Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
Good
Below Average
42
BEST
Bar length in each cell shows performance versus the class leader; longer bars mean stronger performance. The class-leading value in each column appears in bold. The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Snow | Ice | Comfort | Value | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Subj. Dry Handling Points | % | Braking M | Handling s | Straight Aqua Km/H | % | Braking M | Traction s | Handling s | % | Braking M | Traction s | Handling s | % | Subj. Comfort Points | Noise dB | % | Price | Rolling Resistance kg / t | % | |||
| 1 ▲4 | Continental IceContact 3 | 95.8% | 32.77 | 5 | 96.5% | 37.87 | 41.1 | 55.2 | 96.9% | 12.98 | 4.84 | 75.1 | 99.1% | 17.14 | 7.88 | 40.8 | 80.4% | 5 | 75 | 100% | 2669 | 5.4 | 81.2% |
| 2 | Michelin X Ice North 4 | 95.7% | 32.37 | 5 | 97.5% | 37.56 | 41.8 | 55.9 | 96.6% | 13.24 | 4.83 | 75.5 | 98.4% | 12.93 | 5.55 | 39.6 | 99.3% | 3 | 75.8 | 79.5% | 2435 | 5.5 | 81.8% |
| 3 ▲3 | Hankook Winter i pike RS2 | 95.3% | 32.82 | 2 | 86.2% | 35.85 | 41.5 | 56.8 | 99.1% | 12.82 | 4.9 | 76.7 | 98.3% | 15.87 | 6.41 | 42.2 | 86.7% | 4 | 75.4 | 89.7% | 1878 | 5.15 | 92% |
| 4 ▲3 | Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506 | 94.6% | 32.36 | 4 | 94.1% | 39.19 | 42.6 | 56.4 | 94.1% | 12.8 | 4.87 | 78.7 | 97.7% | 17.16 | 7.53 | 44.1 | 79.1% | 3 | 75.5 | 79.7% | 1499 | 5.3 | 96.8% |
| 5 ▼2 | Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 | 94.4% | 32.11 | 2 | 88% | 35.94 | 41.2 | 57.3 | 99.4% | 12.96 | 4.79 | 75.3 | 99.4% | 12.97 | 6.09 | 39.6 | 96.3% | 2 | 75.4 | 69.7% | 2277 | 5.7 | 81.1% |
| 6 ▼5 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 | 94.3% | 32.74 | 3 | 89.8% | 38.58 | 41.4 | 55.1 | 95.8% | 12.96 | 4.85 | 74.8 | 99.2% | 12.77 | 5.74 | 39.3 | 98.9% | 3 | 75.6 | 79.6% | 2513 | 5.35 | 82.9% |
| 7 ▼3 | Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1 | 93.4% | 33.32 | 2 | 85% | 36.98 | 41.4 | 59.1 | 98.3% | 12.85 | 4.86 | 76.1 | 98.8% | 14.6 | 6.51 | 41 | 89.5% | 2 | 76 | 69.3% | 2124 | 5.4 | 85.9% |
| 8 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8 | 92.7% | 31.4 | 4 | 96.6% | 37.02 | 41.9 | 56.5 | 97.3% | 13.06 | 4.84 | 79 | 97.2% | 19.03 | 8.66 | 42.6 | 74.5% | 3 | 75.4 | 79.7% | 5.05 | ||
Scroll for more
Dry
97%
Wet
97%
Snow
99%
Ice
80%
Comfort
100%
Value
81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
32.77 M
Subj. Dry Handling
5 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
37.87 M
Wet Handling
41.1 s
Straight Aqua
55.2 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
12.98 M
Snow Traction
4.84 s
Snow Handling
75.1 s
Ice
Ice Braking
17.14 M
Ice Traction
7.88 s
Ice Handling
40.8 s
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
5 Points
Noise
75 dB
Value
Price
2669
Rolling Resistance
5.4 kg / t
Dry
98%
Wet
97%
Snow
98%
Ice
99%
Comfort
80%
Value
82%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
32.37 M
Subj. Dry Handling
5 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
37.56 M
Wet Handling
41.8 s
Straight Aqua
55.9 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
13.24 M
Snow Traction
4.83 s
Snow Handling
75.5 s
Ice
Ice Braking
12.93 M
Ice Traction
5.55 s
Ice Handling
39.6 s
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
3 Points
Noise
75.8 dB
Value
Price
2435
Rolling Resistance
5.5 kg / t
Dry
86%
Wet
99%
Snow
98%
Ice
87%
Comfort
90%
Value
92%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
32.82 M
Subj. Dry Handling
2 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
35.85 M
Wet Handling
41.5 s
Straight Aqua
56.8 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
12.82 M
Snow Traction
4.9 s
Snow Handling
76.7 s
Ice
Ice Braking
15.87 M
Ice Traction
6.41 s
Ice Handling
42.2 s
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
4 Points
Noise
75.4 dB
Value
Price
1878
Rolling Resistance
5.15 kg / t
Dry
94%
Wet
94%
Snow
98%
Ice
79%
Comfort
80%
Value
97%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
32.36 M
Subj. Dry Handling
4 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
39.19 M
Wet Handling
42.6 s
Straight Aqua
56.4 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
12.8 M
Snow Traction
4.87 s
Snow Handling
78.7 s
Ice
Ice Braking
17.16 M
Ice Traction
7.53 s
Ice Handling
44.1 s
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
3 Points
Noise
75.5 dB
Value
Price
1499
Rolling Resistance
5.3 kg / t
Dry
88%
Wet
99%
Snow
99%
Ice
96%
Comfort
70%
Value
81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
32.11 M
Subj. Dry Handling
2 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
35.94 M
Wet Handling
41.2 s
Straight Aqua
57.3 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
12.96 M
Snow Traction
4.79 s
Snow Handling
75.3 s
Ice
Ice Braking
12.97 M
Ice Traction
6.09 s
Ice Handling
39.6 s
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
2 Points
Noise
75.4 dB
Value
Price
2277
Rolling Resistance
5.7 kg / t
Dry
90%
Wet
96%
Snow
99%
Ice
99%
Comfort
80%
Value
83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
32.74 M
Subj. Dry Handling
3 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
38.58 M
Wet Handling
41.4 s
Straight Aqua
55.1 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
12.96 M
Snow Traction
4.85 s
Snow Handling
74.8 s
Ice
Ice Braking
12.77 M
Ice Traction
5.74 s
Ice Handling
39.3 s
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
3 Points
Noise
75.6 dB
Value
Price
2513
Rolling Resistance
5.35 kg / t
Dry
85%
Wet
98%
Snow
99%
Ice
90%
Comfort
69%
Value
86%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
33.32 M
Subj. Dry Handling
2 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
36.98 M
Wet Handling
41.4 s
Straight Aqua
59.1 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
12.85 M
Snow Traction
4.86 s
Snow Handling
76.1 s
Ice
Ice Braking
14.6 M
Ice Traction
6.51 s
Ice Handling
41 s
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
2 Points
Noise
76 dB
Value
Price
2124
Rolling Resistance
5.4 kg / t
Dry
97%
Wet
97%
Snow
97%
Ice
75%
Comfort
80%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
31.4 M
Subj. Dry Handling
4 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
37.02 M
Wet Handling
41.9 s
Straight Aqua
56.5 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
13.06 M
Snow Traction
4.84 s
Snow Handling
79 s
Ice
Ice Braking
19.03 M
Ice Traction
8.66 s
Ice Handling
42.6 s
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
3 Points
Noise
75.4 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
5.05 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Each cell shows a bar comparing the tyre to the class leader for that test — a longer bar means stronger performance. Bar colour matches the test category.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
To the poster, there's an error in terms of the aquaplaning results.
It's said that the older worn tire performed the worst in the aquaplaning resistance due to the lower tread depth, but in the graph and in the end results, the newer Nokian 10's are listed as last (8th place).
https://uploads.disquscdn.c... https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
Good spot, that's my bad assuming the older tyre was worst from glancing at the data! I'll update it now