Menu

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy vs Pilot Sport 5: How Much Do You Really Give Up?

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
3 min read
Below are all the data points for the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy vs Pilot Sport 5: How Much Do You Really Give Up?, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 0.30 M (0.9%) | Avg: 34.95 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry braking test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy
    34.8 M
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5
    35.1 M

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 2.20 M (8.6%) | Avg: 26.70 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 5 with a result of 25.6 M. The difference between best and worst was 7.9%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5
    25.6 M
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy
    27.8 M

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Spread: 0.92 Points (10.3%) | Avg: 8.46 Points

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 5 with a result of 8.92 Points. The difference between best and worst was 10.3%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5
    8.92 Points
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy
    8 Points

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 1.40 kg / t (21.5%) | Avg: 7.20 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy with a result of 6.5 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 17.7%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy
    6.5 kg / t
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5
    7.9 kg / t

Abrasion (g)

Spread: 237.00 g (26.3%) | Avg: 1019.50 g

Total weight loss after wear test in grams (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy with a result of 901 g. The difference between best and worst was 20.8%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy
    901 g
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5
    1138 g

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 0%
2 Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy 0%

Discussion

4 comments
  1. Ryan Blacker archived

    Do you know when/if they're likely to bring out more sizes of this tyre? Would be great on my mach e (225 55 19) which at the moment looks like I'll be going to the Michelin Primacy 5 Energy.

    #10603
  2. Patrick archived

    I'm intresested in the Pilot Sport 5 Energy for my EV... Does anyone have Informations about comfort and noise level for this tire?

    #10532
  3. Nace Kristanc archived

    If the general tradeoff is that an "eco" tyre will have a lower rolling resistance at the cost of wet grip, while their expected mileage is the same, wouldn't their wet grip performances and rolling resistances just converge over time, and thus the results shown are basically the widest they will ever be.

    Additionally if we account for the fact that in this case the PS5 Energy has lower abrasion while achieving the same mileage, the user is essentially buying a tyre with a harder compound, which performs worse grip wise.

    I would assume that the need for such tyres comes from car manufacturers primarily to reduce their carbon tax when selling new vehicles and that there are regulative pressures from EU primarily when it comes to abrasion as tires are a decent factor in micro plastics pollution, it just seems that the rolling resistance gains over the life of the tyre are exaggerated over time.

    #10522
    1. TyreReviews Nace Kristanc archived

      You are correct that, as the tread depth gets worn, they are likely going to get closer overall. Unfortunately, how much closer we don't know without seeing the data, which I'm not sure anyone will ever publish.

      #10523