Menu

2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Tested and written by Jonathan Benson
13 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Reference Tyres: Reference tyres are highlighted with a yellow background and are included as benchmarks rather than competitive entries.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 (Reference)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
Giti GitiWinterW2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 (Reference)
Kumho Winter Craft WP52
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Leao Winter Defender UHP

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 10.97 M (31.9%) | Avg: 42.12 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 with a result of 41.22 M. The difference between best and worst was 9.1%. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 [reference tyre] was 16.6% better than the best competitive tyre.
  1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    34.39 M
  2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    41.08 M
  3. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    41.22 M
  4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    41.64 M
  5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    42.54 M
  6. Giti GitiWinterW2
    42.66 M
  7. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    42.66 M
  8. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    42.74 M
  9. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    42.97 M
  10. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    43.1 M
  11. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    43.49 M
  12. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    43.65 M
  13. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    45.36 M

Dry Handling (s)

Spread: 3.30 s (4.7%) | Avg: 71.62 s

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 with a result of 70.81 s. The difference between best and worst was 3.3%. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 [reference tyre] was 1.2% better than the best competitive tyre.
  1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    69.94 s
  2. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    70.81 s
  3. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    71.25 s
  4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    71.4 s
  5. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    71.45 s
  6. Giti GitiWinterW2
    71.59 s
  7. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    71.68 s
  8. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    71.84 s
  9. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    71.86 s
  10. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    71.91 s
  11. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    72 s
  12. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    72.06 s
  13. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    73.24 s

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Spread: 8.00 Points (8%) | Avg: 97.08 Points

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 8%.
  1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    100 Points
  2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    100 Points
  3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    100 Points
  4. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    98 Points
  5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    98 Points
  6. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    98 Points
  7. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    98 Points
  8. Giti GitiWinterW2
    98 Points
  9. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    95 Points
  10. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    95 Points
  11. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    95 Points
  12. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    95 Points
  13. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    92 Points

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 10.42 M (42.1%) | Avg: 28.83 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 with a result of 27.28 M. The difference between best and worst was 22.4%. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 [reference tyre] was 9.3% better than the best competitive tyre.
  1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    24.74 M
  2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    27.28 M
  3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    27.74 M
  4. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    27.83 M
  5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    27.94 M
  6. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    28.45 M
  7. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    28.49 M
  8. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    28.5 M
  9. Giti GitiWinterW2
    28.84 M
  10. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    29.43 M
  11. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    29.58 M
  12. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    30.8 M
  13. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    35.16 M

Wet Handling (s)

Spread: 9.72 s (17.3%) | Avg: 58.70 s

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 with a result of 56.33 s. The difference between best and worst was 14.7%. The best competitive tyre was 0.9% better than Hankook Ventus Prime 4 [reference tyre].
  1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    56.33 s
  2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    56.87 s
  3. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    57.53 s
  4. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    57.97 s
  5. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    57.97 s
  6. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    58.01 s
  7. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    58.09 s
  8. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    58.15 s
  9. Giti GitiWinterW2
    58.2 s
  10. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    58.36 s
  11. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    59.38 s
  12. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    60.19 s
  13. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    66.05 s

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Spread: 20.00 Points (20%) | Avg: 95.62 Points

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 20%. The best competitive tyre was 2% better than Hankook Ventus Prime 4 [reference tyre].
  1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    100 Points
  2. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    98 Points
  3. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    98 Points
  4. Giti GitiWinterW2
    98 Points
  5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    98 Points
  6. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    98 Points
  7. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    98 Points
  8. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    98 Points
  9. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    95 Points
  10. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    95 Points
  11. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    95 Points
  12. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    92 Points
  13. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    80 Points

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 8.99 Km/H (9%) | Avg: 94.56 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 with a result of 96.81 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 5.9%. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 [reference tyre] was 3.4% better than the best competitive tyre.
  1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    100.07 Km/H
  2. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    96.81 Km/H
  3. Giti GitiWinterW2
    96.03 Km/H
  4. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    95.24 Km/H
  5. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    95.05 Km/H
  6. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    94.96 Km/H
  7. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    94.7 Km/H
  8. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    93.89 Km/H
  9. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    93.63 Km/H
  10. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    93.3 Km/H
  11. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    92.97 Km/H
  12. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    91.52 Km/H
  13. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    91.08 Km/H

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Spread: 20.53 M (114.5%) | Avg: 20.29 M

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook Winter i cept evo3 with a result of 17.93 M. The difference between best and worst was 14.5%. The best competitive tyre was 3.9% better than Hankook Kinergy 4S2 [reference tyre].
  1. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    17.93 M
  2. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    17.97 M
  3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    18.26 M
  4. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    18.38 M
  5. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    18.57 M
  6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    18.59 M
  7. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    18.65 M
  8. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    18.76 M
  9. Giti GitiWinterW2
    18.94 M
  10. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    19.05 M
  11. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    19.23 M
  12. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    20.965 M
  13. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    38.46 M

Snow Traction (s)

Spread: 8.70 s (157%) | Avg: 6.51 s

Snow acceleration time (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 with a result of 5.54 s. The difference between best and worst was 9.9%. The best competitive tyre was 5.8% better than Hankook Kinergy 4S2 [reference tyre].
  1. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    5.54 s
  2. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    5.65 s
  3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    5.73 s
  4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    5.76 s
  5. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    5.79 s
  6. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    5.88 s
  7. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    5.91 s
  8. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    5.95 s
  9. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    5.98 s
  10. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    5.98 s
  11. Giti GitiWinterW2
    6.09 s
  12. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    6.15 s
  13. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    14.24 s

Snow Handling (s)

Spread: 37.92 s (45%) | Avg: 89.55 s

Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 with a result of 84.26 s. The difference between best and worst was 7.1%. The best competitive tyre was 3.3% better than Hankook Kinergy 4S2 [reference tyre].
  1. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    84.26 s
  2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    84.82 s
  3. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    85 s
  4. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    85.24 s
  5. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    86.32 s
  6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    86.63 s
  7. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    86.79 s
  8. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    87.12 s
  9. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    87.61 s
  10. Giti GitiWinterW2
    87.61 s
  11. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    89.95 s
  12. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    90.66 s
  13. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    122.18 s

Subj. Snow Handling ( Points)

Spread: 50.00 Points (50%) | Avg: 90.00 Points

Subjective Snow Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 10%. The best competitive tyre was 8.7% better than Hankook Kinergy 4S2 [reference tyre].
  1. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    100 Points
  2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    95 Points
  3. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    95 Points
  4. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    95 Points
  5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    95 Points
  6. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    92 Points
  7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    92 Points
  8. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    92 Points
  9. Giti GitiWinterW2
    92 Points
  10. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    92 Points
  11. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    90 Points
  12. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    90 Points
  13. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    50 Points

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Spread: 10.00 Points (10%) | Avg: 95.54 Points

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 10%. The best competitive tyre was 5.3% better than Hankook Kinergy 4S2 [reference tyre].
  1. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    100 Points
  2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    100 Points
  3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    100 Points
  4. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    100 Points
  5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    100 Points
  6. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    95 Points
  7. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    95 Points
  8. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    95 Points
  9. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    95 Points
  10. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    92 Points
  11. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    90 Points
  12. Giti GitiWinterW2
    90 Points
  13. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    90 Points

Value Performance Overview

Price

Spread: 93.99 (102.2%) | Avg: 142.17

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Leao Winter Defender UHP. The difference between best and worst was 50.5%.
  1. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    92
  2. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    110.79
  3. Giti GitiWinterW2
    116.79
  4. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    125.19
  5. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    137.99
  6. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    142.89
  7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    152.99
  8. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    154.99
  9. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    171.59
  10. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    172.69
  11. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    185.99

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 1.51 kg / t (20.4%) | Avg: 8.34 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental WinterContact TS 870 P with a result of 7.39 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 17%. The best competitive tyre was 3.9% better than Hankook Ventus Prime 4 [reference tyre].
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    7.39 kg / t
  2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ref
    7.69 kg / t
  3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    7.85 kg / t
  4. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Ref
    7.91 kg / t
  5. Leao Winter Defender UHP
    8.44 kg / t
  6. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    8.45 kg / t
  7. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    8.49 kg / t
  8. Hankook Winter i cept evo3
    8.49 kg / t
  9. Kumho Winter Craft WP52
    8.6 kg / t
  10. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
    8.62 kg / t
  11. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
    8.76 kg / t
  12. Giti GitiWinterW2
    8.79 kg / t
  13. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
    8.9 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Reference Tyres: Reference tyres (highlighted with yellow background) are included as benchmarks rather than competitive entries. They typically show as 0% in overall scoring as they are not part of the final ranking.
Position Tyre Score
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 97.9%
2 Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 97.8%
3 Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 97.5%
4 Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 96.2%
5 Hankook Winter i cept evo3 96.2%
6 Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 95.3%
7 Giti GitiWinterW2 94.3%
8 Vredestein Wintrac Pro 94%
9 Kumho Winter Craft WP52 92.8%
10 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro 92.6%
11 Leao Winter Defender UHP 88.8%
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2 (Reference) 0%
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4 (Reference) 0%

Test Winner

Leao Winter Defender UHP
Leao Winter Defender UHP

88.8%

Discussion

47 comments
  1. Flux Pavillion archived

    Why do the same tyres (e.g. Conti WinterContact TS 870 P) have different rolling resistance values in this test and the UHP-Winter-Tyre-Test?? Also some other categories highly differ between the two tests.

    #10339
  2. Flux Pavillion archived

    to me this suggests that good AllSeason-Tyres are plain BETTER THAN WINTER-Tyres if you rarely drive in snow. Am I correct?
    The advantage in Dry and Wet performance of the AllSeason againt a winter tyre seems much more significant than the downside on snow and ice. Isn't it a no-brainer to choose the allseason if there is only snow 3-4 days a year?

    I wonder: Are the results for wet and dry still so much in favour for the AllSeason when tested in much cooler temperatures (around and sub zero?).

    The data from your Winter-Tyre-Tests suggest the same situation.

    Idea for a future test: Pick a good AllSeason and Winter tyre and define at which temperature the Winter-Tyre pulls ahead.

    #10338
    1. TyreReviews Flux Pavillion archived

      Correct, I think an all season tyre as a winter tyre is a good option for mild winter climates.

      #10342
  3. adven ture archived

    Where is Nokian Tyres???, the legendary tyre brand.... Looks like this test setup was made only to favor certain brands...

    #9769
    1. TyreReviews adven ture archived

      I spoke with nokian and they didn't have a tyre they wanted testing in this category.

      #9808
  4. Lennart H archived

    At what temperature was the wet brake test carried out? I'm trying to decide whether to buy all-weather tires and only use them in winter, because the winters in Germany (in my region) don't get that cold anymore. The last few years max. -5 degrees C. And the effective temperature of winter tires is only up to about 7 degrees C.

    I am between the Allseasoncontact 2 and the Blizzak LM005. The Blizzak performs better in the wet, which would be important for me. But I don't know whether, for example, the (wet) braking distance of these tires worsens when it gets warmer. Because the braking distance of the all- season tires would then remain pretty much the same. In addition, the winter tires would wear out more in the warmer temperatures.

    #9655
    1. TyreReviews Lennart H archived

      I'd have to dig out my notes but I believe around 15c

      #9659
  5. Patrick Boudry archived

    I see you tested here the Mich Alpin 5 ;is this tyre better than the Alpin 6 ??
    I drive with a BMW G30 252 hp now with Hankook S1evo3 ,can i better choose for HK ?Would i feel a big difference with Michelin ? We don't have many snow over here...
    In fact i want to try anything else but HK is very good in price here in Belgium ;about 67,- euro per tyre cheaper
    Thanks

    #9305
    1. TyreReviews Patrick Boudry archived

      Different category, the Pilot version is more performance orientated for larger wheel sizes.

      #9308
  6. Melloon archived

    Hello, in the tests you indicate how many kilometers the tire can last before it wears down and has to be replaced. But we don't know how high the sample is. It is different in every country. You can state it, in Germany it is 1.6 mm, elsewhere, for example, 4 mm. So everyone has a different approach to a given set of tires.

    #9261
    1. TyreReviews Melloon archived

      There was no wear in this test?

      #9272
  7. Mike archived

    Hi, great review again this year thanks. I've moved on to a Tesla 3 and I'm looking forward to the Alps runs over the ski season. Given the Cross Climate 2 is so good in the snow, it really comes down to choosing the all season or dedicated winter tyre. So the question, please, for NONE SNOW conditions, wet, damp and freezing UK road conditions during the winter only, does the Alpin 5 or LM005 outperform the CC2 outside of the snow?
    Thanks

    #9248
    1. TyreReviews Mike archived

      I think the LM005 would be better in the wet, the CC2 will be better in the dry

      #9251
    2. Massimo Mike archived

      Hi Mike, I live in London and four years ago went for the LM005 as winter tyre set for my Model 3. They are truly remarkable tyres and deserving all the praise that they received for wet conditions, and I think a great choice for UK winter climate (more wet than icy/snowy).

      Given the relatively mild winter climate at these latitudes, I often wondered whether the CC2 might have been a wiser choice, replacing the hassle of swapping tyres twice every year. What is putting me off is higher rolling resistance (LM005 are really efficient for a winter tyre!) and arguably less sporty performances both in winter and summer. I have no direct experience with CC2s, it would be nice to hear from someone who made this choice on this same car.

      As an aside, given the healthy pace of EV adoption, it would be cool to hear from @TyreReviews:disqus whether EV driving dynamics are such that they warrant separate tyre tests, or if the findings in these articles can generalize past ICE vehicles. Thank you!

      #9256
  8. PA5 archived

    I think the information about size of rim protection for Pilot Alpin 5 in this test is incorrect. Size is stated to be Large - but it is certainly smaller than rim protection on TS870P.

    I bought Pilot Alpin 5 based on this test and the fact that rim protection was stated to be large!

    However when my tires arrived the rim protection was very small and when I checked your video it’s obvious that protection is small! What a pity.

    LM005 has the largest, then TS870P has medium Pilot Alpin 5 is the smallest from these three.

    #9242
    1. TyreReviews PA5 archived

      I've just double checked the static photos and while there isn't a great angle, the 3/4 shot shows quite a sizable rim protection.

      Rim protection varies based on tyre size, and of course rim width fitted. Looking at my more recent test of the same tires in 255/40 R19 the Michelin also has a larger rim protector than the Conti.

      Sorry you didn't get as much protection as you thought you'd get.

      #9243
  9. Melloon archived

    Hello, thanks for the excellent tests. I would like to ask you if it would be possible to put winter and year-round tests together in the table. It will be wonderful to see how they are doing in exact numbers. All-season tires in many cases here in Europe (little or no snow) are worth using as winter tires and for summer to have really summer ones. And this combination, year-round in winter and summer in summer, works out better than the winter + summer combination.
    The year-round ones are also better suited in the summer and you don't have to throw away the 4 mm sample. Keep in mind that in each country, there are different sample rules.
    So, the indicated runs need to be specified to which number on the tire sample it is. E.g. Germany summer and winter 1.6 mm. All the best.

    #9239
    1. TyreReviews Melloon archived

      this only works out when the tests was done on the same day, sadly that hasn't been the case up until now, but next year I will be doing this.

      #9246
  10. juric archived

    Greetings from Croatia.
    I use summer tyres Goodyear 215/55 R18 99V on my almost new Mokka 100KW.
    I need some advice about winter tyres.
    1. May I mount a different tyre size (except 215/55 R18) on the 7Jx18 ET 35 rims. I would like
    smaller.
    2. Recommend me, please,
    brand of winter tyres. I would like a comfortable, quiet tyre. Very good in the rain, good in the dry and snow.
    (Bridgestone Continental, Goodyear, Dunlop.).
    3. If I stay at the size 215/55 R, could I put instead load/speed index 99V
    level down 97(96)and H ?
    Thank you very much
    Juric

    #9224
  11. Sonny archived

    Great comparative review. But why not including any EV specific tyres? Or a specific EV tyres test. I have only EVs and not a single Hankook ION i*cept professional review on internet.

    #9212
    1. TyreReviews Sonny archived

      I'm not sure there's enough non-oe EV winter tires to test yet, but a lot of these tires are noted as EV-Ready which means the brands don't plan to make an EV specific model in this category.

      #9213
  12. Pedro Neves archived

    Interesting to see the Hankook Prime 4 have a massive win in the aquaplaning test when it always struggles quite behind the best in summer tyre tests, and doesn´t even have a great tread depth compared to the winter and all season tyres in this test. I've always thought winter and all season tyres had a lot more aquaplaning resistance. Another good reason to change tyres when the winter season is over.

    #9196
    1. TyreReviews Pedro Neves archived

      Asymmetric ribs are very good for aquaplaning :)

      #9206
  13. Gordan Žokalj archived

    I'm not too surprised about the results. All tires and results are somehow expected. Very interesting data since you tested all-season and summer tires too to compare results. I'm surprised how much better the summer tire is in performance in dry conditions. What was the air temperature during the test?

    #9173
    1. TyreReviews Gordan Žokalj archived

      If I recall around 10c. Summer will be better in the dry whatever the temp

      #9179
  14. Scour archived

    Yeah, big Thanks for this review :)

    No big surprises so far, the LM005 and Pilot Alpin 5 seems to be simply the best.

    It´s annoying that the Pilot are not available in my size, so I decided last year to get the LM005.

    At least it won my vote because of the large Rim Protection, my other choices, the Hankook icept RS3 and Pirelli Winter Cinturato 2 don´t offer this kind of protection.

    So also a big Thanks for mention this :)

    I´m not absoluty satisfied with my LM005, it´s a very good tyre for wet grip, but the quality doesn´t confied me. After one winter the front tyre(s) looks like the tread is cracked in the middle. And on some surfaces it start to have micro-vibrations.

    Hope there will a alternative in my size in the next years, maybe an Alpin 7?

    #9163
  15. Scour archived

    I saw the Auto Express Winter tyre test is out since 20. Sept.

    https://www.autoexpress.co....

    But strange thing I don´t know in which issue the test is.

    #9161
  16. Dmitrii archived

    Did you compare TS860S vs VikingContact7 (ice braking)?? I can not find any tests for different types of tires..

    #9156
    1. TyreReviews Dmitrii archived

      I did vc7 against TS870 yes, find the VC7 page and the test is linked there.

      #9157
  17. Stanislav B archived

    Hi guys, I need help... I am trying to buy the best tires for my mother, its 205/60 R16 for hatchback... she drives around 3000 km a year, usually regional roads and city. We live in the are we there is no much snow during the year, but sometimes you cannot predict... I dont care about the price, just want to get her best tyre for winter, summer ... somebody would say that all season might be best, but the braking performance in wet (for winter tyres) and dry (for summer) are quite better in comparison to all season... i compare just the best 3 tyres... economy of the tyre does not play the role.... what would be your suggestion? https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

    thanks!

    #9154
    1. TyreReviews Stanislav B archived

      It depends if you want 2 sets. If you do the PC7 and LM005 combo is hard to beat but also the all seasons are a great compromise assuming she's not racing around and you don't have to worry about changing them.

      #9158
      1. Stanislav B TyreReviews archived

        thanks, she is very comfort driver. Only thing where I fear is the braking distance, for summer ones will be better, in winter to winter ones will be better. Do I understand correctly, that the braking distances are not important when driving in comfort?

        #9424
        1. TyreReviews Stanislav B archived

          I'm not sure I understand. Braking distances are always important to me as that's when you need a tyre the most (emergency braking!)

          #9443
  18. Tranquility archived

    You mention that some tyres may have got an update, in this case the Vredestein. Is there a way to see if an tyre did have an update within the same model? Something like "Mark I", "Mark II", printed on the sidewall etc?

    I was surprised that the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was the winner in the test again. I have had these tyres on my Opel Ampera-e (215/50/r17) for three seasons and it has only 3mm of tread depth left. The tyre indeed has great grip (couldn't try it in the snow, because we didn't have any), but the comfort, and especially the sound, is lacking. Rarely had such a noisy tyre. But that will undoubtedly also have to do with the fact that it is an EV, so you will hear more tyre noise. But maybe this tyre also got an update? So I'm still in doubt as to which tyre I'm going to get for my winter rims. Possibly a All Season tire, given the good performance of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 or perhaps the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3. Which would you prefer for use in an area with mild winters?

    #9133
    1. TyreReviews Tranquility archived

      Usually midlife updates are not published anywhere, I have no info for them sadly.

      The Bridgestone does seem to wear very quickly but as we don't test that for this test I can't include it in the results.

      I think there are a number of goood allseason-as-winter-tyre options for the UK like climates, check out the two most recent all season tests for full info

      #9137
  19. Lukica Stipetić archived

    Very interesting results..especially for WINTRAC PRO, a tire that until recently was the "queen in the wet"

    #9131
    1. TyreReviews Lukica Stipetić archived

      Are you thinking about the Wintrac being queen in wet? (newer different product)

      #9135
  20. acmeopinionfactory archived

    Why no Nokian tyres?
    I've used them for many years and found their performance quite good.

    #9120
    1. TyreReviews acmeopinionfactory archived

      The SnowProof range was made in Russia so availability was difficult at time of purchasing tyres.

      #9123
    2. Scour acmeopinionfactory archived

      Nokian fights often with very different quality and weakness in minimal one of the 3 test categories.

      Personally I avoid Nokian since the WR D3. Not because Nokian give the testers money to get better results, the WR D3 Made in Russia looks after 3 years very cracked and was very bad in the wet. Our oldest tyres in the last decades, 9 year old Toyo Snowprox S940 and 8 year old Dunlop SP01 AS looks so much better. And in contrast to the Nokian the Toyo and Dunlop were fit on a car which was never in a garage.

      #9162
  21. Tranquility archived

    Again, great test. Nice work!
    It is amazing to see how well the all season Hankook Kinergy 4S2 performs in the test. This actually makes it the ultimate mild climate tyre.
    Also I’m happy to see that you have added the degree of rim protection. Nice!

    #9117
      1. Scour TyreReviews archived

        Hope in the next summer tyre test you will also add the Rim Protection degree :)

        #9306
        1. TyreReviews Scour archived

          It's already in this test, noted in the results section

          #9307
          1. Scour TyreReviews archived

            You mean the last summer tyres test, I guess :)

            Have seen it now, Thanks :)

            #9310