Menu

2025 AMS Winter Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
10 min read

Adjust Result Weighting

The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Dry 20%
Wet 35%
Snow 30%
Comfort 5%
Value 10%
Dry 20% · Wet 35% · Snow 30% · Comfort 5% · Value 10%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet
Snow
Comfort
Value

Test Results Data

BEST Good Average Below Average
# Tyre Total Score Dry Wet Snow Comfort Value
Braking M Handling Km/H Subj. Dry Handling Points % Braking M Handling Km/H Subj. Wet Handling Points Circle m/s Straight Aqua Km/H Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 % Braking M Handling Km/H Subj. Snow Handling Points Circle ms/2 % Subj. Comfort Points Noise dB % Rolling Resistance kg / t %
1 ▲1 Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 98.1% 44.6 3 110.5 9 99% 32.8 65.9 10 7.47 3 78.5 2 2.91 2 98.3% 28.1 3 97.8 10 3.9 2 98.8% 10 71.1 100% 7.7 84.4%
2 ▼1 Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 97.2% 43.6 108.9 9 99.3% 31.2 65.6 2 10 7.52 77.4 2.69 99.1% 28.7 96.1 8 3 3.73 94.4% 7 71.4 2 84.8% 7 2 92.9%
3 Michelin Alpin 7 96.4% 45.7 109 9 97.3% 31.4 2 64.7 8 7.43 73.5 2.33 95.7% 28.4 96.5 8 3 3.94 96.4% 8 3 71.5 89.7% 7 2 92.9%
4 ▲1 Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus 95.1% 46.4 107.8 9 96.2% 31.9 3 65.6 2 10 7.42 78.3 3 2.81 3 98.5% 29.6 93.7 8 3 3.73 92.8% 9 2 72.9 93.8% 8 81.3%
5 ▲1 Bridgestone Blizzak 6 95.1% 45 109.3 8 97.1% 33.3 63.6 7 7.42 75.3 2.63 93.8% 28.3 96.8 2 9 2 3.89 3 97.2% 8 3 72.9 88.8% 7.7 84.4%
6 ▼2 Hankook Winter I cept RS3 94.8% 45.6 108.8 9 97.3% 32.6 65 8 7.5 2 80 2.95 97.1% 27.2 95.4 7 3.74 94.8% 7 72.1 84.3% 8.2 79.3%
7 Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 93.9% 45.5 109.5 3 9 97.7% 32.9 64.6 9 7.47 3 78.2 2.78 96.7% 29.1 93.8 7 3.69 92% 7 73.4 83.4% 8.1 80.3%
8 Linglong Sport Master Winter 92.3% 44.5 2 109.6 2 8 97.7% 32.2 63.7 6 7.27 73.6 2.5 93.1% 29.4 94 6 3.76 91.3% 7 73.1 83.6% 8.2 79.3%
9 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 91.4% 45.2 108.6 7 95.6% 33.2 62.5 6 7.32 76.2 2.66 92.6% 30.8 92.2 7 3.54 88.9% 7 72 84.4% 7.9 82.3%
10 Profil Winter Maxx 83.7% 50.1 101 2 83.1% 52.5 52.1 2 5.79 63.1 2.08 68.7% 27.7 2 96.7 3 8 3 3.85 96.5% 4 71.4 2 69.8% 6.5 100%
Scroll for more
Dry 99% Wet 98% Snow 99% Comfort 100% Value 84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 44.6 M 3
Dry Handling 110.5 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling 9 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 32.8 M
Wet Handling 65.9 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling 10 Points
Wet Circle 7.47 m/s 3
Straight Aqua 78.5 Km/H 2
Curved Aquaplaning 2.91 m/sec2 2
Snow
Snow Braking 28.1 M 3
Snow Handling 97.8 Km/H
Subj. Snow Handling 10 Points
Snow Circle 3.9 ms/2 2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 10 Points
Noise 71.1 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 7.7 kg / t
Dry 99% Wet 99% Snow 94% Comfort 85% Value 93%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 43.6 M
Dry Handling 108.9 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling 9 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 31.2 M
Wet Handling 65.6 Km/H 2
Subj. Wet Handling 10 Points
Wet Circle 7.52 m/s
Straight Aqua 77.4 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.69 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking 28.7 M
Snow Handling 96.1 Km/H
Subj. Snow Handling 8 Points 3
Snow Circle 3.73 ms/2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 7 Points
Noise 71.4 dB 2
Value
Rolling Resistance 7 kg / t 2
Dry 97% Wet 96% Snow 96% Comfort 90% Value 93%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 45.7 M
Dry Handling 109 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling 9 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 31.4 M 2
Wet Handling 64.7 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling 8 Points
Wet Circle 7.43 m/s
Straight Aqua 73.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.33 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking 28.4 M
Snow Handling 96.5 Km/H
Subj. Snow Handling 8 Points 3
Snow Circle 3.94 ms/2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 8 Points 3
Noise 71.5 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 7 kg / t 2
Dry 96% Wet 99% Snow 93% Comfort 94% Value 81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 46.4 M
Dry Handling 107.8 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling 9 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 31.9 M 3
Wet Handling 65.6 Km/H 2
Subj. Wet Handling 10 Points
Wet Circle 7.42 m/s
Straight Aqua 78.3 Km/H 3
Curved Aquaplaning 2.81 m/sec2 3
Snow
Snow Braking 29.6 M
Snow Handling 93.7 Km/H
Subj. Snow Handling 8 Points 3
Snow Circle 3.73 ms/2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 9 Points 2
Noise 72.9 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 8 kg / t
5
95.1%
Dry 97% Wet 94% Snow 97% Comfort 89% Value 84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 45 M
Dry Handling 109.3 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling 8 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 33.3 M
Wet Handling 63.6 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling 7 Points
Wet Circle 7.42 m/s
Straight Aqua 75.3 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.63 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking 28.3 M
Snow Handling 96.8 Km/H 2
Subj. Snow Handling 9 Points 2
Snow Circle 3.89 ms/2 3
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 8 Points 3
Noise 72.9 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 7.7 kg / t
Dry 97% Wet 97% Snow 95% Comfort 84% Value 79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 45.6 M
Dry Handling 108.8 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling 9 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 32.6 M
Wet Handling 65 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling 8 Points
Wet Circle 7.5 m/s 2
Straight Aqua 80 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.95 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking 27.2 M
Snow Handling 95.4 Km/H
Subj. Snow Handling 7 Points
Snow Circle 3.74 ms/2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 7 Points
Noise 72.1 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 8.2 kg / t
Dry 98% Wet 97% Snow 92% Comfort 83% Value 80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 45.5 M
Dry Handling 109.5 Km/H 3
Subj. Dry Handling 9 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 32.9 M
Wet Handling 64.6 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling 9 Points
Wet Circle 7.47 m/s 3
Straight Aqua 78.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.78 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking 29.1 M
Snow Handling 93.8 Km/H
Subj. Snow Handling 7 Points
Snow Circle 3.69 ms/2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 7 Points
Noise 73.4 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 8.1 kg / t
Dry 98% Wet 93% Snow 91% Comfort 84% Value 79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 44.5 M 2
Dry Handling 109.6 Km/H 2
Subj. Dry Handling 8 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 32.2 M
Wet Handling 63.7 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling 6 Points
Wet Circle 7.27 m/s
Straight Aqua 73.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.5 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking 29.4 M
Snow Handling 94 Km/H
Subj. Snow Handling 6 Points
Snow Circle 3.76 ms/2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 7 Points
Noise 73.1 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 8.2 kg / t
Dry 96% Wet 93% Snow 89% Comfort 84% Value 82%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 45.2 M
Dry Handling 108.6 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling 7 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 33.2 M
Wet Handling 62.5 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling 6 Points
Wet Circle 7.32 m/s
Straight Aqua 76.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.66 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking 30.8 M
Snow Handling 92.2 Km/H
Subj. Snow Handling 7 Points
Snow Circle 3.54 ms/2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 7 Points
Noise 72 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance 7.9 kg / t
Dry 83% Wet 69% Snow 97% Comfort 70% Value 100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 50.1 M
Dry Handling 101 Km/H
Subj. Dry Handling 2 Points
Wet
Wet Braking 52.5 M
Wet Handling 52.1 Km/H
Subj. Wet Handling 2 Points
Wet Circle 5.79 m/s
Straight Aqua 63.1 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning 2.08 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking 27.7 M 2
Snow Handling 96.7 Km/H 3
Subj. Snow Handling 8 Points 3
Snow Circle 3.85 ms/2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 4 Points
Noise 71.4 dB 2
Value
Rolling Resistance 6.5 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.

Discussion

5 comments
  1. Alexandru Burulea archived

    Considering the price, Linglong Sport Master Winter is a steel on price/performance ratio.
    2025 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test had similar good overall results, this confirms it as an good overall winter tyre in my opinion.
    Most of the tyres in this list are double the price at the moment, i also think the price will go up for this tire, get it at this price while you can.

    #10350
    1. TyreReviews Alexandru Burulea archived

      Autobild tested wear to see the value of it, check out the results as euros per 1000km is a better metric

      #10355
      1. Vozac TyreReviews archived

        In this case, wear is not important, since Linglong is 4 times cheaper than premium brands (in my country).

        #10365
    2. Vozac Alexandru Burulea archived

      EU is scared of cheap Chinese tyres, which are in this case very good, so they try to discriminate them with poor test results.

      #10364
      1. TyreReviews Vozac archived

        The Chinese quality has not caught up yet, but it's getting closer as proven by linglong. Why is linglong much better than it was? It is in least in part due to having EU offices and development. Which makes the tyre more expensive, if you look at the Chinese brands who make a good product it is nearly always more expensive than the general chinese product. The big EU brands are definitely concerned but we're not suppressing the results of brands like linglong, we're promoting how far they've come.

        #10370