Test Publication:
Auto Bild Allrad
235/55 R19
9 tyres
5 categories
Test Size:
235/55 R19
Tyres Tested:
9 tyres
Auto Bild Allrad is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
Earlier this year Auto Bild published their 2019 SUV all season tyre test, using an Audi Q3 wearing the popular 235/55 R19 all season tyre size.
As usual, all seven tyre patterns were tested in the dry, wet and snow, and as a reference Auto Bild included a premium summer and winter tyre.
All Season vs Summer vs Winter
As we've seen before, the balance of all season vs summer tyres follows a general trend. Summer tyres do the best in the wet and dry, but cannot perform in snowy conditions.
When it comes to comparing all season tyres against winter tyres, things get a little more muddled. In this test the unnamed premium winter tyre only won the aquaplaning test. It was strong in the snow, but not the strongest on test, and while it was weaker in the dry and wet than most of the all season tyres, it wasn't the worst. It just goes to show, the range of all season tyres abilities can span from dry optimised, like the Michelin Crossclimate to a winter tyre beating all season tyre, like the Nokian Weatherproof.
Dry
The dry braking results yielded no big surprises, with the summer tyre and Michelin CrossClimate leading the pack. The Continental was the best of the rest, with the winter bias Nokian Weatherproof struggling to stop the SUV in dry conditions.
- Reference Summer
- Michelin CrossClimate SUV
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Vredestein Quatrac 5
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SU
- Gripmax Status AllClimate
- Reference Winter
- Nokian WeatherProof SUV
The dry handling results were similar to the dry braking, with the summer and Michelin leading the pack.
- Reference Summer
- Michelin CrossClimate SUV
- Vredestein Quatrac 5
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SU
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Reference Winter
- Nokian WeatherProof SUV
- Gripmax Status AllClimate
Wet
During wet braking, the Vredestein and Continental were closest to the summer tyres distances, just 0.1 meters off. The Nokian, Falken struggled compared to the best on test, and the budget GripMax was shockingly bad.
- Reference Summer
- Vredestein Quatrac 5
- Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SU
- Michelin CrossClimate SUV
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Reference Winter
- Nokian WeatherProof SUV
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Gripmax Status AllClimate
As with the dry handling results, the wet handling results showed a similar order to wet braking.
- Reference Summer
- Vredestein Quatrac 5
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SU
- Michelin CrossClimate SUV
- Nokian WeatherProof SUV
- Reference Winter
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Gripmax Status AllClimate
The straight aquaplaning results had the reference winter tyre winning the test, with the summer in the middle of the all season tyres.
- Reference Winter
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Reference Summer
- Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SU
- Michelin CrossClimate SUV
- Nokian WeatherProof SUV
- Vredestein Quatrac 5
- Gripmax Status AllClimate
Snow
The winter bias Nokian all season tyre won snow braking, stopping in a shorter distance than even the full winter tyre! Continental Did a great job of mixing dry, wet and snow results by finishing second.
- Nokian WeatherProof SUV
- Reference Winter
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Vredestein Quatrac 5
- Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SU
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Michelin CrossClimate SUV
- Gripmax Status AllClimate
- Reference Summer
The Continental and Nokian were again the strongest tyres during snow handling, besting the full winter tyre. The summer tyre could not complete a lap of snow handling, so didn't set a time.
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Nokian WeatherProof SUV
- Reference Winter
- Michelin CrossClimate SUV
- Vredestein Quatrac 5
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SU
- Gripmax Status AllClimate
Environment
The Goodyear was the only tyre to match the low noise of the summer tyre.
- Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SU
- Reference Summer
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Nokian WeatherProof SUV
- Reference Winter
- Michelin CrossClimate SUV
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Vredestein Quatrac 5
- Gripmax Status AllClimate
The Continental and Michelin had the lowest rolling resistance on test, but were some of the most expensive tyres to purchase at the time of test.
- Gripmax Status AllClimate
- Vredestein Quatrac 5
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Nokian WeatherProof SUV
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SU
- Michelin CrossClimate SUV
Results
An excellent all season tyre with great performance in all weather conditions. Good balance and precise steering, short wet and snow braking, well priced.
None mentioned.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
40.5 M |
36.9 M |
+3.6 M |
91.11% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
95 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
55.6 M |
55.5 M |
+0.1 M |
99.82% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
80 Km/H |
82.5 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
96.97% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
72.2 Km/H |
76.5 Km/H |
-4.3 Km/H |
94.38% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
25 M |
23.5 M |
+1.5 M |
94% |
| Snow Handling |
5th |
45.7 Km/H |
47.3 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
96.62% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
73.1 dB |
72.1 dB |
+1 dB |
98.63% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
650 |
480 |
+170 |
73.85% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.27 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+1.54 kg / t |
81.38% |
A strong allrounder with sport dynamic handling in the dry, and good in the snow and wet. Low rolling resistance.
Expensive.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
38.9 M |
36.9 M |
+2 M |
94.86% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
95.2 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
99.17% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
58.5 M |
55.5 M |
+3 M |
94.87% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
78.6 Km/H |
82.5 Km/H |
-3.9 Km/H |
95.27% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
74 Km/H |
76.5 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
96.73% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
7th |
27.2 M |
23.5 M |
+3.7 M |
86.4% |
| Snow Handling |
4th |
45.9 Km/H |
47.3 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
97.04% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
72.8 dB |
72.1 dB |
+0.7 dB |
99.04% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
830 |
480 |
+350 |
57.83% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.37 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+0.64 kg / t |
91.32% |
Excellent in the snow, dynamic wet handling, good comfort levels, low noise, best rolling resistance on test.
Understeer in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
40.1 M |
36.9 M |
+3.2 M |
92.02% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
93.9 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
97.81% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
58.6 M |
55.5 M |
+3.1 M |
94.71% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
80 Km/H |
82.5 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
96.97% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
75.1 Km/H |
76.5 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.17% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
3rd |
24.7 M |
23.5 M |
+1.2 M |
95.14% |
| Snow Handling |
1st |
47.3 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
72.2 dB |
72.1 dB |
+0.1 dB |
99.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
770 |
480 |
+290 |
62.34% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
6.73 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Short snow and wet braking distances, low noise, low rolling resistance.
Average snow cornering, understeer in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
42 M |
36.9 M |
+5.1 M |
87.86% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
94.1 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
98.02% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
55.6 M |
55.5 M |
+0.1 M |
99.82% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
78.8 Km/H |
82.5 Km/H |
-3.7 Km/H |
95.52% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
74.5 Km/H |
76.5 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
97.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
5th |
25.5 M |
23.5 M |
+2 M |
92.16% |
| Snow Handling |
7th |
44.6 Km/H |
47.3 Km/H |
-2.7 Km/H |
94.29% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
72.1 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
6th |
810 |
480 |
+330 |
59.26% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
7.51 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+0.78 kg / t |
89.61% |
Strong winter abilities, good aquaplaning result, low noise.
Extended wet and dry braking, understeer in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
43.6 M |
36.9 M |
+6.7 M |
84.63% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
92.2 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
96.04% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
61.4 M |
55.5 M |
+5.9 M |
90.39% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
78.5 Km/H |
82.5 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
95.15% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
74 Km/H |
76.5 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
96.73% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
23.5 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Handling |
2nd |
47.1 Km/H |
47.3 Km/H |
-0.2 Km/H |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
72.4 dB |
72.1 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
4th |
710 |
480 |
+230 |
67.61% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
8.55 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+1.82 kg / t |
78.71% |
Good aquaplaning result.
Slow steering, understeer and long braking distances in the wet, average comfort.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
40.6 M |
36.9 M |
+3.7 M |
90.89% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
94.3 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
98.23% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
62 M |
55.5 M |
+6.5 M |
89.52% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
77.2 Km/H |
82.5 Km/H |
-5.3 Km/H |
93.58% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
76.4 Km/H |
76.5 Km/H |
-0.1 Km/H |
99.87% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
6th |
27.1 M |
23.5 M |
+3.6 M |
86.72% |
| Snow Handling |
6th |
45.2 Km/H |
47.3 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
95.56% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
73 dB |
72.1 dB |
+0.9 dB |
98.77% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
650 |
480 |
+170 |
73.85% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
7.98 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+1.25 kg / t |
84.34% |
Low rolling resistance, low price.
Very poor grip in the wet and snow, very long wet braking distances, poor dry handling.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
42.1 M |
36.9 M |
+5.2 M |
87.65% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
92 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
95.83% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
88.5 M |
55.5 M |
+33 M |
62.71% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
66.8 Km/H |
82.5 Km/H |
-15.7 Km/H |
80.97% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
68.5 Km/H |
76.5 Km/H |
-8 Km/H |
89.54% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
8th |
28.5 M |
23.5 M |
+5 M |
82.46% |
| Snow Handling |
8th |
43 Km/H |
47.3 Km/H |
-4.3 Km/H |
90.91% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
9th |
73.8 dB |
72.1 dB |
+1.7 dB |
97.7% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
1st |
480 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
7.69 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+0.96 kg / t |
87.52% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
36.9 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
96 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
55.5 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
82.5 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
74.7 Km/H |
76.5 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
97.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
9th |
62.5 M |
23.5 M |
+39 M |
37.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
72.1 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.37 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+0.64 kg / t |
91.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
42.8 M |
36.9 M |
+5.9 M |
86.21% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
93.4 Km/H |
96 Km/H |
-2.6 Km/H |
97.29% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
59 M |
55.5 M |
+3.5 M |
94.07% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
78.2 Km/H |
82.5 Km/H |
-4.3 Km/H |
94.79% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
76.5 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
2nd |
24.1 M |
23.5 M |
+0.6 M |
97.51% |
| Snow Handling |
3rd |
46.2 Km/H |
47.3 Km/H |
-1.1 Km/H |
97.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
72.5 dB |
72.1 dB |
+0.4 dB |
99.45% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
7.52 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+0.79 kg / t |
89.49% |
Hi! I have a CX5 2.0 petrol (165 bhp) only front drive.
We live in a hot and near the sea area, but we have to do like 250 km a day into a cold area, with snow sometimes and frequent ice presence on winding roads. We wear currently Toyo Proxes R46 (225/55 R19). Bad wet handling and decent on dry.
We are thinking of mounting all season. 225/55 r19 is not very common size and the preferred option (Michelin Crossclimate SUV) is very expensive, so we are thinking of changing to equivalent 235/50 R19.
As we do a lot of kms, with hot surfaces, frequent ice and event snow, and mixed highway and secundary roads, which model would yoy recommend me? We value wear (as we do lot of kms), and dey/wet/snow/ice balance.
Thanks.
Nice Test John!
Just ordered the Vredestein Quatrac 5 in 245/45/20 for our Discovery Sport.
They gonna replace the Pirelli Scorpion Verde Allseason (who have only M+S) and are done.
Ps. We live in the Grindelwald Region in Switzerland, can’t wait to test these in this size.
We had these Quatrac 5 on our Smart fortwo and they did amazingly well here.
Thank you Vredestein!!
I just came back from Grindelwald! BEautiful place, video up in a few weeks and there's stuff on instagram. Let me know how you get on with the Vreds :)
found the article John, all good.
http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Article/2019-Auto-Bild-SUV-All-Season-Tyre-Test.htm
Yes it is nice over there! we move in 2020 to Scandinavia after 4 years Switzerland. Main reason: We need more snow on the streets ;) (they clean to quick and to good the swiss roads during winter...) :p
I´m using the Continental AllSeasonsContact in Luxembourg where 3PMFS is mandatory and they are performing much better than my previous winter tyres (MS77) - at least in wet & dry, not tested yet on snow- Really good option.
Glad you're enjoying them :)
Looking at the last tests (not only this one), it seems that all seasons tires have similar (sometime better) snow performances than pure winter tires but with significant better performances on the dry and wet.
I'm starting to think that in my country (Italy) a good option could be to use AS tires in the winter and Summer tires in summer...
I've been recommended all season tyres as winter tyres for a while now, especially summer bias all season like the CrossClimate to the warmer parts of Europe.