Below are all the data points for the 2016 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts:
For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.
Spider chart cannot be displayed because there are no test categories common to all tires.
Don´t find this test at the hompage?
If it's not yet on the AE website, it will be on there this week once the magazine goes off sale.
OK. But I read somewhere there are only %-values and no brake distances or handling-times?
That is correct. The test is now live on the AE website!
Thanks for the info.
But I would like a review with more details than some %
I think we will sadly have to wait until next year now as the summer tests are over for 2016. The % difference between the top tyres in wet and dry braking are tiny, which would naturally indicate the stopping distances are too.
Yeah, I hope for a review in sport auto (german), I also hope that new Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 get a review
So I still had 3 favorites for me, PS4 (IMHO to expensive compared to the competitors), F1 Asy.3, Dunlop RT2. Sadly, the new P Zero isn´t available in 225/45R17
Regarding difference in the "real" world driving between top 6, if I would take my experience with previous generation which I had on my cars PS3, Assymetric 2, CS3 and PZ3 - regarding wear Michelin would be far better then the rest, PZ with best feeling and grip and others in between.
With the new generation, after reading the tests and users experiences Michelin would stay on top regarding wear but regarding other "sportier" characteristics good and progressive grip, good steering feedback it overcomes the competition (PSS was the main contributor in this)
In my size 235/40R18, PS4 is 25% more expensive then the Assymetric 3, so it comes to personal preferences and driving style; with beter wear and the fact that is the best tyre at the moment I will go with PS4; for less spirited drivers less expensive options seem more reasonable especially with the margins between top 6 being rather small.
Strange, because my experiences with the Assymetric 2 and PS-3 in terms of wear were the other way around. I am finding the Assymetric 2 is wearing better than the PS-3 did. I also had the Dunlop SportMaxx RT, and the wear on those was absolutely apalling.
Yep, Asy.2 wears better than PS3.
I think the Asy3 are very similar to Asy2, but the PS4 is very different to PS3
In the real world is there much difference between the Assymetric 3 and the PS4? Most people wouldn't notice a slight difference in grip, but they would notice an increase/decrease in noise, a difference in wear rates or a higher/lower price.
Sadly wear wasn't tested, and you can find prices above. As for noise, the Michelin was 98% of the quietest tyre on test (Pirelli) and the Goodyear was 98.2%. This wouldn't be noticeable.
The overall results are so close between the premium manufacturers now, you're not going to make a bad choice with any of the top 6!
Finally!
Agreed. We've been running a set of MPS4's on a long term car and have found them incredible, it's nice to see some hard data to verify this!
Incredible? Can´t believe I feel a big difference to the competitos like P Zero series, Dunlop Sportmaxx or Goodyear F1
And yet the venerable SC5 beat it in both dry & wet handling disciplines. The wet score might be expected but I would have thought that newer tyres like the PS4 would better it in the dry.