ride and lower noise than the tyres they replaced, making it feel unusually "daily-friendly" for this category. The most repeated downsides are quicker-than-expected wear for some users and pronounced rumble/roar on rough asphalt, with a smaller but recurring theme of softer sidewalls or slightly duller turn-in compared with sharper rivals.
Based on 183 reviews with an average rating of 86%
Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Driver Reviews
Drivers generally describe the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 as a very sporty max-performance summer tyre with strong dry grip, sharp steering, and confident handling/feedback that can hold up surprisingly well for occasional track use. Many also report good wet traction, though several note reduced confidence in colder conditions and some aquaplaning as the tyre wears. The most consistent drawbacks are short tread life for a “premium” tyre and higher road noise/roar on coarse pavement, especially at highway speeds.
Based on 20 reviews with an average rating of 73%
I have now had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's, Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersports, Michelin PS4 and even some Avon's (for a brief period) on my current car - a Golf GTI Clubsport 40.
I mix up my driving a lot - lots of motorway driving but also lots of hard street driving and B road blasts, I find it massively important to have the best tyres possible to allow me to push my car as hard as I can in a safe manner.
I was massively impressed with the Asymmetric 5's, the sheer grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Yokohama Advan Sport V107's case is narrower but real: it is very often excellent in dry braking and can be slightly quicker/keener in dry handling feel, with some tests highlighting higher “fun” and sharper feedback at the limit. It also can be a touch cheaper to buy (it wins the “price” metric in multiple tests). The problem is that its weak spot aligns with real-world risk and cost: wet stopping/traction gaps can be meaningful, and its rolling resistance is repeatedly among the worst in the field-penalising fuel/energy use and total cost per kilometre.
Practical takeaway: if you want one tyre that works brilliantly in mixed summer weather, racks up miles, stays quiet and keeps consumption down, the Goodyear is the smarter, safer buy. The Yokohama makes most sense for drivers prioritising a more lively, track-day-friendly feel and strong dry braking-provided they accept higher running costs and less wet security.
Key Differences
- Overall test outcomes strongly favour Goodyear: for example 2/20 vs 13/20 (Auto Bild 2026) and 1/21 vs 19/21 (Auto Bild 2025), indicating better all-round scoring beyond single dry metrics.
- Dry bias vs wet bias: Yokohama more often leads dry braking (e.g., 34.1 m vs 34.5 m in Auto Bild 2026; 34.0 m vs 35.6 m in Auto Express 2025), while Goodyear more often leads wet braking (e.g., 27.5 m vs 30.6 m in 2026 braking test; 44.2 m vs 49.6 m in Auto Bild 2025).
- Aquaplaning and wet stability: Goodyear repeatedly posts higher straight aquaplaning speeds (often +2-5 km/h), translating to more stability in heavy rain and standing water.
- Efficiency: Yokohama repeatedly shows much higher rolling resistance (e.g., 10.1 vs 8.33 kg/t in Auto Bild 2026; 10.62 vs 8.97 in Auto Bild 2025), which increases fuel/energy use.
- Longevity: Goodyear's projected mileage is consistently far higher (e.g., 63,200 vs 33,600 km in Auto Bild 2023; 50,800 vs 34,300 km in ADAC 2025), making a major difference in total cost of ownership.
- Comfort/noise: Goodyear more often measures quieter with better comfort scores (e.g., 70.8 vs 73.1 dB in Auto Bild 2026; 71.3 vs 74.8 dB in Auto Bild 2025), while Yokohama is more likely to feel firmer/rougher over sharp impacts per test notes.
Overall Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.
Discussion
- No comments yet — be the first.