Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
Good
Below Average
42
BEST
Bar length in each cell shows performance versus the class leader; longer bars mean stronger performance. The class-leading value in each column appears in bold. The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories.
| # | Tyre | Total Score |
|---|---|---|
Scroll for more
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Each cell shows a bar comparing the tyre to the class leader for that test — a longer bar means stronger performance. Bar colour matches the test category.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
Useful to add as a follow-up test review (repeated test of winner & 'loser'):
Giti: Dekra independent results contradict magazine tyre test (http://www.tyrepress.com/20....
Useful to add as a follow-up test review (repeated test of winner & 'loser'):
Giti: Dekra independent results contradict magazine tyre test (http://www.tyrepress.com/20....
The 2nd test from GTÜ is more interesting
http://www.gtue.de/sixcms/m...
Thanks, we've just covered it here:
http://www.tyrereviews.co.u...
Yeah goid few omissions there, as you say benchmark premium tyre, but also where are two of the biggest mid-range players Falken and Kumho?? Avon too now i think...