Continental Premium Contact 6 Reviews - Page 7
Mercedes Benz C350 RWD
(255/35 R18 W)
on a combination of roads
for 1 spirited miles
Thoughts on initial receipt of the tyres in 255/35/18 94Y size.
7-7.2 tread, seemingly the norm these days, so effectively only 5.4mm usable tread vs. 6.4mm at 8mm new.
VERY wide longitudinal grooves - leaving not much 'rubber on the road'/contact patch compared to the CSC5 s ive previously used. (Or much rubber to wear through at all) Despite the publication reviews showing the best wear on test at date, having used PS4s a while back, also with very wide grooves and 7mm tread, which did not last well at all for a Michelin, I'm sceptical of how well these will last.
Full review to follow in the coming weeks once I've got the winter wheels off and ive managed to run them in.
Given 74%
while driving a
Audi A3 Sportback
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 8,000 spirited miles
very good and soft tyre good handling far less noisy than my previous Bridgestone s001s but much less sporty.
yes they grip well at both dry and wet road but they are too soft with stability problems when driving on "s" turns and high speed.
slow response from the steering wheel.
definitely NOT a sport tyre.
Given 56%
while driving a
Volvo XC40
(235/50 R19 V)
on mostly town
for 8,000 average miles
Repeat of another review, too soft. Tyres squirm and slip at the slightest road discrepancy. No confidence with these tyres if in icy conditions. At brand new, they slipped as if already badly worn and now 8k miles, they need replacing. Be glad to get rid of them for something more stable.
Given 91%
while driving a
Volkswagen Passat 2.0TDI
(235/45 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 22,000 spirited miles
Excellent tires in every category apart from wear. (I guess it is the trade-off) From new(7,2mm) to wear indicator (3mm)it takes me dead on 22K miles, so 2 years in my driving style. Still I am buying it every two years as they are just superb.
Given 46%
while driving a
Ford S Max
(235/45 R18 W)
on a combination of roads
for 10,000 miles
Too soft. Awful value for money. Wheel spin without much effort. Fine if they were 50 quid each. So, given the price, terrible.
Very unhappy. Don't feel safe with speed or hard cornering. Don't trust them at all.
I drive on country roads and motorways...lots.
All over France.
Done 20000 miles in 6 months. They won't last long.
Very unhappy. Don't feel safe with speed or hard cornering. Don't trust them at all.
I drive on country roads and motorways...lots.
All over France.
Done 20000 miles in 6 months. They won't last long.
Given 97%
while driving a
Skoda Octavia vRS
(225/40 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 1,000 spirited miles
Really good tyres, excellent dry and wet grip, good steering feel, and not too noisy.
Given 84%
while driving a
BMW 316
(225/45 R17 V)
on track
for 13,500 spirited miles
I use my f30 ied with stage1 220 hp. Really good in dry and short braking dist. Also good in wet braking dist but sometimes oversteer in wet cornering , lost control 1 or 2 times lucky catch the road quickly . Wear is ok modarete and comfortable tires . Drive about 22k km.
Given 100%
while driving a
Audi A4 Quattro 220 bhp TFSI
(235/45 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 8,000 spirited miles
Great overall experience, awesome tyre modell for sport cars.
Given 96%
while driving a
Toyota Auris
(205/55 R16 V)
on a combination of roads
for 3,000 average miles
very good in dry and wet roads. very comfort also but a little noisy. we shall see about wear.
Given 95%
while driving a
Volkswagen 1.8 20vT Sport
(225/40 R18 W)
on a combination of roads
for 100 average miles
So far they are very good, better than my previous Assymetric 3s. But time will tell, most tyres are good in their first few miles.
Given 70%
while driving a
Audi A6 Avant Quattro 2.0TDI
(225/55 R17 W)
on mostly motorways
for 3,000 average miles
Had these tyres a few months on my Audi A6 Avant Quattro which has very light steering and they improved the handling and directional stability of my car hugely compared to the Michelin CrossClimate+ tyres. The Contis are superb when cornering whereas the CrossClimate felt wallowy and difficult to keep in a straight line at speed. However, and it's a big however, the Contis are very noisy on the high number of poor road surfaces in the UK, whereas the CrossClimate+ were quiet and comfortable. Apart from on the best smooth road surfaces, I don't find the Contis comfortable and I'm almost constantly aware of the noise levels. It's a trade off between comfort and handling.
Given 89%
while driving a
Honda Accord iVtec Type S saloon
(225/40 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 1,500 spirited miles
I replaced my Michelin PS3/4 with these tyres on my Honda Accord Type S and I must say that i am loving them. Compared to PS, for me they just handle better. Maybe even better dry and wet grip. Michelin was better on the initial turn in because it had stiffer and harder side walls. These tyres have thiner sides. But after that, oh boy, welcome to the world of grip. Maybe they are a bit more comfortable than the Pilots.