Menu

2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental Premium Contact 5
Toyo Celsius
Michelin CrossClimate Plus
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
Continental WinterContact TS 860
Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
Vredestein Quatrac 5
Continental AllSeasonContact
Nokian WeatherProof

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 9.40 M (26.3%) | Avg: 42.02 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Premium Contact 5 with a result of 35.7 M. The difference between best and worst was 20.8%.
  1. Continental Premium Contact 5
    35.7 M
  2. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    39.4 M
  3. Continental AllSeasonContact
    41.9 M
  4. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
    42.2 M
  5. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    42.6 M
  6. Vredestein Quatrac 5
    43.4 M
  7. Nokian WeatherProof
    43.6 M
  8. Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
    44.3 M
  9. Toyo Celsius
    45.1 M

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 4.30 Km/H (3.5%) | Avg: 119.19 Km/H

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Vredestein Quatrac 5 with a result of 121.6 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 3.5%.
  1. Vredestein Quatrac 5
    121.6 Km/H
  2. Continental Premium Contact 5
    120.7 Km/H
  3. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    120.1 Km/H
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    119.8 Km/H
  5. Toyo Celsius
    119.1 Km/H
  6. Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
    118.1 Km/H
  7. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
    118 Km/H
  8. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    118 Km/H
  9. Nokian WeatherProof
    117.3 Km/H

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 7.20 M (22.6%) | Avg: 36.30 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental WinterContact TS 860 with a result of 31.8 M. The difference between best and worst was 18.5%.
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    31.8 M
  2. Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
    35.7 M
  3. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
    36.1 M
  4. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    36.1 M
  5. Continental Premium Contact 5
    36.6 M
  6. Continental AllSeasonContact
    36.8 M
  7. Vredestein Quatrac 5
    37.1 M
  8. Nokian WeatherProof
    37.5 M
  9. Toyo Celsius
    39 M

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 4.50 Km/H (6%) | Avg: 72.53 Km/H

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate Plus with a result of 74.4 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 6%.
  1. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    74.4 Km/H
  2. Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
    73.6 Km/H
  3. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
    73.1 Km/H
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    73 Km/H
  5. Continental Premium Contact 5
    72.9 Km/H
  6. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    72.8 Km/H
  7. Nokian WeatherProof
    72.1 Km/H
  8. Vredestein Quatrac 5
    71 Km/H
  9. Toyo Celsius
    69.9 Km/H

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 14.60 Km/H (18.4%) | Avg: 68.91 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental WinterContact TS 860 with a result of 79.3 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 18.4%.
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    79.3 Km/H
  2. Continental Premium Contact 5
    74.6 Km/H
  3. Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
    68.2 Km/H
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    67.8 Km/H
  5. Nokian WeatherProof
    67.5 Km/H
  6. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    66.3 Km/H
  7. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
    66.2 Km/H
  8. Toyo Celsius
    65.6 Km/H
  9. Vredestein Quatrac 5
    64.7 Km/H

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Spread: 24.30 M (85.6%) | Avg: 32.88 M

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental WinterContact TS 860 with a result of 28.4 M. The difference between best and worst was 46.1%.
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    28.4 M
  2. Continental AllSeasonContact
    29.3 M
  3. Nokian WeatherProof
    29.6 M
  4. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
    29.8 M
  5. Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
    30 M
  6. Toyo Celsius
    31.1 M
  7. Vredestein Quatrac 5
    32.1 M
  8. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    32.9 M
  9. Continental Premium Contact 5
    52.7 M

Snow Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 47.90 Km/H (85.7%) | Avg: 43.60 Km/H

Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental WinterContact TS 860 with a result of 55.9 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 85.7%.
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    55.9 Km/H
  2. Continental AllSeasonContact
    48.2 Km/H
  3. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
    48.1 Km/H
  4. Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
    47.1 Km/H
  5. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    47 Km/H
  6. Toyo Celsius
    46.8 Km/H
  7. Vredestein Quatrac 5
    46.5 Km/H
  8. Nokian WeatherProof
    44.8 Km/H
  9. Continental Premium Contact 5
    8 Km/H

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

Spread: 3.60 dB (5%) | Avg: 73.68 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental WinterContact TS 860 with a result of 71.9 dB. The difference between best and worst was 4.8%.
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    71.9 dB
  2. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
    72 dB
  3. Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
    73.1 dB
  4. Continental AllSeasonContact
    73.8 dB
  5. Vredestein Quatrac 5
    73.9 dB
  6. Toyo Celsius
    74.1 dB
  7. Nokian WeatherProof
    74.3 dB
  8. Continental Premium Contact 5
    74.5 dB
  9. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    75.5 dB

Value Performance Overview

Price

Spread: 39.00 (42.4%) | Avg: 113.89

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nexen N Blue 4 Season. The difference between best and worst was 29.8%.
  1. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
    92
  2. Continental Premium Contact 5
    93
  3. Toyo Celsius
    106
  4. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    110
  5. Nokian WeatherProof
    117
  6. Vredestein Quatrac 5
    123
  7. Continental AllSeasonContact
    126
  8. Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
    127
  9. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    131

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 1.70 kg / t (21.5%) | Avg: 8.54 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental AllSeasonContact with a result of 7.9 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 17.7%.
  1. Continental AllSeasonContact
    7.9 kg / t
  2. Continental Premium Contact 5
    7.9 kg / t
  3. Nokian WeatherProof
    8.1 kg / t
  4. Continental WinterContact TS 860
    8.2 kg / t
  5. Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
    8.4 kg / t
  6. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    8.6 kg / t
  7. Vredestein Quatrac 5
    9.1 kg / t
  8. Toyo Celsius
    9.1 kg / t
  9. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
    9.6 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Continental WinterContact TS 860 0%
2 Continental AllSeasonContact 0%
3 Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 0%
4 Michelin CrossClimate Plus 0%
5 Nexen N Blue 4 Season 0%
6 Vredestein Quatrac 5 0%
7 Continental Premium Contact 5 0%
8 Nokian WeatherProof 0%
9 Toyo Celsius 0%

Discussion

19 comments
  1. grapevine archived

    According to BMW "Star" marked tyres are essential on the All4 Mini as ordinary tyres can cause the electronicaly controlled 4 wheel drive gear train to tie itself in knots, but local BMW dealers did not know of any Star marked all seasons tyres.

    Still looking for tips on best Tyres 235X40X18 for Audi S4V8 Quatro living near Inverness; less concerned about mpg or noise most concerned about handling / steering sensitivity and wet / icy conditions.

    #4961
    1. TyreReviews grapevine archived

      Manufacturers love that line, but I'm sure you'll be able to find a lot of people running non * marked tyres with no issue.

      #4963
      1. grapevine TyreReviews archived

        Can you please direct me to some All4 Mini owners who have had "No Issues" with non Star marked tyres ?

        A tyre dealer assured me that they had had "No trouble" with ordinary tyres on a Mini, but when pressed conceded that it was not a 4 wheel drive Mini.

        Why would a BMW dealer not expecting me to buy tires from them be so adamant that non Star marked tires could accelerate wear on my All4 Mini transmission ?

        #4965
        1. TyreReviews grapevine archived

          I have no such sources, I don't own a BMW mini. I'd suggest getting over to an owners forum and seeing what people are doing in the real world. Dealers advice is often as cautious and on brand message as possible.

          #4966
  2. grapevine archived

    Need all season tyres for two very different cars, Inverness weather. All 4 Mini and Audi S4 ( Quatro 350 BHP V8). Very brassed of with Michelin, tyres perishing after 7 years, Michelin said get stuffed, over 6 years old.

    So need a BMW Allwheel drive star marked tyre for the Mini All4 (MUST be star marked )

    and very positive handling all season for the S4 Vredesteiin or Continental ?

    Any suggestions gratefully recd

    #4957
    1. TyreReviews grapevine archived

      Sadly I'm not in a position to know what's * marked and what isn't in your various sizes. The 7 year rule is fair though, no one recommends using tyres after 5 years of use.

      #4958
  3. Paul archived

    It is mentioned in the results summary that the Michelin CrossClimates got a "poor curved aquaplaning result" but there is no curved aquaplaning graph?

    #4238
    1. TyreReviews Paul archived

      We don't cover every element tested, you can check out the Auto Motor Und Sport website for the curved aqua testing :)

      #4239
  4. John Rayner archived

    Hi Tyre Reviews, I've just bought a mid engined 2006 MR2 Roadster, and I want to get some all season tyres to use over the winter months to avoid any hairy moments if it gets frosty. I was all set to get Continental All Season Contact (theoretically the best available in my staggered sizes - 215/45 16 and 185/55 15). Then I saw the above test, and saw that the Vredestein Quatrac 5 gets a score of 9 for subjective (the same as the reference summer tyre), and is said to have the best steering response. As I am keen to retain as sporty a feel as possible in normal conditons, I'm now leaning towards the Vred instead. Is my logic sound, or am I being overly led by the results of a single test? Thanks

    #4005
    1. TyreReviews John Rayner archived

      Your logic is both good in both directions. The Conti is a great tyre, but the Vred is very good for the size and the Vred has been noted to have great steering in a number of tests now. The other option is CrossClimate but i presume not available in your awkward sizes?

      #4006
      1. John Rayner TyreReviews archived

        Thanks. Yeah, Crossclimate unavailable. I've emailed Michelin and they've no intention at present of making them in my rear size. Think I'll try the Vred

        #4007
        1. TyreReviews John Rayner archived

          Whatever you go for, let me know how you find them :)

          #4008
          1. John Rayner TyreReviews archived

            Hello Again, got my Vredestein Quatrac 5 fitted today, and took car out on some choice roads. Really, really pleased. Instantly make the car really secure, even in this unseasonably mild weather we're having here in the south at the mo. Roads just starting to get the first fall of leaves which, mixed with rain, create that greasy road feeling and the car just felt planted, even over bumpy, twisty negative camber back lanes. My first ever tyre with snowflake mountain symbol, so I've got nothing to compare them to. But the tyres I bought the car with, three weeks ago, were Tigar Prima front - drastically lacking feel, and Bridgestone Potenza RE040 rear - apparently good in it's day, but honestly a bit skittish. Compared to those, my new Vreds have more feel at the front, about the same feel at the back, and more grip across the board. So, it looks like I've got what I wanted. Difficult for me to imagine a siped tyre feeling more sporty. Can't wait to try them in cold weather ...

            #4065
    2. BahnStormer John Rayner archived

      John - I've got the same car and I've gone for the TS860's, so we can compare notes on MR2ROC in March ;)
      Thanks for the reviews (to the other John!)...

      #4053
      1. John Rayner BahnStormer archived

        Nice one. Just got my Vred Quatracs fitted today and lovin em! Feel really secure

        #4064
  5. kelper archived

    There's no graph for the snow performance?

    #3962
    1. TyreReviews kelper archived

      VERY good point! I've updated the article to include the graphs!

      #3967