For their 2025 winter tyre test, Auto Express have tested eight popular winter tyres in 225/45 R17.
As always we suggest you visit the Auto Express website on the link below for the full details, but here is our summary.
Test Publication:
Auto Express
225/45 R17
8 tyres
5 categories
Test Publication:
Auto Express
Test Size:
225/45 R17
Tyres Tested:
8 tyres
Auto Express is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
As Auto Express do not provide raw data, instead percentages to the best in test, the data below is based on estimated 'bests'. The percentage difference between the tyres is accurate, but the numbers are based on guessing the best in category. As scoring is done on percentages this doesn't affect the score weighting calculator on the results tab but I thought it was important to share.
Click 'Test Charts' above to see the charts for each test.
Results
Auto Express praises the Continental for winning across the snow, wet and dry disciplines and for its “lovely feel,” calling it an “exceptional, unbeatable winter tyre”. Its blend of grip and refinement makes it a benchmark despite a relatively high price.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
30 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
59.3 s |
58 s |
+1.3 s |
97.81% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
35.43 M |
35 M |
+0.43 M |
98.79% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
60 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
81.14 Km/H |
91.53 Km/H |
-10.39 Km/H |
88.65% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
7th |
70.71 m/sec2 |
105.9 m/sec2 |
-35.19 m/sec2 |
66.77% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
8th |
44 M |
40 M |
+4 M |
90.91% |
| Snow Traction |
5th |
10.33 s |
10 s |
+0.33 s |
96.81% |
| Snow Handling |
1st |
60 s |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
70 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
8.6 kg / t |
8 kg / t |
+0.6 kg / t |
93.02% |
Described as “consistently excellent” and “highly recommended”, this tyre performs well in every test area. Reviewers highlight its secure feel in snow, wet and dry conditions, and note that it is enjoyable to drive.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
31.25 M |
30 M |
+1.25 M |
96% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
59.55 s |
58 s |
+1.55 s |
97.4% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
35 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
60.24 s |
60 s |
+0.24 s |
99.6% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
80 Km/H |
91.53 Km/H |
-11.53 Km/H |
87.4% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
8th |
70 m/sec2 |
105.9 m/sec2 |
-35.9 m/sec2 |
66.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
40 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Traction |
1st |
10 s |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Handling |
3rd |
62.5 s |
60 s |
+2.5 s |
96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
70.42 dB |
70 dB |
+0.42 dB |
99.4% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
9.21 kg / t |
8 kg / t |
+1.21 kg / t |
86.86% |
Auto Express comments that the Blizzak 6 is “great in all conditions” and shines especially in cold, wet and dry weather. Its overall consistency, combined with strong fuel‑efficiency, makes it a good all‑round choice.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
31.35 M |
30 M |
+1.35 M |
95.69% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
58.53 s |
58 s |
+0.53 s |
99.09% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
35.57 M |
35 M |
+0.57 M |
98.4% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
60.61 s |
60 s |
+0.61 s |
98.99% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
84.57 Km/H |
91.53 Km/H |
-6.96 Km/H |
92.4% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
6th |
83.14 m/sec2 |
105.9 m/sec2 |
-22.76 m/sec2 |
78.51% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
7th |
42.6 M |
40 M |
+2.6 M |
93.9% |
| Snow Traction |
4th |
10.29 s |
10 s |
+0.29 s |
97.18% |
| Snow Handling |
4th |
62.7 s |
60 s |
+2.7 s |
95.69% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
71.43 dB |
70 dB |
+1.43 dB |
98% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
8 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
The test team notes a “balanced performance overall, with a slight snow bias” and that the Alpin 7 feels reassuringly good to drive in the wet. It is well‑rounded and refined, though it is the priciest tyre in the group.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
30.71 M |
30 M |
+0.71 M |
97.69% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
59.61 s |
58 s |
+1.61 s |
97.3% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
37 M |
35 M |
+2 M |
94.59% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
60.98 s |
60 s |
+0.98 s |
98.39% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
84.66 Km/H |
91.53 Km/H |
-6.87 Km/H |
92.49% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
5th |
83.73 m/sec2 |
105.9 m/sec2 |
-22.17 m/sec2 |
79.07% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
6th |
41.28 M |
40 M |
+1.28 M |
96.9% |
| Snow Traction |
3rd |
10.2 s |
10 s |
+0.2 s |
98.04% |
| Snow Handling |
2nd |
61.41 s |
60 s |
+1.41 s |
97.7% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
70.78 dB |
70 dB |
+0.78 dB |
98.9% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
8.12 kg / t |
8 kg / t |
+0.12 kg / t |
98.52% |
According to Auto Express, this tyre delivers a “strong performance” that announces LingLong’s arrival on the winter‑tyre scene, but they warn that its economy is “poor”. It excels in dry handling and offers competitive grip, yet higher running‑costs reduce its appeal.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
31.98 M |
30 M |
+1.98 M |
93.81% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
58 s |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
36.34 M |
35 M |
+1.34 M |
96.31% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
61.54 s |
60 s |
+1.54 s |
97.5% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
90.29 Km/H |
91.53 Km/H |
-1.24 Km/H |
98.65% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
2nd |
97.36 m/sec2 |
105.9 m/sec2 |
-8.54 m/sec2 |
91.94% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
40.94 M |
40 M |
+0.94 M |
97.7% |
| Snow Traction |
8th |
11.04 s |
10 s |
+1.04 s |
90.58% |
| Snow Handling |
5th |
63.97 s |
60 s |
+3.97 s |
93.79% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
70.85 dB |
70 dB |
+0.85 dB |
98.8% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
10.7 kg / t |
8 kg / t |
+2.7 kg / t |
74.77% |
The magazine notes that there is “a good feel in the wet,” but a mixed set of results leaves the Vredestein in the mid‑field. It offers reasonable comfort and grip without standing out in any one area.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
32.75 M |
30 M |
+2.75 M |
91.6% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
59.73 s |
58 s |
+1.73 s |
97.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
37.8 M |
35 M |
+2.8 M |
92.59% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
60.85 s |
60 s |
+0.85 s |
98.6% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
87.34 Km/H |
91.53 Km/H |
-4.19 Km/H |
95.42% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
3rd |
95.11 m/sec2 |
105.9 m/sec2 |
-10.79 m/sec2 |
89.81% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
2nd |
40.69 M |
40 M |
+0.69 M |
98.3% |
| Snow Traction |
6th |
10.55 s |
10 s |
+0.55 s |
94.79% |
| Snow Handling |
8th |
65.5 s |
60 s |
+5.5 s |
91.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
70.28 dB |
70 dB |
+0.28 dB |
99.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
8.87 kg / t |
8 kg / t |
+0.87 kg / t |
90.19% |
Reviewers describe the Falken as “refined” and able to perform well in all conditions. It strikes a solid balance between grip and ride comfort, making it an easy tyre to live with and competitively priced.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
32.72 M |
30 M |
+2.72 M |
91.69% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
59.18 s |
58 s |
+1.18 s |
98.01% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
37.35 M |
35 M |
+2.35 M |
93.71% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
60.85 s |
60 s |
+0.85 s |
98.6% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
89.29 Km/H |
91.53 Km/H |
-2.24 Km/H |
97.55% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
4th |
94.59 m/sec2 |
105.9 m/sec2 |
-11.31 m/sec2 |
89.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
5th |
41.11 M |
40 M |
+1.11 M |
97.3% |
| Snow Traction |
2nd |
10.19 s |
10 s |
+0.19 s |
98.14% |
| Snow Handling |
7th |
65.43 s |
60 s |
+5.43 s |
91.7% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
70.21 dB |
70 dB |
+0.21 dB |
99.7% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
9.74 kg / t |
8 kg / t |
+1.74 kg / t |
82.14% |
Auto Express says the budget Triangle is better than a summer tyre in snowy conditions but warns that it is “worryingly poor in the wet” and that buying it “is false economy”. Its snow performance is acceptable, but its weak wet grip and high running‑costs undermine its low purchase price.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
32.5 M |
30 M |
+2.5 M |
92.31% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
59 s |
58 s |
+1 s |
98.31% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
40.37 M |
35 M |
+5.37 M |
86.7% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
64.66 s |
60 s |
+4.66 s |
92.79% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
91.53 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
1st |
105.9 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
3rd |
40.9 M |
40 M |
+0.9 M |
97.8% |
| Snow Traction |
7th |
10.99 s |
10 s |
+0.99 s |
90.99% |
| Snow Handling |
6th |
65.01 s |
60 s |
+5.01 s |
92.29% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
70.28 dB |
70 dB |
+0.28 dB |
99.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
9.83 kg / t |
8 kg / t |
+1.83 kg / t |
81.38% |
Discussion