Menu

2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated

Adjust Result Weighting

The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Dry 35%
Wet 50%
Comfort 5%
Value 10%
Dry 35% · Wet 50% · Comfort 5% · Value 10%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet
Comfort
Value

Test Results Data

BEST Good Average Below Average
# Tyre Total Score Dry Wet Comfort Value
Braking M Handling Km/H % Braking M Handling Km/H Circle m/s Straight Aqua Km/H Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 % Noise dB % Price Rolling Resistance kg / t %
1 ▲1 Bridgestone Turanza T005 97.3% 35.3 3 125.6 2 98.9% 30 2 87.3 2 6.5 65.5 2.8 2 97% 69.4 97% 167 6.5 92.7%
2 ▲3 Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 96% 35.4 125.5 3 98.8% 30.8 3 84.5 6.46 73.3 2.8 2 96.6% 67.3 100% 138 3 8.7 81.1%
3 ▼2 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 95.8% 34.6 125.8 100% 31.3 88.4 6.67 65.6 2.6 96.2% 70 96.1% 203 7.6 78.4%
4 ▲2 Nokian PowerProof 95% 35.3 3 124.7 98.6% 31.4 85.9 6.52 65.2 2.4 94% 69.6 96.7% 144 7.7 86.4%
5 ▼2 Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 94.8% 34.9 2 123.1 98.5% 29.5 85.6 6.54 3 63 2.5 95.6% 70.6 95.3% 160 8.5 78%
6 ▼2 Continental Premium Contact 6 94.7% 35.4 125.5 3 98.8% 31.8 85.9 6.46 65.7 2.8 2 95% 71.1 94.7% 209 7.5 3 78.6%
7 ▲2 Maxxis Victra Sport 5 94.5% 35.6 125.2 98.4% 34.3 86.8 3 6.63 2 67.5 2.5 93.3% 68.5 98.3% 137 2 8.1 85.1%
8 ▲2 GT-Radial SportActive 2 94.4% 37.3 125.3 96.2% 34.4 86.1 6.51 70.1 2 2.9 94.5% 67.8 2 99.3% 130 8.3 85.5%
9 ▼2 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 94.4% 35.4 125.4 98.7% 33.3 84.7 6.4 69.7 3 2.7 93.6% 68.3 3 98.5% 208 7.2 2 81.1%
10 ▼2 Falken Azenis FK510 93.6% 36.3 125.4 97.5% 32.3 85.7 6.5 63.4 2.6 93.7% 70.4 95.6% 155 8.6 78.3%
Scroll for more
Dry 99% Wet 97% Comfort 97% Value 93%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.3 M 3
Dry Handling 125.6 Km/H 2
Wet
Wet Braking 30 M 2
Wet Handling 87.3 Km/H 2
Wet Circle 6.5 m/s
Straight Aqua 65.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.8 m/sec2 2
Comfort
Noise 69.4 dB
Value
Price 167
Rolling Resistance 6.5 kg / t
Dry 99% Wet 97% Comfort 100% Value 81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.4 M
Dry Handling 125.5 Km/H 3
Wet
Wet Braking 30.8 M 3
Wet Handling 84.5 Km/H
Wet Circle 6.46 m/s
Straight Aqua 73.3 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.8 m/sec2 2
Comfort
Noise 67.3 dB
Value
Price 138 3
Rolling Resistance 8.7 kg / t
Dry 100% Wet 96% Comfort 96% Value 78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.6 M
Dry Handling 125.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 31.3 M
Wet Handling 88.4 Km/H
Wet Circle 6.67 m/s
Straight Aqua 65.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.6 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 70 dB
Value
Price 203
Rolling Resistance 7.6 kg / t
4
95%
Dry 99% Wet 94% Comfort 97% Value 86%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.3 M 3
Dry Handling 124.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 31.4 M
Wet Handling 85.9 Km/H
Wet Circle 6.52 m/s
Straight Aqua 65.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.4 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 69.6 dB
Value
Price 144
Rolling Resistance 7.7 kg / t
Dry 99% Wet 96% Comfort 95% Value 78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.9 M 2
Dry Handling 123.1 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 29.5 M
Wet Handling 85.6 Km/H
Wet Circle 6.54 m/s 3
Straight Aqua 63 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.5 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 70.6 dB
Value
Price 160
Rolling Resistance 8.5 kg / t
Dry 99% Wet 95% Comfort 95% Value 79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.4 M
Dry Handling 125.5 Km/H 3
Wet
Wet Braking 31.8 M
Wet Handling 85.9 Km/H
Wet Circle 6.46 m/s
Straight Aqua 65.7 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.8 m/sec2 2
Comfort
Noise 71.1 dB
Value
Price 209
Rolling Resistance 7.5 kg / t 3
7
94.5%
Dry 98% Wet 93% Comfort 98% Value 85%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.6 M
Dry Handling 125.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 34.3 M
Wet Handling 86.8 Km/H 3
Wet Circle 6.63 m/s 2
Straight Aqua 67.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.5 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 68.5 dB
Value
Price 137 2
Rolling Resistance 8.1 kg / t
Dry 96% Wet 95% Comfort 99% Value 86%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.3 M
Dry Handling 125.3 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 34.4 M
Wet Handling 86.1 Km/H
Wet Circle 6.51 m/s
Straight Aqua 70.1 Km/H 2
Curved Aquaplaning 2.9 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 67.8 dB 2
Value
Price 130
Rolling Resistance 8.3 kg / t
9
94.4%
Dry 99% Wet 94% Comfort 99% Value 81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.4 M
Dry Handling 125.4 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 33.3 M
Wet Handling 84.7 Km/H
Wet Circle 6.4 m/s
Straight Aqua 69.7 Km/H 3
Curved Aquaplaning 2.7 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 68.3 dB 3
Value
Price 208
Rolling Resistance 7.2 kg / t 2
10
93.6%
Dry 98% Wet 94% Comfort 96% Value 78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.3 M
Dry Handling 125.4 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking 32.3 M
Wet Handling 85.7 Km/H
Wet Circle 6.5 m/s
Straight Aqua 63.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.6 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise 70.4 dB
Value
Price 155
Rolling Resistance 8.6 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.

Discussion

14 comments
  1. fredzy archived

    I've run PS4 on several cars now and really can't complain about them. On GR86 the OEM set held up to 3 hard track weekends. They are about cooked now at 15,000 miles. The biggest win is that they never had any bad/funny wear patterns, or got significantly louder as they wore or anything like that. This was my experience with some other UHP tires. They are a great summer tire. But the main purpose of this comment is as a test. I haven't been able to post or comment anywhere on the site!

    #10458
    1. TyreReviews fredzy archived

      Glad you got the comment working. Are you also unable to leave a review on the site?

      #10459
      1. fredzy TyreReviews archived

        Thank you for replying! No, I am not able to leave a comment, and I even got an email that I tried sending to [email protected] bounced back to me by the filter policy. Let me know if I get the green light and I will re-send that email with the details on the issues I've been having (unable to verify email for my account, etc)

        #10460
  2. Lokids archived

    Hello,
    Got a set of new Hankook S1 Evo3 based on this test. (Assy6 was not available)
    Do you have any experience how tyre performance change if we change the size? Like 17" ->18". Or 215 -> 225. Or bigger change like 17" -> 20"

    #7958
    1. TyreReviews Lokids archived

      The trends should continue, where it's very close there might be some inversions in the results.

      #7961
  3. BeastMonkey archived

    Hello @TyreReviews:disqus, thank you for all your reviews. For me comfort and noice is most important, but since inside noice does not correlate to external noice, this is hard to judge. I was happy to note the below comment which indicates that the internal noice is measured:

    "External noise testing had no advantage for the foam damped Continental, which was the noisiest outside but the quietest inside the car."

    Would it be possible to include this in future tests?

    #7940
    1. TyreReviews BeastMonkey archived

      I do internal noise testing where it's realistic to do but it's very very time consuming so often not possible sadly

      #7941
  4. T Turkington archived

    Hi there - love your content and can't wait for the Michelin PS5 v Goodyear Asymmetric 6 comparison to come out! I have a quick question about whether the new Goodyear Asymmetric 6 or the existing Goodyear SuperSport would be the better tyre for an enthusiastically driven mainstream car (BMW 3 series)? I prioritise accurate and sharp steering but also have to live with the reality of potholes and speed bumps. Tough one I know but basically wondering how the latest and greatest Asymmetric 6 compares to the 'previous gen' tyre from the UUHP segment above i.e. the SuperSport. Any advice much appreciated!

    #7929
    1. TyreReviews T Turkington archived

      Good question, and I don't have an answer as I've not driven both. I would probably opt for the Asym 6 at this point for a daily.

      #7930
      1. T Turkington TyreReviews archived

        Thanks for the quick reply and thanks again for all your great work.

        #7933
  5. dufonrafal . archived

    Hi, sorry because I don't want to be that guy... But you always seem to make this typo :

    "quiet sensitive" , it's "quite" :D

    #7923
  6. Lukica Stipetić archived

    Too bad there are no Michelin 5 and Falken 520

    #7884