Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Wet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | % | |||
| 1 ▲9 | Semperit Speed Life 3 | 100% | 32.7 ★ | 100% |
| 2 | Continental Premium Contact 6 | 98.2% | 33.3 2 | 98.2% |
| 3 ▼2 | Falken Azenis FK510 | 97.9% | 33.4 3 | 97.9% |
| 4 ▲1 | Michelin Primacy 4 | 95.9% | 34.1 | 95.9% |
| 5 ▲2 | ESA-Tecar Spirit Pro | 95.1% | 34.4 | 95.1% |
| 6 ▼2 | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 93.4% | 35 | 93.4% |
| 7 ▼4 | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 92.1% | 35.5 | 92.1% |
| 8 | Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 | 90.6% | 36.1 | 90.6% |
| 9 ▲2 | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 89.3% | 36.6 | 89.3% |
| 10 ▼1 | Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 | 88.1% | 37.1 | 88.1% |
| 11 ▲3 | Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus | 87.4% | 37.4 | 87.4% |
| 12 ▼6 | Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 | 86.3% | 37.9 | 86.3% |
| 13 ▼1 | Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 84.5% | 38.7 | 84.5% |
| 14 ▼1 | Giti GitiPremium H1 | 84.3% | 38.8 | 84.3% |
| 15 ▲1 | Viking Protech Newgen | 84.1% | 38.9 | 84.1% |
| 16 ▼1 | Barum Bravuris 5HM | 83.6% | 39.1 | 83.6% |
| 17 | Firestone RoadHawk | 79.4% | 41.2 | 79.4% |
Scroll for more
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
Can we please stop using misleading graphs. That graph of stopping distance makes the difference from best to worse look a lot bigger than it is - sure, the worst is pretty terrible, particularly at the sharp end of the race, the results are SO much closer than that graph makes them look.
Start the graph at zero rather than at 32 and see how close most of them really are...
Unfortunately if you start at zero it's very difficult to re why differences on mobile devices, which is the largest audience. The axis are clearly labeled so nothing is being hidden!
I mostly read on mobile, and I still find it misleading. It exaggerates the variation, makes it look more significant than it really is.
I do appreciate the time you've taken to reply though!
WhaT means " The Sava Intensa UHP2 is another tyre which is good in the wet but weak in the wet."
It should have been weak in the dry, weak in the wet. I'll update it now, thnaks
Oops, in both weak ;) ? But I guess the text at the tyre is mostly OK now
The Sava Intensa UHP2 is another tyre which is good in the
sry but weak in the wet