Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system based on the test methodology. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tyre in each test.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Snow | Comfort | Value | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Handling Km/H | % | Braking M | Handling Km/H | Circle s | Straight Aqua Km/H | Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | % | Braking M | Traction N | Handling Km/H | Slalom m/sec2 | % | Noise dB | Tyre Weight Kg | % | Wear KM | Value Price/1000 | Rolling Resistance kg / t | Fuel Consumption l/100km | % | |||
| 1 | Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 94.5% | 37.7 ★ | 89.2 2 | 99.7% | 47 | 72.7 | 11.99 | 79 | 3.29 | 95.6% | 23 3 | 2765 2 | 58.1 ★ | 4.27 ★ | 99.2% | 72.6 | 35 3 | 99.1% | 57046 | 8.76 | 7.69 | 5.48 | 75% |
| 2 ▲10 | Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 | 94.2% | 39.2 | 88.5 | 97.4% | 48.8 | 70.5 | 12.07 | 72.8 | 3.04 | 91.4% | 24.7 | 2539 | 55.4 | 3.82 | 92.3% | 72.7 | 36.4 | 99% | 75034 ★ | 4.6 ★ | 8.01 | 5.68 | 97.8% |
| 3 ▼1 | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 93.9% | 40.4 | 87.8 | 95.5% | 45.4 2 | 74.6 | 11.96 | 76.1 | 2.95 | 95.7% | 23.2 | 2744 3 | 57.4 | 4.23 2 | 98.3% | 72.3 3 | 37.2 | 99.5% | 58923 3 | 8.15 | 7.68 2 | 5.56 | 77.2% |
| 4 ▲2 | Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 | 93.7% | 41.8 | 89.8 ★ | 95.1% | 48.3 | 74.8 2 | 11.74 3 | 77.1 | 3.37 2 | 95.6% | 22.5 ★ | 2777 ★ | 57.4 | 4.08 | 99.2% | 73.3 | 34.9 2 | 98.2% | 57129 | 7.61 | 8.21 | 5.66 | 75.4% |
| 5 ▲3 | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 | 93.2% | 41.3 | 87.8 | 94.5% | 49.5 | 72.1 | 11.94 | 78.6 | 3.58 ★ | 94.7% | 23.1 | 2639 | 57.3 | 4.02 | 96.7% | 73.1 | 36.4 | 98.4% | 60289 2 | 6.47 3 | 8.24 | 5.74 | 79.9% |
| 6 ▼3 | Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 | 93.1% | 38.5 3 | 88.8 | 98.4% | 45 ★ | 74.7 3 | 11.86 | 79.8 | 3.14 | 97.6% | 23.1 | 2660 | 57.6 2 | 4.16 | 97.4% | 73.3 | 37.2 | 98.2% | 49794 | 10.74 | 7.86 | 5.46 2 | 66.9% |
| 7 | Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 91.9% | 38.3 2 | 89.2 2 | 98.9% | 48.5 | 70.9 | 12.07 | 80.4 2 | 3.36 3 | 94.5% | 23.2 | 2682 | 57.6 2 | 4.08 | 97.4% | 72.8 | 35.3 | 98.9% | 44009 | 8.71 | 7.69 | 5.47 3 | 64.7% |
| 8 ▼4 | Vredestein Quatrac | 91.7% | 40.3 | 89 | 96.3% | 45.4 2 | 76.1 ★ | 11.62 ★ | 79.2 | 3.27 | 98.3% | 23.1 | 2600 | 57.1 | 3.92 | 96% | 72.9 | 36.5 | 98.7% | 43091 | 9.75 | 8.27 | 5.78 | 61.5% |
| 9 ▼4 | Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 | 91.4% | 38.8 | 88.7 | 98% | 46.7 | 74.5 | 11.95 | 81.7 ★ | 3.17 | 96.9% | 23.6 | 2610 | 57.5 | 4.04 | 96% | 72.2 2 | 36.2 | 99.7% | 42447 | 10.13 | 8.59 | 5.68 | 60% |
| 10 ▼1 | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season | 91.3% | 38.9 | 88.2 | 97.6% | 47.4 | 72 | 12.21 | 80.4 2 | 3.31 | 95.3% | 22.9 2 | 2713 | 57.5 | 4.18 3 | 98.3% | 73 | 35.3 | 98.6% | 40317 | 12.28 | 7.7 | 5.57 | 58.7% |
| 11 ▲3 | Toyo Celsius AS2 | 90.6% | 40.9 | 87.9 | 95% | 50.6 | 70.8 | 12.26 | 78.6 | 3.31 | 92.6% | 23.9 | 2410 | 55.5 | 3.9 | 92.1% | 73.3 | 37.5 | 98.2% | 56012 | 7.05 | 8.1 | 5.58 | 75.7% |
| 12 ▼2 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus | 90.3% | 41.4 | 88.5 | 94.8% | 49.8 | 74.7 3 | 11.83 | 72.8 | 2.44 | 91% | 23.4 | 2672 | 56.4 | 3.8 | 95.7% | 72 ★ | 38 | 99.9% | 49009 | 7.35 | 8.51 | 5.67 | 68.8% |
| 13 ▲2 | Ceat 4 SeasonDrive+ | 89.6% | 40.8 | 87.7 | 95% | 50.1 | 70.8 | 12.01 | 75.5 | 2.84 | 90.9% | 24.5 | 2509 | 54.9 | 3.57 | 91.4% | 72.8 | 38.7 | 98.8% | 51953 | 6.16 2 | 8.73 | 5.65 | 73.1% |
| 14 ▼3 | Dunlop Sport All Season | 89% | 42.5 | 88 | 93.4% | 47.4 | 74.5 | 11.69 2 | 72.3 | 3.36 3 | 94.9% | 23.9 | 2587 | 56.2 | 3.67 | 93.8% | 74.2 | 34 ★ | 97.1% | 39489 | 10.13 | 7.68 2 | 5.35 ★ | 59.7% |
| 15 ▼2 | Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 | 87.8% | 41.8 | 87.5 | 93.8% | 47.9 | 73.5 | 12.06 | 71.5 | 2.64 | 91.7% | 23.4 | 2688 | 57 | 3.79 | 96.2% | 72.7 | 36.4 | 99% | 30063 | 12.64 | 7.16 ★ | 5.49 | 51.8% |
| 16 | Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro | 87.6% | 39.8 | 88.8 | 96.8% | 46 | 72.8 | 11.9 | 76.1 | 3.13 | 95.2% | 25.7 | 2479 | 55.9 | 3.63 | 90.4% | 73.1 | 36.3 | 98.5% | 34319 | 12.53 | 9.01 | 5.64 | 51.1% |
| Reference Winter | 44.8 | 85.2 | 89.5% | 49.4 | 74.5 | 12.04 | 73 | 2.93 | 92.4% | 20.9 1 | 2890 1 | 58.8 1 | 4.27 ★ | 103.9% | 72.5 | 8.52 | 99.3% | |||||||
| Reference Summer | 36 1 | 90.2 1 | 102.6% | 42.9 1 | 77.2 1 | 11.56 1 | 79 | 3.42 2 | 100.9% | 64.3 | 822 | 1 | 1.61 | 23.7% | 73.2 | 7.88 | 98.4% | |||||||
Scroll for more
Dry
100%
Wet
96%
Snow
99%
Comfort
99%
Value
75%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
37.7 M
★
Dry Handling
89.2 Km/H
2
Wet
Wet Braking
47 M
Wet Handling
72.7 Km/H
Wet Circle
11.99 s
Straight Aqua
79 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.29 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
23 M
3
Snow Traction
2765 N
2
Snow Handling
58.1 Km/H
★
Snow Slalom
4.27 m/sec2
★
Comfort
Noise
72.6 dB
Tyre Weight
35 Kg
3
Value
Wear
57046 KM
Value
8.76 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
7.69 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.48 l/100km
Dry
97%
Wet
91%
Snow
92%
Comfort
99%
Value
98%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.2 M
Dry Handling
88.5 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
48.8 M
Wet Handling
70.5 Km/H
Wet Circle
12.07 s
Straight Aqua
72.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.04 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
24.7 M
Snow Traction
2539 N
Snow Handling
55.4 Km/H
Snow Slalom
3.82 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
72.7 dB
Tyre Weight
36.4 Kg
Value
Wear
75034 KM
★
Value
4.6 Price/1000
★
Rolling Resistance
8.01 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.68 l/100km
Dry
96%
Wet
96%
Snow
98%
Comfort
100%
Value
77%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
40.4 M
Dry Handling
87.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
45.4 M
2
Wet Handling
74.6 Km/H
Wet Circle
11.96 s
Straight Aqua
76.1 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.95 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
23.2 M
Snow Traction
2744 N
3
Snow Handling
57.4 Km/H
Snow Slalom
4.23 m/sec2
2
Comfort
Noise
72.3 dB
3
Tyre Weight
37.2 Kg
Value
Wear
58923 KM
3
Value
8.15 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
7.68 kg / t
2
Fuel Consumption
5.56 l/100km
Dry
95%
Wet
96%
Snow
99%
Comfort
98%
Value
75%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
41.8 M
Dry Handling
89.8 Km/H
★
Wet
Wet Braking
48.3 M
Wet Handling
74.8 Km/H
2
Wet Circle
11.74 s
3
Straight Aqua
77.1 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.37 m/sec2
2
Snow
Snow Braking
22.5 M
★
Snow Traction
2777 N
★
Snow Handling
57.4 Km/H
Snow Slalom
4.08 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
73.3 dB
Tyre Weight
34.9 Kg
2
Value
Wear
57129 KM
Value
7.61 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
8.21 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.66 l/100km
Dry
95%
Wet
95%
Snow
97%
Comfort
98%
Value
80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
41.3 M
Dry Handling
87.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
49.5 M
Wet Handling
72.1 Km/H
Wet Circle
11.94 s
Straight Aqua
78.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.58 m/sec2
★
Snow
Snow Braking
23.1 M
Snow Traction
2639 N
Snow Handling
57.3 Km/H
Snow Slalom
4.02 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
73.1 dB
Tyre Weight
36.4 Kg
Value
Wear
60289 KM
2
Value
6.47 Price/1000
3
Rolling Resistance
8.24 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.74 l/100km
Dry
98%
Wet
98%
Snow
97%
Comfort
98%
Value
67%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.5 M
3
Dry Handling
88.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
45 M
★
Wet Handling
74.7 Km/H
3
Wet Circle
11.86 s
Straight Aqua
79.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.14 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
23.1 M
Snow Traction
2660 N
Snow Handling
57.6 Km/H
2
Snow Slalom
4.16 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
73.3 dB
Tyre Weight
37.2 Kg
Value
Wear
49794 KM
Value
10.74 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
7.86 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.46 l/100km
2
Dry
99%
Wet
95%
Snow
97%
Comfort
99%
Value
65%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.3 M
2
Dry Handling
89.2 Km/H
2
Wet
Wet Braking
48.5 M
Wet Handling
70.9 Km/H
Wet Circle
12.07 s
Straight Aqua
80.4 Km/H
2
Curved Aquaplaning
3.36 m/sec2
3
Snow
Snow Braking
23.2 M
Snow Traction
2682 N
Snow Handling
57.6 Km/H
2
Snow Slalom
4.08 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
72.8 dB
Tyre Weight
35.3 Kg
Value
Wear
44009 KM
Value
8.71 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
7.69 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.47 l/100km
3
Dry
96%
Wet
98%
Snow
96%
Comfort
99%
Value
62%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
40.3 M
Dry Handling
89 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
45.4 M
2
Wet Handling
76.1 Km/H
★
Wet Circle
11.62 s
★
Straight Aqua
79.2 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.27 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
23.1 M
Snow Traction
2600 N
Snow Handling
57.1 Km/H
Snow Slalom
3.92 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
72.9 dB
Tyre Weight
36.5 Kg
Value
Wear
43091 KM
Value
9.75 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
8.27 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.78 l/100km
Dry
98%
Wet
97%
Snow
96%
Comfort
100%
Value
60%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.8 M
Dry Handling
88.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
46.7 M
Wet Handling
74.5 Km/H
Wet Circle
11.95 s
Straight Aqua
81.7 Km/H
★
Curved Aquaplaning
3.17 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
23.6 M
Snow Traction
2610 N
Snow Handling
57.5 Km/H
Snow Slalom
4.04 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
72.2 dB
2
Tyre Weight
36.2 Kg
Value
Wear
42447 KM
Value
10.13 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
8.59 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.68 l/100km
Dry
98%
Wet
95%
Snow
98%
Comfort
99%
Value
59%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
38.9 M
Dry Handling
88.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
47.4 M
Wet Handling
72 Km/H
Wet Circle
12.21 s
Straight Aqua
80.4 Km/H
2
Curved Aquaplaning
3.31 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
22.9 M
2
Snow Traction
2713 N
Snow Handling
57.5 Km/H
Snow Slalom
4.18 m/sec2
3
Comfort
Noise
73 dB
Tyre Weight
35.3 Kg
Value
Wear
40317 KM
Value
12.28 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
7.7 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.57 l/100km
Dry
95%
Wet
93%
Snow
92%
Comfort
98%
Value
76%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
40.9 M
Dry Handling
87.9 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
50.6 M
Wet Handling
70.8 Km/H
Wet Circle
12.26 s
Straight Aqua
78.6 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.31 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
23.9 M
Snow Traction
2410 N
Snow Handling
55.5 Km/H
Snow Slalom
3.9 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
73.3 dB
Tyre Weight
37.5 Kg
Value
Wear
56012 KM
Value
7.05 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
8.1 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.58 l/100km
Dry
95%
Wet
91%
Snow
96%
Comfort
100%
Value
69%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
41.4 M
Dry Handling
88.5 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
49.8 M
Wet Handling
74.7 Km/H
3
Wet Circle
11.83 s
Straight Aqua
72.8 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.44 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
23.4 M
Snow Traction
2672 N
Snow Handling
56.4 Km/H
Snow Slalom
3.8 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
72 dB
★
Tyre Weight
38 Kg
Value
Wear
49009 KM
Value
7.35 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
8.51 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.67 l/100km
Dry
95%
Wet
91%
Snow
91%
Comfort
99%
Value
73%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
40.8 M
Dry Handling
87.7 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
50.1 M
Wet Handling
70.8 Km/H
Wet Circle
12.01 s
Straight Aqua
75.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.84 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
24.5 M
Snow Traction
2509 N
Snow Handling
54.9 Km/H
Snow Slalom
3.57 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
72.8 dB
Tyre Weight
38.7 Kg
Value
Wear
51953 KM
Value
6.16 Price/1000
2
Rolling Resistance
8.73 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.65 l/100km
Dry
93%
Wet
95%
Snow
94%
Comfort
97%
Value
60%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
42.5 M
Dry Handling
88 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
47.4 M
Wet Handling
74.5 Km/H
Wet Circle
11.69 s
2
Straight Aqua
72.3 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.36 m/sec2
3
Snow
Snow Braking
23.9 M
Snow Traction
2587 N
Snow Handling
56.2 Km/H
Snow Slalom
3.67 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
74.2 dB
Tyre Weight
34 Kg
★
Value
Wear
39489 KM
Value
10.13 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
7.68 kg / t
2
Fuel Consumption
5.35 l/100km
★
Dry
94%
Wet
92%
Snow
96%
Comfort
99%
Value
52%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
41.8 M
Dry Handling
87.5 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
47.9 M
Wet Handling
73.5 Km/H
Wet Circle
12.06 s
Straight Aqua
71.5 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.64 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
23.4 M
Snow Traction
2688 N
Snow Handling
57 Km/H
Snow Slalom
3.79 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
72.7 dB
Tyre Weight
36.4 Kg
Value
Wear
30063 KM
Value
12.64 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
7.16 kg / t
★
Fuel Consumption
5.49 l/100km
Dry
97%
Wet
95%
Snow
90%
Comfort
99%
Value
51%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
39.8 M
Dry Handling
88.8 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
46 M
Wet Handling
72.8 Km/H
Wet Circle
11.9 s
Straight Aqua
76.1 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.13 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
25.7 M
Snow Traction
2479 N
Snow Handling
55.9 Km/H
Snow Slalom
3.63 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
73.1 dB
Tyre Weight
36.3 Kg
Value
Wear
34319 KM
Value
12.53 Price/1000
Rolling Resistance
9.01 kg / t
Fuel Consumption
5.64 l/100km
Dry
90%
Wet
92%
Snow
104%
Comfort
99%
Value
84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.8 M
Dry Handling
85.2 Km/H
Wet
Wet Braking
49.4 M
Wet Handling
74.5 Km/H
Wet Circle
12.04 s
Straight Aqua
73 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
2.93 m/sec2
Snow
Snow Braking
20.9 M
1
Snow Traction
2890 N
1
Snow Handling
58.8 Km/H
1
Snow Slalom
4.27 m/sec2
★
Comfort
Noise
72.5 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
8.52 kg / t
Dry
103%
Wet
101%
Snow
24%
Comfort
98%
Value
91%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
36 M
1
Dry Handling
90.2 Km/H
1
Wet
Wet Braking
42.9 M
1
Wet Handling
77.2 Km/H
1
Wet Circle
11.56 s
1
Straight Aqua
79 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
3.42 m/sec2
2
Snow
Snow Braking
64.3 M
Snow Traction
822 N
Snow Handling
1 Km/H
Snow Slalom
1.61 m/sec2
Comfort
Noise
73.2 dB
Value
Rolling Resistance
7.88 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
Hello, how déterminante the wear of the tyre please ?
You drive ex. 5000km and you calculate aploxymatly ?
Thanks
The estimated tread life is in the test data so you can do the math yourself.
For interest, I've made a chart I hope people find useful comparing performance vs cost.
Y-axis is mild climate rating (35% dry, 45% wet, 5% snow and 5% NVH - normalised, average of 2023 Auto Bild & 2023 Tyre Reviews data).
X-axis is excess annual cost, i.e. the cheapest overall tyre per year is £0, with every other tyre showing the additional cost (this includes 4x tyres purchase price/fitting in UK, wear and fuel costs all averaged over 1 year, wear and fuel economy data from 2023 Auto Bild test).
For reference, vehicle is a Honda Civic 1.8 i-VTEC petrol, averaging 41 mpg and 14000 miles per year with 205/55R16 tyres.
Data obviously not perfect as some tyres Conti ASC2 & Bridgestone TAS6 and others aren't included in the 2023 Tyre Reviews test, but hopefully gives a good overall picture.
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
Interesting visualization! We arrive at slighty different total costs -I wonder how that came-, but the trends are the same: the tyres in the upper left quadrant seem to be the "best buys" - in this size, at least.
Interesting that they also measure wear and fuel consumption, that gives us a better idea of the TCO. So I wanted to find out how the TCO of the different tyres compares.
I combined for each tyre the price/wear value as indicated in the test, with the fuel consumption at a price of 1,85 €/l, which seems to be the european average fuel price. From that I calculated the cost / 1.000 km, and -to put things in perspective- the total cost difference after 50.000 km, compared with the most economical option.
If I change the price to 1,6 or 2,1 €/l, there isn't that much difference: the fuel saving tyres like Michelin, Kleber and Bridgestone climb one or two places in the ranking when the fuel is more expensive, those with a bad fuel consumption drop one or two places.
Some interesting conclusions: if you buy the test winning Crossclimate, then it would after 50.000 km have cost you in total just +/- 50 € more than the tyre with the cheapest TCO. That is less than 1% of your total (tyres + fuel) budget. Driving the Falken or Vredestein will cost you more than 300 € extra, compared to the Michelin.
But this is just one test in one size. There can be big differences in the wear and fuel consumption results when the same tyres are tested in different sizes: in other Autobild tests the Quatrac scores very good on wear and the Michelin/Kleber have a high fuel consumption. In reality, factors like your driving style will influence the TCO more than the mostly small variations that we see in this calculation. The main conclusion for me, is that in the end most “budget” and most top quality tyres have about the same cost. That is if you don’t have an accident with your budget tyres…
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
Since I was in my nerd-trip, I also added a “driving and safety” score, that is based on the dynamic test results without fuel consumption and tyre cost (and with a bit more weight on the wet performance). We see that -though the premium tyres in general seem to perform better on the road- there is very little correlation between the TCO and the road qualities of the tyres.
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
This is excellent nerding! I've just scanned it for now, I'll try and take a deeper look next week. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks. If you are looking into it, you might want to compare with the results of last years AutoBild test (195/55R16). There the Kleber and Michelin are the most expensive tyres in terms of TCO. A bit confusing, isn't it?
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
..
Hello; Is it possible to get the spreadsheet so I could adjust those
results according to local prices in Poland? Good work anyway, greetings :)
No prob, but I can't send you the Excel file through this channel. I can e-mail it to you, if you want.
Of coz; Thank you v much; [email protected]
Hello; Didn't get your email; Did you send it? Greetings
Are the Kleber Quadraxer 3 and BFG Advantage All Season basically the same tyre?
Tread patterns look identical and have very similar performance (Quadraxer has slightly better rolling resistance and wear though).
Both are owned by Michelin...
"Same technology. Some differences due to production machines types", whatever that means :)
it's a bit different