Menu

2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
4 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Dry
  3. Wet
  4. Environment
  5. Results
  6. Continental Sport Contact 6
  7. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
  8. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
  9. Falken Azenis FK510
  10. Toyo Proxes Sport
  11. Nankang Noble Sport NS20

Test Summary
Wet Braking Continental Sport Contact 6
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Dry Braking Falken Azenis FK510
Wear Continental Sport Contact 6
Rolling Resistance Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Noise Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Snow Handling Continental Sport Contact 6
Toyo Proxes Sport
Nankang Noble Sport NS20
This year Auto Bild have covered both 19 and 20" UHP tyres, and while we've covered the 20" test already, we delayed covering the 19" test for a few weeks.

In those few weeks, Sport Auto Magazine released their 19" tyre test, and it uses exactly the same 245/35 R19 and 265/35 R19 tyres, on the same BMW M2, and tests the same six UHP tyres at the same location.

The logical question would be why publish this version of the test, as the results should be exactly the same? Well, they're not. Whether it be down to driving style, test parameters or just the weather on the day, Sport Auto and Auto Bild have managed to come up with two different test results using the same vehicle and tyres, proving just how close the very best tyres on the market are.

Below is the Auto Bild version of the test, be sure to check out Sport Autos results here.

Dry

In the dry the Continental was strongest, winning both the dry braking and dry handling tests. The Michelin was second fastest around the lap, but could only place fourth during the braking tests, stopping the car 0.6 meters after the Continental did.

Dry Braking

Spread: 3.40 M (9.6%)|Avg: 36.70 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre

Dry Handling

Spread: 7.20 Km/H (5.8%)|Avg: 120.25 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Continental Sport Contact 6
    123.10 Km/H
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    122.70 Km/H
  3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    121.40 Km/H
  4. Falken Azenis FK510
    120.00 Km/H
  5. Toyo Proxes Sport
    118.40 Km/H
  6. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    115.90 Km/H

Wet

The Falken continued its recent strong performance by dominating in both the shallow water wet tests, and being close enough during the aquaplaning results. The Michelin, Continental and Hankook were again all close with the Toyo and Nankang once again lagging behind.

Wet Braking

Spread: 12.80 M (27.4%)|Avg: 50.23 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre

Wet Handling

Spread: 7.00 Km/H (8.6%)|Avg: 79.58 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Falken Azenis FK510
    81.70 Km/H
  2. Continental Sport Contact 6
    81.30 Km/H
  3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    80.70 Km/H
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    79.90 Km/H
  5. Toyo Proxes Sport
    79.20 Km/H
  6. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    74.70 Km/H

Straight Aqua

Spread: 7.40 Km/H (8%)|Avg: 87.63 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
  1. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    92.80 Km/H
  2. Toyo Proxes Sport
    88.40 Km/H
  3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    86.90 Km/H
  4. Falken Azenis FK510
    86.70 Km/H
  5. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    85.60 Km/H
  6. Continental Sport Contact 6
    85.40 Km/H

Environment

While the Nankang was the cheapest to buy, it also used the most fuel. The Continental proved to have the best external noise levels.

Rolling Resistance

Spread: 1.42 kg / t (16.6%)|Avg: 9.43 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
  1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    8.57 kg / t
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    9.21 kg / t
  3. Toyo Proxes Sport
    9.34 kg / t
  4. Falken Azenis FK510
    9.49 kg / t
  5. Continental Sport Contact 6
    9.97 kg / t
  6. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    9.99 kg / t

19,000 km
£1.45/L
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Noise

Spread: 1.00 dB (1.4%)|Avg: 74.08 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
  1. Continental Sport Contact 6
    73.60 dB
  2. Toyo Proxes Sport
    73.60 dB
  3. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    74.10 dB
  4. Falken Azenis FK510
    74.20 dB
  5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    74.40 dB
  6. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    74.60 dB

Price

Spread: 640.00 (152.4%)|Avg: 705.00
Price in local currency (Lower is better)
  1. Nankang Noble Sport NS20
    420.00
  2. Falken Azenis FK510
    590.00
  3. Toyo Proxes Sport
    590.00
  4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    690.00
  5. Continental Sport Contact 6
    880.00
  6. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    1060.00

Results

Full details below, and as always check out the Auto Bild website for all the glorious details (in German)

Continental Sport Contact 6
Total: 39
Dry 8
Wet 7
Comfort 5
Rolling Resistance 5
Noise 6
Overall 8
2nd

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

265/35 R19
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Total: 38
Dry 7
Wet 6
Comfort 7
Rolling Resistance 6
Noise 5
Overall 7
3rd

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

265/35 R19
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Total: 38
Dry 8
Wet 6
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 6
Noise 5
Overall 7
4th

Falken Azenis FK510

265/35 R19
Falken Azenis FK510
Total: 32
Dry 6
Wet 8
Comfort 3
Rolling Resistance 5
Noise 5
Overall 5
5th

Toyo Proxes Sport

265/35 R19
Toyo Proxes Sport
Total: 29
Dry 4
Wet 5
Comfort 5
Rolling Resistance 5
Noise 6
Overall 4
6th

Nankang Noble Sport NS20

265/35 R19
Nankang Noble Sport NS20
Total: 17
Dry 1
Wet 1
Comfort 2
Rolling Resistance 5
Noise 6
Overall 2

Discussion

10 comments
  1. Andy venn archived

    I’m looking for replacement tyres for my 2016 Audi A4 3.0 tdi s line it’s on 245 35 19 Hankook Ventus s1 evo at the moment I’m looking for a tyre with low road noise and a smooth ride would the Goodyear f1 3 be my best bet?

    #3653
  2. 1hp archived

    Just noticed today that the Sport Contact 6 is available in one 18 inch size, 235/40R18 which is 'my' size. Does @Tyrereviews recon this is an upgrade in ultimate grip and trackability compared to the PS4 I'm rocking now? My car is a MQB Hot Estate pushing 370hp+ through the front wheels... Realize it is a more expensive tyre because of the quicker wear, but if it puts power down noticeably better and perhaps gives some more steering feel (probably not) it could be worth it..

    #3618
    1. TyreReviews 1hp archived

      Sorry, I can't really answer that as I've not done the test. I think the raw dry and wet grip will be similar, however the SC6 might give you better steering feel. This is based on an assumption so might not be true.

      #3624
      1. 1hp TyreReviews archived

        After careful consideration, I think I'm gonna try the Supersports for their motorsport construction. I'm in it for the fun/feedback, bit like running a cold Cup2 can be fun while being dead slow. But since I do daily the car and carry the whole family a Cup2 would be a notch too far... If I don't like it, I just paid for an early swap, the PS4 can go back on once the PSS wear down. Makes sense to a tyre testing/handling nerd, right? ;)

        #3628
        1. TyreReviews 1hp archived

          I'm on board with that plan :)

          #3632
          1. 1hp TyreReviews archived

            I got the 225/40R18 HN version, the ones that go on the i30N, a similar weight HH. As opposed to the * star BMW version (narrower front axle version?). I do wonder what the HN version entails... You have good contacts at Michelin?

            #3633
            1. TyreReviews 1hp archived

              I have great contacts at Michelin, but often they can't or won't say when it comes to specific details like that sadly.

              #3636
              1. 1hp TyreReviews archived

                Little follow up. Drove the home commute with the PSS, which involves a small back road I know very well. The PS4 were only 1mm down, same weather same road, same car, same tyre pressures, same alignment. PSS already scrubbed in a fair bit. The PSS most definitely gives more feedback up and beyond max grip. And on top of that and to me clearly noticable, more eager to change direction, which is something that I was missing with the PS4. Definitely more enjoyable to drive on my fairly focussed ride, the relative small cold wet grip penalty should be worth it. I'll certainly will have a better idea of grip levels. Aftermarket tpms sensors added will give some tyre temp information there too...

                #3648
                1. TyreReviews 1hp archived

                  Glad you're liking them :)

                  #3649
                  1. 1hp TyreReviews archived

                    Just to be clear, this is entirely your working, from the comparison vid to the SC6 and the PS4S, would have otherwise discounted it as an 'old' tyre... So thank you sir, you saved my very important car-guy relationship!! ;)

                    Subjective impressions are difficult to validate, even more so on different platforms, but from another drive this night, it is uncanny how much a, to most people fairly similar, tyre can make itself felt so clearly even at low speeds. MQB with aftermarket LCA with uniball front and fairly aggresive alignment with max toe rear and max toe out (instead of in) front. First now I really feel the alignment working its magic. And bit surprising that I can still be surprised having extensive experience on other cars with SC3, VEvo2, Asymmetrics, AD08, SC5, RE001, SC5P, PS3*, PS4* and also proper drives with MPSC, V105 and PS4S to name a few... Hope this feedback is helpful to you and others.

                    *with hindsight these two *feel* very similar with reservation for different platforms

                    #3650