Menu

2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
19 min read Updated

Adjust Result Weighting

The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Dry 41%
Wet 59%
Dry 41% · Wet 59%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet

Test Results Data

BEST Good Average Below Average
# Tyre Total Score Dry Wet
Braking M % Braking M %
1 ▲2 Bridgestone Potenza S001 98.3% 33.5 95.8% 28.7 100%
2 Nokian PowerProof 98.2% 32.9 2 97.6% 29.1 3 98.6%
3 ▼2 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 97.8% 32.1 100% 29.8 96.3%
4 ▲1 Kumho Ecsta PS71 96.1% 34.9 92% 29 2 99%
5 ▼1 Continental Premium Contact 6 95.7% 33.2 3 96.7% 30.2 95%
6 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 94.6% 33.2 3 96.7% 30.8 93.2%
7 Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 94.4% 33.2 3 96.7% 30.9 92.9%
8 ▲1 Apollo Aspire XP 93.8% 34.7 92.5% 30.3 94.7%
9 ▲1 Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 93.8% 34.7 92.5% 30.3 94.7%
10 ▼2 Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 93.5% 33.4 96.1% 31.3 91.7%
11 Firestone RoadHawk 93.3% 34.3 93.6% 30.8 93.2%
12 Fulda SportControl 2 91.9% 34.2 93.9% 31.7 90.5%
13 ▲2 Falken Azenis FK510 91.7% 36 89.2% 30.7 93.5%
14 ▼1 Kleber Dynaxer UHP 91.2% 34.1 94.1% 32.2 89.1%
15 ▲1 Toyo Proxes Sport 90.9% 35.4 90.7% 31.5 91.1%
16 ▼2 Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus 90.7% 34 94.4% 32.6 88%
17 ▲1 Zeetex HP2000 vfm 89.8% 36 89.2% 31.8 90.3%
18 ▼1 Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 89.7% 34.3 93.6% 33 87%
19 Uniroyal RainSport 3 89.1% 35.7 89.9% 32.4 88.6%
20 ▲3 Semperit SpeedLife 2 88.9% 36.2 88.7% 32.2 89.1%
21 Infinity Ecomax 88.8% 35.7 89.9% 32.6 88%
22 GiTi GitiSport S1 88.5% 35.5 90.4% 32.9 87.2%
23 ▼3 Maxxis Victra Sport 5 88.5% 34.8 92.2% 33.4 85.9%
24 Debica Presto UHP2 88.1% 36.1 88.9% 32.8 87.5%
25 Pirelli P Zero 86.8% 34.8 92.2% 34.6 83%
26 Yokohama Advan Sport V105 86.1% 35.3 90.9% 34.7 82.7%
27 Mabor Sport Jet 3 86% 35.9 89.4% 34.3 83.7%
28 ▲1 Cooper Zeon Sport 85.6% 36 89.2% 34.5 83.2%
29 ▼1 Sava Intensa UHP 2 85.6% 34.7 92.5% 35.5 80.9%
30 ▲1 Gislaved Ultra Speed 85% 37.5 85.6% 33.9 84.7%
31 ▲3 General Altimax One S 85% 35.4 90.7% 35.4 81.1%
32 ▼2 Avon ZZS 84.5% 36.2 88.7% 35.2 81.5%
33 Matador MP 47 Hectorra 3 84% 36 89.2% 35.7 80.4%
34 ▲2 Viking ProTech HP 83.9% 37.3 86.1% 34.8 82.5%
35 ▲2 Tracmax X Privilo TX3 83.4% 37 86.8% 35.4 81.1%
36 ▲3 Rotalla RU01 S Pace 82.8% 37.2 86.3% 35.7 80.4%
37 ▲1 Minerva Radial F 205 82.7% 36.9 87% 36 79.7%
38 ▼3 Radar Dimax R8 82% 36.7 87.5% 36.7 78.2%
39 ▲1 Tristar Sportpower 2 81.8% 36.5 88% 37 77.6%
40 ▲2 Barum Bravuris 5HM 81.8% 37.7 85.2% 36.1 79.5%
41 Dayton Touring 2 81.7% 36.4 88.2% 37.2 77.2%
42 ▲2 Seiberling Seiberling Touring 2 81.3% 37 86.8% 37 77.6%
43 Marshal MU12 81.2% 36.6 87.7% 37.4 76.7%
44 ▲2 Nankang NS2 80.4% 36.5 88% 38.2 75.1%
45 Federal Evoluzion ST 1 80.3% 35.3 90.9% 39.4 72.8%
46 ▲1 GT-Radial SportActive 79.1% 36.8 87.2% 39.1 73.4%
47 ▲1 Imperial Ecosport 2 79% 37.3 86.1% 38.7 74.2%
48 ▲1 Accelera PHI R 77% 37.4 85.8% 40.5 70.9%
49 ▲1 King-Meiler Sport 3 KM 71.3% 41 78.3% 43.2 66.4%
Scroll for more
Dry 96% Wet 100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 33.5 M
Wet
Wet Braking 28.7 M
Dry 98% Wet 99%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 32.9 M 2
Wet
Wet Braking 29.1 M 3
3
97.8%
Dry 100% Wet 96%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 32.1 M
Wet
Wet Braking 29.8 M
4
96.1%
Dry 92% Wet 99%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.9 M
Wet
Wet Braking 29 M 2
Dry 97% Wet 95%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 33.2 M 3
Wet
Wet Braking 30.2 M
Dry 97% Wet 93%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 33.2 M 3
Wet
Wet Braking 30.8 M
Dry 97% Wet 93%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 33.2 M 3
Wet
Wet Braking 30.9 M
8
93.8%
Dry 93% Wet 95%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.7 M
Wet
Wet Braking 30.3 M
Dry 93% Wet 95%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.7 M
Wet
Wet Braking 30.3 M
10
93.5%
Dry 96% Wet 92%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 33.4 M
Wet
Wet Braking 31.3 M
Dry 94% Wet 93%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.3 M
Wet
Wet Braking 30.8 M
Dry 94% Wet 91%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.2 M
Wet
Wet Braking 31.7 M
13
91.7%
Dry 89% Wet 94%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36 M
Wet
Wet Braking 30.7 M
14
91.2%
Dry 94% Wet 89%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.1 M
Wet
Wet Braking 32.2 M
15
90.9%
Dry 91% Wet 91%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.4 M
Wet
Wet Braking 31.5 M
16
90.7%
Dry 94% Wet 88%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34 M
Wet
Wet Braking 32.6 M
17
89.8%
Dry 89% Wet 90%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36 M
Wet
Wet Braking 31.8 M
18
89.7%
Dry 94% Wet 87%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.3 M
Wet
Wet Braking 33 M
Dry 90% Wet 89%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.7 M
Wet
Wet Braking 32.4 M
20
88.9%
Dry 89% Wet 89%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.2 M
Wet
Wet Braking 32.2 M
21
88.8%
Dry 90% Wet 88%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.7 M
Wet
Wet Braking 32.6 M
Dry 90% Wet 87%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.5 M
Wet
Wet Braking 32.9 M
23
88.5%
Dry 92% Wet 86%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.8 M
Wet
Wet Braking 33.4 M
Dry 89% Wet 88%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.1 M
Wet
Wet Braking 32.8 M
25
86.8%
Dry 92% Wet 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.8 M
Wet
Wet Braking 34.6 M
Dry 91% Wet 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.3 M
Wet
Wet Braking 34.7 M
Dry 89% Wet 84%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.9 M
Wet
Wet Braking 34.3 M
28
85.6%
Dry 89% Wet 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36 M
Wet
Wet Braking 34.5 M
29
85.6%
Dry 93% Wet 81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.7 M
Wet
Wet Braking 35.5 M
30
85%
Dry 86% Wet 85%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.5 M
Wet
Wet Braking 33.9 M
31
85%
Dry 91% Wet 81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.4 M
Wet
Wet Braking 35.4 M
32
Avon ZZS ▼2
84.5%
Dry 89% Wet 82%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.2 M
Wet
Wet Braking 35.2 M
Dry 89% Wet 80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36 M
Wet
Wet Braking 35.7 M
34
83.9%
Dry 86% Wet 83%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.3 M
Wet
Wet Braking 34.8 M
35
83.4%
Dry 87% Wet 81%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37 M
Wet
Wet Braking 35.4 M
36
82.8%
Dry 86% Wet 80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.2 M
Wet
Wet Braking 35.7 M
37
82.7%
Dry 87% Wet 80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.9 M
Wet
Wet Braking 36 M
38
82%
Dry 88% Wet 78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.7 M
Wet
Wet Braking 36.7 M
39
81.8%
Dry 88% Wet 78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.5 M
Wet
Wet Braking 37 M
40
81.8%
Dry 85% Wet 80%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.7 M
Wet
Wet Braking 36.1 M
41
81.7%
Dry 88% Wet 77%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.4 M
Wet
Wet Braking 37.2 M
Dry 87% Wet 78%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37 M
Wet
Wet Braking 37 M
43
81.2%
Dry 88% Wet 77%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.6 M
Wet
Wet Braking 37.4 M
44
80.4%
Dry 88% Wet 75%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.5 M
Wet
Wet Braking 38.2 M
Dry 91% Wet 73%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 35.3 M
Wet
Wet Braking 39.4 M
46
79.1%
Dry 87% Wet 73%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.8 M
Wet
Wet Braking 39.1 M
47
79%
Dry 86% Wet 74%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.3 M
Wet
Wet Braking 38.7 M
48
77%
Dry 86% Wet 71%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.4 M
Wet
Wet Braking 40.5 M
49
71.3%
Dry 78% Wet 66%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 41 M
Wet
Wet Braking 43.2 M
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.

Discussion

38 comments
  1. Mohammed Hamed Ahmed Soliman archived

    Braking distance at what car speed?

    #7178
  2. TyreReviews archived

    Firstly, not my test so I can't answer. Autobild do an all season test every year with a summer and winter tyre as reference, which should answer your point.

    Also, my own all season test https://www.tyrereviews.com... has summer and winter references

    #6405
  3. Chris archived

    So Auto Bild want us to believe that Michelin PS4 are the only tyres that brake better in WET conditions (29.8 m) than dry (32.1 m)? Am I missing something, or is this against the laws of physics? Or did someone make a typo when entering the data?

    All the other tyres in this list behave normally, that is, brake better in dry conditions.

    #6331
    1. TyreReviews Chris archived

      Initial speed will be different, likely 100 for dry and 80 for wet

      #6332
  4. Simon Green archived

    Hi, really confused about the mixed reviews of the PS 4s. Seems to be getting great reviews at the technical level but mixed by the community. Are there quality issues compared to the competitors? Looking for tyres for my S63 Coupe and just so confused as to what would be ‘best’. I just want something that is safe, quiet and reasonably durable. That’s not too much to ask is it? :)

    #5672
    1. TyreReviews Simon Green archived

      Michelin probably make the most consistent tyres in the market, so I doubt it's due to quality issues!

      The only negatives I really see against the PS4 is that they can be a little noisy in some fitments, and they don't wear as well as previous Michelins.

      I'm not sure what sizes you have, but the Asymmetric 5 would be an alternative.

      #5673
      1. Simon Green TyreReviews archived

        Thanks for the reply! I’m currently running 255 45 19 and 285 40 19 which aren’t available in PS 4s from what I can tell. I think I can get the PS2 or SS in that size but they seem like old technology. I’m thinking of moving to 20” rims as tyres seem to be more available and cheaper in that size. So it would be 255 40 20 and 285 35 20 if I went with the Mercedes size recommendations. Cheers.

        #5675
  5. Scour archived

    Is there a reason why my last comment was marked as spam?

    #5587
  6. Damian archived

    How come the Bridgestone S001 has done so much better in the wet in this test than previous tests?

    #5580
    1. TyreReviews Damian archived

      I feel like I covered that in the article :)

      #5581
      1. Damian TyreReviews archived

        Are there different iterations of the same tyre? If so is there any way to find out what you've got? Asking as we bought a used car with S001's and was thinking of changing them but this has confused me.

        #5582
        1. TyreReviews Damian archived

          No way of telling unless Bridgestone will tell you. They will need a combination of the DOT code andthe factory it was produced, but I wouldn't be hopeful getting that data from them

          #5585
          1. Damian TyreReviews archived

            Numbers on mine (if this ever blows up): DOT 7GN1 P7C. 4218. 69873

            #5586
  7. MDGTI archived

    Another strange thing for me is how far the falken 510 has slipped down the list this year it was really good the last few years.
    Strange how they are testing the toyo t1 sport instead of the newer TR1 and the rainsport 3 instead of the rainsport 5.

    #5575
    1. Kolemjdouci MDGTI archived

      The test must have been done last summer or autumn...

      #5577
  8. Lulu Bulu archived

    Am I the only one that is disappointed by Michelin Pilot Sport 4? 225/45R17 (94Y) XL.
    I find them less grippy than the Kenda Vezda AST. They're spinning very easy and abs kicks in constantly.

    #5567
    1. TyreReviews Lulu Bulu archived

      Might it be down to the time of year? They're consistently well rated!

      #5569
      1. Lulu Bulu TyreReviews archived

        That is what worries me. If it wasn't consistent and if there were bad reviews I could understand that it was a bad choice. I chose what is considered the best without budget restrictions.
        I'm now playing with tyre pressure as they were overinflated by installer.
        I'm gonna wait a little more for weather to get hotter but I'm not hoping much.
        Could be the months stored be an issue? Greece hot summer etc. Installer is official Michelin trader-installer.

        #5572
    2. Kolemjdouci Lulu Bulu archived

      Depending on how they were stored, hopefully not on direct Greek sun. They should not be too much old either (DOT max. 4 years).
      You can try to change front & rear set, sometimes it can help, together with different air pressure. If one only tire is problematic, use it just as for the reserve wheel.
      P.S. You can also just start slower when no launch control available :-)

      #5573
      1. Lulu Bulu Kolemjdouci archived

        If one is problematic then I will change a pair under warranty. Spare wheel is 16", so not fitting!
        I believe they were protected by sun and extreme temperatures, I bought from main supplier of North Greece and they have a big warehouse. Dot1619
        I'll also try front-rear interchange after some testing with pressures.
        They feel solid in feedback and response comparing to my previous tyres. If we were talking about turning I would say that the safety feeling makes me getting in with higher speed. But it is difficult to start without spinning.

        #5576
        1. TyreReviews Lulu Bulu archived

          Fingers crossed you get to the bottom of your issue

          #5579
  9. DL archived

    Wet braking distance shorter than dry braking distance? What were the relative starting speeds and what vehicle was used?

    #5561
    1. Kolemjdouci DL archived

      Like they always test: Braking in dry from 100 km/h and from 80 km/h in wet.

      #5562
  10. FritzHatezYouAll archived

    Stupid test. The Debica and Sava tire are exactly the same.......still different in scores ?!?!?!?!

    #5553
      1. FritzHatezYouAll Lulu Bulu archived

        Thats only on the surface.....less then 1mm deep. The rest including the material is all the same.
        This test is useless. There are more weird tires used like the old Bridgestone S001.
        And what about the whole specs off the used tires....96 or 100 loadindex???

        #5558
        1. Lulu Bulu FritzHatezYouAll archived

          I can see what you're saying but these small differences could make a difference. The gum could also be "almost" the same.
          Can't say for sure.
          Yeah, for Pirelli also the old P zero.

          #5559
  11. Pedro Neves archived

    There´s going to be some serious arguing and yelling at Pirelli's and Yokohama's, since they went off the top 20 and the full test...

    #5551
    1. TyreReviews Pedro Neves archived

      At least it was the previous gen P Zero, not the new PZ4!

      #5552
        1. Kolemjdouci Lulu Bulu archived

          They bought it under known title "P Zero" in the shop anonymously like all others.
          They simulated purchase of a normal consumer (not a professional client).

          #5556
          1. Lulu Bulu Kolemjdouci archived

            What do you mean? Couldn't they ask for the new pz4? It's a different tyre. I'm not a pirelli fan but I think it's not fair. It's like asking for the Conti premium contact and getting the 5 no questions asked.

            #5557
            1. MDGTI Lulu Bulu archived

              I don't get it either. When looking for tyres I have no idea if it's an updated version or not. That's the problem with the p zero there is nothing to indicate if it's the pz4 or not. In any case a tyre shouldn't get worse but some how they do vary a lot. Not sure if tyre size makes a big difference or not.

              #5574
        2. TyreReviews Lulu Bulu archived

          It's perhaps more likely that in this size, at the time of test (last summer!) the PZ4 might not have been available, so they chose to test the older pattern instead rather than exclude it

          #5560
          1. Scour TyreReviews archived

            They wrote the PZ4 was tested in this dimension a year ago and it was much better

            https://www.tyrereviews.co....

            But it´s still strange. I bought the old P Zero in 2015, in that year it dominated in wet braking in two magazines, different size. In one test it the 2nd tyre needed over 3m more, in other test around 2m more.

            Can´t believe other tyres now are so much better now, so it means the P Zero is more worse now?

            Here is the test in another size in 2019

            https://www.tyrereviews.co....

            Very good in important points

            #5563
            1. TyreReviews Scour archived

              Sometimes tyre manufacturers have variable quality between factories, but I doubt this is the case with Pirelli. Unless in this size they've made a compound update to improve wear, at the expense of wet grip, I'm a bit stumped!

              #5564
              1. Mohamed Shalaby TyreReviews archived

                Pirelli have variable quality between factories.

                #5565
              2. Scour TyreReviews archived

                I remember some years ago the ADAC-magazine test the P1 Verde, made in Romania and Turkey. The romanian Tyres were much better than the turkish.

                But Pirelli said some weeks later it was because the romanian plant had already the new producition process, the turkish plant get it later.

                But still, the tyres don´t get so much better in a few years, so the P Zero must be getting worse

                #5566