Menu

2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Michelin CrossClimate Plus
Continental AllSeasonContact
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Vredestein Quatrac
Nokian SeasonProof

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking - Cool (M)

Spread: 3.60 M (9.5%) | Avg: 39.74 M

Dry braking at cooler temperatures in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO with a result of 38 M. The difference between best and worst was 8.7%.
  1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    38 M
  2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    38.2 M
  3. Vredestein Quatrac
    38.9 M
  4. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    39.2 M
  5. Continental AllSeasonContact
    39.7 M
  6. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    39.8 M
  7. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    41 M
  8. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    41.3 M
  9. Nokian SeasonProof
    41.6 M

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 2.90 M (7.4%) | Avg: 40.71 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate Plus with a result of 39.2 M. The difference between best and worst was 6.9%.
  1. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    39.2 M
  2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    39.4 M
  3. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    39.7 M
  4. Vredestein Quatrac
    40.1 M
  5. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    40.2 M
  6. Nokian SeasonProof
    41.7 M
  7. Continental AllSeasonContact
    42 M
  8. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    42 M
  9. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    42.1 M

Dry Handling - Cool (s)

Spread: 1.50 s (2%) | Avg: 77.22 s

Dry handling cooler temperatures in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling - cool test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    76.6 s
  2. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    76.9 s
  3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    77 s
  4. Vredestein Quatrac
    77.1 s
  5. Continental AllSeasonContact
    77.2 s
  6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    77.3 s
  7. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    77.4 s
  8. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    77.4 s
  9. Nokian SeasonProof
    78.1 s

Dry Handling (s)

Spread: 1.30 s (1.9%) | Avg: 69.66 s

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Vredestein Quatrac
    69.2 s
  2. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    69.3 s
  3. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    69.4 s
  4. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    69.6 s
  5. Continental AllSeasonContact
    69.7 s
  6. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    69.7 s
  7. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    69.7 s
  8. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    69.8 s
  9. Nokian SeasonProof
    70.5 s

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 4.30 M (7.9%) | Avg: 55.96 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 with a result of 54.6 M. The difference between best and worst was 7.3%.
  1. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    54.6 M
  2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    54.7 M
  3. Continental AllSeasonContact
    54.9 M
  4. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    55.1 M
  5. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    55.4 M
  6. Vredestein Quatrac
    55.7 M
  7. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    56.4 M
  8. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    57.9 M
  9. Nokian SeasonProof
    58.9 M

Wet Braking - Cool (M)

Spread: 12.10 M (22.7%) | Avg: 60.17 M

Wet braking at cooler temperature in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO with a result of 53.4 M. The difference between best and worst was 18.5%.
  1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    53.4 M
  2. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    56.3 M
  3. Vredestein Quatrac
    56.8 M
  4. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    59.2 M
  5. Continental AllSeasonContact
    59.7 M
  6. Nokian SeasonProof
    62.4 M
  7. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    63.6 M
  8. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    64.6 M
  9. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    65.5 M

Wet Handling - Cool (s)

Spread: 4.10 s (4.5%) | Avg: 92.06 s

Wet handling at cooler temperature in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Vredestein Quatrac with a result of 90.3 s. The difference between best and worst was 4.3%.
  1. Vredestein Quatrac
    90.3 s
  2. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    90.5 s
  3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    90.5 s
  4. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    90.6 s
  5. Continental AllSeasonContact
    91.5 s
  6. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    93.3 s
  7. Nokian SeasonProof
    93.5 s
  8. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    93.9 s
  9. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    94.4 s

Wet Handling (s)

Spread: 3.10 s (4.8%) | Avg: 66.07 s

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 with a result of 64.9 s. The difference between best and worst was 4.6%.
  1. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    64.9 s
  2. Continental AllSeasonContact
    65.1 s
  3. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    65.5 s
  4. Vredestein Quatrac
    65.6 s
  5. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    65.9 s
  6. Nokian SeasonProof
    66 s
  7. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    66.6 s
  8. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    67 s
  9. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    68 s

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 5.80 Km/H (7.5%) | Avg: 75.18 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Vredestein Quatrac with a result of 77.2 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 7.5%.
  1. Vredestein Quatrac
    77.2 Km/H
  2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    76.6 Km/H
  3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    76.4 Km/H
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    76.2 Km/H
  5. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    75.7 Km/H
  6. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    75.5 Km/H
  7. Nokian SeasonProof
    74.6 Km/H
  8. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    73 Km/H
  9. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    71.4 Km/H

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Spread: 1.90 M (5.9%) | Avg: 32.79 M

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental AllSeasonContact with a result of 32 M. The difference between best and worst was 5.6%.
  1. Continental AllSeasonContact
    32 M
  2. Nokian SeasonProof
    32 M
  3. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    32.3 M
  4. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    32.8 M
  5. Vredestein Quatrac
    32.8 M
  6. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    33 M
  7. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    33.1 M
  8. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    33.2 M
  9. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    33.9 M

Snow Traction (N)

Spread: 181.00 N (8.1%) | Avg: 2147.00 N

Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental AllSeasonContact with a result of 2240 N. The difference between best and worst was 8.1%.
  1. Continental AllSeasonContact
    2240 N
  2. Nokian SeasonProof
    2205 N
  3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    2159 N
  4. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    2159 N
  5. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    2152 N
  6. Vredestein Quatrac
    2152 N
  7. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    2114 N
  8. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    2083 N
  9. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    2059 N

Snow Handling (s)

Spread: 1.80 s (6%) | Avg: 30.63 s

Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook Kinergy 4S2 with a result of 30 s. The difference between best and worst was 5.7%.
  1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    30 s
  2. Nokian SeasonProof
    30.3 s
  3. Continental AllSeasonContact
    30.4 s
  4. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    30.4 s
  5. Vredestein Quatrac
    30.4 s
  6. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    30.6 s
  7. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    30.7 s
  8. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    31.1 s
  9. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    31.8 s

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

Spread: 2.00 dB (2.9%) | Avg: 71.00 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the noise test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    70 dB
  2. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    70 dB
  3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    70 dB
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    71 dB
  5. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    71 dB
  6. Nokian SeasonProof
    71 dB
  7. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    72 dB
  8. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    72 dB
  9. Vredestein Quatrac
    72 dB

Value Performance Overview

Price

Spread: 75.00 (31.3%) | Avg: 274.44

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3. The difference between best and worst was 23.8%.
  1. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    240
  2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    250
  3. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    250
  4. Vredestein Quatrac
    260
  5. Nokian SeasonProof
    260
  6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    290
  7. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    295
  8. Continental AllSeasonContact
    310
  9. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    315

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 1.70 kg / t (22.7%) | Avg: 8.28 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian SeasonProof with a result of 7.5 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 18.5%.
  1. Nokian SeasonProof
    7.5 kg / t
  2. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
    7.7 kg / t
  3. Continental AllSeasonContact
    7.9 kg / t
  4. Vredestein Quatrac
    7.9 kg / t
  5. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
    8.3 kg / t
  6. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    8.4 kg / t
  7. Hankook Kinergy 4S2
    8.7 kg / t
  8. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    8.9 kg / t
  9. Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
    9.2 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Continental AllSeasonContact 0%
2 Vredestein Quatrac 0%
3 Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 0%
4 Michelin CrossClimate Plus 0%
5 Hankook Kinergy 4S2 0%
6 Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 0%
7 Nokian SeasonProof 0%
8 Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 0%
9 Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 0%

Discussion

16 comments
  1. Mark archived

    I struggle to see how a tyre that is 21 ft worse than the best at cool wet braking and is very average at wet handling in cool conditions and is even more average/poor in dry conditions can be the test winner. Yes its snow performance is excellent but this is not a winter tyre test. Even if I lived in central Europe I wouldn't want to risk the Continental in non snowy weather. Surely if you have the sort of climate with winter snow that the Conti excels in you'd go for a winter/summer combo. Just MHO but the Vredestein and Michelin seem much more rounded tyres.

    Your point in another test that a tyre that is poor in key areas can't make that up by excellence in others due to weighting of scores is well made. German tyre tests do seem to err in this regard.

    #7509
    1. TyreReviews Mark archived

      I totally agree, however there is one thing to keep in mind. It's super far behind the Bridgestone, which we know from other tests trades wet grip for wear, so it's a bit of a false benchmark!

      #7510
      1. Mark TyreReviews archived

        The Bridgestone braking results are amazing - only 1.4m off the best across the 5 braking results compared to the Contis 11.1m. Wear is important but only within reason, it's not everything. If I'm doing 6K a year then 40K life is fine as I change every 5-6 years come what may. If I'm doing 20K a year then I want 60K life as it's much more important. Having said that safety trumps wear every time for me.

        The comment by AZ that the Conti convinced across dry and wet surfaces is just not borne out by the results.

        For example the total of the braking distances across the various conditions are:

        Bridge +1.4M!!!!
        MCC +6.0M
        Vred +7.1M
        Conti +11.1M
        Good + 12.8M

        The combined handling times are:

        Vred +1.6s
        Good +1.6s
        Conti +2.9s
        MCC +4.5s
        Bridge +4.9s

        This is where your Tests are so good, Jonathan. I forget which test it was but you marked one tyre down from 3rd where its score put it to 4th due to a poor performance in a key test. Otherwise, in the converse to the German tests, you could end up with a situation in a mild climate scoring system in which snow gets say 5%, where a summer tyre wins an AS test due to its woeful snow performance being totally eclipsed by its much higher scoring superior dry/wet results which would be equally odd

        Basically IMHO there has to be a minimum standard for every key test which a tyre cannot fall behind if it wants to win. ADAC, AutoBild, AZ scoring systems seem to ignore dry/wet provided snow is great. Well it doesn't snow in Bavaria in July?.

        #7511
  2. Timothy Blake archived

    I really wonder why the Vredestein Tyre get´s such a good rating. I mean it really wears of quickly. Which isnt rated here. But all in all the tyre is definitely not better than the allmighty Vectore 4S Gen3!
    Especially if it wears of quicker and loses grip during aging.

    #7400
    1. TyreReviews Timothy Blake archived

      In tests where you don't test wear, you can't degrade a result based on another tests data (though some days I wish you could!)

      #7403
      1. Timothy Blake TyreReviews archived

        This is why I love your Page. I love tyres. Written with a Y not I.
        I can compare differents tests, weigh them and see every tyre compared in bar charts in each specific summary of yours. Your videos are also great.

        Through your page I startet weighing my specific needs on a tyre. This is how I came to a set of summer tyres (for summer) and a set of all season tyres (for winter use).

        #7404
  3. William Read archived

    I am about to purchase all-season tyres for my Skoda Fabia Estate, 185/60R15, 20,000+ miles per annum, and I live in the West Midlands region of the UK. Snow is rare, but temperatures are regularly below 7c in the winter. My driving is leisurely, and I am interested in good fuel economy and ride comfort, but not interested in sporty performance or handling. The Nokian Seasonproof has some excellent reviews; any other ideas?

    #7392
    1. TyreReviews William Read archived

      I'm not sure where you saw excellent reviews of the seasonproof but it only really does well in the snow, which isn't that useful. Check out our all season test video for recommendations but the usual recommendations are the Michelin, Goodyear, Conti or Pirelli

      #7394
      1. William Read TyreReviews archived

        Thanks; I will compare the Vredestein and the Pirelli for local availability and prices.

        #7397
  4. Scour archived

    Vredestein seems to be on a good way actually. The new Quatrac seems to be good, the Ultrac (Summer Tyre) had a good test result in Auto Express and the new Wintrac seems to be also not bad

    https://reifenpresse.de/202...

    #7159
    1. TyreReviews Scour archived

      Their' latest gen stuff is really good, it performed well in the tyre review as test this year

      #7162
  5. Asier archived

    Very nice to see how they perform at different temp and surfaces. Some of them are less influenced by those variables, so it could make the results more aplicable to the real world of roads and countries. Looking forward to see your own test! Which tyre measure have you used for it? ?

    #7102
    1. Scour Asier archived

      Yep, agree. 1st test I see with these parameters. It looks like the all season tyres going to be more all season tyres than winter tyres. Maybe I will get in the next years all season instead of winter tyres, for summer I will stay with summer tyres.

      #7160
  6. bshaftoe archived

    I am thinking about buying an electric car. I know EVs have their own specialized tyres that are usually optimized for very low rolling resistance to increase range as much as possible. Would it be a good idea to fit all season tyres if you'd rather have better grip in all weather even if range suffers? What's the average rolling resistance of EV optimized tyres when compared with the tyres in this test?

    #7097
    1. TyreReviews bshaftoe archived

      If you'd rather have better all weather grip, an all season / winter tyre is a good option :) The Crossclimate 2 is OE on one of the Volvo EVs so they must be getting there in terms of RR :)

      #7098