Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system based on the test methodology. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Snow | Comfort | Value | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Handling s | Subj. Dry Handling Points | % | Braking M | Handling s | Subj. Wet Handling Points | Straight Aqua Km/H | Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | % | Braking M | Traction s | Handling s | Subj. Snow Handling Points | % | Subj. Comfort Points | Subj. Noise Points | Noise dB | % | Price | Rolling Resistance kg / t | % | |||
| 1 ▲1 | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV | 97.9% | 42.15 3 | 66.61 | 95 | 98.5% | 32.86 ★ | 73.55 | 95 3 | 86.1 | 3.63 | 98.3% | 16.06 3 | 3.53 ★ | 88.65 ★ | 100 ★ | 99.6% | 100 ★ | 100 ★ | 68.9 ★ | 100% | 171.49 | 8.186 | 79.1% |
| 2 ▼1 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | 97.7% | 43.02 | 66.28 3 | 95 | 97.5% | 33.06 3 | 73.45 3 | 95 3 | 84.9 | 3.73 | 98% | 16.21 | 3.68 | 90.85 2 | 95 2 | 97.4% | 95 | 95 | 71.1 | 95.5% | 162.29 | 6.493 ★ | 99.6% |
| 3 | Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X | 97.1% | 42.93 | 66.27 2 | 100 ★ | 97.8% | 33.32 | 73.9 | 95 3 | 86.6 | 4 3 | 97.9% | 15.92 ★ | 3.62 | 92.35 | 92 | 97.9% | 95 | 90 | 74.6 | 93.1% | 128.79 3 | 7.459 3 | 86.9% |
| 4 ▼1 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | 97.1% | 43.46 | 66.63 | 95 | 96.7% | 33.03 2 | 73.85 | 92 | 88.7 2 | 4.08 2 | 98.6% | 16.24 | 3.56 3 | 94.9 | 95 2 | 96.7% | 98 2 | 95 | 70.8 | 97.1% | 138.29 | 7.248 2 | 89.4% |
| 5 ▲1 | Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2 | 96.2% | 41.52 2 | 66.11 ★ | 100 ★ | 99.9% | 34.64 | 73.11 ★ | 95 3 | 85.8 | 3.42 | 95.6% | 16.23 | 3.54 2 | 92.05 | 95 2 | 97.7% | 92 | 100 ★ | 70 2 | 95.6% | 160.39 | 8.43 | 76.9% |
| 6 ▼1 | Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV | 96.1% | 44.18 | 66.88 | 92 | 95.5% | 34.11 | 74.13 | 95 3 | 90.7 ★ | 4.3 ★ | 97.5% | 15.97 2 | 3.67 | 93.25 | 95 2 | 97.4% | 98 2 | 98 3 | 72.2 | 97.4% | 157.69 | 8.221 | 78.8% |
| 7 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus SUV | 95.8% | 43.75 | 67.36 | 92 | 95.8% | 33.64 | 73.33 2 | 100 ★ | 85.3 | 3.4 | 97.1% | 16.13 | 3.65 | 91.9 3 | 95 2 | 97.4% | 95 | 95 | 70.5 3 | 95.7% | 161.19 | 8.476 | 76.4% |
| 8 | Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 SUV | 94.7% | 42.63 | 66.37 | 100 ★ | 98.2% | 35.11 | 74.56 | 100 ★ | 88.3 3 | 3.6 | 95.1% | 16.31 | 3.76 | 96.3 | 90 | 94.8% | 92 | 95 | 70.9 | 94% | 106.39 2 | 8.467 | 76.9% |
| 9 | Leao Winter Defender UHP | 91.4% | 41.45 ★ | 67.11 | 88 | 98.9% | 34.75 | 76.14 | 80 | 85.3 | 3.64 | 93.7% | 19.46 | 4.51 | 94.6 | 80 | 84.6% | 92 | 90 | 72 | 92.4% | 98.99 ★ | 7.772 | 83.7% |
Scroll for more
Dry
99%
Wet
98%
Snow
100%
Comfort
100%
Value
79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
42.15 M
3
Dry Handling
66.61 s
Subj. Dry Handling
95 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
32.86 M
★
Wet Handling
73.55 s
Subj. Wet Handling
95 Points
3
Straight Aqua
86.1 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.63 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
16.06 M
3
Snow Traction
3.53 s
★
Snow Handling
88.65 s
★
Subj. Snow Handling
100 Points
★
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
100 Points
★
Subj. Noise
100 Points
★
Noise
68.9 dB
★
Value
Price
171.49
Rolling Resistance
8.186 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
98%
Snow
97%
Comfort
96%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
43.02 M
Dry Handling
66.28 s
3
Subj. Dry Handling
95 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
33.06 M
3
Wet Handling
73.45 s
3
Subj. Wet Handling
95 Points
3
Straight Aqua
84.9 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.73 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
16.21 M
Snow Traction
3.68 s
Snow Handling
90.85 s
2
Subj. Snow Handling
95 Points
2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
95 Points
Subj. Noise
95 Points
Noise
71.1 dB
Value
Price
162.29
Rolling Resistance
6.493 kg / t
★
Dry
98%
Wet
98%
Snow
98%
Comfort
93%
Value
87%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
42.93 M
Dry Handling
66.27 s
2
Subj. Dry Handling
100 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
33.32 M
Wet Handling
73.9 s
Subj. Wet Handling
95 Points
3
Straight Aqua
86.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
4 m/sec2
3
Snow
Snow Braking
15.92 M
★
Snow Traction
3.62 s
Snow Handling
92.35 s
Subj. Snow Handling
92 Points
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
95 Points
Subj. Noise
90 Points
Noise
74.6 dB
Value
Price
128.79
3
Rolling Resistance
7.459 kg / t
3
Dry
97%
Wet
99%
Snow
97%
Comfort
97%
Value
89%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
43.46 M
Dry Handling
66.63 s
Subj. Dry Handling
95 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
33.03 M
2
Wet Handling
73.85 s
Subj. Wet Handling
92 Points
Straight Aqua
88.7 Km/H
2
Curved Aquaplaning
4.08 m/sec2
2
Snow
Snow Braking
16.24 M
Snow Traction
3.56 s
3
Snow Handling
94.9 s
Subj. Snow Handling
95 Points
2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
98 Points
2
Subj. Noise
95 Points
Noise
70.8 dB
Value
Price
138.29
Rolling Resistance
7.248 kg / t
2
Dry
100%
Wet
96%
Snow
98%
Comfort
96%
Value
77%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
41.52 M
2
Dry Handling
66.11 s
★
Subj. Dry Handling
100 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
34.64 M
Wet Handling
73.11 s
★
Subj. Wet Handling
95 Points
3
Straight Aqua
85.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.42 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
16.23 M
Snow Traction
3.54 s
2
Snow Handling
92.05 s
Subj. Snow Handling
95 Points
2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
92 Points
Subj. Noise
100 Points
★
Noise
70 dB
2
Value
Price
160.39
Rolling Resistance
8.43 kg / t
Dry
96%
Wet
98%
Snow
97%
Comfort
97%
Value
79%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.18 M
Dry Handling
66.88 s
Subj. Dry Handling
92 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
34.11 M
Wet Handling
74.13 s
Subj. Wet Handling
95 Points
3
Straight Aqua
90.7 Km/H
★
Curved Aquaplaning
4.3 m/sec2
★
Snow
Snow Braking
15.97 M
2
Snow Traction
3.67 s
Snow Handling
93.25 s
Subj. Snow Handling
95 Points
2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
98 Points
2
Subj. Noise
98 Points
3
Noise
72.2 dB
Value
Price
157.69
Rolling Resistance
8.221 kg / t
Dry
96%
Wet
97%
Snow
97%
Comfort
96%
Value
76%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
43.75 M
Dry Handling
67.36 s
Subj. Dry Handling
92 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
33.64 M
Wet Handling
73.33 s
2
Subj. Wet Handling
100 Points
★
Straight Aqua
85.3 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.4 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
16.13 M
Snow Traction
3.65 s
Snow Handling
91.9 s
3
Subj. Snow Handling
95 Points
2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
95 Points
Subj. Noise
95 Points
Noise
70.5 dB
3
Value
Price
161.19
Rolling Resistance
8.476 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
95%
Snow
95%
Comfort
94%
Value
77%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
42.63 M
Dry Handling
66.37 s
Subj. Dry Handling
100 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
35.11 M
Wet Handling
74.56 s
Subj. Wet Handling
100 Points
★
Straight Aqua
88.3 Km/H
3
Curved Aquaplaning
3.6 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
16.31 M
Snow Traction
3.76 s
Snow Handling
96.3 s
Subj. Snow Handling
90 Points
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
92 Points
Subj. Noise
95 Points
Noise
70.9 dB
Value
Price
106.39
2
Rolling Resistance
8.467 kg / t
Dry
99%
Wet
94%
Snow
85%
Comfort
92%
Value
84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
41.45 M
★
Dry Handling
67.11 s
Subj. Dry Handling
88 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
34.75 M
Wet Handling
76.14 s
Subj. Wet Handling
80 Points
Straight Aqua
85.3 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.64 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
19.46 M
Snow Traction
4.51 s
Snow Handling
94.6 s
Subj. Snow Handling
80 Points
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
92 Points
Subj. Noise
90 Points
Noise
72 dB
Value
Price
98.99
★
Rolling Resistance
7.772 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
Hello,
One quick question: is there a big difference between Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV and Michelin Alpine 7? When I put my wheel size 225 60 R18 100H to look for winter tyres (for my RAV4 PHEV 2,000kg weight) I got both options. But always I see in your reviews for winter tyres testing Michelin Pilot Alpin but never Michelin Alpine (cars or SUV). Is there a lot difference Pilot Alpine versus just Alpine? Thanks.
Pilot Alpin is the more sporty winter tyre line, the regular alpin is more comfort / touring bias. The SUV marking probably doesn't make much difference.
Hi,
Why do they make the same Alpin 5 tyres for SUV and non-SUV?
What is the differens? It's as if non-SUV tyres score better. Take a look:
SUV
https://www.tyrereviews.com/Tyre/Michelin/Pilot-Alpin-5-SUV.htm
Non-SUV
https://www.tyrereviews.com/Tyre/Michelin/Pilot-Alpin-5.htm
I bought Michelin Pilot Alpin SUV 245-50-19 ZP for my BMW iX3 because it is proved by BMW to iX3, but I think it makes a special noise which BMW says it is because it is a run-flat tyre. But I can also see that the rolling resistance is less on this run-flat compared to the Alpin 5 SUV as a non-run-flat tyre.
I think I will replace the Alpin tyre with TS870 P on iX3. How will I experience the difference in terms of noise?
Generally it's for marketing reasons and the only differences are the size and the sidewall
Thanks :-)
Are there any experiences in therms of noise between TS 870 P and the run-flat-tire Alpin 5 SUV ZP?
No one tests runflat tyres so you have to go by the non runflat tests, of which we have lots of data: https://www.tyrereviews.com...
Great test Jonathan! I have a question that I can't get answered properly. I have just bought a Volvo XC90 T8 and want to put it on winter tires as we often drive to Sweden. Volvo puts 275 - 45-R20 tires on 20" inc rims. I actually want 245 or 255 tires on these 9-20 rims. Not for the price, but for the idea that a narrower tire has more grip in snow. What do you have for advice for me. Thanks!
This should help https://www.youtube.com/wat...
Awesome test yet again Jonathan! Question; is there a (big) difference in fitting these suv tyres, as opposed to the non SUV variant? (with a high enough load rating of course) Thanks!
It really does vary. If you can find them in the same specs (size, speed and load rating) they might actually be the same tyre, just different sidewalls, or they might be quite different!
Width of a tire matters as you cannot mount a snow chain on all tire dimensions. You have to check the owner's manual and/or homologation data to find out the limits. In my case I had to move from 275/50/20 summer to 265/55/19 winter because this was the max size that snow chains were allowed. With all 20, 21 and bigger rims this would not have worked. Also for the same car make a winter higher side wall makes more sense as you protect the rim itself in case of driving in more harsh conditions iced ruts etc.