Menu

2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Vredestein Ultrac
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Continental PremiumContact 7
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 2.30 M (6.2%) | Avg: 38.25 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental PremiumContact 7 with a result of 36.9 M. The difference between best and worst was 5.9%.
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    36.9 M
  2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    37.6 M
  3. Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
    38 M
  4. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    38.1 M
  5. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    38.3 M
  6. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
    38.5 M
  7. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
    38.5 M
  8. Vredestein Ultrac
    38.6 M
  9. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    38.8 M
  10. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    39.2 M

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 1.90 Km/H (2.4%) | Avg: 78.25 Km/H

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    79.2 Km/H
  2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    78.9 Km/H
  3. Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
    78.8 Km/H
  4. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    78.4 Km/H
  5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    78.3 Km/H
  6. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
    78.1 Km/H
  7. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
    78 Km/H
  8. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    77.8 Km/H
  9. Vredestein Ultrac
    77.7 Km/H
  10. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    77.3 Km/H

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 5.90 M (14.9%) | Avg: 42.22 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental PremiumContact 7 with a result of 39.7 M. The difference between best and worst was 12.9%.
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    39.7 M
  2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    40.1 M
  3. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
    41.7 M
  4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
    41.9 M
  5. Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
    42.2 M
  6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    42.3 M
  7. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    42.6 M
  8. Vredestein Ultrac
    42.8 M
  9. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    43.3 M
  10. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    45.6 M

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 1.90 Km/H (2.7%) | Avg: 67.95 Km/H

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the wet handling test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    69.1 Km/H
  2. Continental PremiumContact 7
    68.4 Km/H
  3. Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
    68.2 Km/H
  4. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    67.9 Km/H
  5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
    67.9 Km/H
  6. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
    67.8 Km/H
  7. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    67.7 Km/H
  8. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    67.7 Km/H
  9. Vredestein Ultrac
    67.6 Km/H
  10. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    67.2 Km/H

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 2.60 Km/H (2.8%) | Avg: 92.68 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the straight aqua test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    93.9 Km/H
  2. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
    93.6 Km/H
  3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    93.1 Km/H
  4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
    93 Km/H
  5. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    92.9 Km/H
  6. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    92.8 Km/H
  7. Vredestein Ultrac
    92.4 Km/H
  8. Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
    92.3 Km/H
  9. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    91.5 Km/H
  10. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    91.3 Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Spread: 1.00 m/sec2 (7.5%) | Avg: 12.85 m/sec2

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco with a result of 13.3 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 7.5%.
  1. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    13.3 m/sec2
  2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    13.2 m/sec2
  3. Vredestein Ultrac
    13.1 m/sec2
  4. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    13.1 m/sec2
  5. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    13 m/sec2
  6. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
    12.9 m/sec2
  7. Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
    12.6 m/sec2
  8. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
    12.6 m/sec2
  9. Continental PremiumContact 7
    12.4 m/sec2
  10. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    12.3 m/sec2

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

Spread: 2.10 dB (2.9%) | Avg: 71.80 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the noise test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
    71.2 dB
  2. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
    71.3 dB
  3. Vredestein Ultrac
    71.5 dB
  4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    71.5 dB
  5. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    71.6 dB
  6. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    71.6 dB
  7. Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
    71.8 dB
  8. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    71.9 dB
  9. Continental PremiumContact 7
    72.3 dB
  10. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    73.3 dB

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 1.20 kg / t (15.7%) | Avg: 8.25 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 with a result of 7.66 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 13.5%.
  1. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
    7.66 kg / t
  2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    7.69 kg / t
  3. Continental PremiumContact 7
    7.82 kg / t
  4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    8 kg / t
  5. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
    8.34 kg / t
  6. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
    8.38 kg / t
  7. Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
    8.42 kg / t
  8. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    8.47 kg / t
  9. Toyo Proxes Comfort
    8.85 kg / t
  10. Vredestein Ultrac
    8.86 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Bridgestone Potenza Sport 0%
2 Continental PremiumContact 7 0%
3 Michelin Primacy 4 Plus 0%
4 Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%
5 Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 0%
6 Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 0%
7 Vredestein Ultrac 0%
8 Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 0%
9 Toyo Proxes Comfort 0%
10 Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco 0%

Similar Tyre Tests

Show All summer tyre tests
2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test
March 2026 255/45 R19 Hankook Ventus Evo 9 tyres
2025 Teknikens Varld Summer Tyre Test
April 2025 235/55 R19 Pirelli Scorpion 8 tyres
2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test
April 2025 255/55 R18 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 10 tyres
2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test
April 2025 225/55 R18 Pirelli Cinturato C3 7 tyres
2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test
March 2025 235/55 R19 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 7 tyres
2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test
March 2024 235/55 R18 Continental PremiumContact 7 8 tyres

Discussion

5 comments
  1. 4cvg archived

    While you are accessing the various sub-entities within the A. B. stable, would it be possible to access the Klassik variant in order to extract the classic tyre tests A. B. performss?

    #9446
    1. TyreReviews 4cvg archived

      I'll see what I can find!

      #9452
      1. 4cvg TyreReviews archived

        Thanks Jonathan. One thing that I've found interesting in the two past tests which I've accessed indirectly is the relative merits of an indifferent & obsolescent "modern" tyre (the Maxxis MAP1) compared to the "classic" tyres tested. Wet results are fascinating. I would have thought that, given the value of the vehicles which use them & the low use most have, longevity would be a low priority & wet grip compounding a very high priority. But not so it seems.

        #9457