Menu

All Season vs Winter vs Nordic vs Studded Tyres

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the All Season vs Winter vs Nordic vs Studded Tyres, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental WinterContact TS 860
Reference Winter Studded
Reference Winter Nordic
Continental AllSeasonContact

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 6.44 M (16.1%) | Avg: 43.41 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental AllSeasonContact with a result of 40.1 M. The difference between best and worst was 13.8%.
  1. Continental AllSeasonContact
    40.1 M
  2. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    41.9 M
  3. Reference Winter Nordic
    45.1 M
  4. Reference Winter Studded
    46.54 M

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Spread: 3.00 Points (60%) | Avg: 3.75 Points

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental AllSeasonContact with a result of 5 Points. The difference between best and worst was 60%.
  1. Continental AllSeasonContact
    5 Points
  2. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    5 Points
  3. Reference Winter Studded
    3 Points
  4. Reference Winter Nordic
    2 Points

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 5.68 M (21.9%) | Avg: 28.54 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental AllSeasonContact with a result of 25.9 M. The difference between best and worst was 18%.
  1. Continental AllSeasonContact
    25.9 M
  2. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    26.6 M
  3. Reference Winter Studded
    30.06 M
  4. Reference Winter Nordic
    31.58 M

Wet Handling (s)

Spread: 4.77 s (12%) | Avg: 42.03 s

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental AllSeasonContact with a result of 39.63 s. The difference between best and worst was 10.7%.
  1. Continental AllSeasonContact
    39.63 s
  2. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    40.45 s
  3. Reference Winter Studded
    43.65 s
  4. Reference Winter Nordic
    44.4 s

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 14.90 Km/H (19.9%) | Avg: 67.88 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental WinterContact TS 860 with a result of 74.9 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 19.9%.
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    74.9 Km/H
  2. Continental AllSeasonContact
    74.6 Km/H
  3. Reference Winter Nordic
    62 Km/H
  4. Reference Winter Studded
    60 Km/H

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Spread: 3.24 M (18.5%) | Avg: 18.75 M

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Reference Winter Nordic with a result of 17.56 M. The difference between best and worst was 15.6%.
  1. Reference Winter Nordic
    17.56 M
  2. Reference Winter Studded
    17.74 M
  3. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    18.9 M
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    20.8 M

Snow Traction (s)

Spread: 0.58 s (13.8%) | Avg: 4.44 s

Snow acceleration time (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Reference Winter Studded with a result of 4.19 s. The difference between best and worst was 12.2%.
  1. Reference Winter Studded
    4.19 s
  2. Reference Winter Nordic
    4.23 s
  3. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    4.55 s
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    4.77 s

Snow Handling (s)

Spread: 12.12 s (14%) | Avg: 90.98 s

Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Reference Winter Studded with a result of 86.76 s. The difference between best and worst was 12.3%.
  1. Reference Winter Studded
    86.76 s
  2. Reference Winter Nordic
    87.47 s
  3. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    90.81 s
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    98.88 s

Ice Performance Overview

Ice Braking (M)

Spread: 5.19 M (52.4%) | Avg: 12.55 M

Ice braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Reference Winter Studded with a result of 9.9 M. The difference between best and worst was 34.4%.
  1. Reference Winter Studded
    9.9 M
  2. Reference Winter Nordic
    11.06 M
  3. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    14.15 M
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    15.09 M

Ice Traction (s)

Spread: 3.61 s (79.3%) | Avg: 6.58 s

Ice acceleration time (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Reference Winter Studded with a result of 4.55 s. The difference between best and worst was 44.2%.
  1. Reference Winter Studded
    4.55 s
  2. Reference Winter Nordic
    6 s
  3. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    7.61 s
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    8.16 s

Ice Handling (s)

Spread: 6.72 s (12.5%) | Avg: 56.77 s

Ice handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Reference Winter Nordic with a result of 53.85 s. The difference between best and worst was 11.1%.
  1. Reference Winter Nordic
    53.85 s
  2. Reference Winter Studded
    54.18 s
  3. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    58.49 s
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    60.57 s

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

Spread: 3.90 dB (5.9%) | Avg: 67.85 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Reference Winter Nordic with a result of 66.2 dB. The difference between best and worst was 5.6%.
  1. Reference Winter Nordic
    66.2 dB
  2. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    67.1 dB
  3. Continental AllSeasonContact
    68 dB
  4. Reference Winter Studded
    70.1 dB

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 0.19 kg / t (4.3%) | Avg: 4.56 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Reference Winter Nordic with a result of 4.47 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 4.1%.
  1. Reference Winter Nordic
    4.47 kg / t
  2. Reference Winter Studded
    4.54 kg / t
  3. Continental AllSeasonContact
    4.56 kg / t
  4. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    4.66 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Continental WinterContact TS 860 0%
2 Continental AllSeasonContact 0%
3 Reference Winter Nordic 0%
4 Reference Winter Studded 0%

Discussion

11 comments
  1. Masch archived

    I live in South West Norway, where winter is mostly wet asphalt, but with periods of everything from snow, through slush to thick, uneven, wet ice. Up to now I have driven on nordic winter tyres, but will soon be switching to quite a heavy EV. I have read that nordic rubber doesn't suit EVs well and was wondering if the extra weight might warrant using a good European tyre, like the winter contact TS870p, which has better drainage and might be better in the wet conditions that we get the most. The standard winter tyres for the car in Norway are Viking contact 7.

    #7444
    1. TyreReviews Masch archived

      I know a lot of the US guys really rate the X-Ice Snow on the Teslas, which I realise is a nordic winter tyre but it seems less extreme than some.

      If the Viking Contact 7 is an OE tyre for the vehicle it will have been developed with the weight and torque in mind so that would likely be the best option.

      #7445
      1. Masch TyreReviews archived

        Thanks for that. After reading your reply and checking out the local company that deals with tyres for Polestar, I went with the X-Ice Snow. Not the best in the wet, but one of the better nordics and a good all-rounder.

        #7448
  2. Mike archived

    It's pretty cool to see how different types of winter tyres act and compare to each other. I've long wanted to test different "blends" myself but, well, real life and budgets and stuff like that. However...
    I live in a nordic country and we have mandatory winter tyres that have to have M+S and 3PMSF ratings on them from December 1st until last day of February. You can legally run your summer tyres from March 1st but that I would consider as chasing the Darwin's award.
    I have used different winter tyres over the 12 years I've owned cars. I've used expensive studs, very very cheap chinese brands, mid-range winter tyres, very expensive top of the line nordic un-studded tyres and I once did try chasing the Darwin's award by replacing winters with summers on 1st of March. I survived. It was a poor winter tho, no snow, no ice, just cold and dry roads. But I have not tested a proper good quality all-season tyre during winter.
    Now, I've looked at most of the tyre tests and yes, nordic and studded "blends" are awesome on snow and ice. You really can't beat a set of Nokians or Contis doing their business on snow and ice. But, as I am a city dweller who quite occasionally takes a drive out of town, mostly on major roads, 90% of my driving time is spent on wet roads since we use a stupendous amount of salt on our roads. The temperature is mostly a few degrees below freezing and we get an occasional snow-storm or overnight fresh powder but there's hardly ever any ice on the roads. It's a bit different when navigating through supermarket parking lots, it seems that nobody tends to those, and small city streets in residential areas might have a lof of loose or packed snow as it's really difficult to clean those areas up with cars that are parked everywhere. But the speeds are low and the chance to slip and crash are non-existent unless you drive like an idiot.
    So here I am, wondering away, if I should take a plunge and try a decent set of all-seasons next time I replace winter tyres. Or not.

    #6425
    1. TyreReviews Mike archived

      It's an interesting dilemma, but I'm not sure you'll find a tester / tyre company in the world that would recommend an all season tyre as a winter for nordic climates, as ice is the downfall.

      It's worth remembering that these Conti all season tyres are a fairly winter bias set, and a tyre like the CrossClimate or A005 would be even further back on ice.

      #6426
      1. Mike TyreReviews archived

        Back again to regret and repent my stupid ideas.
        The thing that got me thinking about using all-seasons was that we haven't had a proper winter in years now. Well, proper winter happened. It's mayhem. There's so much snow. And ice. And it's fun. Unless you have to dig out your car every morning from the snow.
        Yes, Nordic blends all the way. I pity the fools with no proper rubber and am ashamed of my heretical thinking. I hope the Spanish Inquisition won't catch me.

        #6428
        1. TyreReviews Mike archived

          Glad you came to that conclusion before purchasing any tyres :)

          #6430
        2. Jacek Figuła Mike archived

          There is one gap in recomment - You haven't bought nor tested and all-season tire. So that's a shame because I thought that would be respectfull information. Nonetheless good for you that you have proper tires anyway. : )

          #7302
            1. Jacek Figuła TyreReviews archived

              Yes you have! Thank you for that, at last I can compare results of test made in the same environment and conditions. My comments was about Mike's heretical thinking. :)
              I am very close to buy an all-season tire (vector gen-3) as winter tires for my S-max 2.2 200hp but there is still a bit of concern if that will be fine with occasional snow in Poland where i live. I have used an all-seasons before as allyear tire (Quadraxer 2 and Nokian weatherproof) on my Skoda Rapid and Renault Megane 3 but an S-max is way heavier and powerfull.
              On one hand all-seasons seems to be better at everything except snow vs winter tires but on the other the difference is not that big. But on the snow the difference is theoretically not that big either but in the real life amount of snow might be way bigger that on the video with test.
              Tests will be tests, I guess everyone have to make his own choice. :)
              I do enjoy watching your videos TyreReviews, as an engineer I appreciate methodology and precision with a bit of entertainment.
              Cheers!

              #7306
              1. TyreReviews Jacek Figuła archived

                I think if it's just snow, I'll be fine with all season as winter. However if you start to see any serious ice or compacted snow, that's when the winter tyre stretches its legs :)

                #7309