Below are all the data points for the 2013 Auto Bild Top 15 Winter Tyre Shootout, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts:
For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.
Spider chart cannot be displayed because there are no test categories common to all tires.
i bought infinity tyres but i didn't pay attention to the date 01 2010
is it ok now we are 2014
Assuming they've been stored correctly some manufacturers recommend up to 10 years, which would give you another 6 years.
We'd certainly run them for another year or two without worrying, but it might be worth speaking to infinity to double check.
Do you know how the wear ratings of different tyres relate to each other? The Goodyear scored 8 and the Nokian scored 4. Surely this doesn't mean that the Nokian wears twice as quickly?
The projected mileage for the Michelin was 40,000 miles, the Goodyear 37,200 and the Nokian 28,000, so not quite half as you correctly say.
That's a huge difference, I was actually expecting them to be much closer than that. I currently run the Goodyears and was going to replace two shortly with the Nokians due to price but it's not worth it if I'd probably only get 75% of the mileage. Thanks.
If you checkout the full auto bild article, they also gave each tyres a value factor which, we presume, combined purchase price vs wear.
Where can I read that? I can't see anything detailed on the website and I assume you can't get the German magazine in the UK? Interestingly the UK edition placed the Nokian in 1st:
http://www.autoexpress.co.u...
Also nothing mentioned about wear.
I think you'll have to buy the PDF version of the article from autobild.com.
The UK magazine is a completely different test, and wear wasn't a factor in their scoring.
In Nokian's defense I have to say that I'm running their WR D3s in 185/65 R15 on my Grande Punto. I've done over 25.000 kilometers the past two winters and wear has been excellent. Last year's fronts, which are now at the rear, are down to 6+ mil.
Tyre pressure is very important with winter tyres though. Simply adding 0.2 or 0.3 bar to the amount used in your summer tyres isn't always accurate. I pays to do some trail and error.
Those projected lifetimes are really interesting. If representative they mean that for the majority of UK motorists wear really won't be an issue at all, since the tyres will need replacing on age instead. For example, if a driver does 10,000 miles per year and does half of these on winter tyres (probably an overestimate), then over 5 years that would be 25,000 miles on the winter tyres. So even the worst wearing Nokian (and I guess Continental) tyres will do this OK.
A very interesting point, but sadly not one which is entirely accurate.
The drum tests they use to test wear are quite simple machines, and the projected mileage is just that, projected. It's a better indication of the RELATIVE miles one tyre will do to the next, rather than an exact figure.
Thanks, I did wonder how representative those figures might be.
hello,
I just have conti TS 830P on 15" tire(almost new),is any reason to change the tire for better grip to any of the first 3 from this test?
If It was our vehicle we would be inclined to use the current tyres until around 4mm then upgrade to the newer patterns.
The increase with these new tyres are evolutionary rather than revolutionary
What is your opinion about the age (DOT) of winter tyres. How many years should they serve properly if they are used only in winter?
Providing they are stored properly in the summer, they should last 4-5 years without problem.
The recommended upper age limit from most manufacturers is 6 years.
So in fact I can hardly know what I am buying....This Michelín could be the very same sample tested hereabouts or very well might be a very different one if bought in, say, Spain....Italy...tomorrow or next week....Yes, I recall being told one never knows !!!!
Actually there is a way of telling. When the tyre companies update their tyres they have to give them a new article number. You could email Michelin and ask what the latest article number is and make sure you order that one, or ask them what dates the latest compound has been produced from and make sure you order tyres with newer DOT codes than that.
Thank you. I am about to send 25 emails...Not interested at all in those ranking 26-50.
To the testers: please be aware that your reports on product "MAKE + ABC " are of no meaning at all if not followed by DOT codes.
I will refrain from buying winter tyres in 2013....
Looks like a warm winter anyway. Nevertheless, red in the morning, sailor's warning.
Changing compounds !!!! How funny !!!! Every week or on a yearly basis ???
Tyre labelling has forced these updates as the manufacturers aim for better and better label scores so it's quite a rare occurrence.
Why are the results so different from the same test conducted in 2012 where the Continental won and the Michelin placed 3rd? Even more surprising is that in 2012 the Hankook placed in 4th above the Goodyear, Dunlop and Nokian and this year the same tyre is below them all in 14th! Doesn't make any sense.
Tyre companies have been rolling out a lot of compound updates to their tyres, without updating the pattern names.
That means the Bridgestone / Michelin tested this year could actually be DIFFERENT tyres tested last year. Why the tyre companies don't make this obvious we don't know...
Also, the testing location, the car used and the tyre size chosen can all have an impact on the overall results when the group is so close...
Not a single word about Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme....!!!!
Vredestein put in the Snowtrac 3 which only finished 18th in the bigger test: http://www.tyrereviews.co.u...
Really, I can't get why Continental took 3rd place instead 1st. If we look total - it has 48 to Michelin's 47, actually I even can't comment Pirelli (2nd ???) with their 41. Of course somebody will say that different aspects of the performance of tyres have different weight. Ok I totally agree. So let compare most important aspects for winter conditions from my point of view.
Snow: Continental - 9, Michelin - 8, Pirelli - 7;
Wet: Continental - 8, Pirelli - 8, Michelin - 6;
Dry: Pirelli - 6, Michelin - 6; Continental - 5; dry is not so common for winter and that's why isn't important to me but yes Continental is the weakest from these three.
If we sum up now Continental - 22, Pirelli - 21, Michelin - 20.
In the minor aspects Continental is better again except wear. I can't explain myself why wear is so important for Auto Bild
That's a great question, sadly one we can't answer!