Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system based on the test methodology. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Snow | Ice | Comfort | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Handling s | Subj. Dry Handling Points | % | Braking M | Handling s | Subj. Wet Handling Points | Circle s | Straight Aqua Km/H | Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | % | Braking M | Traction s | Handling s | Subj. Snow Handling Points | Circle ms/2 | % | Braking M | Traction s | % | Noise dB | % | Wear KM | Value Price/1000 | Price | Rolling Resistance kg / t | % | |||
| 1 | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 95.4% | 41.4 | 55.8 2 | 95 2 | 94.3% | 34.1 2 | 86.1 ★ | 100 ★ | 12.03 | 78.5 | 2.92 | 97.5% | 18 | 8.04 ★ | 92.18 | 98 2 | .382 2 | 98.5% | 6.67 2 | 4.78 2 | 97.5% | 71 2 | 99.9% | 48900 ★ | 1.88 2 | 92.09 | 7.25 3 | 84.3% |
| 2 | Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 | 95.1% | 38.9 2 | 56 | 95 2 | 97.4% | 33.2 ★ | 87.2 | 95 3 | 12.01 3 | 81.3 2 | 3.12 3 | 98.3% | 18.2 | 8.57 | 95.01 | 92 | .372 | 95.2% | 7.11 | 4.88 3 | 93% | 71.6 | 99% | 44499 2 | 2.04 | 90.69 | 8.71 | 74% |
| 3 | Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 | 95% | 37.7 ★ | 55.4 ★ | 100 ★ | 100% | 35.5 3 | 86.2 2 | 100 ★ | 12 2 | 84.2 ★ | 3.43 ★ | 97.3% | 18.8 | 8.46 3 | 91.99 2 | 98 2 | .378 3 | 96.3% | 6.89 | 4.68 ★ | 96.4% | 71.7 | 98.9% | 33741 | 2.75 | 92.78 | 7.86 | 67.1% |
| 4 | Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 93.6% | 39.2 3 | 56.4 | 92 | 96.5% | 37.3 | 87.9 | 95 3 | 12.18 | 80.1 3 | 3.22 2 | 93.6% | 17.6 ★ | 8.69 | 90.68 ★ | 100 ★ | .386 ★ | 98.5% | 6.79 3 | 4.97 | 94.9% | 70.9 ★ | 100% | 39609 3 | 2.54 | 100.59 | 6.98 ★ | 75.9% |
| 5 | Dunlop Sport All Season | 91.2% | 43 | 55.8 2 | 92 | 92.2% | 36.8 | 87 3 | 90 | 11.86 ★ | 76.4 | 2.99 | 93.2% | 18 | 8.46 3 | 95.45 | 88 | .346 | 94.6% | 7.47 | 5.56 | 85.7% | 72 | 98.5% | 36186 | 2.12 | 76.89 3 | 7.06 2 | 75.9% |
| 6 | Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 | 89.6% | 44.3 | 56.6 | 92 | 90.3% | 38 | 88.7 | 88 | 12.23 | 75.5 | 2.7 | 90.6% | 17.6 ★ | 8.04 ★ | 93.51 | 92 | .362 | 97.7% | 6.48 ★ | 5.44 | 94.4% | 73.5 | 96.5% | 38631 | 1.97 3 | 75.99 2 | 9.18 | 69.4% |
| 7 | Fronway Fronwing AS | 80.8% | 43.6 | 58.1 | 85 | 89.4% | 48.7 | 99.7 | 10 | 13.1 | 70.2 | 2.14 | 70.2% | 17.9 3 | 9.11 | 92.16 3 | 90 | .352 | 94.8% | 6.79 3 | 4.94 | 95.2% | 71.1 3 | 99.7% | 1 | 1 ★ | 60 ★ | 7.62 | 67% |
Scroll for more
Dry
94%
Wet
98%
Snow
99%
Ice
98%
Comfort
100%
Value
84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
41.4 M
Dry Handling
55.8 s
2
Subj. Dry Handling
95 Points
2
Wet
Wet Braking
34.1 M
2
Wet Handling
86.1 s
★
Subj. Wet Handling
100 Points
★
Wet Circle
12.03 s
Straight Aqua
78.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.92 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
18 M
Snow Traction
8.04 s
★
Snow Handling
92.18 s
Subj. Snow Handling
98 Points
2
Snow Circle
.382 ms/2
2
Ice
Ice Braking
6.67 M
2
Ice Traction
4.78 s
2
Comfort
Noise
71 dB
2
Value
Wear
48900 KM
★
Value
1.88 Price/1000
2
Price
92.09
Rolling Resistance
7.25 kg / t
3
Dry
97%
Wet
98%
Snow
95%
Ice
93%
Comfort
99%
Value
74%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.9 M
2
Dry Handling
56 s
Subj. Dry Handling
95 Points
2
Wet
Wet Braking
33.2 M
★
Wet Handling
87.2 s
Subj. Wet Handling
95 Points
3
Wet Circle
12.01 s
3
Straight Aqua
81.3 Km/H
2
Curved Aquaplaning
3.12 m/sec2
3
Snow
Snow Braking
18.2 M
Snow Traction
8.57 s
Snow Handling
95.01 s
Subj. Snow Handling
92 Points
Snow Circle
.372 ms/2
Ice
Ice Braking
7.11 M
Ice Traction
4.88 s
3
Comfort
Noise
71.6 dB
Value
Wear
44499 KM
2
Value
2.04 Price/1000
Price
90.69
Rolling Resistance
8.71 kg / t
Dry
100%
Wet
97%
Snow
96%
Ice
96%
Comfort
99%
Value
67%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.7 M
★
Dry Handling
55.4 s
★
Subj. Dry Handling
100 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
35.5 M
3
Wet Handling
86.2 s
2
Subj. Wet Handling
100 Points
★
Wet Circle
12 s
2
Straight Aqua
84.2 Km/H
★
Curved Aquaplaning
3.43 m/sec2
★
Snow
Snow Braking
18.8 M
Snow Traction
8.46 s
3
Snow Handling
91.99 s
2
Subj. Snow Handling
98 Points
2
Snow Circle
.378 ms/2
3
Ice
Ice Braking
6.89 M
Ice Traction
4.68 s
★
Comfort
Noise
71.7 dB
Value
Wear
33741 KM
Value
2.75 Price/1000
Price
92.78
Rolling Resistance
7.86 kg / t
Dry
97%
Wet
94%
Snow
99%
Ice
95%
Comfort
100%
Value
76%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.2 M
3
Dry Handling
56.4 s
Subj. Dry Handling
92 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
37.3 M
Wet Handling
87.9 s
Subj. Wet Handling
95 Points
3
Wet Circle
12.18 s
Straight Aqua
80.1 Km/H
3
Curved Aquaplaning
3.22 m/sec2
2
Snow
Snow Braking
17.6 M
★
Snow Traction
8.69 s
Snow Handling
90.68 s
★
Subj. Snow Handling
100 Points
★
Snow Circle
.386 ms/2
★
Ice
Ice Braking
6.79 M
3
Ice Traction
4.97 s
Comfort
Noise
70.9 dB
★
Value
Wear
39609 KM
3
Value
2.54 Price/1000
Price
100.59
Rolling Resistance
6.98 kg / t
★
Dry
92%
Wet
93%
Snow
95%
Ice
86%
Comfort
99%
Value
76%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
43 M
Dry Handling
55.8 s
2
Subj. Dry Handling
92 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
36.8 M
Wet Handling
87 s
3
Subj. Wet Handling
90 Points
Wet Circle
11.86 s
★
Straight Aqua
76.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.99 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
18 M
Snow Traction
8.46 s
3
Snow Handling
95.45 s
Subj. Snow Handling
88 Points
Snow Circle
.346 ms/2
Ice
Ice Braking
7.47 M
Ice Traction
5.56 s
Comfort
Noise
72 dB
Value
Wear
36186 KM
Value
2.12 Price/1000
Price
76.89
3
Rolling Resistance
7.06 kg / t
2
Dry
90%
Wet
91%
Snow
98%
Ice
94%
Comfort
97%
Value
69%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.3 M
Dry Handling
56.6 s
Subj. Dry Handling
92 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
38 M
Wet Handling
88.7 s
Subj. Wet Handling
88 Points
Wet Circle
12.23 s
Straight Aqua
75.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.7 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
17.6 M
★
Snow Traction
8.04 s
★
Snow Handling
93.51 s
Subj. Snow Handling
92 Points
Snow Circle
.362 ms/2
Ice
Ice Braking
6.48 M
★
Ice Traction
5.44 s
Comfort
Noise
73.5 dB
Value
Wear
38631 KM
Value
1.97 Price/1000
3
Price
75.99
2
Rolling Resistance
9.18 kg / t
Dry
89%
Wet
70%
Snow
95%
Ice
95%
Comfort
100%
Value
67%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
43.6 M
Dry Handling
58.1 s
Subj. Dry Handling
85 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
48.7 M
Wet Handling
99.7 s
Subj. Wet Handling
10 Points
Wet Circle
13.1 s
Straight Aqua
70.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.14 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
17.9 M
3
Snow Traction
9.11 s
Snow Handling
92.16 s
3
Subj. Snow Handling
90 Points
Snow Circle
.352 ms/2
Ice
Ice Braking
6.79 M
3
Ice Traction
4.94 s
Comfort
Noise
71.1 dB
3
Value
Wear
1 KM
Value
1 Price/1000
★
Price
60
★
Rolling Resistance
7.62 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
Great and unbiased test, thank you!
I have been using Michelin CC1 tires for 7 years on my Suzuki SX4 Scross, with 60,000 km.
I am thinking about replacing them. Which would you recommend? CC2 or Conti Allseason contact 2?
I am a little concerned about Conti's poorer aquaplaning resistance.
ASC2 for the wet grip.
The temperature fluctuates throughout the year here, even in winter it can be 10 degrees, but also -10, with little snow and more rain. (But it's okay if the tires don't let me down in the snow either.) Spring and autumn also show great fluctuations. Summers, on the other hand, are hot.
I have read in several places that ASC2 tend to slip in hot weather, making the car unstable. Could this be true? I don't dare to try them. Plus, the short lifespan is also a concern.
I've not heard either of those things
Read the comment section:
https://www.tyrereviews.com/Tyre/Continental/AllSeasonContact-2.htm
The expected tread life is higher than a lot of all seasons, and i've tested these in 30c+ heat at least once (sadly we don't control the weather) and they were fine. All all season tyres will slip a little in the dry compared to a summer tyre, hot weather would make the slightly worse but marginally. It depends on the compromise you want from an all season tyre.
Thank you! If it's no worse than CC+, then there's no problem.
Mileage should be the same, dry grip will likely be a tiny fraction down on cc+ but it should have better wet grip, way better snow.
:O Compared to ASC2? Wasn't it really good when it wet?
The CC+ was good in the wet when it was launched but modern all season tyre are much better
Hello!
I am looking to refresh the tires on my Opel Astra.
Context : 205 55 r16 is the tire size.
I currenly own 2 sets of wheels ; 1. Summer - Dunlop SportBluResponse DOT 4815 - good shape just a bit old
2. Winter - Nokian WRA4 DOT 4318 - goodish shape, sadly worn in 2022 and 2023 without swapping.
I live in Romania
My question is : should i buy a good set of AllSeasons (probably Pirelli's) and sell my winter wheels as is or buy 4 new Dunlops and 2 Nokian winter ones? What would you do? Price is the same for the 4 vs 4+2 where i live.
Thanks in advance!
Summers are Alloys while Winters are Steelies. Thread-wise both are still ok but i am worried blow-outs may occur soon on the summer set.
This is a great review, however I noticed that both your dry and wet weather testing was done at 17.5 degrees. I drive a lot in UK autumn/winter where temps often hover from 2 - 8 degrees when wet or damp and I've found some compounds cope very well with the lower temps whilst others really suffer in the wet when temps get below 10 degrees.
I wondered if this you can include slightly lower temp (but not snow or ice) tests in the future? Or is there some way to use the other test data to draw some conclusions on how each tire performs in more typical northerly UK conditions?
Thanks!
I always try and test at cool times of the year but sadly I've yet the master the weather so sometimes we have to go with the cards we're dealt.
Hi,
I have 4 all-season Avon tyres and the front two need to be replaced soon. All four tyres have small cracks in the thread areas. I don't drive much, around 5k-6k per year, is it worth spending money on premium tyres when I mostly drive in the city?
I was thinking about Yokohama. Can you recommend any other brand? I drive Nissan QQ 2011.
Thanks
I always thing the best tires possible are worth it. Just get one that wears quickly ;)
Hey. Why didn't you include Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 in this test? Goodyear ranked second in 2023 test.
I'll include it next year
I came with the same question, which would be better continental or goodyear? We have RAV4 2017 hybrid and we are mostly in the town or country roads, nothing sporty but we want the safer ones.
Thank you.
Forget to mention UK weather.
Hopefully this will help you both
https://www.tyrereviews.com...
Thanks for the great review.
I am looking for All Season Tyres 235/55 R19. I am quite a noob.
In the ADAC Test from 2024 the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 ranked first.
Which one would you recommend and why? The Continental Allseason Contact 2 or the Goodyear or another tyre.
I live in a big German City with snow for only a couple of days per year though we usually go skiing for one week and have snow chains with us for severe snow conditions. Safety is the most important, yet wear and rolling resistance are also important for us.
Thanks in advance!
The conti is better in the dry, so the Conti.
Thanks for another great review. I am currently considering buying new tires for the winter, but I'm also thinking about all-season ones. I live in Slovakia, where most of the winter is wet and dry. There are a few days when there may be snow on the road, either fresh or wet. I drive on packed and icy roads a few times when I go to the mountains. My Vredestein Wintrac Pro tires, which I've had for 5 seasons, are wearing out, and they worked quite well for my driving. I am considering new winter tires, Continental TS870p, or the all-season Continental AllSeasonContact 2. Could you directly compare them? I haven't found relevant data for a comparison in the same size and on the same car, but it seems to me that the TS870p might be slightly better on ice and perhaps (if at all) on snow. However, on wet and dry surfaces, the ASC2 should perform better. In transitional conditions, which prevail during most of the period from October to April, the all-season tires should be better, so I'm wondering if it's worth buying strictly winter tires. Thank you.
Why in this year comparison there is no Good Year?
I Wanted to test tyres I'd not tested before and use the Michelin as the reference.
Any thoughts on the Nokian Remedy 5s ...
I had the 4s which were medicore. The 5s are apparently much improved.
I would appreciate feedback
I should be testing them next year, Nokian are very confident in their performance.
I've got the Bridgestone on for nearly a year now. While I cannot speak to its snow performance because all roads were cleared up before I could experience it, what I can say it is a very comfortable tyre in 225/45 R17 size. It gives a 'plush' feel, even when highly inflated (running around 38). I suspect it's because of the tread structure. Of course, it is not as sharp as a consequence, but the grip is there, as you would expect from a premium tyre. Also, wear looks good after a year, done probably around 15k on it, they still look young.
Hi Jonathan, amazing work as always! One question I have for you, which I can’t find an answer to anywhere - why are UHP all season tyres not offered in the UK?
they seem like the perfect tyre for milder parts of the country, southern areas especially.
Do you think this segment will ever be sold in the UK?
I believe it's because they don't (can't) meet 3PMSF. While this isn't a problem in the UK it is a problem of mixed messaging selling an "all season" tire in the parts of europe 3PMSF is required in winter
Thank you for the quick reply! Ok understood, shame that we miss out on a whole segment. What would you say is the most high performing all season tyre in the summer that is available in the UK? Based on what i have read, it looks like it's the Pirelli SF3? If one were willing to sacrifice snow/ice performance a bit, would there be another tyre that's even better?
Certainly looking forward to your upcoming tests looking at all seasons in summer and winter!
SF3 or T6AS has my vote.
Jonathan ! After watching previous episode about AS tyres decided to buy kleber Quadraxer3. By the end of september I will have been on them a year. Great on dry, good on snow, birdish sound on wet and damn silent on all surfaces. But I still have my winter tires dunlop winter sport 5 6 year old with 5.85 mm of depth. Is it worth concidering putting them (dunlop) back for one and last winter or is it better to stick to almost new (10000km done so far)kleber quadraxer3? Is a 6 year old dunlop (no cracks, no damage) any worth for winter condition.?
I guess that comes down to affordability. I would imagine the quadraxer 3 would be on par with the old dunlop in the snow and maybe even ice, however you are effectively leaving money on the table by scrapping the Dunlops. 6 years is certainly near the end of life so depending on the compound performance they might already be past their best.
Thx for replay. So I will stick to quadraxer 3 still the incoming winter. Fresh tyre is always a fresh one and nor worn. The revious winter., here in Poland, we had 2 weeks in december and 2 weeks in february full snow. Thats all as far as snow is concerned. In the times rain, mud thats all. Kleber was far from good. It was excellent in snow.
Really complete and extremely clear tests! Unfortunately I only found this site last week. I only knew TCS tests which are much much less detailed.
Now my question.
I am waiting for a new Skoda Karoq 4x4 in September and thinking to replace the summer tyres with all season as soon as the car is available. My choice would be Pirelli even if I know I will need to replace them in three yeas (anyway much less expensive than buying 4 winter + cost of changing two times a year + replacing 8 tyres for aging).
My question is: do you think that high Pirelli wear rate implies also weakness / easy damaging on hard surface like (light) offroad?
Thank you!
Thanks for the great test again!
Guys, I am having a hard time choosing between Michelin CrossClimate 2, Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Kleber Quadraxer 3.
The main point - it has to have the best winter capabilities: snow and hopefully, ice. I was thinking to buy Kleber, but then saw this Continental test. Just wondering if it is a bit worse in snow then Kleber/Michelin. Seems that it's better on ice though.
Thank you!
Continental AllSeasonContact2 will NOT be released in the US - just talked to a Continental rep. Any other info on this would be great. Thanks
Sadly not, the US market has slightly different demands. There is a US version of it coming, for now check out the new Nokian WRG5 or this looks very promising https://www.tire-reviews.co...
Firstly, big fan of your work - keep it up! Secondly, I’m looking to switch to all seasons on my rwd BMW 320i Touring for the changeable Scottish weather. I’ve spent a lot of time searching online, but I’m struggling to find anything to fit both the front and rear due to the car having a staggered wheel set up and needing run flats (no spare wheel)
Any advice for something that would be suitable in 225/45/18 front and 255/40/18 rear? I would love to use one of the new continental, Pirelli or Bridgestones, but so far all I can find is the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.
Thanks in advance!
If you can only find the hankook then that is the obvious choice. Sadly that 18" rear is quite a low volume size
Thanks for your reply. Yeh it’s an annoying wheel size that I didn’t really consider when buying the car. One final option is that I could ditch the run flats entirely and then the CC2 comes into play. Not sure if that’s smart or not though?
Lots of people write in to say they ditched the runflats and are really happy with the choice as there's usually a huge increase in grip and better comfort, but extended mobility is a very personal choice.
for some reason the Conti isn't available in the US :-(
They don't have an all weather tyre in the US yet sadly. I'm sure one is coming.
Sadly not, the US market has slightly different demands. There is a US version of it coming, for now check out the new Nokian WRG5 or this looks very promising https://www.tire-reviews.co...
Since there won't be many tests due to the lack of new tires that will debut in 2024, would you entertain a suggestion for a test? Equip a car with two Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06+ tires in the front and two Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 in the rear, and then repeat the test with two different Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 in the front and two different Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06+ tires in the rear and see how they perform. Find out which way works better, and whether the car performs better with mixed tires or kept all the same. That would satisfy my curiosity. But if not, then it will just have to remain a dream :)
Thanks for your YouTube channel and all the testing that you do!
That does sound fun but PG time is very expensive and it's so niche it will be low priority so might not happen. I'll put it on the list though.
I'm just happy that you are even considering it :)
Hi! I need some specific help here. I need to change tires on an e38 bmw 7 series.
235/60/16...
All I can find are SUV XL tires and I dont know if it's OK to fit them. Please help. I'm in the market for all season tires for this car. Location: western + central europe. Thanks!
Generally it's fine to fit the SUV version of the tyres if that's all you can find. Generally the suv marking is just marketing.
After ~37k+ km and almost 3 years, its time to change Michelin CC2 to something else, because tread now is down to about 4mm, tire is quite cracked and about this I am shocked. What I think about CC2: Good comfort, good in snow, bad on ice, not so great on wet tarmac, okayish on dry tarmac in sharp corners, not so great on gravel.
Thinking to go to Continental AllSeasonContact 2 in autumn.
Where in the world are you?
Continental looks great all-around, but it lost 10% on dry breaking to no.1 Pirelli. This is THE ONE most important category! 4m longer braking... Bridgestone loses on ice and snow to everyone. I think the best all-arounder is stil Michelin or maybe Pirelli(with the worse snow braking, but still only about 5%). Which is not so surpise - the most expensive tires.
Michelin wet braking needs to improve.
I can't find any of the "highly recommended" all season tires from this article for my car (235/45 R18) at Discount Tire :(
:( The US CC2 is very good
Hello TyreReviews!
https://www.bridgestone.co.uk/car-tyres/summer-tyres-turanza/turanza-all-season-6
Please, in the test, was this the newer ENLITEN family tire or plain and older? It would be important as it developed further. I hope I get a quick answer.
The tire i tested does have the enliten marking on the sidewall, I believe they all did at launch.
Hello, i like your reviews very much! I'm currently deciding which of these to take as a replacement for my Nokian WRD4. My question would be which acts better on accelerations for a high torque front wheel drive Octavia VRS with 350hp and 500nm? Considering that summer Goodyear Asymmetric 6 225/40R18 i sometimes loose grip even in 4th gear. So which of these have the better grip on wet/dry? Thanks in advance!
Asym 6 will be a big upgrade on the WRD4 and is a wonderful tyre for a VRS
Hello, question, why 94V and not 91H? I am looking to buy AS tires for my Ford Focus MK2 Facelift 1.8tdci and I thought 94H would be overkill because they have this "XL" rating (both Crossclimate2 and Allseasoncontact 2) and it would harm performance in curves and make driving feel stiffer. In exchange they seem to have a better fuel rating index (B vs. C), and I guess they'll last longer because "XL" tires are made more durable? But that's what I think, is there really any disadvantage to it? Should I buy 205/55 R16 91H or 94H XL Continental Allseasoncontact 2
A lot of the time the 91H tires in this size are the same as the 94V now. It reduces manufacturing complexity.
hello i live in Greece,i have peugeot 3008 and i want all season tyres,which to buy? (i need more dry and wet to be good beacause we dont have snow here,just a little bit for 1-3 days maybe and not)
tyre size is 225/55/18
Have you watched video?
The Pirelli is the best for dry/wet currently.
Hi guys! I've been thinking to purchase one of the top all season tyres for a while. I live in Kyiv, Ukraine and only drive in the city. We do get snow and slush. Sometimes, the road may be covered with a bit of ice, but not on the main roads I guess. The winter temperatures are usually around -3 - -5 C. Sometimes a bit lower. I've previously used Nokian WR G2, that are probably closer to all seasons than to real winter tires and they did good. I also used Michelin X-Ice, which are true winters - good too. Never used studded tyres as I don't see the value for where I live. From the experts point of view, do you think Micheline CrossClimate 2, Continental or Kleber Quadraxer 3 would work well for these winter conditions? They seem to be, according to all the tests that I have seen, just wanted to hear from someone who actually used those. Thank you!
The area the all seasons struggle with is ice, but in reality they won't be much behind the WRG2 if any (that's an old tech tyre now) so I would say it seems like a good idea.
Thank you so much! I really appreciate your feedback! And thanks for amazing reviews, I've watched lots of them. Have a great weekend.
What tyre do you recommend for the mountain area in Romania, where it can get very hot in the summer and also snow can be an issue in winter? I have used Michelin Cross Climate for the last 8 years and because they were not so good in the snow I bought Continental TS860 winter tyres too. Wear is not an issue because I still have 4mm of thread pattern left on the Cross Climate... I have to change them because the tyres seem to be too old for safe usage. Should I try a new generation of All Season tyres or should I have learned my lesson and go for Summer tyres and Winter Tyres? The good part about all season tyres as summer tyres is that during spring it can get up to 28C hot and next days it can snow again, so there are a lot of safety reserves in all conditions. Thank you for your recommendations.
Thanks for your effort and utmost useful reviews.
Are these measuments also meningful for the 195/55 R16 tyre size? Or is it better to refer to your previous "2023 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test" which was conducted on 195/65 R15 tyre size?
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen3 were not included in the test; are these, today, still a safe choice or rather a "thing of the past" (for the 195/55 R16 tyre size)?
I suppose test measurements were taken on tyres at their 100% full tread depth; do also they remain valid along the tyres life span ( e.g. at 50% and 30% remaining tread depth)? Also, does tread wear determine a change in the ranking position of the different tyre models?
Actually, I need to replace my first generation Goodyear Vector 4Seasons tyres, which have reached their limits (2mm tread depth). I almost drive on urban roads and highways (rarely on extra-urban or winding roads); I live in region with temperatures spanning from -3°C to over 30°C. Mostly and mainly, I am interested in performances on dry and wet road coditions; a bit on iced one; snow might be a climate accident but noy my habit at all. My shortlist (for the 195/55 R16 size) includes: Continental AllSeasonContact, Bridgestone Turanza AllSeason 6 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3.
I'd love reading your recommendation.
Thanks
Big Thanks for the very nice review.
I noticed also that Pirelli make a very big step forward, the predecessors had a hard time to reach average performance. The Pirelli would also my 1st choice if I would buy an Allseason
The Bridgestone did also much better in overall performance than the A005 and I´m surprised in the wear performance. The Potenza Sport was devalued in the last tests because of awful wear performance. But yeah, it looks like a copy from the CC2. Hope, it would not be like in the past where all Winter Tyres look like the Goodyear UG 4
The Conti reminds me a bit of 1st Goodyear Vector and the copy, my unknown Hankook All Season from 1991 (which even Hankook can´t remember). To sad, I don´t found pictures of these tyres
Hello,
It is time for me to change my all season tiers. I'm driving Skoda Octavia Wagon, tyre size 225/45/17.
I live in South East Euore, where we have hot summers and winters are mainly cold and rainy and sometimes with little snow. I'm a familiy man and I need a tayre that is good, relaible, good wear, performance also.
I have narrowed to following tiers Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, Continental Contact 2, Goodyear Vector Gen3 and CrossClimate 2. If I need to put them in order it should go something like this Continetal, Goodyear, Bridgestone and CC2.
I'm even considering Kleber Quadrarex 3.
Which one do you recomend? Or do you have something else to recomend? Thank you for your time and help!
The Conti won this test so it seems like a good option to me
Hello, I have decided to go with Conti Contact 2, instead of Bridgestone Truanza 6. For me neck to neck tyres. Reasons why I went with Conti was almost the same price. Bridgestone are ten euros chipper per tyre then Conti 2, but wear is better on Conti2. Conti 2 have 10k more on wear. Thats why I went for Conti 2. If price difference would be bigger, then probably go with Bridgestone.
Either way I'm satisfied with my decision, already made 3000 km.
My recommendation for the Conti 2.
Let us know how you like them
I wonder why the dry braking tests are done from rather conservative 100 km/h and not from highway speeds (120 km/h / 130 km/h or even 160 km/h).
With winter tyres I have noticed that during emergency braking from higher speeds (100+ km/h or few times even from 80 km/h when using witer tires in hot weather) at some point the tires started to melt and there was a clear jerk as the deceleration was suddely reduced. During the first two seconds the deceleration was excellent as expected on premium winter tyres. However, somewhere close to the third second of the emergency braking the melting occured and it was almost like a switch from dry braking on premium tyres to wet braking on budget tyres.
I have never observed anyting like this with summer tires as i tend to use UHP tires in summer. I suspect all season tyres might suffer from this as well.
For this reason I wonder what the winter tire results might be when dry braking from highway speeds.
Maybe because at higher speed, the brakes are the limiting factor, not the tyres?
We allow enough cooling between the runs to not trouble the brakes. You don't really see any difference in results starting from a higher speed, and for certain tyre categories the 5 or so stops we do for dry braking is so damaging by the 5th stop your data variance is too high.
Thank You!
I live in Southern Europe, the weather is quite hot from May-September. Because of my job I travel 70km daily and during winter about half of this road is quite tricky, especially in the morning. It's not that bad tho to use two pairs in summer and winter, so I decided the all seasons. So, I'm searching for the most summer oriented tyres that would be capable to step in the snow if needed, but I'm afraid the extreme weather conditions for my area for these tyres would be the +30°C during summer.
I'd love reading your recommendation.
Thx...
Tough conditions for any tyre, but really all the tyres in this test woudl be fine (apart from maybe the dunlop in the deep snow)
I want to take the opportunity (since high temperatures were mentioned here) and ask, if you have ever had the chance to notice any significant deviation from your test results (mainly regarding dry, rolling resistance and wear tests, obviously), when the temperature goes above 30°C (or, even better 35°C), since your ordinary tests are traditionally done below 25°C.
It would be very interesting if at some point a series of tests could be done (even once) in more southern regions, in summer, and determine if such high temperatures significantly affect the tires' behavior. This would allow residents in southern Europe for example, to understand if and how your common test results relate to these regions.
I'd say Vredestein Quatrac Pro, I live in Milan, nearly 40 degrees in summer, often under zero in winter, I think it’s a safe bet,
Interesting.
Pirelli excels in seven tests, so it is still third.
The winner Continental is the best in four tests, while the second Bridgestone excels in only one test.
I think I will still buy Pirelli.
That's where my money would go, but then I can write off tyres as a business expense so the wear isn't an issue for me.
Great reviews!! I am driving a Mercedes '17 E300 4matic. All season fan as I have been living in moderate climates. Moving to Wisconsin for work now so instead of buying two sets of tires would like one great set (also for winter conditions). Michelin CC2 is a great choice, but have you done a report on the Continental Extreme Contract Plus? Or a head to head comparison? Please note here the Conti's are USD $100 cheaper per tire than the CC2. (Even the Pilot AS4 are $70 cheaper per tire than the CC2). Love a quiet ride with secure handling. Please note, love good handling but it is an E300 and not a sports car which I totally understand. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
The DWS is a UHP all season so not 3 peak rated, it's much weaker in the snow, but better in the dry and wet.
Jonathan you say that wet performance is the most important attribute in an AS tyre but I wondered if you could explain why it's more important than dry. Clearly snow is a nice to have and the MCC2 is too good in this respect and needs to trade off for wet performance but surely dry and wet are equally important?
This preference for wet also explains some frankly bizarre conclusions in otherwise exemplary German tyre tests where frankly unacceptably poor dry braking was ignored due to stellar wet performance.
Generally there are bigger differences in wet performance than dry, though this test has certainly spread out dry braking! This is why we focus on wet more, especially in summer tyres as its where a good tyre makes the difference.
I bought Bridgestone weather control A001 to replace Michelin Crossclimate but i don't have opinion because are new.What is your point of view about these tyres?
A001 was replaced by the a005 which was replaced by the a005 EVO which was replaced by the Turanza All Season 6.
The A001 was a great tyre for its time but it's now getting on in years
Yes i did wrong,i bought the A005 Evo weather control before 2 months as brand new.Was produced 2023.
Why is there first generation Dunlop in the test and not the brand new second generation Dunlop All Season 2?
The new version wasn't available when we started this test 8 months ago.
I was not able to find any news regarding the new Dunlop All Season 2, not on the Dunlop site not anywhere else, despite this pictures of this new tyre circulate. Will it replace the current Dunlop Sport All Season after its very short run on the market. (it would remind me a little the Goodyear Opti Grip story). From the pictures the Dunlop All Season 2 looks exactly like the Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 3 without the central groove.
The Dunlop missed all the tests this year by coming out so late, but it wouldn't surprise me if it's mostly previous generation Goodyear.
this new Dunlop All Season 2 looks exactly the same as the Sava All Weather, also from the Goodyear brands family.
Nice spot! It's probably the same tyre.
I did some homework :)
of the brands under Goodyear (Dunlop, Fulda, Sava, Debica, Cooper, Avon) there are multiple all seasons tyres with extremely similar pattern, the Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 3 Efficiency C wet B (size 205/55 16) is the only one with the central groove and was place on the European market the 4th week of 2020, the Sava All Weather eff. C wet C was placed on the market the 43th week of 2020, the Debica Navigator 3 eff. C wet C was placed on the EU market on the 01/05/2021 (this is the date you usually get when a tyre was present on the market at that date but a precise week for placement on the market cannot be traced back) and finally the Dunlop All Season 2 eff. C wet C was placed on the market the 50th week of 2023.
From the digging I made it seems the pattern is shared across multiple brands and that the Goodyear has a slight edge regarding wet.
Good digging!
These days the tier 2 brands are essentially taking previous generation tier 1 products, and as you've noticed, being shared across multiple brands.
I am quite surprised by underperformance of a Michelin CC2 in your test and is somewhat at odds with other tests (e.g. AutoBild). OK, The new Bridgestone has always been better in wet, but not by so much and new Michelin CC2 has always been better in dry. Overall, it has always been a very close call.
What happened here?
Were the condition different (temperature in dry test?)
Do tyre dimensions play a role? 225/45 R17 in AutoBild test vs. 205/55 R16 in yours?
Sidewalls rigidity does effect handling, maybe also braking?
Is quality of Michelin tyres inconsistent?
Do you expect Michelin CC2 SUV (225/50 R18) with reinforced sidewall to perform differently?
Unfortunately I ordere a new set of Michelin CC2 SUV (225/50 R18) for my BMW X1 xDrive just days before you published you test. And they were not cheap either. I was leaning towards new Bridgestone anyway, but were somewhat hard to find...perhaps I should try harder..
Did I make a mistake?
In dry braking conditions don't play a big role. Size certainly does which why we might see the difference.
Michelin quality is more consistent than anyone in the industry so it's not that.
The SUV editions of the CC2 are essentially the same as the regular.
I do not thing you've made a mistake, the CC2 is still an excellent all round package, and in larger sizes the dry braking might be reversed. The CC2 has never been the strongest in the wet, but it isn't a disaster compared to other products.
A suggestion to Tyrereviews team: you could calculate the total cost of ownership per kilometer when data is available. You have often calculated value for tires, but it doesn’t take into account the rolling resistance, cost of changing tyres or interest rate. Rolling resistance could be estimated on a average fuel consuming car, for example VW Golf.
Interesting idea, I'll put that on the todo list!
So having been driven (pun intended) to do ever more research into tyres and their likely availability and having spoken to customer service at Bridgestone, Continental and Michelin on multiple occasions about tyre availability over the last 6 months - I fear I am becoming or even may have become a tyre geek/bore.
The Bridgestone site has tyre availability table that shows the IPC number of a specific size that can then be looked up on the EPREL website https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/tyres This also enables you to look up other of the new Continental and Pirelli All season tyres in your desired configuration/size.
Sadly for me, as I am looking for a 245/40 R18, there are none of the new Bridgestone/Pirelli/Continental tyres that have been issued with EU tyre labels. This ties up with what I was told by Continental that they have not had authorisation to make the other new sizes yet.
So, if you want to find out whether your tyre is likely to be released soon then visit eprel site and look up your tyre as the new Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3, Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and Continental Allseasoncontact 2 can all be found in various sizes.
What I can therefore deduce is that the size I am looking for is unlikely to be available any time soon ☹ Unless Jonathan and the team have insights into how EPREL do testing i.e. continually, in batches at specific times of the year - I suspect the former
Hope you find the tyre you are looking for and this proves helpful.
I'm afraid I don't know how EPREL does its testing, but as you said the tyres are usually in the database a chunk of time before they hit the market. 245/r40 R18 is not a common size so it will be down the priority list for moulds sadly.
Awesome review as always. This page/platform is pure gold.
It is very interesting for me, that the Conti won, and the Michelin is off the podium. I know it is a personal preference what do you want from a 4season, but IMO snow grip is crucial. Even if it is 3days in a year. I would buy a summer tire if there is no snow, and i would buy a dedicated winter tire if its more then ... dunno 60days of snow. Couple of days is the territory of 4seasons, and- those are the very dangeaorus ones, where a perfect snow grip is needed to avoid crashes, etc.
But now the testwinner is much worse than the Mich on snow and not much-much better in the other areas. For me the overall winner has to be in the top3 in snow... or to go further it has to be very very good on snow, no matter what is the place :D.
On the other side its good to see that the others are catching up; and so sad that there was no room for the Vector from GY. :D
My view is that even the worst tyre here is so far ahead of a summer tyre, the difference in the snow for those 3 days will be out weighed by the different in the wet for 150 days! That said, everyone has their own priorities which is why you can change the score weighting and pick your own winner :)
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 are 45% more expensive than Michelin CrossClimate 2, at least in Serbia. I've noticed that Pirellis here are always more expensive than Michelins, while it is the other way around in other countries. :(
That's very unusual! Perhaps the price will come down. How does the PZ4 compare to the PS5/PS4S?
Could be just the small size all season thing. In 235/45 R18 the PZ4 are a bit cheaper or the same price as PS5 (depending on the store). PS4S is almost double the price.
PS4S usually has a small premium over the PS5, shouldn't be double, might be a stock issue
Very useful test for choosing my next AS tyres. Interesting how wet grip EU label B tyres Bridgestone and Continental outperform wet grip EU label A tyre Pirelli in your wet braking test.
Yep! Something I hope to have time to dig into this year.
Is it OK to compare those dry/wet results with ie Conti PC7 tested here ?
Those were from the same speed (80km/h)? So ASC2 need 41,4m and PC7 only 35,27m ? I mean the difference is massive! Same for wet but diff is much less but still;
Still weighing pros/cons between allseason and season tyres in the south of Poland where driving mostly around the city and sometimes local roads with snow lying longer but still nothing serious; But is the much worse wet/dry results (if in fact same test condition) worth the sacrifice?
Great test anyway!
Unexpected turn; Finally bought Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 summer tires DOT2024 with a great discount (300PLN ->69eu/pc) Will worry about winter later :)
:D let me know how you like them.
Braking distances can vary quite a lot based on conditions so it's not a direct comparison, but check out some of the other tests on the site with a summer tyre in the all season test and you'll see you're not that far off.
Is the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 available in the US?
Not yet.
It would be interesting to see direct comparison between best all season tyres and best summer tyres in summer and winter tyres in winter.
That's coming this year
On the Pirelli's, they wear faster and only start at 7mm thread depth. AFAIK below 4mm winter capability really starts to degrade. Would this not mean that the window you can use the Pirelli reliably in snow is quite limited?
4mm is a little high, the rear drop starts around 3mm, but yes it means the Pirellis window for peak performance is smaller than the other tyres
I thought a bit on this and wanted to touch upon two things:
1 Thread to 3.5mm as usefull test addition
2 Braking performance vs. thread depth.
1 Thread to 3.5mm as usefull test addition
I was thinking would it not be usefull to also list the wear till 3-4mm to show how quickly a tyre drops down to a thread depth that is still usefull for safe driving in snow? The nice thing is this additional information does not require additional testing but can simply be interpolated from the existing wear value from original thread depth to 1.6mm.
Based on this test it would look like this:
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
This table shows that tyres that have good wear rates but start with a low thread depth, don't wear as long till a depth that is still safe for snow. Examples of this are the Michelin CrossClimate and the Pirelli SF3.
2 Braking performance vs. thread depth.
Would it be correct to say that, everything being equal, tyres will a lower thread depth perform better in mainly the braking test (perhaps due to a decreased bending moment working on the thread blocks). For instance the Continental with 7.9mm thread depth performs much worse in the braking than the Pirelli with 7mm depth. I was wondering, how would the Continental perform in the braking test when it's thread depth has worn down to the same 7mm as the Pirelli. If there is indeed a clear correlation between thread depth and for instance braking, it feels a bit unfair towards the brands that are generous to their customers by providing them with a beefy thread depth and it rewards brands that focus their product on performing well in the tests by minimizing the orginal thread depth. I mean, if the Continental brakes a lot better at 7mm, compared to 7.9mm, you still get that better braking performance after you have driven it for a year and it has worn down to that depth.
This would of course be too much work to do another set of tests with all tyres when they are worn to the same thread depth, but perhaps picking one tyre with a generous thread depth and do another test would be interesting to see. Perhaps even if it is only tested once, to test the priniciple.
Excellent comment!
1) Agreed, I'll add it in future tests
2) Tread depth does play a role but I'm not sure the Conti would suddenly match the Pirelli at 7mm. Also this sort of test would punish companies with better wearing compound, such as michelin. Generally they can start with less generous tread depth but still out perform may products in wear (perhaps not this test though)
Well, maybe it's time Goodyear to present Vector4season 4th generetion...
I think it will be 5 as goodyear don't do 4!
Jonathan, great test and great comments and as you rightly say these 3 new tyres are a game changer. The challenge now, in the UK at least, is the availability of these tyres as most manufacturers seems to be suggesting April (ish)
I played with the figures (a lot) and using my normal weighting that focuses more on wet/dry braking than snow/ice and also keeps comfort at circa 10% but reduces value to only 5% it is interesting that the Bridgestone comes out 1st then continental then Pirelli.
My heart says Pirelli (fun), the data says Bridgestone (safest) but I have to say I think I will look for the Continentals. This will of course be dependent upon which becomes available first as I am touring in May and need to change them before that (worst case may be the Michelin as I have a pair of ditch finders on the back wheels at the moment)
I might be heart broken if I can only get the Pirellis :-D
Superb job and well worth the wait THANK YOU!!!
I wouldn't be so sad if you could only get the Pirellis
Great test again Jon as always!
Few questions:
1) Do you have any insights on the interior noise differences between the Conti and Bridgestone?
2) Do you think that 15% snow/ice is the most representative for northern England, or would you weight snow/ice lower and bump up dry/wet weighting?
3) As a one tyre set all year round for northern England, do you think that All Seasons are still the right choice, or do you think they sacrifice too much dry/wet grip at warm temps compared to summer tyres?
Thanks again, always a pleasure reading your insights.
1) Sorry, I don't.
2) That's up to you really. Lots of people argue that snow is the most important aspect even if you only see 2 snow days a winter. I disagree but everyone has their own opinion.
3) I'll find out later this year as I have a summer tyre in the all season test. I think I'd maybe consider the Bridgestone or Pirelli on a non-performance car.
For the three new tyres, what tread depth are they certified to still work on snow to? I know Michelin make a big deal out of their tyres still being safe and usable all the way down to 2mm which is a big plus point in terms of longevity. Do the Conti, Bridgestone and Pirelli also have full depth sipes in the tread or do they need replacing at 4mm like full winter tyres do?
Michelin marketing makes a big deal of it but in reality their performance at 2mm isn't that far different from any other premium brand, so I expect they'll all be pretty similar at 2mm.
How is it possible that Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 are not available in size 235/50R19 for cars such as Peugeot 3008/Opel Grandland/VW Tiguan/Hyundai Tuscon/Kia Sportage? These are millions of cars on the market.
In the global scale of things, that's a pretty low volume size. When new tyres are launched they focus on high volume sizes, maybe it's worth emailing some of the brands to see if they have any plans for that size this year.
Great test, thanks! But i have a question... what about the Hankook Kinergy 4S2? I switched to this from MCC2, I am absolutely satisfied with it, while it is visibly cheaper.
I only had budget for 6 in the wear test and I wanted to test new tyres where possible.