Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system based on the test methodology. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Comfort | Value | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Handling s | Subj. Dry Handling Points | % | Braking M | Handling s | Subj. Wet Handling Points | Circle s | Straight Aqua Km/H | Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | % | Subj. Comfort Points | Noise dB | % | Price | Rolling Resistance kg / t | % | |||
| 1 | Continental PremiumContact 7 | 99.6% | 35.27 ★ | 51.73 ★ | 100 ★ | 100% | 31.58 ★ | 84.85 ★ | 100 ★ | 11.5 ★ | 74.91 ★ | 3.3 ★ | 100% | 92 2 | 72 | 94.8% | 86.19 | 8.38 3 | 98.4% |
| 2 | Tomket Sport Series 1 | 92.1% | 37.83 2 | 52.78 3 | 85 3 | 94.6% | 38.69 2 | 89.21 2 | 90 2 | 12 3 | 70.52 | 2.8 | 88.7% | 91 3 | 72.6 | 93.8% | 50.49 | 8.28 ★ | 99.9% |
| 3 | Nankang Econex NA1 | 89.8% | 38.45 3 | 52.23 2 | 75 | 93.3% | 39.61 3 | 89.36 3 | 70 | 11.9 2 | 74.13 2 | 3.2 2 | 86.8% | 90 | 71.9 3 | 93.8% | 46.69 3 | 9.18 | 90.3% |
| 4 | Winrun R330 | 89.5% | 39.41 | 52.85 | 90 2 | 93.3% | 40.91 | 92.25 | 70 | 12.4 | 70.83 | 3 | 84% | 100 ★ | 72.2 | 98.6% | 46.59 2 | 8.37 2 | 98.9% |
| 5 | Davanti DX390 | 88.3% | 39.08 | 53.32 | 70 | 91.3% | 40.75 | 92.19 | 65 | 12.4 | 70.98 3 | 3.1 3 | 83.8% | 91 3 | 70.3 2 | 95.4% | 57.78 | 8.56 | 96.6% |
| 6 | Triangle SporteX TH201 | 86.8% | 40.01 | 52.97 | 80 | 91.6% | 43.6 | 93.11 | 70 | 12.7 | 69.51 | 2.7 | 81.1% | 91 3 | 73.2 | 93.5% | 56.08 | 8.71 | 94.9% |
| 7 | King-Meiler Sport 1 KM | 85.9% | 39.48 | 52.84 | 85 3 | 92.8% | 43.93 | 95.24 | 65 | 12.7 | 69.61 | 2.8 | 79.9% | 91 3 | 72.9 | 93.7% | 54.3 | 9.42 | 87.9% |
| 8 | Maxtrek MAXIMUS M1 | 85.7% | 39.32 | 53.21 | 75 | 91.6% | 43.45 | 93.93 | 75 3 | 12.7 | 67.3 | 2.6 | 81.1% | 91 3 | 74.4 | 92.7% | 55.18 | 9.82 | 84.3% |
| 9 | Double-Coin DC99 | 82.5% | 39.62 | 53.39 | 30 | 86.7% | 46.04 | 96.27 | 50 | 12.8 | 64.55 | 2.3 | 75.6% | 90 | 70.2 ★ | 95% | 45.87 ★ | 8.63 | 96% |
Scroll for more
Dry
100%
Wet
100%
Comfort
95%
Value
98%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
35.27 M
★
Dry Handling
51.73 s
★
Subj. Dry Handling
100 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
31.58 M
★
Wet Handling
84.85 s
★
Subj. Wet Handling
100 Points
★
Wet Circle
11.5 s
★
Straight Aqua
74.91 Km/H
★
Curved Aquaplaning
3.3 m/sec2
★
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
92 Points
2
Noise
72 dB
Value
Price
86.19
Rolling Resistance
8.38 kg / t
3
Dry
95%
Wet
89%
Comfort
94%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.83 M
2
Dry Handling
52.78 s
3
Subj. Dry Handling
85 Points
3
Wet
Wet Braking
38.69 M
2
Wet Handling
89.21 s
2
Subj. Wet Handling
90 Points
2
Wet Circle
12 s
3
Straight Aqua
70.52 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.8 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
91 Points
3
Noise
72.6 dB
Value
Price
50.49
Rolling Resistance
8.28 kg / t
★
Dry
93%
Wet
87%
Comfort
94%
Value
90%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.45 M
3
Dry Handling
52.23 s
2
Subj. Dry Handling
75 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
39.61 M
3
Wet Handling
89.36 s
3
Subj. Wet Handling
70 Points
Wet Circle
11.9 s
2
Straight Aqua
74.13 Km/H
2
Curved Aquaplaning
3.2 m/sec2
2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
90 Points
Noise
71.9 dB
3
Value
Price
46.69
3
Rolling Resistance
9.18 kg / t
Dry
93%
Wet
84%
Comfort
99%
Value
99%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.41 M
Dry Handling
52.85 s
Subj. Dry Handling
90 Points
2
Wet
Wet Braking
40.91 M
Wet Handling
92.25 s
Subj. Wet Handling
70 Points
Wet Circle
12.4 s
Straight Aqua
70.83 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
100 Points
★
Noise
72.2 dB
Value
Price
46.59
2
Rolling Resistance
8.37 kg / t
2
Dry
91%
Wet
84%
Comfort
95%
Value
97%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.08 M
Dry Handling
53.32 s
Subj. Dry Handling
70 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
40.75 M
Wet Handling
92.19 s
Subj. Wet Handling
65 Points
Wet Circle
12.4 s
Straight Aqua
70.98 Km/H
3
Curved Aquaplaning
3.1 m/sec2
3
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
91 Points
3
Noise
70.3 dB
2
Value
Price
57.78
Rolling Resistance
8.56 kg / t
Dry
92%
Wet
81%
Comfort
94%
Value
95%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
40.01 M
Dry Handling
52.97 s
Subj. Dry Handling
80 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
43.6 M
Wet Handling
93.11 s
Subj. Wet Handling
70 Points
Wet Circle
12.7 s
Straight Aqua
69.51 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.7 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
91 Points
3
Noise
73.2 dB
Value
Price
56.08
Rolling Resistance
8.71 kg / t
Dry
93%
Wet
80%
Comfort
94%
Value
88%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.48 M
Dry Handling
52.84 s
Subj. Dry Handling
85 Points
3
Wet
Wet Braking
43.93 M
Wet Handling
95.24 s
Subj. Wet Handling
65 Points
Wet Circle
12.7 s
Straight Aqua
69.61 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.8 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
91 Points
3
Noise
72.9 dB
Value
Price
54.3
Rolling Resistance
9.42 kg / t
Dry
92%
Wet
81%
Comfort
93%
Value
84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.32 M
Dry Handling
53.21 s
Subj. Dry Handling
75 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
43.45 M
Wet Handling
93.93 s
Subj. Wet Handling
75 Points
3
Wet Circle
12.7 s
Straight Aqua
67.3 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.6 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
91 Points
3
Noise
74.4 dB
Value
Price
55.18
Rolling Resistance
9.82 kg / t
Dry
87%
Wet
76%
Comfort
95%
Value
96%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.62 M
Dry Handling
53.39 s
Subj. Dry Handling
30 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
46.04 M
Wet Handling
96.27 s
Subj. Wet Handling
50 Points
Wet Circle
12.8 s
Straight Aqua
64.55 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.3 m/sec2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
90 Points
Noise
70.2 dB
★
Value
Price
45.87
★
Rolling Resistance
8.63 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
How bad is the ice performance of the current crop of all-seasons (& more specifically, the best) vs, say, a reference winter tire (blizzak/870/etc)?
I'm looking at moving to all-seasons (the contis, in particular) for my winter set of tires on a gs450h (currently 225/50/17 alpin 6 about to start its 4th season - might replace early). Winters here are generally mild (Sofia, Bulgaria), but I do drive in conditions that sometimes form the worst kind of ice (a few below subzero + wet weather + road with basically no sunlight = smooth, slick... you know) - plus the hard ice at winter resort parkings, of course. Same day I can be driving on a highway (140kph) in 15+ degrees dry & sunny weather (say, going to the seaside or to Greece or anywhere southern and/or generally flat), which sounds like the perfect way to degrade winter tires (both compound and thread) - or am I perhaps worrying too much and should stick with winters? And yes, I do see snow regularly, but the snow performance of today's all-seasons seems almost indistinguishable from a non-X-Ice-type winter tires.
I've only done ice traction and braking but it was broadly similar. Data out in next few weeks.
...and I guess I should've posted under the correct article. Not sure how I ended up here, I was looking at the "best 2024 all-seasons" one. Sorry and please move if you're able - my bad.
I'd be very interested to know the relative effect of tyre wear. We all know that a 50% worn tyre does not perform as well as it did when it was new. What we dont know is how does a 50% worn premium tyre compare against a brand new budget tyre...?
Maybe if you buy budget but change at 50% wear, you might be overall safer than if you buy premium but run it til it's not legal anymore, I don't know?
A purist will buy premium AND change well within the limit but not all of us have the budget to do that, so I'd love to see some hard facts on the topic.
thanks, Mark
In aquaplaning you likely would be safer with two budget tyres, but in every other way I would rather be on the premium tyre.
all your tests are done at high speeds. i am interested in the slow speed dry/wet braking test. does that also translate to cars driven inside the city at slow speeds (30 to 40 km/h)?
Trends continue but naturally things are much closer as distances are shorter
I would compare budget summer tyres with the European winter tyres, as this should be the case. Those who wants to save some money, they would not even change non-studded winter tyres. I'm working in tyre online store in Latvia, mostly this is the issue - most of the drivers does not see the benefit in switching tyres, European winter tyres are considered as All season tyres: www.jaunasriepas.lv
« While external noise does have an impact on », https://media1.giphy.com/me...
lol, top gif.
External noise is a factor, however tyre companies can direct the noise of the tyre with tread pattern design, meaning some companies can direct the noise into the wheel arch to get a better EU label score, but have worse internal noise. I don't think it makes a massive difference.
Pitch is also another thing you notice a lot more inside which isn't recorded on the external noise tests.
Not sure if it’s being on mobile, but the formatting cuts of whatever external noise has an impact on https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
Ah thanks, that's a copy and paste issue on my part!
Did you try putting 4 different budget tyres on the car - some part worn etc. The number of times while I've been waiting for a tyre change someone has come in and asked for a single tyre change with the cheapest replacement going.
I've not done all 4 but there's a video on the channel comparing budgets on the rear and premium on front of an M2
Best thinking face emoji in video thumbnail yet! :D
I would add another recent test, where they compare set of premium tyres vs set of budget brands (some maybe rather known midrange brands, not necessarily Asian unknown brands):
https://autozurnal.com/test...
I know it is in Slovak, but nowadays with google translate available... anyway, it is mostly about graphs and numbers :)
Btw, the test also confirms CPC7's great wet road abilities. I think the test was done in cooperation with Czech car club, as they have the same results in different graphic design on their web.
There's a bunch of similar tests on the site from this year, all very similar results. It's nice when tyre testers agree.
Though you are correct, I wouldn't call any of those tyres budget at all, lowest is mid range / tier 2. This is a true budget test!
Sorry, I realised there was a page 2 with lots of budget tyres on too, but I realised that as I was taking off on a flight so just got around to replying now :)
Thanks for the link!
Retreaded passenger car tires are sometimes good for slow moving low load vehicles that travel on dirt roads. Farm cars, hunting cars we call them. In the USA the last company to offer retail retreaded passenger car tires finally went out of business recently. They produced lots of junk tires that failed at highway speeds and were a nightmare to own. Their off road low speed low load tires performed much better.
Agreed! Truck and bus tires also often get re-treaded, but they're designed to be!