Dry 41%

Wet 59%

Dry 41% · Wet 59%

Dry

Wet

Fine-tune sub-categories

Dry

Dry Braking

Wet

Wet Braking

Test Results Data

BEST Good Average Below Average

#	Tyre	Total Score	Dry		Wet
#	Tyre	Total Score	Braking M	%	Braking M	%
1	Bridgestone Turanza T005	99.9%	35.8 3	99.7%	27.5 ★	100%
2	Hankook Ventus Prime 4	99.2%	35.8 3	99.7%	27.8 2	98.9%
3 ▲2	Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	98.3%	36.5	97.8%	27.9 3	98.6%
4 ▼1	Vredestein Ultrac	98.1%	36.1	98.9%	28.2	97.5%
5 ▼2	Kumho Ecsta HS52	97.7%	35.7 ★	100%	28.6	96.2%
6	Nokian PowerProof	97.1%	35.7 ★	100%	28.9	95.2%
7	Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2	96.9%	36.1	98.9%	28.8	95.5%
8 ▲2	Nexen N Fera Primus	96.1%	37.2	96%	28.6	96.2%
9 ▼1	Michelin Primacy 4	95.8%	36.2	98.6%	29.3	93.9%
10 ▼1	Toyo Proxes Comfort	95.6%	35.9	99.4%	29.6	92.9%
11 ▲3	Maxxis Premitra HP5	95.4%	37.3	95.7%	28.9	95.2%
12 ▼1	Fulda SportControl 2	95.3%	36.5	97.8%	29.4	93.5%
13 ▼1	Kleber Dynaxer HP4	94.8%	36.3	98.4%	29.8	92.3%
14 ▼2	Sava Intensa UHP 2	94.7%	36.2	98.6%	29.9	92%
15	Debica Presto UHP2	94.5%	36.5	97.8%	29.8	92.3%
16	Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	94.4%	36.8	97%	29.7	92.6%
17	GT-Radial FE2	94.2%	37	96.5%	29.7	92.6%
18	BFGoodrich Advantage	92.7%	36.3	98.4%	31	88.7%
19 ▲1	Goodride SA57	91.1%	37.3	95.7%	31.3	87.9%
20 ▼1	Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus	91%	36.5	97.8%	31.9	86.2%
21	Continental EcoContact 6	89.8%	36.4	98.1%	32.7	84.1%
22 ▲3	Cooper Zeon CS8	89.3%	39.1	91.3%	31.3	87.9%
23	Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51	89.2%	37.7	94.7%	32.2	85.4%
24	Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	88.8%	37.2	96%	32.8	83.8%
25 ▲3	Hifly HF805	88.7%	38.5	92.7%	32	85.9%
26 ▲4	Tyfoon Successor 5	88.6%	38.5	92.7%	32.1	85.7%
27 ▼2	Infinity Ecomax	88.4%	37.7	94.7%	32.7	84.1%
28 ▼3	Starmaxx Ultra Sport ST760	88.4%	37.5	95.2%	32.9	83.6%
29 ▼1	Firestone RoadHawk	88.3%	37.7	94.7%	32.8	83.8%
30 ▲1	Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04	87.6%	38.7	92.3%	32.6	84.4%
31 ▲2	Landsail DH2	87.2%	39.1	91.3%	32.6	84.4%
32 ▲3	General Altimax One S	86.6%	39.3	90.8%	32.9	83.6%
33 ▲1	Uniroyal RainSport 5	86.6%	38.4	93%	33.5	82.1%
34 ▲7	Semperit Speed Life 3	85.6%	40	89.3%	33.1	83.1%
35 ▲3	Zeetex HP2000 vfm	85.5%	38.9	91.8%	33.9	81.1%
36 ▲3	Aplus A607	85.4%	39	91.5%	33.9	81.1%
37 ▲5	Viking Protech Newgen	85.4%	39.8	89.7%	33.4	82.3%
38 ▲6	Barum Bravuris 5HM	85.3%	40	89.3%	33.3	82.6%
39 ▲3	Tracmax X Privilo TX3	84.9%	38.9	91.8%	34.3	80.2%
40 ▲7	Imperial Ecosport 2	84.3%	40.3	88.6%	33.8	81.4%
41 ▲4	Lassa DriveWays	84%	39	91.5%	34.9	78.8%
42 ▲6	Rotalla RU01 S Pace	83%	39.8	89.7%	35.1	78.4%
43 ▲6	Firemax FM601	81.8%	39.8	89.7%	36	76.4%
44 ▲6	Atlas Sport Green 2	81.4%	39.5	90.4%	36.6	75.1%

Scroll for more

Dry 100% Wet 100%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 35.8 M 3

Wet

Wet Braking 27.5 M ★

Dry 100% Wet 99%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 35.8 M 3

Wet

Wet Braking 27.8 M 2

Dry 98% Wet 99%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.5 M

Wet

Wet Braking 27.9 M 3

Dry 99% Wet 98%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.1 M

Wet

Wet Braking 28.2 M

Dry 100% Wet 96%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 35.7 M ★

Wet

Wet Braking 28.6 M

Dry 100% Wet 95%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 35.7 M ★

Wet

Wet Braking 28.9 M

Dry 99% Wet 96%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.1 M

Wet

Wet Braking 28.8 M

Dry 96% Wet 96%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 37.2 M

Wet

Wet Braking 28.6 M

Dry 99% Wet 94%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.2 M

Wet

Wet Braking 29.3 M

Dry 99% Wet 93%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 35.9 M

Wet

Wet Braking 29.6 M

Dry 96% Wet 95%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 37.3 M

Wet

Wet Braking 28.9 M

Dry 98% Wet 94%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.5 M

Wet

Wet Braking 29.4 M

Dry 98% Wet 92%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.3 M

Wet

Wet Braking 29.8 M

Dry 99% Wet 92%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.2 M

Wet

Wet Braking 29.9 M

Dry 98% Wet 92%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.5 M

Wet

Wet Braking 29.8 M

Dry 97% Wet 93%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.8 M

Wet

Wet Braking 29.7 M

Dry 97% Wet 93%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 37 M

Wet

Wet Braking 29.7 M

Dry 98% Wet 89%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.3 M

Wet

Wet Braking 31 M

Dry 96% Wet 88%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 37.3 M

Wet

Wet Braking 31.3 M

Dry 98% Wet 86%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.5 M

Wet

Wet Braking 31.9 M

Dry 98% Wet 84%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 36.4 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32.7 M

Dry 91% Wet 88%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 39.1 M

Wet

Wet Braking 31.3 M

Dry 95% Wet 85%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 37.7 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32.2 M

Dry 96% Wet 84%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 37.2 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32.8 M

Dry 93% Wet 86%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 38.5 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32 M

Dry 93% Wet 86%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 38.5 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32.1 M

Dry 95% Wet 84%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 37.7 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32.7 M

Dry 95% Wet 84%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 37.5 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32.9 M

Dry 95% Wet 84%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 37.7 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32.8 M

Dry 92% Wet 84%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 38.7 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32.6 M

Dry 91% Wet 84%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 39.1 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32.6 M

Dry 91% Wet 84%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 39.3 M

Wet

Wet Braking 32.9 M

Dry 93% Wet 82%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 38.4 M

Wet

Wet Braking 33.5 M

Dry 89% Wet 83%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 40 M

Wet

Wet Braking 33.1 M

Dry 92% Wet 81%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 38.9 M

Wet

Wet Braking 33.9 M

Dry 92% Wet 81%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 39 M

Wet

Wet Braking 33.9 M

Dry 90% Wet 82%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 39.8 M

Wet

Wet Braking 33.4 M

Dry 89% Wet 83%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 40 M

Wet

Wet Braking 33.3 M

Dry 92% Wet 80%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 38.9 M

Wet

Wet Braking 34.3 M

Dry 89% Wet 81%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 40.3 M

Wet

Wet Braking 33.8 M

Dry 92% Wet 79%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 39 M

Wet

Wet Braking 34.9 M

Dry 90% Wet 78%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 39.8 M

Wet

Wet Braking 35.1 M

Dry 90% Wet 76%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 39.8 M

Wet

Wet Braking 36 M

Dry 90% Wet 75%

View detailed scores

Dry

Dry Braking 39.5 M

Wet

Wet Braking 36.6 M

Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.

Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.

The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.

Discussion

18 comments

Simon H Jul 25, 2022 archived

Does anyone know when Dunlop will be replacing the RT2? I really liked that tyre, but technology has moved on and it over due a replacement.

#8162
1. TyreReviews Simon H Jul 25, 2022 archived
  
  RT2 was close to the Asym 3 so you're right it's pretty old now. I don't know anything about a replacement in the near future so I'd suggest moving to the Goodyear range, as they're similar in feel but generally better in the wet and RR now.
  
  #8163
murray Mar 16, 2022 archived

Can you provide any indication when you hope to post your review or comparison of the Pilot Sport 5. Really want to make the most of a limited time offer however would be good to see how it compares!

#7892
1. TyreReviews murray Mar 16, 2022 archived
  
  Around the first week of April
  
  #7893
4cvg Mar 12, 2022 archived

One thing that astonishes me is the number of rubbish brands in the test. By all means include a few to show that rubbish is rubbish but a better service to their tyre-interested readers would be achieved by having most of the tyres from the first & second quality tiers.

#7878
1. TyreReviews 4cvg Mar 13, 2022 archived
  
  Who do you think is missing? There's certainly issues with the size tested not allowing everyone we'd expect.
  
  #7880
  1. 4cvg TyreReviews Mar 14, 2022 archived
    
    Michelin PS4 &/or 5 (for comparison with included P4)
    Continental PC6 &/or 5 (for comparison with the woefully eco-skewed EC6)
    Pirelli P7C2
    Each available according to your tyre search function.
    
    #7883
    1. TyreReviews 4cvg Mar 14, 2022 archived
      
      I believe PC6 is OE only in this size, and this will have been tested in October last year when there were no PS5s to test (I've had similar issues)
      
      #7886
      1. 4cvg TyreReviews Mar 15, 2022 archived
        
        yep
        
        #7887
semrin Feb 23, 2022 archived

terrible results for conti sub-brands: uniroyal, semperit, barum … what is the issue with semperit? last year one of the best in both adac and autobild test, this year one of the worst …

#7830
1. TyreReviews semrin Feb 23, 2022 archived
  
  I can only assume it's a function of the size. But yes, very strange.
  
  #7831
  1. HP k TyreReviews Feb 24, 2022 archived
    
    Would you say that with these sub-brands there is more difference between sizes?
    For example it looks like Michelin Primacy 4 is always on top no matter the tyre size.
    Still, there I also see differences even between two speed ratings on the same tyre.
    
    #7834
    1. TyreReviews HP k Feb 24, 2022 archived
      
      I'm afraid I don't have the answer for that! It's an interesting question though.
      
      #7837
  2. Pedro Neves TyreReviews Feb 25, 2022 archived
    
    Even the Conti EcoContact 6 is going to be out of the top 20! Continental went too far making this tyre too eco friendly and very water unfriendly.
    
    #7838
    1. TyreReviews Pedro Neves Feb 25, 2022 archived
      
      It will be interesting to see how it does in the full test, it's certainly aimed at a specific solution, but it might also be the way all tyres go eventually
      
      #7839
      1. Pedro Neves TyreReviews Feb 25, 2022 archived
        
        I believe manufacturers like Continental design tyres like the EcoContact 6 for car constructors that need to present cars to the public with the lowest emissions possible, and then design tyres for the aftermarket for those of us who want the best (or at least the most reasonable) performance possible. Too bad Auto Bild didn't want to test the Premium Contact 6, since the Eco Contact 6 ended up out of the top 20 that will move on to the full test. Likewise, it would be great if Auto Bild went for testing the Michelin PS4 and the E.Primacy. Strangely enough, they left Pirelli out when they could have tested or chosen 2 different tyres from!
        
        #7840
        
        TyreReviews Pedro Neves Feb 26, 2022 archived
        
        Auto Bild changed the rules so the EcoContact 6 is in the full test. There's no premium contact 6 in this size.
        And you're pretty on the money with your belief :)
        
        #7841
        
        Petr TyreReviews Mar 3, 2022 archived
        
        It is similar for Goodyear - seems that with EG Performance 2 they focused on mileage and rolling resistance rather than safety. How I wish they cared for chemical stability and thus preserving safety properties for longer instead!
        However, Conti EcoContact 6 is a bigger disaster because PremiumContact 6 is not produced in smaller sizes and PremiumContact 5 is no longer available. I honestly didn't expect it to be THAT bad. And they even started to offer even more "ECO" UltraContact for ultra high mileage which inevitably will provide safety properties of a hockey puck.
        
        #7856

Menu

2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview

Adjust Result Weighting

Dry

Wet

Test Results Data

Similar Tyre Tests

Discussion