Menu

Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024]

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
12 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024], displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
General Grabber AT3
Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
Continental CrossContact HT
Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
Loder Loder AT1
Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 3.20 M (7.6%) | Avg: 44.07 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 with a result of 42.3 M. The difference between best and worst was 7%.
  1. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    42.3 M
  2. Continental CrossContact HT
    43.1 M
  3. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    43.9 M
  4. General Grabber AT3
    44.4 M
  5. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    44.6 M
  6. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    44.7 M
  7. Loder Loder AT1
    45.5 M

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 4.20 Km/H (4.7%) | Avg: 88.21 Km/H

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental CrossContact HT with a result of 90.2 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.7%.
  1. Continental CrossContact HT
    90.2 Km/H
  2. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    89.2 Km/H
  3. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    89 Km/H
  4. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    88.2 Km/H
  5. General Grabber AT3
    87.8 Km/H
  6. Loder Loder AT1
    87.1 Km/H
  7. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    86 Km/H

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 16.50 M (50.8%) | Avg: 40.83 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental CrossContact HT with a result of 32.5 M. The difference between best and worst was 33.7%.
  1. Continental CrossContact HT
    32.5 M
  2. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    37.7 M
  3. General Grabber AT3
    39.7 M
  4. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    40.5 M
  5. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    40.5 M
  6. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    45.9 M
  7. Loder Loder AT1
    49 M

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 10.80 Km/H (13.4%) | Avg: 75.11 Km/H

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental CrossContact HT with a result of 80.4 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 13.4%.
  1. Continental CrossContact HT
    80.4 Km/H
  2. General Grabber AT3
    76.8 Km/H
  3. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    76.6 Km/H
  4. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    75.3 Km/H
  5. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    75 Km/H
  6. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    72.1 Km/H
  7. Loder Loder AT1
    69.6 Km/H

Wet Circle (m/s)

Spread: 0.64 m/s (9.4%) | Avg: 6.48 m/s

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental CrossContact HT with a result of 6.84 m/s. The difference between best and worst was 9.4%.
  1. Continental CrossContact HT
    6.84 m/s
  2. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    6.71 m/s
  3. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    6.53 m/s
  4. General Grabber AT3
    6.41 m/s
  5. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    6.41 m/s
  6. Loder Loder AT1
    6.24 m/s
  7. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    6.2 m/s

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 10.30 Km/H (14.8%) | Avg: 64.41 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental CrossContact HT with a result of 69.7 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 14.8%.
  1. Continental CrossContact HT
    69.7 Km/H
  2. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    68 Km/H
  3. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    66.1 Km/H
  4. Loder Loder AT1
    66.1 Km/H
  5. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    60.9 Km/H
  6. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    60.7 Km/H
  7. General Grabber AT3
    59.4 Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Spread: 3.91 m/sec2 (37.9%) | Avg: 8.67 m/sec2

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental CrossContact HT with a result of 10.32 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 37.9%.
  1. Continental CrossContact HT
    10.32 m/sec2
  2. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    10.26 m/sec2
  3. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    9.39 m/sec2
  4. Loder Loder AT1
    8.62 m/sec2
  5. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    7.9 m/sec2
  6. General Grabber AT3
    7.77 m/sec2
  7. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    6.41 m/sec2

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Spread: 9.20 M (34.3%) | Avg: 29.46 M

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 with a result of 26.8 M. The difference between best and worst was 25.6%.
  1. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    26.8 M
  2. Loder Loder AT1
    27.1 M
  3. General Grabber AT3
    27.3 M
  4. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    30.1 M
  5. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    36 M

Snow Traction (N)

Spread: 0.53 N (14.1%) | Avg: 3.56 N

Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Loder Loder AT1 with a result of 3.75 N. The difference between best and worst was 14.1%.
  1. Loder Loder AT1
    3.75 N
  2. General Grabber AT3
    3.7 N
  3. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    3.6 N
  4. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    3.51 N
  5. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    3.22 N

Snow Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 10.80 Km/H (16.2%) | Avg: 62.38 Km/H

Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 with a result of 66.5 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 16.2%.
  1. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    66.5 Km/H
  2. Loder Loder AT1
    66.2 Km/H
  3. General Grabber AT3
    64.7 Km/H
  4. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    58.8 Km/H
  5. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    55.7 Km/H

Off road Performance Overview

Gravel Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 3.80 Km/H (5.8%) | Avg: 64.27 Km/H

Gravel Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA with a result of 66 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 5.8%.
  1. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    66 Km/H
  2. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    65.4 Km/H
  3. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    65 Km/H
  4. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    64.2 Km/H
  5. Loder Loder AT1
    64.2 Km/H
  6. General Grabber AT3
    62.9 Km/H
  7. Continental CrossContact HT
    62.2 Km/H

Gravel Braking (m)

Spread: 0.90 m (8%) | Avg: 11.69 m

Gravel Braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA with a result of 11.2 m. The difference between best and worst was 7.4%.
  1. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    11.2 m
  2. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    11.3 m
  3. General Grabber AT3
    11.7 m
  4. Continental CrossContact HT
    11.7 m
  5. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    11.8 m
  6. Loder Loder AT1
    12 m
  7. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    12.1 m

Gravel Traction (N)

Spread: 0.14 N (3.3%) | Avg: 4.18 N

Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 with a result of 4.23 N. The difference between best and worst was 3.3%.
  1. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    4.23 N
  2. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    4.22 N
  3. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    4.2 N
  4. Loder Loder AT1
    4.2 N
  5. General Grabber AT3
    4.15 N
  6. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    4.15 N
  7. Continental CrossContact HT
    4.09 N

Sand Traction (N)

Spread: 0.12 N (6.3%) | Avg: 1.86 N

Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was General Grabber AT3 with a result of 1.9 N. The difference between best and worst was 6.3%.
  1. General Grabber AT3
    1.9 N
  2. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    1.88 N
  3. Loder Loder AT1
    1.88 N
  4. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    1.87 N
  5. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    1.85 N
  6. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    1.85 N
  7. Continental CrossContact HT
    1.78 N

Mud Traction (N)

Spread: 0.43 N (42.6%) | Avg: 0.90 N

Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure with a result of 1.01 N. The difference between best and worst was 42.6%.
  1. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    1.01 N
  2. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    0.97 N
  3. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    0.95 N
  4. General Grabber AT3
    0.94 N
  5. Loder Loder AT1
    0.93 N
  6. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    0.92 N
  7. Continental CrossContact HT
    0.58 N

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

Spread: 2.90 dB (4.1%) | Avg: 71.96 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental CrossContact HT with a result of 70.5 dB. The difference between best and worst was 4%.
  1. Continental CrossContact HT
    70.5 dB
  2. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    70.7 dB
  3. General Grabber AT3
    70.9 dB
  4. Loder Loder AT1
    71.9 dB
  5. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    72.9 dB
  6. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    73.4 dB
  7. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    73.4 dB

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 2.70 kg / t (33.8%) | Avg: 9.24 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental CrossContact HT with a result of 8 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 25.2%.
  1. Continental CrossContact HT
    8 kg / t
  2. Loder Loder AT1
    8.9 kg / t
  3. Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
    9 kg / t
  4. Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA
    9 kg / t
  5. General Grabber AT3
    9.3 kg / t
  6. Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
    9.8 kg / t
  7. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
    10.7 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Continental CrossContact HT 0%
2 Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA 0%
3 General Grabber AT3 0%
4 Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure 0%
5 Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 0%
6 Loder Loder AT1 0%
7 BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 0%

Similar Tyre Tests

Show All all season tyre tests
Best HT All Season Tyres for 2026 Tested!
April 2026 265/65 R18 General Grabber HT 7 tyres
2025 Autobild Crossover SUV All Season Test
December 2025 215/50 R18 Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 12 tyres
Which is Best? BFGoodrich All Terrain KO3 vs Bridgestone AT Ascent vs Cooper Stronghold AT
February 2026 275/65 R18 BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3 3 tyres
2025 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Test
October 2025 265/70 R17 Continental TerrainContact AT 9 tyres
2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test
October 2025 215/55 R17 Vredestein Quatrac 13 tyres
2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test
August 2025 245/45 R19 Hankook iON FlexClimate 3 tyres

Discussion

11 comments
  1. Steve archived

    Was this the Falken AT3WA, not the AT3?

    #10589
    1. TyreReviews Steve archived

      You're most likely correct as it's an EU test

      #10590
      1. Steve TyreReviews archived

        Cheers Jon, are you able to update the test with the correct one?

        #10594
  2. Mark Greenhoff archived

    Hi - how does the Continental Cross Contact H/T compare with the equivalent Continental/Pirelli summer tyres off road please?
    Thanks for all the awesome testing you do. Keep up the epic work!!

    #10305
    1. TyreReviews Mark Greenhoff archived

      There's limited tests out there, have you checked to see if TireRack have tested it? I'm sure it's a very good tyre, conti rarely miss.

      #10317
  3. İlke archived

    What is the difference between the falken wildpeak at3wa model and at3w model? was at3wa or at3w used in the test?

    #9837
    1. TyreReviews İlke archived

      As far as I understand the A model is an OE fitment so should not have been tested.

      #9839
      1. erpsysscg TyreReviews archived

        AT3W is not sold in Europe. AT3WA is OE fitment for US, but only option that can be bought in Europe.
        Please, confirm which tire is tested.

        #9843
        1. TyreReviews erpsysscg archived

          You are correct it was the A version tested. I'll get the site updated when I can.

          #9849
          1. Andrii Gumennyi TyreReviews archived

            Thank you both for this clarification. It seems to be a no-brainer because of its price and test results

            #9971