Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system based on the test methodology. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Snow | Comfort | Value | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Handling s | Subj. Dry Handling Points | % | Braking M | Handling s | Subj. Wet Handling Points | Straight Aqua Km/H | Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | % | Braking M | Traction s | Handling s | Subj. Snow Handling Points | % | Subj. Comfort Points | Subj. Noise Points | Noise dB | % | Rolling Resistance kg / t | % | |||
| 1 | Nokian Seasonproof 2 | 98% | 37.83 | 73.17 | 9.75 3 | 97.1% | 30.46 ★ | 72.38 2 | 10 ★ | 81.7 ★ | 8.01 3 | 99.9% | 18.79 2 | 3.88 | 84.07 ★ | 10 ★ | 98% | 9.5 | 9.75 | 70.7 ★ | 98.1% | 7.36 | 89.3% |
| 2 | BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season | 97% | 36.21 ★ | 73.16 | 10 ★ | 99.6% | 33.63 | 73.66 | 9.5 3 | 81 2 | 8.06 2 | 94.6% | 19.08 | 3.81 | 86.91 3 | 9.5 3 | 96.6% | 10 ★ | 10 ★ | 71.7 | 99.3% | 6.57 ★ | 100% |
| 3 | Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 | 96.7% | 38.55 | 72.59 3 | 10 ★ | 96.8% | 30.72 2 | 72.35 ★ | 9.5 3 | 80 | 7.52 | 98.1% | 18.85 | 3.77 2 | 87.8 | 9 | 96.5% | 10 ★ | 10 ★ | 71.2 3 | 99.7% | 7.89 | 83.3% |
| 4 | Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X | 96.7% | 38.3 | 72.3 ★ | 9.75 3 | 96.9% | 31.04 3 | 72.48 3 | 9.5 3 | 79.1 | 7.25 | 97.3% | 18.81 3 | 3.77 2 | 86.01 2 | 10 ★ | 98.1% | 10 ★ | 9.5 | 70.9 2 | 98.6% | 7.96 | 82.5% |
| 5 | Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV | 96.5% | 37.33 3 | 72.38 2 | 9.75 3 | 98.1% | 32.57 | 72.65 | 10 ★ | 80.7 3 | 8.17 ★ | 97.2% | 18.51 ★ | 3.68 ★ | 88.15 | 8.5 | 97.1% | 9.5 | 9.5 | 72.1 | 96.5% | 8.35 | 78.7% |
| 6 | Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 | 96.1% | 36.54 2 | 72.97 | 9.75 3 | 98.9% | 32.69 | 73.8 | 9.5 3 | 80.7 3 | 7.57 | 95.3% | 19.6 | 3.95 | 87.8 | 9 | 94% | 9.5 | 10 ★ | 71.7 | 98.1% | 7.13 3 | 92.2% |
| 7 | Westlake All Season Elite Z401 | 86.6% | 39.94 | 75.86 | 8 | 90.7% | 38.49 | 75.51 | 7 | 69 | 3.28 | 80.1% | 20.27 | 4.24 | 89.91 | 8.5 | 90% | 9.5 | 6 | 73.3 | 87% | 6.6 2 | 99.6% |
| Reference Summer | 33.97 1 | 72.2 1 | 28.89 1 | 103.9% | 71.83 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Reference Winter Nordic | 16.7 1 | 3.2 1 | 80.01 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Scroll for more
Dry
97%
Wet
100%
Snow
98%
Comfort
98%
Value
89%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.83 M
Dry Handling
73.17 s
Subj. Dry Handling
9.75 Points
3
Wet
Wet Braking
30.46 M
★
Wet Handling
72.38 s
2
Subj. Wet Handling
10 Points
★
Straight Aqua
81.7 Km/H
★
Curved Aquaplaning
8.01 m/sec2
3
Snow
Snow Braking
18.79 M
2
Snow Traction
3.88 s
Snow Handling
84.07 s
★
Subj. Snow Handling
10 Points
★
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
9.5 Points
Subj. Noise
9.75 Points
Noise
70.7 dB
★
Value
Rolling Resistance
7.36 kg / t
Dry
100%
Wet
95%
Snow
97%
Comfort
99%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.21 M
★
Dry Handling
73.16 s
Subj. Dry Handling
10 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
33.63 M
Wet Handling
73.66 s
Subj. Wet Handling
9.5 Points
3
Straight Aqua
81 Km/H
2
Curved Aquaplaning
8.06 m/sec2
2
Snow
Snow Braking
19.08 M
Snow Traction
3.81 s
Snow Handling
86.91 s
3
Subj. Snow Handling
9.5 Points
3
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
10 Points
★
Subj. Noise
10 Points
★
Noise
71.7 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
6.57 kg / t
★
Dry
97%
Wet
98%
Snow
97%
Comfort
100%
Value
83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.55 M
Dry Handling
72.59 s
3
Subj. Dry Handling
10 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
30.72 M
2
Wet Handling
72.35 s
★
Subj. Wet Handling
9.5 Points
3
Straight Aqua
80 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
7.52 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
18.85 M
Snow Traction
3.77 s
2
Snow Handling
87.8 s
Subj. Snow Handling
9 Points
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
10 Points
★
Subj. Noise
10 Points
★
Noise
71.2 dB
3
Value
Rolling Resistance
7.89 kg / t
Dry
97%
Wet
97%
Snow
98%
Comfort
99%
Value
83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.3 M
Dry Handling
72.3 s
★
Subj. Dry Handling
9.75 Points
3
Wet
Wet Braking
31.04 M
3
Wet Handling
72.48 s
3
Subj. Wet Handling
9.5 Points
3
Straight Aqua
79.1 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
7.25 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
18.81 M
3
Snow Traction
3.77 s
2
Snow Handling
86.01 s
2
Subj. Snow Handling
10 Points
★
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
10 Points
★
Subj. Noise
9.5 Points
Noise
70.9 dB
2
Value
Rolling Resistance
7.96 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
97%
Snow
97%
Comfort
97%
Value
79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.33 M
3
Dry Handling
72.38 s
2
Subj. Dry Handling
9.75 Points
3
Wet
Wet Braking
32.57 M
Wet Handling
72.65 s
Subj. Wet Handling
10 Points
★
Straight Aqua
80.7 Km/H
3
Curved Aquaplaning
8.17 m/sec2
★
Snow
Snow Braking
18.51 M
★
Snow Traction
3.68 s
★
Snow Handling
88.15 s
Subj. Snow Handling
8.5 Points
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
9.5 Points
Subj. Noise
9.5 Points
Noise
72.1 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
8.35 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
95%
Snow
94%
Comfort
98%
Value
92%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36.54 M
2
Dry Handling
72.97 s
Subj. Dry Handling
9.75 Points
3
Wet
Wet Braking
32.69 M
Wet Handling
73.8 s
Subj. Wet Handling
9.5 Points
3
Straight Aqua
80.7 Km/H
3
Curved Aquaplaning
7.57 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
19.6 M
Snow Traction
3.95 s
Snow Handling
87.8 s
Subj. Snow Handling
9 Points
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
9.5 Points
Subj. Noise
10 Points
★
Noise
71.7 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
7.13 kg / t
3
Dry
91%
Wet
80%
Snow
90%
Comfort
87%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.94 M
Dry Handling
75.86 s
Subj. Dry Handling
8 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
38.49 M
Wet Handling
75.51 s
Subj. Wet Handling
7 Points
Straight Aqua
69 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.28 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
20.27 M
Snow Traction
4.24 s
Snow Handling
89.91 s
Subj. Snow Handling
8.5 Points
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
9.5 Points
Subj. Noise
6 Points
Noise
73.3 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
6.6 kg / t
2
Dry
104%
Wet
104%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
33.97 M
1
Dry Handling
72.2 s
1
Wet
Wet Braking
28.89 M
1
Wet Handling
71.83 s
1
Snow
110%
View detailed scores
Snow
Snow Braking
16.7 M
1
Snow Traction
3.2 s
1
Snow Handling
80.01 s
1
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
How would the Nokian compare to the CC2 SUV I have on my Tesla Y RWD right now.
They are up for a change before next winter, and I am a bit upset about the CC3 non sport version dosen come in the correct size. I am locked in chillmode and doesn’t giv anything about sportiness and performance.
Snow traction is the main thing. I don’t want to be stuck.
I'm not 100% sure, I would like to see some more test data for the Nokian. The CrossClimate series is always hard to beat in snow traction, but I expect the Nokian to be better in the wet.
Hi Jonathan
Do you have any plans to test the Nokian Seasonproof 2 in other sizes and any general thoughts about their suitability for non SUVs? I used to run Nokian WRG2s as a dedicated winter tyre before going over to all seasons some years back, specifically the Goodyear Vector 4 Season, but I always rated the Nokian as the best tyre I ever had for winter. The availability of the brand has always been something of an issue in the UK, but I have now found a national retailer which stocks the Seasonproof 2 for very sensible money. The car I drive is a Kia Ceed SW estate, so for me it’s basically a choice between Goodyear and Nokian. In your view would there be a clear cut winner for UK driving conditions?
Thank you.
I would like to see more tests of the Nokian, I will be testing it again next year.
I have the Nokian and they are fabulous in wet and snow. Precise, silent and well balanced tire. I recommend.
Just an observation. I find the graphs a little misleading in terms of how they visualize the size of the differences betweent the tires, and that affects cognitive appreciation of how small the differences among the best really are. I think a better way of representing this data would be to show the data as a percentage of the best. So the best tire in any test is 100% and the other tires represented as what percentage of that ideal they achieve. Just think it would provide a more easily grasped appreciation of where each tire stands than absolute reference numbers of time or distance.
Having said that, you are the only tire review site I bother with. Nothing else compares in the quality of the data.
Hi John,
Compared to "The Best All Season Tyres for 2024 / 2025" test it seems that margin between the reference tyres and all season tyres is bigger. Is it due to different size/heavier car, or maybe you can think about some other factors?
I'm in the eastern Europe and really concerned about winter performance, compared to a dedicated winter tyres. I can't say we have a lot of snow, but some days it can be really cold, like -30C and ice or frozen snow everywhere.
Are the seasonproof 2 available in the UK? I can’t find anyone who stocks them.
Great test! Could you please name the reference summer tyre?
It was the Nokian Hakka Green 3 (from memory)
Hi John, amazing review again, as always. It seems this was a US market focussed test? How should we read the results? Do they apply to non SUV sizes? It’s hard for me to interpret the results as the Bridgestones, which normally test super well at smaller sizes seem to have underperformed here, and the Goodyears which also seem to score lower in other tests, given their age, showed better here.
Would it be fair to say that these results should not be used to judge these tyres in smaller non size sizes?
Will there be any other non suv tyre tests before September (all season, touring or UHP)?
Appreciate your work!
This was EU focused, generally the trend between the SUV variant and 'regular' is good but when things are super tight there can be small differences.
Well it would be nice to have continental, pirelli and michelin as you have already commented but it is good that budget tyres are improving. It would also be nice to see yokohama geolandar g061 CV 4S which also is an SUV oriented all season tyre. In fact I was looking forward to this test since it's time to change to the Goodyear 4 season GEN-2 SUV on my MAZDA CX-30 (215/55/18) in greece. If am not very wrong, Pirelli SF3 are the more summerish all season tyre?
I am also looking forward to a test of the Yokohama G061 CV 4S though this tyre is not imported in Greece by the Yokohama importer. Really interested in how they would perform in a test against the above tyres and more over the Michelin cc2, pirelli sf3, Bridgestone all seasons.
Have you seen tireracks test? https://www.tirerack.com/ti... It didn't seem super strong in winter, compared to the CC2 (AW)