Menu

2024 EV Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
8 min read Updated

Adjust Result Weighting

The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Dry 35%
Wet 50%
Comfort 5%
Value 10%
Dry 35% · Wet 50% · Comfort 5% · Value 10%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet
Comfort
Value

Test Results Data

Good Below Average 42 BEST
# Tyre Total Score Dry Wet Comfort Value
Braking M Handling Km/H % Braking M Handling Km/H Circle s Straight Aqua Km/H Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 % Noise dB % Wear KM Value Price/1000 Rolling Resistance kg / t Energy Consumption kWh/100km Abrasion g %
1 ▲1 Continental PremiumContact 7 97.9% 33.2 71.3 99.7% 37.7 57.6 12.88 93.4 2.96 98% 70.3 97.6% 36885 20.2 6.64 18.46 1069 91.4%
2 Hankook iON evo SUV 96.8% 33 70.2 99.2% 39.4 57.1 13.11 94.4 2.99 96.4% 68.6 100% 35695 19.33 6.88 18.83 1141 89.1%
3 ▼2 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 96.8% 34.1 70.9 98.1% 39.2 58.5 12.93 95.5 3.25 98.5% 70 98% 35865 23.42 7.99 19.17 1211 83.2%
4 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 96.6% 33.9 70.4 98% 39.1 58.3 13.01 94.6 3.27 98.3% 70 98% 33015 21.05 7.51 20.02 1234 82.5%
5 ▲2 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 94.4% 34 70.7 98.1% 39.4 59.2 12.88 94.4 3.24 98.6% 71.2 96.4% 18530 38.32 9.1 20.66 2093 59.1%
6 ▼1 Falken e.Ziex 93.8% 34.7 69.6 96.4% 42.4 56.3 13.39 92.1 2.94 93.3% 70.2 97.7% 27375 23.01 5.55 18.28 1244 85.7%
7 ▼1 GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV 90.5% 37.9 67.6 90.9% 46 55.2 13.45 94.1 2.64 90.1% 70.5 97.3% 34905 19.48 6.17 20.82 1222 87.5%
8 Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco 90.4% 37.2 67.1 91.4% 48.1 54.3 13.95 94.7 3.28 90.1% 70.5 97.3% 27155 14.55 7.71 19.88 1211 84.3%
9 Michelin Pilot Sport EV 86.9% 35 70.1 96.3% 43.3 56.2 12.95 93.2 2.7 93% 71.3 96.2% 6.55
Scroll for more
1
Continental PremiumContact 7 ▲1
97.9%
Dry 100% Wet 98% Comfort 98% Value 91%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 33.2 M
Dry Handling 71.3 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 37.7 M
Wet Handling 57.6 Km/H
Wet Circle 12.88 s
Straight Aqua 93.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.96 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 70.3 dB
Value
Wear 36885 KM
Value 20.2 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance 6.64 kg / t
Energy Consumption 18.46 kWh/100km
Abrasion 1069 g
More information
2
Hankook iON evo SUV
96.8%
Dry 99% Wet 96% Comfort 100% Value 89%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 33 M
Dry Handling 70.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 39.4 M
Wet Handling 57.1 Km/H
Wet Circle 13.11 s
Straight Aqua 94.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.99 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 68.6 dB
Value
Wear 35695 KM
Value 19.33 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance 6.88 kg / t
Energy Consumption 18.83 kWh/100km
Abrasion 1141 g
More information
3
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV ▼2
96.8%
Dry 98% Wet 99% Comfort 98% Value 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.1 M
Dry Handling 70.9 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 39.2 M
Wet Handling 58.5 Km/H
Wet Circle 12.93 s
Straight Aqua 95.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.25 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 70 dB
Value
Wear 35865 KM
Value 23.42 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance 7.99 kg / t
Energy Consumption 19.17 kWh/100km
Abrasion 1211 g
More information
4
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
96.6%
Dry 98% Wet 98% Comfort 98% Value 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 33.9 M
Dry Handling 70.4 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 39.1 M
Wet Handling 58.3 Km/H
Wet Circle 13.01 s
Straight Aqua 94.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.27 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 70 dB
Value
Wear 33015 KM
Value 21.05 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance 7.51 kg / t
Energy Consumption 20.02 kWh/100km
Abrasion 1234 g
More information
5
Bridgestone Potenza Sport ▲2
94.4%
Dry 98% Wet 99% Comfort 96% Value 59%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34 M
Dry Handling 70.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 39.4 M
Wet Handling 59.2 Km/H
Wet Circle 12.88 s
Straight Aqua 94.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.24 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 71.2 dB
Value
Wear 18530 KM
Value 38.32 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance 9.1 kg / t
Energy Consumption 20.66 kWh/100km
Abrasion 2093 g
More information
6
Falken e.Ziex ▼1
93.8%
Dry 96% Wet 93% Comfort 98% Value 86%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.7 M
Dry Handling 69.6 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 42.4 M
Wet Handling 56.3 Km/H
Wet Circle 13.39 s
Straight Aqua 92.1 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.94 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 70.2 dB
Value
Wear 27375 KM
Value 23.01 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance 5.55 kg / t
Energy Consumption 18.28 kWh/100km
Abrasion 1244 g
More information
7
GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV ▼1
90.5%
Dry 91% Wet 90% Comfort 97% Value 88%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.9 M
Dry Handling 67.6 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 46 M
Wet Handling 55.2 Km/H
Wet Circle 13.45 s
Straight Aqua 94.1 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.64 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 70.5 dB
Value
Wear 34905 KM
Value 19.48 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance 6.17 kg / t
Energy Consumption 20.82 kWh/100km
Abrasion 1222 g
More information
8
Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
90.4%
Dry 91% Wet 90% Comfort 97% Value 84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.2 M
Dry Handling 67.1 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 48.1 M
Wet Handling 54.3 Km/H
Wet Circle 13.95 s
Straight Aqua 94.7 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 3.28 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 70.5 dB
Value
Wear 27155 KM
Value 14.55 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance 7.71 kg / t
Energy Consumption 19.88 kWh/100km
Abrasion 1211 g
More information
9
Michelin Pilot Sport EV
86.9%
Dry 96% Wet 93% Comfort 96% Value 85%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35 M
Dry Handling 70.1 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 43.3 M
Wet Handling 56.2 Km/H
Wet Circle 12.95 s
Straight Aqua 93.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.7 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 71.3 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 6.55 kg / t
More information
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Each cell shows a bar comparing the tyre to the class leader for that test — a longer bar means stronger performance. Bar colour matches the test category.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.

Similar Tyre Tests

Show All summer tyre tests
2025 AutoView Sports Tyre Test
May 2026 275/35R19 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 5 tyres
2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test
April 2026 215/55 R18 Hankook iON Evo 10 tyres
2026 Motor Summer Tyre Test
April 2026 225/45 R17 Continental PremiumContact 7 9 tyres
2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test
April 2026 275/35 R19 Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS 7 tyres
2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test
March 2026 195/55 R16 Dunlop Blue Response TG 8 tyres
2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test
March 2026 205/45 R17 Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo 7 tyres

Discussion

2 comments
  1. Morten KA archived

    In your test, the Continental tire has lower rolling resistance than the Hankook. But according to the EU tire marking, the Continental tire is a C tire and the Hankook is an A tire. How can that be?

    #10054
    1. TyreReviews Morten KA archived

      I don't know the answer (this isn't my test) however tyre manufacturers are allowed to downgrade label scores if they want to for marketing reasons.

      #10060