Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Comfort | Value | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Handling Km/H | Subj. Dry Handling Points | % | Braking M | Handling Km/H | Subj. Wet Handling Points | Circle m/s | Straight Aqua Km/H | % | Noise dB | % | Price | Rolling Resistance kg / t | % | |||
| 1 ▲2 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 96.9% | 34 | 128.3 | 9 3 | 97.5% | 34.6 | 72.6 2 | 9 ★ | 9.13 | 89.1 | 98.9% | 72.7 | 97.9% | 240 | 8.7 2 | 83% |
| 2 | Bridgestone Potenza Sport | 96.9% | 33.1 ★ | 129.3 ★ | 10 ★ | 100% | 34.3 3 | 72 3 | 9 ★ | 9.16 2 | 88.1 | 98.9% | 73.1 | 97.4% | 267 | 9.7 | 74.5% |
| 3 ▲2 | Falken Azenis FK510 | 96.8% | 34.3 | 127.2 | 8 | 95.9% | 34.2 2 | 72.8 ★ | 9 ★ | 9.05 | 88.5 | 99% | 72.2 | 98.6% | 161 3 | 9.5 | 87% |
| 4 ▼3 | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S | 96.4% | 33.3 2 | 129.2 2 | 10 ★ | 99.7% | 34.1 ★ | 69.7 | 7 | 9.23 ★ | 89.2 | 96.8% | 72 3 | 98.9% | 259 | 8.8 3 | 80.9% |
| 5 ▼1 | Continental Sport Contact 6 | 96.1% | 34.3 | 129 3 | 9 3 | 97.4% | 36.7 | 71.7 | 8 | 9.08 | 89.8 2 | 96.1% | 71.9 2 | 99% | 211 | 8.3 ★ | 88.7% |
| 6 | Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 95.7% | 33.9 3 | 127 | 7 | 95.4% | 35.1 | 71.2 | 7 | 9.14 3 | 87.6 | 96.1% | 73.1 | 97.4% | 150 2 | 9 | 92.4% |
| 7 | Nankang Sportnex AS2 Plus | 93.3% | 37.5 | 125.2 | 5 | 88.7% | 36.5 | 71.1 | 8 | 8.68 | 91.8 ★ | 95.1% | 71.2 ★ | 100% | 139 ★ | 9 | 94.8% |
| 8 | Toyo Proxes Sport | 90% | 35.8 | 126.7 | 6 | 92% | 41.5 | 68.6 | 7 | 8.41 | 89.7 3 | 89.3% | 72.9 | 97.7% | 192 | 9.7 | 81.2% |
Scroll for more
Dry
98%
Wet
99%
Comfort
98%
Value
83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
34 M
Dry Handling
128.3 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
9 Points
3
Wet
Wet Braking
34.6 M
Wet Handling
72.6 Km/H
2
Subj. Wet Handling
9 Points
★
Wet Circle
9.13 m/s
Straight Aqua
89.1 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.7 dB
Value
Price
240
Rolling Resistance
8.7 kg / t
2
Dry
100%
Wet
99%
Comfort
97%
Value
75%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
33.1 M
★
Dry Handling
129.3 Km/H
★
Subj. Dry Handling
10 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
34.3 M
3
Wet Handling
72 Km/H
3
Subj. Wet Handling
9 Points
★
Wet Circle
9.16 m/s
2
Straight Aqua
88.1 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
73.1 dB
Value
Price
267
Rolling Resistance
9.7 kg / t
Dry
96%
Wet
99%
Comfort
99%
Value
87%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
34.3 M
Dry Handling
127.2 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
8 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
34.2 M
2
Wet Handling
72.8 Km/H
★
Subj. Wet Handling
9 Points
★
Wet Circle
9.05 m/s
Straight Aqua
88.5 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.2 dB
Value
Price
161
3
Rolling Resistance
9.5 kg / t
Dry
100%
Wet
97%
Comfort
99%
Value
81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
33.3 M
2
Dry Handling
129.2 Km/H
2
Subj. Dry Handling
10 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
34.1 M
★
Wet Handling
69.7 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
7 Points
Wet Circle
9.23 m/s
★
Straight Aqua
89.2 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72 dB
3
Value
Price
259
Rolling Resistance
8.8 kg / t
3
Dry
97%
Wet
96%
Comfort
99%
Value
89%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
34.3 M
Dry Handling
129 Km/H
3
Subj. Dry Handling
9 Points
3
Wet
Wet Braking
36.7 M
Wet Handling
71.7 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
8 Points
Wet Circle
9.08 m/s
Straight Aqua
89.8 Km/H
2
Comfort
Noise
71.9 dB
2
Value
Price
211
Rolling Resistance
8.3 kg / t
★
Dry
95%
Wet
96%
Comfort
97%
Value
92%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
33.9 M
3
Dry Handling
127 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
7 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
35.1 M
Wet Handling
71.2 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
7 Points
Wet Circle
9.14 m/s
3
Straight Aqua
87.6 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
73.1 dB
Value
Price
150
2
Rolling Resistance
9 kg / t
Dry
89%
Wet
95%
Comfort
100%
Value
95%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.5 M
Dry Handling
125.2 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
5 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
36.5 M
Wet Handling
71.1 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
8 Points
Wet Circle
8.68 m/s
Straight Aqua
91.8 Km/H
★
Comfort
Noise
71.2 dB
★
Value
Price
139
★
Rolling Resistance
9 kg / t
Dry
92%
Wet
89%
Comfort
98%
Value
81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
35.8 M
Dry Handling
126.7 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling
6 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
41.5 M
Wet Handling
68.6 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling
7 Points
Wet Circle
8.41 m/s
Straight Aqua
89.7 Km/H
3
Comfort
Noise
72.9 dB
Value
Price
192
Rolling Resistance
9.7 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
Thanks for the hard work + great work.
Just wondering if you can help
answer a question that I'm sure it's on the minds of many enthusiasts.
How are a asymmetric/directional pattern tyre's performance, and
dynamics affected if it's mounted inside-out out instead of the correct
way.
Thanks, and eagerly waiting for your test results on the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Sadly I've never tested it, however both would certainly be affected as asymmetric tyres tend to have larger outer shoulder blocks for cornering, and directional tyres would have water dispersal changed.
My test should be out in May!
Hi. Pls help me. I need to replace Michelin Pilot Super Sports. Oe sizes which i want to stary with are 205/45/17 - here i can go with Bridgestone Potenza Sport, which is great choice if this size is equally good as bigger sizes (who knows that?). Better choice is to go to size 205/40/18 but heres the problems are getting bigger. Only "proper" sport tire in this size is Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersport, but this size costs over 400 euro for one tire...... If goin into this better handling 18" size i can go Michelin Pilot Sport 4 or Continental PremiumContact 6. The question is which choice is better for sporty sharp handling. Would You choose Bridgestone Potenza Sport (lets say equivalent of Michelin Pilot Sport 4s) in 17" or Michelin Pilot Sport 4 18"?
Sadly I have not tested this yet, so I won't know until next month! Hopefully you can wait, though it's worth noting the PSS is a very good handling tyre so you might be disappointed whatever you do.
My Super Sports are 17", theyre ok but i want to go to the next level...
If you want the next level in dry handling you might have to move to a more track bias tyre!
The next level could also be the relative new Conti SportContact 6, more sporty than CPC 6.
The Sport Contact 6 isn't made in 17" sadly and only a few 18"
OK, if insisting on 17' then still possible with ContiSportContact 5 or 5 P.
I am on 17" but i try to go up to 18". Stock is 205/40/18, I aim at this size, but i think one and only is GY F1 Supersport which costs 400 Euro per tire...wtf. Other options are less performance tires like Michelin Pilot Sport 4. Got to solve this: better tire Bridgestone Potenza Sport 17" or worse Continental PremiumContact 6 18".
https://www.tyrereviews.com...
None of SportContacts are available in 205/40/18
https://www.tyrereviews.com...
This is 205/45/17...
Yes, you are on 17' and 18' are substantially more expensive and you would still need to buy new 18' rims.
I seek uuhp tires in freakin size 205/40/18. Thats why ive asked for help in my first post...
Bridgestone has aced its latest product it seems. So top marks in UUHP and also a very good tyre in T005 for the premium touring class. But what about the middle ground? Is the S007 the rival to the PS4?
I've no idea about the S007, they didn't really communicate anything.
The Potenza Sport goes down to 17" so it could be the middle ground tyre too
I thought the S007 was only a Ferrari/Renault Megan RS bespoke tyre. I saw quite a few S007A and S005 on recent bimmers. I was under the impression the 007A was the replacement to the S001 and I have no clue about the 005.
https://www.caradvice.com.a...
It seems to me that the direct opponent for the PS4S is the potenza sport and the T005 stacks against primacy 4. I suppose that the S007 is the natural opponent for PS4 but it is absent from almost all testing.
Looking at the size range available of the S007, it seems unlikely this is aimed at the PS4. https://www.tyrereviews.com...
I'll be testing 18" Potenza Sport vs PS4 and 4S so we'll see where it sits in the smaller sizes.
There's no 'middle ground' Bridgestone AFAIK, this idea of having 'performance tyres' that have high grip but soft compliant sidewalls like a touring tyre is a very new idea and seems to be a uniquely European concept. There's the cheaper Potenza RE004 Adrenalin but it's just as rigid in the sidewalls and sharp on the turn-in as the bigger brother Potenza S007A or Sport AFAIK (or perhaps even sharper at <120 km/hr, because the Adrenalin line has traditionally been biased to a lower speed range for backroads driving as opposed to Autobahns or circuits).
I'm pretty sure the distinction between UHP and so-called UUHP has only been created in the last 10 years or less by Michelin, Continental and Goodyear, and Bridgestone will have no part of it -- a sporty tyre should have a stiff sidewall!
Remember when there was the Pilot Sport 2 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric and that was it, the next step up was the track day tyres. It wasn't that long ago!
I remember when Bridgestone were king of UHP, back in the SO2 days.
The S001 even started life as a tyre with a firm sidewall, but 10 years later the aftermarket version seems to have evolved into a soft tyre.
The potenza sport is great, however not intended for track use as it overheats pretty quickly sadly.