Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Comfort | Value | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Handling Km/H | % | Braking M | Handling Km/H | Straight Aqua Km/H | % | Noise dB | % | Wear KM | Value Price/1000 | Price | Rolling Resistance kg / t | % | |||
| 1 | Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 | 96% | 34.5 ★ | 115.1 ★ | 100% | 35.2 3 | 76.2 3 | 83.2 | 96.8% | 72.3 3 | 99.2% | 37440 | 5.74 | 215 | 7.77 | 76.2% |
| 2 ▲5 | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 95.9% | 35.7 | 112.6 | 97.2% | 34.3 ★ | 77.6 ★ | 82.3 | 98.4% | 74.1 | 96.8% | 42120 | 6.17 | 260 | 7.02 2 | 78.5% |
| 3 ▲1 | Firestone RoadHawk | 95.3% | 35.2 2 | 115 2 | 99% | 36.5 | 77 2 | 85.1 | 96.2% | 76.1 | 94.2% | 38220 | 5.23 | 200 | 8.12 | 78.1% |
| 4 ▼1 | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | 94.4% | 36.7 | 113.5 3 | 96.3% | 35.9 | 74.7 | 86.8 | 96% | 73 | 98.2% | 44460 | 5.4 | 240 | 8.44 | 78.3% |
| 5 ▲1 | Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde | 94.2% | 36.2 | 112.9 | 96.7% | 36 | 75.1 | 83.5 | 95.4% | 73.8 | 97.2% | 41340 | 5.44 | 225 | 8.13 | 77.8% |
| 6 ▲3 | Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 94.2% | 37 | 112.3 | 95.4% | 37 | 75.8 | 83.8 | 94.8% | 72 2 | 99.6% | 41340 | 4.84 2 | 200 | 7.26 | 84.2% |
| 7 ▲5 | Uniroyal RainExpert 3 | 94% | 38.7 | 111.6 | 93.1% | 34.5 2 | 73.7 | 90.1 ★ | 97.7% | 73.9 | 97% | 38610 | 5.57 | 215 | 7.79 | 77.4% |
| 8 ▼6 | Continental Premium Contact 5 | 93.9% | 36.4 | 113 | 96.5% | 36 | 75.6 | 84.7 | 95.9% | 72.7 | 98.6% | 38220 | 6.54 | 250 | 8.02 | 72.3% |
| 9 ▼1 | Fulda EcoControl HP | 93.6% | 37 | 113.3 | 95.8% | 39.6 | 74.2 | 86.4 | 92% | 72.7 | 98.6% | 49920 ★ | 3.91 ★ | 195 2 | 8.14 | 91.5% |
| 10 ▲1 | Dunlop Sport BluResponse | 93.4% | 36 | 112.7 | 96.9% | 37.3 | 75.1 | 86.7 | 94.7% | 72.6 | 98.8% | 34710 | 6.77 | 235 | 7.54 | 71.8% |
| 11 ▲9 | Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 92.9% | 35.6 3 | 113.4 | 97.7% | 38.1 | 75.4 | 85.5 | 93.8% | 72.9 | 98.4% | 27300 | 7.14 | 195 2 | 7.55 | 68.9% |
| 12 ▼2 | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance | 92.9% | 37.5 | 113.2 | 95.2% | 37.6 | 76.1 | 87.3 2 | 95% | 73.3 | 97.8% | 35100 | 6.98 | 245 | 7.35 | 71.8% |
| 13 | Infinity Ecosis | 92.8% | 38.1 | 112.7 | 94.2% | 37 | 74.2 | 82.2 | 93.6% | 71.7 ★ | 100% | 35880 | 5.02 3 | 180 ★ | 7.61 | 80.5% |
| 14 ▼9 | Michelin Energy Saver | 92.8% | 37.5 | 113.1 | 95.1% | 38.7 | 74 | 85.6 | 92.5% | 72.6 | 98.8% | 47580 2 | 5.67 | 270 | 7.04 3 | 82.7% |
| 15 ▲1 | Cooper Zeon CS8 | 92.1% | 37.7 | 111 | 94% | 37.5 | 75.6 | 86.1 | 94.6% | 72.7 | 98.6% | 34710 | 6.19 | 215 | 9.3 | 69.3% |
| 16 ▲3 | Nokian Line | 91.9% | 37.5 | 112.3 | 94.8% | 38 | 74.4 | 85.4 | 93.4% | 73.6 | 97.4% | 31980 | 6.72 | 215 | 7.51 | 71.4% |
| 17 | GiTi GitiSynergy E1 | 91.8% | 37.9 | 111.3 | 93.9% | 39.2 | 73.6 | 81.2 | 91% | 72.4 | 99% | 39000 | 5.38 | 210 | 6.2 ★ | 84.8% |
| 18 ▼3 | BFGoodrich gGrip | 91.7% | 38.3 | 112 | 93.7% | 39.1 | 73.6 | 84.3 | 91.7% | 73.7 | 97.3% | 45240 3 | 5.19 | 235 | 7.62 | 82.1% |
| 19 ▼1 | Kleber Dynaxer HP 3 | 91.6% | 39.2 | 111.9 | 92.6% | 37.7 | 73.3 | 82.8 | 92.6% | 73.5 | 97.6% | 42510 | 5.29 | 225 | 7.67 | 80.5% |
| 20 ▼6 | Avon ZV7 | 91.2% | 38.3 | 111.4 | 93.4% | 38.2 | 74.5 | 87.3 2 | 93.6% | 73.4 | 97.7% | 34710 | 6.91 | 240 | 8.81 | 67.6% |
Scroll for more
Dry
100%
Wet
97%
Comfort
99%
Value
76%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
34.5 M
★
Dry Handling
115.1 Km/H
★
Wet
Wet Braking
35.2 M
3
Wet Handling
76.2 Km/H
3
Straight Aqua
83.2 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.3 dB
3
Value
Wear
37440 KM
Value
5.74 Price/1000
Price
215
Rolling Resistance
7.77 kg / t
Dry
97%
Wet
98%
Comfort
97%
Value
79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
35.7 M
Dry Handling
112.6 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
34.3 M
★
Wet Handling
77.6 Km/H
★
Straight Aqua
82.3 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
74.1 dB
Value
Wear
42120 KM
Value
6.17 Price/1000
Price
260
Rolling Resistance
7.02 kg / t
2
Dry
99%
Wet
96%
Comfort
94%
Value
78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
35.2 M
2
Dry Handling
115 Km/H
2
Wet
Wet Braking
36.5 M
Wet Handling
77 Km/H
2
Straight Aqua
85.1 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
76.1 dB
Value
Wear
38220 KM
Value
5.23 Price/1000
Price
200
Rolling Resistance
8.12 kg / t
Dry
96%
Wet
96%
Comfort
98%
Value
78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.7 M
Dry Handling
113.5 Km/H
3
Wet
Wet Braking
35.9 M
Wet Handling
74.7 Km/H
Straight Aqua
86.8 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
73 dB
Value
Wear
44460 KM
Value
5.4 Price/1000
Price
240
Rolling Resistance
8.44 kg / t
Dry
97%
Wet
95%
Comfort
97%
Value
78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.2 M
Dry Handling
112.9 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
36 M
Wet Handling
75.1 Km/H
Straight Aqua
83.5 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
73.8 dB
Value
Wear
41340 KM
Value
5.44 Price/1000
Price
225
Rolling Resistance
8.13 kg / t
Dry
95%
Wet
95%
Comfort
100%
Value
84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37 M
Dry Handling
112.3 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
37 M
Wet Handling
75.8 Km/H
Straight Aqua
83.8 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72 dB
2
Value
Wear
41340 KM
Value
4.84 Price/1000
2
Price
200
Rolling Resistance
7.26 kg / t
Dry
93%
Wet
98%
Comfort
97%
Value
77%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.7 M
Dry Handling
111.6 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
34.5 M
2
Wet Handling
73.7 Km/H
Straight Aqua
90.1 Km/H
★
Comfort
Noise
73.9 dB
Value
Wear
38610 KM
Value
5.57 Price/1000
Price
215
Rolling Resistance
7.79 kg / t
Dry
97%
Wet
96%
Comfort
99%
Value
72%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.4 M
Dry Handling
113 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
36 M
Wet Handling
75.6 Km/H
Straight Aqua
84.7 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.7 dB
Value
Wear
38220 KM
Value
6.54 Price/1000
Price
250
Rolling Resistance
8.02 kg / t
Dry
96%
Wet
92%
Comfort
99%
Value
92%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37 M
Dry Handling
113.3 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
39.6 M
Wet Handling
74.2 Km/H
Straight Aqua
86.4 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.7 dB
Value
Wear
49920 KM
★
Value
3.91 Price/1000
★
Price
195
2
Rolling Resistance
8.14 kg / t
Dry
97%
Wet
95%
Comfort
99%
Value
72%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36 M
Dry Handling
112.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
37.3 M
Wet Handling
75.1 Km/H
Straight Aqua
86.7 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.6 dB
Value
Wear
34710 KM
Value
6.77 Price/1000
Price
235
Rolling Resistance
7.54 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
94%
Comfort
98%
Value
69%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
35.6 M
3
Dry Handling
113.4 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
38.1 M
Wet Handling
75.4 Km/H
Straight Aqua
85.5 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.9 dB
Value
Wear
27300 KM
Value
7.14 Price/1000
Price
195
2
Rolling Resistance
7.55 kg / t
Dry
95%
Wet
95%
Comfort
98%
Value
72%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.5 M
Dry Handling
113.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
37.6 M
Wet Handling
76.1 Km/H
Straight Aqua
87.3 Km/H
2
Comfort
Noise
73.3 dB
Value
Wear
35100 KM
Value
6.98 Price/1000
Price
245
Rolling Resistance
7.35 kg / t
Dry
94%
Wet
94%
Comfort
100%
Value
81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.1 M
Dry Handling
112.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
37 M
Wet Handling
74.2 Km/H
Straight Aqua
82.2 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
71.7 dB
★
Value
Wear
35880 KM
Value
5.02 Price/1000
3
Price
180
★
Rolling Resistance
7.61 kg / t
Dry
95%
Wet
93%
Comfort
99%
Value
83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.5 M
Dry Handling
113.1 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
38.7 M
Wet Handling
74 Km/H
Straight Aqua
85.6 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.6 dB
Value
Wear
47580 KM
2
Value
5.67 Price/1000
Price
270
Rolling Resistance
7.04 kg / t
3
Dry
94%
Wet
95%
Comfort
99%
Value
69%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.7 M
Dry Handling
111 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
37.5 M
Wet Handling
75.6 Km/H
Straight Aqua
86.1 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.7 dB
Value
Wear
34710 KM
Value
6.19 Price/1000
Price
215
Rolling Resistance
9.3 kg / t
Dry
95%
Wet
93%
Comfort
97%
Value
71%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.5 M
Dry Handling
112.3 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
38 M
Wet Handling
74.4 Km/H
Straight Aqua
85.4 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
73.6 dB
Value
Wear
31980 KM
Value
6.72 Price/1000
Price
215
Rolling Resistance
7.51 kg / t
Dry
94%
Wet
91%
Comfort
99%
Value
85%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.9 M
Dry Handling
111.3 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
39.2 M
Wet Handling
73.6 Km/H
Straight Aqua
81.2 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
72.4 dB
Value
Wear
39000 KM
Value
5.38 Price/1000
Price
210
Rolling Resistance
6.2 kg / t
★
Dry
94%
Wet
92%
Comfort
97%
Value
82%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.3 M
Dry Handling
112 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
39.1 M
Wet Handling
73.6 Km/H
Straight Aqua
84.3 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
73.7 dB
Value
Wear
45240 KM
3
Value
5.19 Price/1000
Price
235
Rolling Resistance
7.62 kg / t
Dry
93%
Wet
93%
Comfort
98%
Value
81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.2 M
Dry Handling
111.9 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
37.7 M
Wet Handling
73.3 Km/H
Straight Aqua
82.8 Km/H
Comfort
Noise
73.5 dB
Value
Wear
42510 KM
Value
5.29 Price/1000
Price
225
Rolling Resistance
7.67 kg / t
Dry
93%
Wet
94%
Comfort
98%
Value
68%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.3 M
Dry Handling
111.4 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
38.2 M
Wet Handling
74.5 Km/H
Straight Aqua
87.3 Km/H
2
Comfort
Noise
73.4 dB
Value
Wear
34710 KM
Value
6.91 Price/1000
Price
240
Rolling Resistance
8.81 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
How the top is made with Bridgestone T005 in 7th place with total of 43 points but Hankook on 1st place with 40 points, less than Bridgestone?
I'm very interested to purchase Bridgestone T005 for a Golf 7 and see it's very good in wet. I'm sure it's ok on dry as well. The car is user in South East Europe so not too much rain as in North of Europe. I'm surpised to see it on 7th place.
Score weighting, Auto Bild priorities certain tests over the others, such as wet braking, which in this case makes no sense.
It will have been marked down due to aquaplaning performance.
Ok, now I understood. Thank you for information. Hard to decide between Hankook and Bridgestone. I think I whill choose Hankook. Looks very balanced and much better orice.
I recommended the Hankook ahead of the T005 in the video on youtube, but I think you're right, they're very very close tyres and both make excellent choices.
Yes, I whill choose Hankook because it's very good on dry when I drive the most and the climate it's most dominant, good on wet braking and handling when anyway all of us should be careful. I was Michelin fan but seems to be too expensive on similar criterias that I have. Thank you very much for all good work and plenty information provided.
Great, let me know how you get on :)
I read more and after a personal top 3 between model on this test from Hankook, Bridgestone and Continental I choose Bridgestone T005 as brand, caracteristics and new model. I will see how works after will arrive from shop in couple of days. The price is in the middle for Bridgestone, just 5 GBP more than Hankook and less that Continental.
It's strange the same AutoBild scored Bridgestone second in below link and in this test they ranked on 7th place. I understand the logic just that it's strange, as a comment.
http://www.tyrereviews.co.u...
Hi Adrian!
Did you buy the Bridgestone T005 tires for your Golf 7?
What kind of experience do you have?
Thanks for the detailed answer!
I have one more question.
How silly are the T005 tires?
This test shows noisy tires.
The tires are very very good, the noise it's not too much, measured in the car it wasn't more than 71 dBm at 100 km / h, depends on the road and also if air condition is on or not. I'm pleased with the noise also because the VW Golf it's very good isolated so no worries about the comfort on long drive. Maybe Michelin I heard that are better on the noise but on similar tests I saw a comment the difference between different brands inside the car is not higher than 2 dBm so no big difference. The very important difference is related to safety, stability and performance on wet and dry in any conditions, I'm very please with Bridgestone T005 comparing with Michelin that I used on other cars (Peugeot 207 and VW Golf 6) or Pirelly that I used on Golf 7. Looking back for Michelin used I remember the noise was a little lower but I didn't feel so confident on corners as with Bridgestone so I prefer T005. On 195/65 R15 they kept all 4 lines for water evacuation and for this size the performance from Bridgestone is the best, I think it's doing a very good job on other sizes as well depends on criteria from everybody. I drive on various type of roads, highways or country roads were safety, control and comfort it's the best on all situations. I drove them at the limit without worries or feeling I can lose control. Every time the feedback from the road was there and the traction from the car responded well. Looking on the price you'll see that it's a best buy performance tire, better price than Conti PC5, Michelin or Pirelly, price similar with Good Year or Dunlop but the performance it's better and new generation, it doesn't compare with previous generations, it's much better and balanced.. Look for your feedback to see what decision will take. From my side I recommend T005, it's the new generation from Bridgestone.
Cheeky request Adrian, but if you haven't already it would be super helpful to leave a review :)
http://www.tyrereviews.co.u...
Hi,
Yes, I already did a review also on that section, thank you for all support and wonderful work with this platform to share all information.
Great, thank you for your support too :)
The wear results are to be taken with a pinch of salt. Unless these tests go to the lengths of convoy driving to wear, the 'lab wear' is not realistic. A lot of these tyres have just been on my short-list, comparing test results and user reviews to find what is most appropriate, I purchased the Pirelli P1 Verde. The tests find that they offer good wet/dry grip/behaviour, decent longevity, and reasonable fuel consumption, whilst the user reviews report just the same.
Premium contact 5, roadhawk, t005 etc test really well, and users report similar behaviour subjectively, but report appalling wear, often bearing a 'not recommended' or 'avoid' message due to the stupidly short longevity.
I shall report my findings of the P1 verde later, but initial impressions are of a surefooted wet tyre...
I think the wear tests are relatively accurate. Just did +- 30000km with the PC5 on the front axle of a Focus II 1.6 TDCI; 90% driving in and around town.
Ordered the Hankooks this time; 10€ cheaper per tyre and better in the dry than the PC5.
A shame they will probably wear out just as fast...
I have ventus prime 3 and before premium contact 1. Hankooks are much better at handling and cornering (as expected from tires that are 2-3 generations newer) but worse in braking than PC1 (I'm really surprised here).
I don't know if same tires on different cars can have different characteristics, but it may be the case. I remember reading somewhere sometime about cooperation between Michelin and PSA about tweaking the OEM tires for some cars from PSA.
On OEM tires that's expected, I think there was article here on TR.co.uk about Pirelli OEM's for Mercedes, BMW and Audi and what are the differences on the same model.
Tests of aftermarket tires are usually done using VAG vehicles, and maybe the tire manufacturers tweak the tires towards better characteristics and cooperation with the electronics on those cars. Just my thoughts.
I have ventus prime 3 and before premium contact 1. Hankooks are much better at handling and cornering (as expected from tires that are 2-3 generations newer) but worse in braking than PC1 (I'm really surprised here).
I don't know if same tires on different cars can have different characteristics, but it may be the case. I remember reading somewhere sometime about cooperation between Michelin and PSA about tweaking the OEM tires for some cars from PSA.
On OEM tires that's expected, I think there was article here on TR.co.uk about Pirelli OEM's for Mercedes, BMW and Audi and what are the differences on the same model.
Tests of aftermarket tires are usually done using VAG vehicles, and maybe the tire manufacturers tweak the tires towards better characteristics and cooperation with the electronics on those cars. Just my thoughts.
As far as I'm aware Auto Bild run the tyres for 10,000 km then extrapolate the wear from there, so it's a fairly accurate picture.
But is that a road convoy or a machine?
Example of the Roadhawk, its showing here as reasonable, they were originally my choice, but reading the user reviews on here, most reviews are claiming that the tread almost disappears in a blink of an eye, so I stayed away for now pending more reviews/tests.
My point was more, where wear rusults in particular are quoted, do some research by fielding reviews to see what users have found, as always, read both tests and reviews to find what suits.
I've not checked this year, but previously Auto Bild have used road convoys for wear testing.
The disparity does interest me, I'll research it further and report back :)
Yep, the Maxxis does wear a lot in the beginning. Ive written a review on this site about this...
Back then I had done 10k km with them being on the rear axle.
(183k-193k). That day I bought 2 new tyres which were placed at the back (Vredestein Ultrac Satin), and the Maxxis were brought to the front. I changed to winter tires at 211k. So until now the Maxxis have done 28k.. (I'm at 220k now, but still on winter tyres)..
It seems the Maxxis premitra start wearing extremely fast, offering good grip, but after that changes character..
I just checked the thread depth (the tyres are in my garage), and it's 5mm. So 28k until now. So the first 10k on the rear axle I lost like 1.5mm (7.5 to 6mm), the next 18k at the front I lost only 1mm.
The tyres have become noisier over time, the grip in fast turns has become worse..
Could it be that Maxxis has different rubber qualities in this tyre?
- great dry/wet result in the beginning at the cost of durability for tests like this Auto Bild test.. after the initial 'setup' the rubber changes characteristics, so ultimately the tyres last as long as 'normal', but ride quality decreases..
Because of this autobild measures terrible wear, but good other results... Which might be good for Maxxis?
I wouldn't want to talk about a specific brand without doing the testing myself, but it's certainly technically possible to do something as you suggest.