Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
Good
Below Average
42
BEST
Bar length in each cell shows performance versus the class leader; longer bars mean stronger performance. The class-leading value in each column appears in bold. The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories.
| # | Tyre | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Snow | Ice | Comfort | Value | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Subj. Dry Handling Points | % | Braking M | Handling s | Straight Aqua Km/H | % | Braking M | Traction s | Handling s | % | Braking M | Traction s | Handling s | % | Subj. Noise Points | % | Fuel Consumption l/100km | % | |||
| 1 | Michelin X Ice North 4 | 97% | 32.31 | 5 | 91.2% | 35.06 | 45.75 | 59.4 | 95% | 10.5 | 3.67 | 75.69 | 99% | 3.47 | 1.89 | 51.23 | 99.6% | 5 | 100% | 5.66 | 100% |
| 2 | Continental IceContact 3 | 95.1% | 30.75 | 3 | 88.2% | 36.92 | 43.77 | 63.7 | 95.5% | 10.5 | 3.67 | 75.04 | 99.3% | 4.2 | 2.18 | 52.24 | 88.8% | 4 | 80% | 5.69 | 99.5% |
| 3 ▲2 | Pirelli Ice Zero 2 | 94.7% | 31.02 | 4 | 90.9% | 34.8 | 44.1 | 64.6 | 97.8% | 10.71 | 3.62 | 75.74 | 98.9% | 5.2 | 2.42 | 56.42 | 78.3% | 3 | 60% | 5.71 | 99.1% |
| 4 | Hankook Winter i pike RS2 | 93.4% | 31.11 | 3 | 87.2% | 36.15 | 44.75 | 62.9 | 95.3% | 10.6 | 3.79 | 75.19 | 97.9% | 4.68 | 2.08 | 53.52 | 86.6% | 3 | 60% | 5.67 | 99.8% |
| 5 ▲3 | GT-Radial IcePro 3 | 92.6% | 28.88 | 2 | 89.8% | 33.87 | 43.11 | 64.1 | 99.9% | 10.73 | 3.83 | 78.81 | 95.6% | 5.31 | 3.29 | 61.42 | 68.5% | 2 | 40% | 5.78 | 97.9% |
| 6 ▼4 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 | 92.5% | 31.94 | 3 | 85.2% | 36.92 | 44.12 | 62.1 | 94.9% | 10.58 | 3.75 | 74.62 | 98.6% | 3.43 | 1.94 | 51.4 | 99% | 2 | 40% | 5.76 | 98.3% |
| 7 | Toyo Observe Ice Freezer | 90.5% | 31.6 | 3 | 86.1% | 37.18 | 45.17 | 62.4 | 93.6% | 10.71 | 3.92 | 76.85 | 95.7% | 4.07 | 2.8 | 59.02 | 79.5% | 2 | 40% | 5.76 | 98.3% |
| 8 ▼2 | Nokian Nordman 7 | 89.5% | 33.3 | 2 | 78.8% | 38.91 | 45.75 | 61.7 | 91.2% | 10.51 | 3.72 | 75.19 | 98.8% | 4.31 | 2.22 | 55.11 | 85.9% | 2 | 40% | 5.74 | 98.6% |
Scroll for more
Dry
91%
Wet
95%
Snow
99%
Ice
100%
Comfort
100%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
32.31 M
Subj. Dry Handling
5 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
35.06 M
Wet Handling
45.75 s
Straight Aqua
59.4 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
10.5 M
Snow Traction
3.67 s
Snow Handling
75.69 s
Ice
Ice Braking
3.47 M
Ice Traction
1.89 s
Ice Handling
51.23 s
Comfort
Subj. Noise
5 Points
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.66 l/100km
Dry
88%
Wet
96%
Snow
99%
Ice
89%
Comfort
80%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
30.75 M
Subj. Dry Handling
3 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
36.92 M
Wet Handling
43.77 s
Straight Aqua
63.7 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
10.5 M
Snow Traction
3.67 s
Snow Handling
75.04 s
Ice
Ice Braking
4.2 M
Ice Traction
2.18 s
Ice Handling
52.24 s
Comfort
Subj. Noise
4 Points
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.69 l/100km
Dry
91%
Wet
98%
Snow
99%
Ice
78%
Comfort
60%
Value
99%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
31.02 M
Subj. Dry Handling
4 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
34.8 M
Wet Handling
44.1 s
Straight Aqua
64.6 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
10.71 M
Snow Traction
3.62 s
Snow Handling
75.74 s
Ice
Ice Braking
5.2 M
Ice Traction
2.42 s
Ice Handling
56.42 s
Comfort
Subj. Noise
3 Points
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.71 l/100km
Dry
87%
Wet
95%
Snow
98%
Ice
87%
Comfort
60%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
31.11 M
Subj. Dry Handling
3 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
36.15 M
Wet Handling
44.75 s
Straight Aqua
62.9 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
10.6 M
Snow Traction
3.79 s
Snow Handling
75.19 s
Ice
Ice Braking
4.68 M
Ice Traction
2.08 s
Ice Handling
53.52 s
Comfort
Subj. Noise
3 Points
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.67 l/100km
Dry
90%
Wet
100%
Snow
96%
Ice
69%
Comfort
40%
Value
98%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
28.88 M
Subj. Dry Handling
2 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
33.87 M
Wet Handling
43.11 s
Straight Aqua
64.1 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
10.73 M
Snow Traction
3.83 s
Snow Handling
78.81 s
Ice
Ice Braking
5.31 M
Ice Traction
3.29 s
Ice Handling
61.42 s
Comfort
Subj. Noise
2 Points
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.78 l/100km
Dry
85%
Wet
95%
Snow
99%
Ice
99%
Comfort
40%
Value
98%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
31.94 M
Subj. Dry Handling
3 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
36.92 M
Wet Handling
44.12 s
Straight Aqua
62.1 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
10.58 M
Snow Traction
3.75 s
Snow Handling
74.62 s
Ice
Ice Braking
3.43 M
Ice Traction
1.94 s
Ice Handling
51.4 s
Comfort
Subj. Noise
2 Points
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.76 l/100km
Dry
86%
Wet
94%
Snow
96%
Ice
80%
Comfort
40%
Value
98%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
31.6 M
Subj. Dry Handling
3 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
37.18 M
Wet Handling
45.17 s
Straight Aqua
62.4 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
10.71 M
Snow Traction
3.92 s
Snow Handling
76.85 s
Ice
Ice Braking
4.07 M
Ice Traction
2.8 s
Ice Handling
59.02 s
Comfort
Subj. Noise
2 Points
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.76 l/100km
Dry
79%
Wet
91%
Snow
99%
Ice
86%
Comfort
40%
Value
99%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
33.3 M
Subj. Dry Handling
2 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
38.91 M
Wet Handling
45.75 s
Straight Aqua
61.7 Km/H
Snow
Snow Braking
10.51 M
Snow Traction
3.72 s
Snow Handling
75.19 s
Ice
Ice Braking
4.31 M
Ice Traction
2.22 s
Ice Handling
55.11 s
Comfort
Subj. Noise
2 Points
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.74 l/100km
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Each cell shows a bar comparing the tyre to the class leader for that test — a longer bar means stronger performance. Bar colour matches the test category.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.
Discussion