Menu

2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Tested and written by Jonathan Benson
7 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Accelera PHI
Continental Sport Contact 6
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Kumho Ecsta PS91
Falken Azenis FK510
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Toyo Proxes Sport
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 5.50 M (15.7%) | Avg: 37.29 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 35 M. The difference between best and worst was 13.6%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    35 M
  2. Continental Sport Contact 6
    35.4 M
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    35.8 M
  4. Falken Azenis FK510
    37.4 M
  5. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    37.7 M
  6. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    37.7 M
  7. Toyo Proxes Sport
    38.8 M
  8. Accelera PHI
    40.5 M

Dry Handling (s)

Spread: 3.50 s (5.8%) | Avg: 61.33 s

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 60.3 s. The difference between best and worst was 5.5%.
  1. Continental Sport Contact 6
    60.3 s
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    60.5 s
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    60.6 s
  4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    60.9 s
  5. Falken Azenis FK510
    61.1 s
  6. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    61.2 s
  7. Toyo Proxes Sport
    62.2 s
  8. Accelera PHI
    63.8 s

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Spread: 3.40 Points (37.8%) | Avg: 7.78 Points

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 9 Points. The difference between best and worst was 37.8%.
  1. Continental Sport Contact 6
    9 Points
  2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    8.9 Points
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    8.7 Points
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    8.3 Points
  5. Toyo Proxes Sport
    7.6 Points
  6. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    7.5 Points
  7. Falken Azenis FK510
    6.6 Points
  8. Accelera PHI
    5.6 Points

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 27.00 M (58.3%) | Avg: 53.00 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 46.3 M. The difference between best and worst was 36.8%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    46.3 M
  2. Continental Sport Contact 6
    46.9 M
  3. Falken Azenis FK510
    48.4 M
  4. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    48.6 M
  5. Toyo Proxes Sport
    49.9 M
  6. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    53.8 M
  7. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    56.8 M
  8. Accelera PHI
    73.3 M

Wet Handling (s)

Spread: 16.06 s (22.8%) | Avg: 74.74 s

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport with a result of 70.37 s. The difference between best and worst was 18.6%.
  1. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    70.37 s
  2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    72.78 s
  3. Toyo Proxes Sport
    73.17 s
  4. Continental Sport Contact 6
    73.36 s
  5. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    73.4 s
  6. Falken Azenis FK510
    73.54 s
  7. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    74.83 s
  8. Accelera PHI
    86.43 s

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Spread: 7.00 Points (77.8%) | Avg: 6.44 Points

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport with a result of 9 Points. The difference between best and worst was 77.8%.
  1. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    9 Points
  2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    8 Points
  3. Falken Azenis FK510
    7 Points
  4. Toyo Proxes Sport
    7 Points
  5. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    6.5 Points
  6. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    6 Points
  7. Continental Sport Contact 6
    6 Points
  8. Accelera PHI
    2 Points

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 4.00 Km/H (4.6%) | Avg: 85.04 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Toyo Proxes Sport with a result of 86.9 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.6%.
  1. Toyo Proxes Sport
    86.9 Km/H
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    86.7 Km/H
  3. Falken Azenis FK510
    85.9 Km/H
  4. Continental Sport Contact 6
    85.8 Km/H
  5. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    84.7 Km/H
  6. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    83.8 Km/H
  7. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    83.6 Km/H
  8. Accelera PHI
    82.9 Km/H

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Spread: 3.30 Points (33.7%) | Avg: 7.85 Points

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken Azenis FK510 with a result of 9.8 Points. The difference between best and worst was 33.7%.
  1. Falken Azenis FK510
    9.8 Points
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    8.5 Points
  3. Accelera PHI
    8 Points
  4. Toyo Proxes Sport
    8 Points
  5. Continental Sport Contact 6
    8 Points
  6. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    7 Points
  7. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    7 Points
  8. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    6.5 Points

Noise (dB)

Spread: 1.70 dB (2.4%) | Avg: 72.84 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the noise test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Continental Sport Contact 6
    72.1 dB
  2. Accelera PHI
    72.3 dB
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    72.4 dB
  4. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    72.5 dB
  5. Falken Azenis FK510
    72.9 dB
  6. Toyo Proxes Sport
    73.3 dB
  7. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    73.4 dB
  8. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    73.8 dB

Tyre Weight (Kg)

Spread: 7.80 Kg (17.9%) | Avg: 46.90 Kg

Tyre Weight Per Set (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport with a result of 43.5 Kg. The difference between best and worst was 15.2%.
  1. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    43.5 Kg
  2. Continental Sport Contact 6
    44.1 Kg
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    45.2 Kg
  4. Toyo Proxes Sport
    45.3 Kg
  5. Falken Azenis FK510
    47.8 Kg
  6. Accelera PHI
    47.9 Kg
  7. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    50.1 Kg
  8. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    51.3 Kg

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 1.23 kg / t (15%) | Avg: 8.87 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 8.18 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 13.1%.
  1. Continental Sport Contact 6
    8.18 kg / t
  2. Accelera PHI
    8.31 kg / t
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    8.7 kg / t
  4. Toyo Proxes Sport
    8.91 kg / t
  5. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    9.04 kg / t
  6. Falken Azenis FK510
    9.1 kg / t
  7. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
    9.31 kg / t
  8. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    9.41 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport 0%
2 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 0%
3 Continental Sport Contact 6 0%
4 Falken Azenis FK510 0%
5 Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 0%
6 Toyo Proxes Sport 0%
7 Kumho Ecsta PS91 0%
8 Accelera PHI 0%

Discussion

56 comments
  1. Beniamin Paduret archived

    Hi, what would you recommend between PS4 normal(not PS4S) and Eagle F1 Super Sport? Ta

    #6938
  2. Prithvi Parvataneni archived

    I see the main problem with the kumho is that it doesnt seem to hold up to track use but it did start out really good, so my question is would it of fared much better if this was a street only test? I have the ps4s currently but at half the price, I've been thinking about moving to kumho, my use is mostly spirited back road drives and no track use, what would you recommend?

    #6872
    1. TyreReviews Prithvi Parvataneni archived

      There certainly wouldn't be as much heat issue on the road, but the wet performance would remain fairly constant.

      #6874
  3. John archived

    Super cool review + data!!

    #6795
  4. Stefano Ciriani archived

    Hi, thanks for the amazing tyre review. Would you recommend using a premium UUHP tyre, like the Michelins PS4 S or the GY F1 SuperSport, also during some occasional and light trackdays? I'd love to occasionaly track my daily (Abarth 124 Spider) but I'm not sure UUHP tyre can handle it.

    #6773
    1. TyreReviews Stefano Ciriani archived

      I'm hopefully making a video on this very thing soon! And yes, those two will take it ok, the Goodyear is very good on track for a road tyre.

      #6774
      1. Stefano Ciriani TyreReviews archived

        I'm looking forward to see your video then!! I eventually choose the new Potenza Sport, which are the only UUHP tyres in EU that fit in my car, but I assume they behave much like the GY F1 SS or PS4 S. I'm just worried that they "cook" and after the trackday they won't handle well (happened with the Potenza RE050 tyres)

        #6775
        1. TyreReviews Stefano Ciriani archived

          It's an interesting tyre, let me know how you find them :)

          #6776
          1. Stefano Ciriani TyreReviews archived

            I definitively will as soon as I have enough experience with them!

            #6782
  5. Guess Who archived

    Unfortunately there is no Pilot Sport 4s in 18" so my chose initially was GY
    F1 Super Sport but now I saw there is yet available Michelin Pilot Super Sport to order from BMW.
    What is better tyre of those two...Michelin Super Sport or Goodyear Super Sport?
    I guess Goodyear is superior in wet condition but what about dry?

    #6146
    1. TyreReviews Guess Who archived

      I'm afraid I've not tested them against each other so I don't know. I have done a video on PSS* vs PS4S which might help a little, it's the OE tyre video from a few weeks back

      #6148
      1. Guess Who TyreReviews archived

        I saw. I watched all your videos more then one time :)
        Thanks anyway!

        #6149
  6. Rich Evans archived

    Having used the PS4S as a road tyre I could take on track I found in 20C temps I was getting bad graining which resulted in raised patches of rubber across the tyre. Given in your review you said the Goodyear handled high temps on track very well would this be a better choice do you think for my needs?

    #5706
    1. TyreReviews Rich Evans archived

      I've actually used the F1 SuperSport on track a number of times now and always been impressed with it, the tyre can take some abuse! I'd be interested to read how you find it if you make the swap

      #5708
  7. Scour archived

    Hope you will test next time also Yokohama, Yokohama is in the Top 10 of world biggest tyre manufacturers but still notto find often in reviews while I get an overdose of Conti, Michelin, even if both don´t offered any new tyre models in the tested sizes since years.

    #5631
    1. Kolemjdouci Scour archived

      Have you fought e.g. how much more CO2 is connected with such a remote import to you, while e.g. Vredestein in Enschede (NL) is recently laying off almost 900 personal cars tyre workers?

      See https://www.tyrepress.com/2...

      Think about it.

      #5633
  8. Fin Guz archived

    https://uploads.disquscdn.c... We have been running the GoodYear F1SS on our Quadrifoglio now for around 2500 miles and I am very happy with them. They are fantastic in the dry and inspire lots of confidence in the wet.

    We're spending the next 10 days driving around the north of Scotland, which should put another couple of thousand spirited miles on them.

    They are very good tyres, and they come in the correct size for our car, unlike the Michelin.

    I'll check the tread wear when we get back and update.

    #5124
    1. TyreReviews Fin Guz archived

      Thanks for the feedback, feel free to write a review on the site if you get the time :)

      #5125
    2. Paul Finlay Fin Guz archived

      5200 miles and while the fronts are still good the rears are basically finished. They have lasted only slightly longer that the AR spec Corsas that came with the car, although the Goodyears are far better in the rain.

      We have the winter wheels and tyres on now, and we'll probably look at trying some MPS4S 295s on the rear next year. https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

      #5236
      1. TyreReviews Paul Finlay archived

        A set of rears in 5200 miles?! Are you flat out everywhere?!

        #5239
        1. Paul Finlay TyreReviews archived

          I bought the car to drive, and I love exploiting it's considerable abilities wherever possible. Have you had a go in a Giulia Quadrifoglio?

          #5243
          1. TyreReviews Paul Finlay archived

            I have, I actually did the Mille Miglia with SeenThroughGlass, so spent 4 days driving one VERY quickly around Italy. Great car.

            #5246
            1. Paul Finlay TyreReviews archived

              So you know why I need new rear tyres ;) I'm glad you enjoyed it!

              #5248
      2. 1hp Paul Finlay archived

        I've done 13000km with 400hp fwd and I'm still at 5-5,5mm (from 7mm new). Did shift the tyres front rear. And I do drive 'normal' 95% of the time, anyway they wear no more than the three sets of Michelin PS4/PSS I had before...

        #5261
  9. Donald Rowe archived

    Ok just to clarify, the tyre weight graph is in kg and is for all four tyres and does not include the rim. So divide the difference by 4. Would have been good to see each tyre weight by itself. thanks

    #5034
  10. Hinu archived

    Missing Hakka Black 2, Eagle F1 Asym. 3 and Asym. 5. Trying to decide on square 275/30R20 setup for Model 3.

    FK510 and Asym. 3 are considerably cheaper than Hakka Black 2 and PS 4S (~£ 230 vs ~£ 300). The latter seem to have only slightly better performance but also worse noise, comfort and most importantly price. Do they perhaps hold up considerably better on track? Performance with decreased thread depth is also important.

    Looking for good wear and performance on & off track (Continental ruled out partly because of wear issues on track). FK510 seem to perform well while comfortable and quiet. I'm a bit worried about the sluggish slow-to-react manner of the FK510. Is Asym. 3 & 5 the same?

    The new Eagle F1 Asym. 5 is tempting, but is only available in 265/30R20 and I'm getting 10 inch rims (slightly stretched?)... :( Worth losing 10 mm? Would be an easy choice if available in 275 mm...

    I guess it stand between 275 mm Asym. 3, 275 mm FK510 and 265 mm Asym. 5. Thanks. :)

    #4955
    1. TyreReviews Hinu archived

      Asym 3 is outdated, I've made a video on Asym 3 vs Asym 5 so you can see how that improves, though I's stick to stock sizes if possible as you'll potentially have insurance issues.

      #4959
      1. Hinu TyreReviews archived

        Thanks for the reply, I saw that video. Stock size is 235 up front and 275 at the rear. Going stock is not an option. :)

        Which would you choose out of Asym. 5 and FK510?

        What if the choice is between Asym. 3 and FK510 (availability)?

        #4960
        1. TyreReviews Hinu archived

          FK510 if you like comfort

          #4964
  11. Jac Poncelet archived

    I have a hatchback Impreza STI Spec C (freshly imported from Japan) and need to buy a set of tyres for it.
    I cannot find any good UHP tyre tests for a performance AWD car.

    Tyre size on the Spec C is:
    245/40 R18 97Y

    From what i can see, none of the Michelin, Goodyear or Continental in this video are available in the UK in this size. From factory it came with Bridgestone Potenza RE070's fitted, again not available in the UK.

    What UHP tyre would you recommend for this?

    The car will be used 99% of the time on the road but it is a second car for summer and weekends (will also have a set of winter tyres for it).
    Best i can seem to find is the older Michelin Pilot Supersport or something like the Yokohama AD08R. I don't need anything quite as racey as the Cup 2 though.

    Any advice would be much appreciated and possible idea for a another video, AWD UHP test since you've now covered RWD in this video and sort of covered FWD in the michelin tyre range test.

    Thanks

    #4932
    1. TyreReviews Jac Poncelet archived

      The Michelin Pilot SuperSport is still an excellent handling tyre with great dry grip, so that's where my money would go.

      #4933
      1. Jac Poncelet TyreReviews archived

        Thanks for the reply! I shall go for that one then.
        Do you know if Michelin are ever planning on bringing out the PS4S in any significant range of 18" tyre sizes in the UK?

        #4934
        1. TyreReviews Jac Poncelet archived

          As far as I'm aware, no. There might be some 18" here where OE fitments are made, but there doesn't look like there will be a range, as there is in the US.

          The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport will be in 18" sizes

          #4935
          1. Jac Poncelet TyreReviews archived

            well thats rubbish, didnt really 18" had already become and obscure wheel size. thanks for the info though i will give the Michelin PSS a go and after that will see what becomes available
            thanks a lot

            #4936
  12. wendy_mu archived

    Is it OK to mix Michelin PSS (rear) and PS4S (front)? They have very similar characteristics, correct? I couldnt find the ps4s in the size I want in the rear, so I bought another set of PSS. Now the fronts are worn too (used them for 9 years), and there's no PSS available where I live, only PS4S. Is there any drawback if I mix them? Thanks

    #4929
    1. TyreReviews wendy_mu archived

      It's not ideal, but it's not the worst mix of tyres you could have. Once the rears are worn just match them again, assuming the size is available.

      The PS4S made a good step forward in wet grip so be mindful of oversteer in the wet

      #4930
      1. wendy_mu TyreReviews archived

        OK got it. Thank you so much for your reply. It's very hard to get matching sets here in Indonesia. The only brands that have the sizes I want are budget brands like accelera, achilles (local brand) or track tires like yoko AD08R. I guess I'll try mixing the . Thanks again

        #4931
  13. terrywang archived

    I have been impressed by the F87 M2's stock PSS, very well balanced in all aspects, not uncomfortable at all as daily drive. I'd definitely go for the PS 4 S when they wear out (looks like they'll last for quite a while).

    BTW: I don't see Eagle F1 SuperSport offered in Australia, sigh.

    #4923
  14. Paul archived

    Where can I check tyres weight?! All numbers provided by michelin are not accurate. Where can I find googyears weight?

    #4919
    1. TyreReviews Paul archived

      The video has the specific weight of the rear tyres in the intro

      #4921
  15. Matthias Ziegler archived

    Sadly the tyres go bigger and bigger. I am on 17" on my MK5 GTI with RE070, which I love for Daily and Trackdays. I would like to test the Contis for FWD, but starting at 19" its a no no for me... Maybe I will give the Goodyear a try, or move to Michelin Super Sports in 18".

    #4918
  16. Pedro Neves archived

    Probably, the best combination for a wet track would be the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport in the back and the Continental SC6 in the front since the Conti has the best front end grip in the wet and the Goodyear has the best rear tyre. Being the front tyres very important for dry/wet braking and aquaplaning, this combination could improve both the dry/wet braking and straight aqua results from a Goodyear's set of 4. It could also improve the dry handling and dry subjective feeling, noise, confort and rolling resistance (this one also meaning faster in a straight road).
    When in the dry season (or track) maybe one could "just" change the rear tyres for a set of Contis and settle for a set of 4 and stow the 2 rear Goodyears until the rain comes back...
    If one chooses the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S in the front instead of the Continental SC6, he could probably get slightly better dry and wet braking, aquaplaning and comfort, but could give away some subjective dry handling.
    This is my extrapolation from the test results but only further private testing could tell.
    The Contis would also cost 28£ less for a set of 2 front tyres compared with the Goodyears and 46£ less for a set of 2 compared with the Michelins, but the Contis tend to wear out fast according to some tests published in Tyrereviews...

    #4912
      1. Pedro Neves paul archived

        They'll certainly last longer.

        #4914
        1. Paul Pedro Neves archived

          it’s ok, front will last long but rear fitted to powerfull car not more than 18-24 months/40-50k miles. Have full set fitted to e92 3.0d with 650nm and they perform well on dry and wet surface. The only downside is a noise on bad road

          #5035
  17. PDAJah archived

    Great review and summary of assessment. Shame the Goodyear SuperSport tyre not widely available in the UK yet. Hopefully will get better with onset of our rainy season in September.

    #4901
    1. TyreReviews PDAJah archived

      More and more sizes are rolling out :)

      #4908
  18. Dave archived

    Hello

    Thanks for the video.

    What tyres would you recommend for a Lexus RCF? I don't track the car and it's my daily so refinement is just as important outright performance, I can't decide whether to go with a more sport orientated tyre (PS4s) or something with a more comfort bias such as PS4 or ASY5.

    I do like to have a b-road blast every now and then but nothing too crazy.

    Currently the car has ditch finders (on the car when purchased) and they need to go. I keep changing my mind and can't decide. I've previously had ASY2/3 on different cars and got on well with them, but that was on cars with ~220hp

    Any advice would be very much appreciated.

    Thanks
    Dave

    #4900
    1. SomeGuy Dave archived

      PS4S for sure...I daily drove the previous model PSS for a few years and it was never noisy or uncomfortable whatsoever, it actually rode better than some all seasons I've had before. Then when the roads got twisty it just gripped for days and had plenty of confidence/feel.

      #4902
      1. Dave SomeGuy archived

        Thanks for the reply and I agree, think I will go with PS4S.

        #4905
        1. TyreReviews Dave archived

          I agree with this, PS4S is a good shout

          #4909
  19. 1hp archived

    I have the goodyears in 18" and what suprised me most was indeed their wet grip. It was still great at 2 degrees Celsius on a cold spell, much to my surprise and especially in combination with the excellent dry grip manners.

    #4898
    1. Ain Ul Haq 1hp archived

      The new Pilot sports did not work great for me though. I live in UAE and its mostly dry and Hot here. I use pilot sport cup 2 and i simply love em on the ferarri world tack. I bought mines from Pitstopaabia Online

      #5260
  20. Bradlee Schlieper archived

    you talked about wear of the tires. Could you possibly discuss that too? If the Falkens cost say half the price of the Michelins (which they do!) but they will last half as long then Michelins win all day and the time saved, install costs, in getting new Falkens aren't worth it. Thank you for your time!

    #4897
    1. TyreReviews Bradlee Schlieper archived

      Sadly we didn't get any wear data I was happy enough with to share. Proper wear testing is very expensive and very time consuming. There are other tests on the site which do cover wear, just not of the new F1 SuperSport yet

      #4910