Auto Bild's 2025 All Season Camper Van Tyre Test evaluated 9 all-season tyres in size 245/45 R18, alongside reference summer and winter tyres. The test revealed significant performance differences across the all-season field, with gaps of up to 9.7 meters in wet braking and 12.4 km/h in aquaplaning resistance. While the best all-season tyres approached or exceeded the reference tyres in certain conditions, the results highlight the importance of choosing quality products within the all-season category.
Test Publication:
Auto Bild
245/45 R18
11 tyres
5 categories
Test Size:
245/45 R18
Tyres Tested:
11 tyres
Auto Bild is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
Dry
In dry braking, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 led the all-season field with a stopping distance of 39.2 meters from 100 km/h. The worst performer, Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03, required 45.3 meters - a 6.1 meter difference. The reference summer tyre stopped in 36.6 meters, significantly outperforming all all-season tyres, while the reference winter tyre needed 45.8 meters.
- Reference Summer
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
- Reference Winter
Dry handling showed the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 achieving the highest average speed among all-season tyres at 82.7 km/h, followed by Continental at 82.5 km/h. The Triangle SeasonX TA01 was slowest at 78.9 km/h. The reference summer tyre achieved 83.2 km/h, outperforming all all-season tyres, while the reference winter tyre managed 79.4 km/h.
- Reference Summer
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Reference Winter
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
Wet
Wet braking performance varied dramatically among the all-season tyres. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped in 47.6 meters, while the Rotalla required 55.0 meters - a 7.4-meter difference. The reference summer tyre achieved an impressive 43.7 meters, significantly outperforming all all-season tyres, while the reference winter tyre needed 53.4 meters.
- Reference Summer
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Reference Winter
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 achieved the highest wet handling average speed among all-season tyres at 68.4 km/h, with Rotalla posting the lowest at 66.3 km/h. The reference summer tyre achieved 69.1 km/h, outperforming all all-season tyres, while the reference winter tyre managed 67.2 km/h.
- Reference Summer
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Reference Winter
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
Straight-line aquaplaning resistance showed both Bridgestone and Pirelli achieving float speeds of 100.4 km/h, while Rotalla managed only 86.6 km/h - a 13.8 km/h difference. The reference summer tyre achieved 100.0 km/h and the reference winter tyre 93.1 km/h.
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Reference Summer
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Reference Winter
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
Curved aquaplaning performance varied significantly. The Pirelli achieved 2.85 m/s² of lateral acceleration, while Vredestein managed 2.34 m/s² - a 0.51 m/s² difference. The reference summer tyre achieved 2.97 m/s², outperforming all all-season tyres, while the reference winter tyre managed 2.35 m/s².
- Reference Summer
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Reference Winter
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
Snow
Snow braking demonstrated the winter capabilities of all-season tyres. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped in 29.8 meters from 50 km/h, while Vredestein needed the longest distance at 31.9 meters among all-season tyres. The reference winter tyre achieved 29.9 meters (very close to the best all-season tyre), and the reference summer tyre needed 66.9 meters - more than double any all-season tyre.
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Reference Winter
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Reference Summer
Snow traction testing showed Pirelli achieving 5894 N of pulling force, with Triangle recording the lowest at 5148 N among all-season tyres. The reference winter tyre managed 5750 N, while the reference summer tyre achieved only 1697 N.
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Reference Winter
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
- Reference Summer
Snow handling results placed Michelin at the top among all-season tyres with an average speed of 57.2 km/h, while Rotalla was slowest at 54.8 km/h. The reference winter tyre achieved 57.8 km/h, slightly outperforming the best all-season tyre. The reference summer tyre was not listed, indicating insufficient performance to complete the test safely.
- Reference Winter
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
The snow slalom test saw Michelin leading at 3.81 m/s² lateral acceleration, with Triangle lowest at 3.33 m/s². The reference winter tyre achieved 3.77 m/s², slightly outperforming the best all-season tyre, while the reference summer tyre managed only 1.62 m/s².
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Reference Winter
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
- Reference Summer
Comfort
Rolling noise measurements ranged from 72.1 dB for Triangle to 74.6 dB for Bridgestone - a 2.5 dB difference among all-season tyres. The reference summer tyre measured 72.1 dB (tied for quietest overall) and the reference winter tyre 73.1 dB.
- Reference Summer
- Triangle SeasonX TA01
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Reference Winter
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Value
Rolling resistance showed Continental, Goodyear, and Michelin all achieving the best result of 7.3 kg/t, while Hankook recorded the highest at 8.7 kg/t among all-season tyres. The reference summer tyre measured 8.3 kg/t and the reference winter tyre 8.6 kg/t
Results
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 emerges as the overall test winner with an "exemplary" rating. This tyre demonstrates exceptional balance across all driving conditions, performing as the best candidate on wet surfaces while matching the top competitors on dry pavement. The Pirelli offers excellent safety reserves for both handling and braking across all road conditions, making it a standout performer. However, it comes with a high price point and shows slightly weaker performance on snow compared to the equally exemplary Michelin.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
39.2 M |
36.6 M |
+2.6 M |
93.37% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
81.5 Km/H |
83.2 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
97.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
48.1 M |
43.7 M |
+4.4 M |
90.85% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
68.1 Km/H |
69.1 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.55% |
| Wet Circle |
2nd |
13.3 s |
12.9 s |
+0.4 s |
96.99% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
100.4 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
2nd |
2.85 m/sec2 |
2.97 m/sec2 |
-0.12 m/sec2 |
95.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
30.1 M |
29.8 M |
+0.3 M |
99% |
| Snow Traction |
1st |
5894 N |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Handling |
4th |
56.6 Km/H |
57.8 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
97.92% |
| Snow Slalom |
3rd |
3.75 m/sec2 |
3.81 m/sec2 |
-0.06 m/sec2 |
98.43% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
10th |
73.8 dB |
72.1 dB |
+1.7 dB |
97.7% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
8.3 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1 kg / t |
87.95% |
Michelin CrossClimate 2 achieves an "exemplary" rating and excels particularly in winter conditions, actually outperforming the reference winter tyre in snow testing three times. This tyre impresses with its balanced performance characteristics, low rolling resistance, and corresponding fuel-saving potential. The Michelin represents remarkable progress in all-season tyre development. Its main weakness lies in slightly inferior aquaplaning behavior compared to other top performers.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
39.6 M |
36.6 M |
+3 M |
92.42% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
80.2 Km/H |
83.2 Km/H |
-3 Km/H |
96.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
49.3 M |
43.7 M |
+5.6 M |
88.64% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
67.7 Km/H |
69.1 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
97.97% |
| Wet Circle |
4th |
13.6 s |
12.9 s |
+0.7 s |
94.85% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
90 Km/H |
100.4 Km/H |
-10.4 Km/H |
89.64% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
5th |
2.66 m/sec2 |
2.97 m/sec2 |
-0.31 m/sec2 |
89.56% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
29.8 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Traction |
2nd |
5825 N |
5894 N |
-69 N |
98.83% |
| Snow Handling |
2nd |
57.2 Km/H |
57.8 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
98.96% |
| Snow Slalom |
1st |
3.81 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
9th |
73.5 dB |
72.1 dB |
+1.4 dB |
98.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
7.3 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 earns a "good" rating and offers the best ride comfort among all candidates tested. It delivers top-level performance on both wet and dry surfaces with good aquaplaning safety reserves and short braking distances on dry pavement. As the most affordable option among the "exemplary" or "good" rated tyres, it provides excellent value. However, it shows slightly weaker performance in snow conditions compared to the test winners.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
40 M |
36.6 M |
+3.4 M |
91.5% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
81.8 Km/H |
83.2 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
47.6 M |
43.7 M |
+3.9 M |
91.81% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
67.5 Km/H |
69.1 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
97.68% |
| Wet Circle |
3rd |
13.4 s |
12.9 s |
+0.5 s |
96.27% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
100.4 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
4th |
2.7 m/sec2 |
2.97 m/sec2 |
-0.27 m/sec2 |
90.91% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
7th |
30.3 M |
29.8 M |
+0.5 M |
98.35% |
| Snow Traction |
7th |
5607 N |
5894 N |
-287 N |
95.13% |
| Snow Handling |
6th |
56 Km/H |
57.8 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
96.89% |
| Snow Slalom |
7th |
3.64 m/sec2 |
3.81 m/sec2 |
-0.17 m/sec2 |
95.54% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
11th |
74.6 dB |
72.1 dB |
+2.5 dB |
96.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
7.6 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+0.3 kg / t |
96.05% |
Continental All Season Contact 2 receives a "good" rating and provides strong safety reserves on dry surfaces with direct steering response. The tyre features low rolling resistance that contributes to high fuel-saving potential and operates with quiet rolling noise. Despite these strengths, it commands the highest price among all test candidates and shows minor weaknesses in curve aquaplaning performance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
41.6 M |
36.6 M |
+5 M |
87.98% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
82.5 Km/H |
83.2 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
99.16% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
48.1 M |
43.7 M |
+4.4 M |
90.85% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
68.4 Km/H |
69.1 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
98.99% |
| Wet Circle |
4th |
13.6 s |
12.9 s |
+0.7 s |
94.85% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
98.3 Km/H |
100.4 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
97.91% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
6th |
2.59 m/sec2 |
2.97 m/sec2 |
-0.38 m/sec2 |
87.21% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
6th |
30.2 M |
29.8 M |
+0.4 M |
98.68% |
| Snow Traction |
6th |
5644 N |
5894 N |
-250 N |
95.76% |
| Snow Handling |
3rd |
56.9 Km/H |
57.8 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
98.44% |
| Snow Slalom |
4th |
3.73 m/sec2 |
3.81 m/sec2 |
-0.08 m/sec2 |
97.9% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
73.4 dB |
72.1 dB |
+1.3 dB |
98.23% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
7.3 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen-3 achieves a "good" rating as a well-balanced tyre across all disciplines. Its low rolling resistance contributes to high fuel-saving potential, and it delivers short braking distances on snow-covered surfaces. The tyre offers consistent performance across various conditions. However, it exhibits minor weaknesses in aquaplaning resistance and shows slightly reduced performance in wet and dry braking compared to the top performers.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
43.6 M |
36.6 M |
+7 M |
83.94% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
80.4 Km/H |
83.2 Km/H |
-2.8 Km/H |
96.63% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
51.6 M |
43.7 M |
+7.9 M |
84.69% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
67.8 Km/H |
69.1 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.12% |
| Wet Circle |
6th |
13.7 s |
12.9 s |
+0.8 s |
94.16% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
88.6 Km/H |
100.4 Km/H |
-11.8 Km/H |
88.25% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
3rd |
2.75 m/sec2 |
2.97 m/sec2 |
-0.22 m/sec2 |
92.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
3rd |
30 M |
29.8 M |
+0.2 M |
99.33% |
| Snow Traction |
4th |
5675 N |
5894 N |
-219 N |
96.28% |
| Snow Handling |
7th |
55.8 Km/H |
57.8 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
96.54% |
| Snow Slalom |
6th |
3.66 m/sec2 |
3.81 m/sec2 |
-0.15 m/sec2 |
96.06% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
72.9 dB |
72.1 dB |
+0.8 dB |
98.9% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
7.3 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Hankook Kinergy 4S² earns a "good" rating and nearly matches summer tyre performance levels in dry handling. It demonstrates good winter characteristics and provides short braking distances on snow-covered surfaces. The tyre offers solid performance across different weather conditions. Its main drawbacks include minor weaknesses in curve aquaplaning and somewhat reduced overall wet performance compared to the test leaders.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
42.2 M |
36.6 M |
+5.6 M |
86.73% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
82.7 Km/H |
83.2 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
99.4% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
50 M |
43.7 M |
+6.3 M |
87.4% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
67.3 Km/H |
69.1 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
97.4% |
| Wet Circle |
7th |
13.8 s |
12.9 s |
+0.9 s |
93.48% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
88 Km/H |
100.4 Km/H |
-12.4 Km/H |
87.65% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
9th |
2.37 m/sec2 |
2.97 m/sec2 |
-0.6 m/sec2 |
79.8% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
30.1 M |
29.8 M |
+0.3 M |
99% |
| Snow Traction |
5th |
5659 N |
5894 N |
-235 N |
96.01% |
| Snow Handling |
5th |
56.2 Km/H |
57.8 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
97.23% |
| Snow Slalom |
5th |
3.72 m/sec2 |
3.81 m/sec2 |
-0.09 m/sec2 |
97.64% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
73.4 dB |
72.1 dB |
+1.3 dB |
98.23% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
11th |
8.7 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1.4 kg / t |
83.91% |
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ receives a "satisfactory" rating as the most affordable brand-name tyre in the test. It delivers balanced performance on wet and dry surfaces, making it a reasonable budget option among established brands. However, the tyre shows minor weaknesses in curve aquaplaning and provides only moderate performance levels on snow-covered surfaces.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
42.2 M |
36.6 M |
+5.6 M |
86.73% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
81.4 Km/H |
83.2 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
97.84% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
50.1 M |
43.7 M |
+6.4 M |
87.23% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
67.6 Km/H |
69.1 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
97.83% |
| Wet Circle |
7th |
13.8 s |
12.9 s |
+0.9 s |
93.48% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
98.3 Km/H |
100.4 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
97.91% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
11th |
2.34 m/sec2 |
2.97 m/sec2 |
-0.63 m/sec2 |
78.79% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
10th |
31.9 M |
29.8 M |
+2.1 M |
93.42% |
| Snow Traction |
9th |
5158 N |
5894 N |
-736 N |
87.51% |
| Snow Handling |
9th |
55.1 Km/H |
57.8 Km/H |
-2.7 Km/H |
95.33% |
| Snow Slalom |
9th |
3.39 m/sec2 |
3.81 m/sec2 |
-0.42 m/sec2 |
88.98% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
73.1 dB |
72.1 dB |
+1 dB |
98.63% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.5 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1.2 kg / t |
85.88% |
Triangle SeasonX TA01 achieves a "satisfactory" rating despite its low price point. The tyre offers only satisfactory performance on snow and dry surfaces but impresses with low pass-by noise levels. However, it suffers from limited grip levels on wet surfaces and shows weaknesses in snow traction and dry handling, making it suitable only for budget-conscious buyers with limited performance requirements.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
41.8 M |
36.6 M |
+5.2 M |
87.56% |
| Dry Handling |
11th |
78.9 Km/H |
83.2 Km/H |
-4.3 Km/H |
94.83% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
54.5 M |
43.7 M |
+10.8 M |
80.18% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
66.5 Km/H |
69.1 Km/H |
-2.6 Km/H |
96.24% |
| Wet Circle |
11th |
14.2 s |
12.9 s |
+1.3 s |
90.85% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
87.5 Km/H |
100.4 Km/H |
-12.9 Km/H |
87.15% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
8th |
2.39 m/sec2 |
2.97 m/sec2 |
-0.58 m/sec2 |
80.47% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
8th |
31 M |
29.8 M |
+1.2 M |
96.13% |
| Snow Traction |
10th |
5148 N |
5894 N |
-746 N |
87.34% |
| Snow Handling |
8th |
55.7 Km/H |
57.8 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
96.37% |
| Snow Slalom |
10th |
3.33 m/sec2 |
3.81 m/sec2 |
-0.48 m/sec2 |
87.4% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
72.1 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
8.4 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1.1 kg / t |
86.9% |
Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 earns a "satisfactory" rating with its main advantage being the low purchase price. It provides good safety reserves on dry surfaces and performs adequately in snow braking. However, the tyre demonstrates weak performance potential in snow conditions and on wet surfaces, limiting its overall capabilities and making it suitable primarily for cost-sensitive applications where performance is not the primary concern.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
45.3 M |
36.6 M |
+8.7 M |
80.79% |
| Dry Handling |
10th |
79 Km/H |
83.2 Km/H |
-4.2 Km/H |
94.95% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
11th |
55 M |
43.7 M |
+11.3 M |
79.45% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
66.3 Km/H |
69.1 Km/H |
-2.8 Km/H |
95.95% |
| Wet Circle |
9th |
14 s |
12.9 s |
+1.1 s |
92.14% |
| Straight Aqua |
11th |
86.6 Km/H |
100.4 Km/H |
-13.8 Km/H |
86.25% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
7th |
2.44 m/sec2 |
2.97 m/sec2 |
-0.53 m/sec2 |
82.15% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
9th |
31.3 M |
29.8 M |
+1.5 M |
95.21% |
| Snow Traction |
8th |
5347 N |
5894 N |
-547 N |
90.72% |
| Snow Handling |
10th |
54.8 Km/H |
57.8 Km/H |
-3 Km/H |
94.81% |
| Snow Slalom |
8th |
3.44 m/sec2 |
3.81 m/sec2 |
-0.37 m/sec2 |
90.29% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
73.3 dB |
72.1 dB |
+1.2 dB |
98.36% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.5 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1.2 kg / t |
85.88% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
36.6 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
83.2 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
43.7 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
69.1 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Circle |
1st |
12.9 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
100 Km/H |
100.4 Km/H |
-0.4 Km/H |
99.6% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
1st |
2.97 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
11th |
66.9 M |
29.8 M |
+37.1 M |
44.54% |
| Snow Traction |
11th |
1697 N |
5894 N |
-4197 N |
28.79% |
| Snow Slalom |
11th |
1.62 m/sec2 |
3.81 m/sec2 |
-2.19 m/sec2 |
42.52% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
72.1 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
8.3 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1 kg / t |
87.95% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
45.8 M |
36.6 M |
+9.2 M |
79.91% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
79.4 Km/H |
83.2 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
95.43% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
53.4 M |
43.7 M |
+9.7 M |
81.84% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
67.2 Km/H |
69.1 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
97.25% |
| Wet Circle |
10th |
14.1 s |
12.9 s |
+1.2 s |
91.49% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
93.1 Km/H |
100.4 Km/H |
-7.3 Km/H |
92.73% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
10th |
2.35 m/sec2 |
2.97 m/sec2 |
-0.62 m/sec2 |
79.12% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
2nd |
29.9 M |
29.8 M |
+0.1 M |
99.67% |
| Snow Traction |
3rd |
5750 N |
5894 N |
-144 N |
97.56% |
| Snow Handling |
1st |
57.8 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Slalom |
2nd |
3.77 m/sec2 |
3.81 m/sec2 |
-0.04 m/sec2 |
98.95% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
73.1 dB |
72.1 dB |
+1 dB |
98.63% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
8.6 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1.3 kg / t |
84.88% |
Jonathan I'm afraid this review badly needs a recheck!
Since the reference tires' results are wrongly assigned, all tires' scores are shifted
(even though the order seems to fit otherwise).
Thanks, you're right, the data is all over the place.
Will fix ASAP.
I couldn't sleep on it - it's now fixed. Thanks again.
The "Dry Handling" graphic may not be right. In the text we can read about the average speed but the graphic shows time (seconds), meaning the tyres should have been located the other way around in the graphic, right?
Thank you so much for pointing that out, fat fingers in the backend. I've reassigned the data to average speed.
I think you missed it again. Now the graphic is still in seconds and the Triangle doesn´t seem to be the worst as described in the upper test even if we consider the measure is speed or time.
You might need to ctrl+refresh to clear your cache
Worked right away! Thanks! Didn´t know about this! :)
What on Earth was the summer tyre I wonder? I find its performance profile compared to the AS tyres quite bewildering. Perhaps a Double Coin type?
Could it just be the temperature they tested on? Summer tyres never behave properly in the cold, specially in the wet.
Autobild don't announce what summer tyre they use but it is usually premium. It could be that it was a van / commercial summer tyre.
Another point (van tyres are awful). I can't see why tests don't tell us what the tyres are.
a point
I wish the test was explicit about temperature-
see above comment
turns out the data was a mess, sorry. The correct data should now be online (it might need a ctrl+f5 refresh)