Performance Overview
This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.
Dry Performance Overview
Dry Braking (M)
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)
Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)
Wet Performance Overview
Wet Braking (M)
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Handling (s)
Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)
Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)
Straight Aqua (Km/H)
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Comfort Performance Overview
Noise (dB)
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Value Performance Overview
Rolling Resistance (kg / t)
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Overall Findings
Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:
| Position | Tyre | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Semperit SpeedLife 2 | 0% | |
| 2 | Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 0% |
| 3 | Nokian Nordman SX2 | 0% |
| 4 | Debica Presto HP | 0% |
| 5 | Kleber Dynaxer HP 3 | 0% |
| 6 | Cooper Zeon CS8 | 0% |
| 7 | Sumitomo BC100 | 0% |
| 8 | Dayton Touring 2 | 0% |
Nobody ever tests tyres that are available on a 13" RIM.
All I have to go on are the Euro ratings!
Tyre testing is very expensive and sadly there's low demand for 13" tests :(
The Continentals PC 6 cost some 13£ more per tyre than the Semperits. For a set of 4 it's just 52£ more and they should last longer according to some wear tests compared to 2018 ADAC test on the Semperit. They usually have low rolling resistance too, where the Semperits are average in this matter, so nowadays it's really pointless to buy mid-range tyres unless someone needs to sell the car asap.
https://www.tyrereviews.co....
https://www.tyrereviews.co....
http://www.tyrereviews.co.u...
http://www.tyrereviews.co.u...
I wish more people thought like you!
The tyre market is so diverse in quality aspects that all information is good. 15 years ago I remember being shocked to see a Toyo (don't remember which one) lasting the same 60k on the rear of a gently driven Audi A4 as a Michelin Primacy HP!
Conversely I've experienced shockingly bad tyres on 2nd hand cars I've bought which is a reason I'm pleasantly surprised to see Maxxis doing well. Now I'd like to see the test repeated with tyres worn to 2mm (incredibly hard to be fair and accurate though). I guess this is the area user reviews are useful though.
Falken make the Best midrange tyre at the moment the FK510. Unless they have now moved upmarket?
That seems to be the current wisdom, yes :)
Wouldnt have classed Dayton as midrange!
Where are Falken, uniroyal, and Kumho...
I'm not sure how they came to their final list! Nokian isn't considered a mid range brand in Finland either, though nordman is their sub-range I believe.
Nokian Nordman's are "cheap" tires that are made with old Nokian tread-patterns. They are considered mid-range tyres here in Finland, although I don't appreciate Nokian tyres at all - generally noisy, sloppy handling and miserable wear resistance (Incl. Nokian Hakka Black (Sold in other parts of Europe as Nokian Powerproof), Nokian Hakka Blue and Nokian Hakka Green (Sold in other parts of Europe as Nokian iLine and Nokian Line).