Performance Overview
This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.
Snow Performance Overview
Snow Braking (M)
Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)
Snow Traction (s)
Snow acceleration time (Lower is better)
Snow Handling (s)
Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Subj. Snow Handling ( Points)
Subjective Snow Handling Score (Higher is better)
Snow Circle (S)
Snow Circle Time in Seconds (Lower is better)
Ice Performance Overview
Ice Braking (M)
Ice braking in meters (Lower is better)
Ice Traction (s)
Ice acceleration time (Lower is better)
Overall Findings
Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:
| Position | Tyre | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Nokian Outpost nAT | 97.1% | |
| 2 | Mickey-Thompson Baja Boss AT | 96.2% |
| 3 | Toyo Open Country AT III | 95.3% |
| 4 | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3 | 94.6% |
| 5 | Falken Wildpeak AT4W | 89.7% |
| - | Reference Winter Nordic (Reference) | 0% |
Test Winner
Falken Wildpeak AT4W
89.7%
Any thoughts on why ice traction is ~2x better than dedicated snow tires? This seems an anomalous result, particularly given that ice braking is worse.
Is it due to the limitations of the ice tunnel which you note?
I didn't have a winter tyre in the ice testing, why do you think the AT is twice as good?
Thanks for rapid response; are distances not comparable across tests? https://www.tyrereviews.com...
oops... times, not distances
Sadly not, they might have used different speeds to measure, and the grip of ice can varely massively hour to hour, let alone between different locations at different times.
Ah, got it... thanks.
I have been searching for a winter test of the new pirelli scorpion xtm and can't find one. I can hardly find any real world on/off road tests since it's release. Any chance you will be able to get a set of the xtms to test
Yes I'll be doing a full test of it next year.