Menu

2026 Motor Summer Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
7 min read

Adjust Result Weighting

The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Dry 35%
Wet 50%
Comfort 5%
Value 10%
Dry 35% · Wet 50% · Comfort 5% · Value 10%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet
Comfort
Value

Test Results Data

BEST Good Average Below Average
# Tyre Total Score Dry Wet Comfort Value
Braking M Handling s Subj. Dry Handling Points % Braking M Handling s Circle m/s Straight Aqua Km/H Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 % Subj. Comfort Points Noise dB % Rolling Resistance kg / t %
1 Continental PremiumContact 7 96.7% 36 2 73.4 7.4 2 99.4% 43.3 2 69.4 .801 74.9 3.85 99.4% 6.9 66.1 98.9% .833 75.9%
2 ▼1 Pirelli Cinturato C3 95.6% 35.7 73.6 2 7.3 99.5% 43.3 2 70.7 2 .775 2 76.9 3 3.42 97.1% 6.6 65.8 96.9% .818 77.3%
3 Hankook Ventus Evo 95% 37.3 74.2 3 7.6 97.6% 43.2 70.9 3 .765 3 78.8 3.84 2 98.3% 6.5 64.8 3 96.9% .876 72.2%
4 Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 93.8% 37.1 3 74.2 3 7.4 2 97.6% 44.3 71 .761 71.4 3.32 94.9% 6.1 65.2 93.7% .804 78.6%
5 ▲3 Bridgestone Turanza 6 93.4% 37.4 76.2 6.3 94.7% 46.1 75.2 .709 72.2 3.59 91.7% 6.2 64.7 2 94.9% .632 100%
6 ▼1 Michelin Primacy 5 93% 38.4 75.2 6.6 94.5% 46.5 74 .692 77 2 3.72 92.4% 6.9 64.6 100% .7 2 90.3%
7 ▼1 Maxxis Premitra HP6 92.8% 38.7 74.7 6.4 94.3% 46.1 73.1 .733 74.6 3.68 93.8% 6.6 65 97.5% .758 3 83.4%
8 ▼1 Kleber Dynaxer HP5 92.3% 38 75.1 6.3 94.7% 45.5 73.7 .711 73.4 3.59 92.8% 6.9 65.6 99.2% .77 82.1%
9 Vredestein Ultrac plus 91.6% 39.3 75.4 6.1 92.8% 47.2 73.8 .711 75.4 3.76 3 92.6% 6.4 65.2 95.9% .762 82.9%
Scroll for more
Dry 99% Wet 99% Comfort 99% Value 76%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36 M 2
Dry Handling 73.4 s
Subj. Dry Handling 7.4 Points 2
Wet
Wet Braking 43.3 M 2
Wet Handling 69.4 s
Wet Circle .801 m/s
Straight Aqua 74.9 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.85 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 6.9 Points
Noise 66.1 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance .833 kg / t
2
95.6%
Dry 100% Wet 97% Comfort 97% Value 77%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.7 M
Dry Handling 73.6 s 2
Subj. Dry Handling 7.3 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 43.3 M 2
Wet Handling 70.7 s 2
Wet Circle .775 m/s 2
Straight Aqua 76.9 Km/H 3
Curved Aquaplaning 3.42 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 6.6 Points
Noise 65.8 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance .818 kg / t
Dry 98% Wet 98% Comfort 97% Value 72%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.3 M
Dry Handling 74.2 s 3
Subj. Dry Handling 7.6 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 43.2 M
Wet Handling 70.9 s 3
Wet Circle .765 m/s 3
Straight Aqua 78.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.84 m/sec2 2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 6.5 Points
Noise 64.8 dB 3
Value
Rolling Resistance .876 kg / t
Dry 98% Wet 95% Comfort 94% Value 79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.1 M 3
Dry Handling 74.2 s 3
Subj. Dry Handling 7.4 Points 2
Wet
Wet Braking 44.3 M
Wet Handling 71 s
Wet Circle .761 m/s
Straight Aqua 71.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.32 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 6.1 Points
Noise 65.2 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance .804 kg / t
5
93.4%
Dry 95% Wet 92% Comfort 95% Value 100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.4 M
Dry Handling 76.2 s
Subj. Dry Handling 6.3 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 46.1 M
Wet Handling 75.2 s
Wet Circle .709 m/s
Straight Aqua 72.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.59 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 6.2 Points
Noise 64.7 dB 2
Value
Rolling Resistance .632 kg / t
6
93%
Dry 95% Wet 92% Comfort 100% Value 90%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 38.4 M
Dry Handling 75.2 s
Subj. Dry Handling 6.6 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 46.5 M
Wet Handling 74 s
Wet Circle .692 m/s
Straight Aqua 77 Km/H 2
Curved Aquaplaning 3.72 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 6.9 Points
Noise 64.6 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance .7 kg / t 2
7
92.8%
Dry 94% Wet 94% Comfort 98% Value 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 38.7 M
Dry Handling 74.7 s
Subj. Dry Handling 6.4 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 46.1 M
Wet Handling 73.1 s
Wet Circle .733 m/s
Straight Aqua 74.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.68 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 6.6 Points
Noise 65 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance .758 kg / t 3
8
92.3%
Dry 95% Wet 93% Comfort 99% Value 82%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 38 M
Dry Handling 75.1 s
Subj. Dry Handling 6.3 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 45.5 M
Wet Handling 73.7 s
Wet Circle .711 m/s
Straight Aqua 73.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.59 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 6.9 Points
Noise 65.6 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance .77 kg / t
Dry 93% Wet 93% Comfort 96% Value 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 39.3 M
Dry Handling 75.4 s
Subj. Dry Handling 6.1 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 47.2 M
Wet Handling 73.8 s
Wet Circle .711 m/s
Straight Aqua 75.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.76 m/sec2 3
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 6.4 Points
Noise 65.2 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance .762 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.

Discussion

3 comments
  1. Néocray archived

    It’s not particularly a surprise that the Hankook is third in this test, given that the podium is the same than the previous test from Jon himself in the same size.
    It’s curious however that the Hankook as a max performance tyre is again mixed with touring tyres.

    #10607
  2. Lukica Stipetić archived

    Everyone keeps criticizing Kumho for its resistance to aquaplaning.
    In this test, there is minimal difference between Kumho and Bridgestone in Straight aquaplaning and Kumho and Pirelli in Curved aquaplaning.

    #10605
  3. JM archived

    It has been a long time since BMW 3 Series or Audi A4 used this tyre size. Octavia doesn't use it any more, either.

    #10601