Menu

2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
4 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental ContiSportContact 5 P
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Nexen N Fera RU1
Maxxis M36
Kumho Ecsta PS91
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 5.63 M (15.8%) | Avg: 38.01 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ContiSportContact 5 P with a result of 35.73 M. The difference between best and worst was 13.6%.
  1. Continental ContiSportContact 5 P
    35.73 M
  2. Michelin Pilot Super Sport
    36.23 M
  3. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    37.43 M
  4. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    37.83 M
  5. Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
    38 M
  6. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    38 M
  7. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    38.16 M
  8. Maxxis M36
    39.36 M
  9. Nexen N Fera RU1
    41.36 M

Dry Handling (s)

Spread: 4.31 s (5.5%) | Avg: 79.68 s

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Super Sport with a result of 78.39 s. The difference between best and worst was 5.2%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Super Sport
    78.39 s
  2. Continental ContiSportContact 5 P
    78.4 s
  3. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    78.7 s
  4. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    78.86 s
  5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    79.42 s
  6. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    79.93 s
  7. Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
    80.13 s
  8. Maxxis M36
    80.55 s
  9. Nexen N Fera RU1
    82.7 s

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 1.97 M (14.1%) | Avg: 14.90 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ContiSportContact 5 P with a result of 13.96 M. The difference between best and worst was 12.4%.
  1. Continental ContiSportContact 5 P
    13.96 M
  2. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    14.36 M
  3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    14.46 M
  4. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    14.66 M
  5. Michelin Pilot Super Sport
    14.7 M
  6. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    15.1 M
  7. Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
    15.26 M
  8. Nexen N Fera RU1
    15.63 M
  9. Maxxis M36
    15.93 M

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Continental ContiSportContact 5 P 0%
2 Michelin Pilot Super Sport 0%
3 Pirelli P Zero PZ4 0%
4 Kumho Ecsta PS91 0%
5 Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 0%
6 Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 0%
7 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 0%
8 Nexen N Fera RU1 0%
9 Maxxis M36 0%

Discussion

2 comments
  1. 4cvg archived

    Note that this is the SC5P & not the SC5 & that the PZero is the "sports" variant of the PZ4. The "scores" are simple rank orders. Errors & methodological crudities have been advised by me to Motor & acknowledged by them in a later issue.

    #2813
    1. TyreReviews 4cvg archived

      I'm not sure what happened to your published letter to the magazine, but thank you for the note regarding the Pirelli and Conti issue. I did query the document I was sent when it arrived as it seemed odd (the 5 isn't made in this size in my market) but the magazine confirmed the details and I didn't think anyone could make an error like that when tyre testing!

      #2821