Menu

2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Toyo R888
Toyo Proxes Sport
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Continental Sport Contact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Nankang Noble Sport NS20
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 5.00 M (15.4%) | Avg: 34.50 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Toyo R888 with a result of 32.4 M. The difference between best and worst was 13.4%.
  1. Toyo R888
    32.4 M
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
    32.9 M
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    33.5 M
  4. Continental Sport Contact 6
    34 M
  5. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
    34.2 M
  6. Falken Azenis FK510
    34.7 M
  7. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    34.9 M
  8. Toyo Proxes Sport
    36.5 M
  9. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    37.4 M

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 11.00 Km/H (7.9%) | Avg: 134.37 Km/H

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R with a result of 139.9 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 7.9%.
  1. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
    139.9 Km/H
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
    138.8 Km/H
  3. Toyo R888
    137 Km/H
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    134.6 Km/H
  5. Continental Sport Contact 6
    133.9 Km/H
  6. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    133 Km/H
  7. Falken Azenis FK510
    131.7 Km/H
  8. Toyo Proxes Sport
    131.5 Km/H
  9. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    128.9 Km/H

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 13.50 M (46.4%) | Avg: 34.91 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken Azenis FK510 with a result of 29.1 M. The difference between best and worst was 31.7%.
  1. Falken Azenis FK510
    29.1 M
  2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    30.2 M
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    31 M
  4. Continental Sport Contact 6
    32.5 M
  5. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    35.5 M
  6. Toyo Proxes Sport
    37.7 M
  7. Toyo R888
    37.7 M
  8. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
    37.9 M
  9. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
    42.6 M

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 11.60 Km/H (14.4%) | Avg: 73.90 Km/H

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nankang Noble Sport NS20 with a result of 80.4 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 14.4%.
  1. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    80.4 Km/H
  2. Falken Azenis FK510
    77.4 Km/H
  3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    77.1 Km/H
  4. Continental Sport Contact 6
    76 Km/H
  5. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    74 Km/H
  6. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
    73.1 Km/H
  7. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
    69.5 Km/H
  8. Toyo Proxes Sport
    68.8 Km/H
  9. Toyo R888
    68.8 Km/H

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 16.40 Km/H (21.2%) | Avg: 70.98 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nankang Noble Sport NS20 with a result of 77.3 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 21.2%.
  1. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    77.3 Km/H
  2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    74.9 Km/H
  3. Continental Sport Contact 6
    74.6 Km/H
  4. Toyo Proxes Sport
    74.5 Km/H
  5. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    74.3 Km/H
  6. Falken Azenis FK510
    73.8 Km/H
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
    67.5 Km/H
  8. Toyo R888
    61 Km/H
  9. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
    60.9 Km/H

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

Spread: 4.90 dB (7.1%) | Avg: 70.94 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Toyo R888 with a result of 68.7 dB. The difference between best and worst was 6.7%.
  1. Toyo R888
    68.7 dB
  2. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    69.7 dB
  3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    70.5 dB
  4. Continental Sport Contact 6
    70.5 dB
  5. Falken Azenis FK510
    70.6 dB
  6. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    70.9 dB
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
    71.8 dB
  8. Toyo Proxes Sport
    72.2 dB
  9. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
    73.6 dB

Value Performance Overview

Price

Spread: 222.00 (177.6%) | Avg: 229.33

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nankang Noble Sport NS20. The difference between best and worst was 64%.
  1. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    125
  2. Falken Azenis FK510
    175
  3. Toyo Proxes Sport
    187
  4. Toyo R888
    187
  5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    213
  6. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
    254
  7. Continental Sport Contact 6
    272
  8. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    304
  9. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
    347

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 1.50 kg / t (16.3%) | Avg: 9.83 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 9.2 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 14%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    9.2 kg / t
  2. Toyo Proxes Sport
    9.3 kg / t
  3. Falken Azenis FK510
    9.6 kg / t
  4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    9.6 kg / t
  5. Continental Sport Contact 6
    9.7 kg / t
  6. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
    9.9 kg / t
  7. Toyo R888
    9.9 kg / t
  8. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    10.6 kg / t
  9. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
    10.7 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 0%
2 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 0%
3 Continental Sport Contact 6 0%
4 Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R 0%
5 Toyo R888 0%
6 Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 0%
7 Falken Azenis FK510 0%
8 Toyo Proxes Sport 0%
9 Nankang Noble Sport NS20 0%

Discussion

14 comments
  1. corrupted pixel archived

    These tests are all over the place, I've seen 5 tests and they all say different things. Also users rate Contact 6 as unbelievable in the wet and I can testify to that, they stick like shit to fur and I have a 700Hp car.

    #3909
  2. Constantine Lycos archived

    why are the wet braking numbers lower than the dry? are the starting speeds the same?

    #3383
    1. TyreReviews Constantine Lycos archived

      That's how Sport Auto scored it, check out their website for the full test

      #3386
  3. 930 Engineering archived

    Not a good idea to mix UHP and track tyre results.

    Btw, hard to believe the R888 measured most 'quiet'. The lowest drive-by noise, while internally it was the loudest in the cabin? This is at least highly misleading. I had a set of these it was no less than unbearable. It wouldn't recommend using it on a daily.

    #3351
    1. TyreReviews 930 Engineering archived

      Drive By noise is largely generated by tread pattern moving air, so it makes sense the semi slicks with less tread pattern are quieter for drive by testing. Internal noise is much worse due to hard construction.

      #3355
  4. v v archived

    I see this test did not include many popular track day tires such as proxes r800r, nankang ar-1, or yokohama advan series.

    How do these tires compare to the always mentioned cup 2's as the go to tire?

    Are there any tests which put the major track day tires against each other?

    #3349
    1. TyreReviews v v archived

      I'm not sure how they compare as no one has done it, but I'm going to try my best to find out :)

      #3356
      1. v v TyreReviews archived

        Hats down for the proper test with all the major track day tires compared

        #3362
  5. John Smith archived

    Is there a particular tire which works better when starting from the go, like a short hill climb, or a slalom event (autocross in US) ?

    We have many events where there's not enough time for the tire to heat up. So even though the cup 2 is apparently the best tire on TRACK, it's not an optimal tire from the start as it haven't got the time to reach it's optimum temperature.

    I know in US they have Potenza RE-71R which dominates American autocross events, but I do struggle to find information about equivalent tires available in Europe?

    How should I approach this? Ask manufacturers for the equivalent in europe?

    #3341
    1. TyreReviews John Smith archived

      As far as I understand the RE71R takes a little while to warm in too. I've been super impressed with the Pilot Sport 4S warm up time, so it might be worth looking at that. That said, even with a small amount of warm up time the Cup 2 would be stronger, so if the runs are over 1 minute the Cup2 might still be the better tyre.

      #3343
      1. zen racer TyreReviews archived

        Would looking for a tire with the lowest UTQG rating be a good start?

        Pirelli P ZERO TROFEO R is 60, and CUP 2 is 180 so even though these numbers are not hard and fast rule, it could be a good indication I suppose?

        #3345
        1. TyreReviews zen racer archived

          We don't really pay any attention to the UTQG ratings in Europe so I'm not educated enough to answer. Treadwear rating and warm up time would be a logical link, but there's so much else happening in a tyre it is no way a direct correlation

          #3346
  6. Melchiz adek archived

    Simply amazing that in all these UHP tyre tests 2017 and so far 2018 that the Pirelli's new P-Zero Corsa hasn't been included....esp against the Michelin PS4S.....maybe it doesn't exist...a well used PR tactic

    #3321
    1. TyreReviews Melchiz adek archived

      I can't speak with certainty for the European tyre tests, but usually the testing magazine invites the tyre manufacturer to submit a tyre pattern in the size they want to test, so it's likely the lack of the tyre being tested is down to Pirelli.

      #3329